524
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Navigating power in doctoral publishing: a data feminist approach

ORCID Icon
Pages 488-507 | Received 09 Dec 2020, Accepted 15 Feb 2021, Published online: 09 Mar 2021

References

  • Aitchison, Claire, Barbara Kamler, and Alison Lee. 2010. “Introduction: Why Publishing Pedagogies?” In Publishing Pedagogies for the Doctorate and Beyond, edited by Claire Aitchison, Barbara Kamler and Alison Lee, 1–11. London and New York: Routledge.
  • Anzaldua, Gloria. 2012. Borderlands: The New Mestiza = La Frontera. 4th ed. San Francisco, CA: Aunt Lute Books.
  • Australian Bureau of Statistics. 2008. “1297.0 - Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification (ANZSRC).” 2008. https://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/[email protected]/Lookup/1297.0Main+Features12008?OpenDocument.
  • Bartlett, Alison, and Gina Mercer. 2000. “Reconceptualising Discourses of Power in Postgraduate Pedagogies.” Teaching in Higher Education 5 (2): 195–204. doi:10.1080/135625100114849.
  • Bastian, Mathieu, Sebastien Heymann, and Mathieu Jacomy. 2009. “Gephi: An Open Source Software for Exploring and Manipulating Networks.” In Third International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media.
  • Bornmann, Lutz. 2017. “Measuring Impact in Research Evaluations: A Thorough Discussion of Methods for, Effects of and Problems with Impact Measurements.” Higher Education. Springer Netherlands..
  • Bornmann, Lutz, Christian Ganser, Alexander Tekles, and Loet Leydesdorff. 2020. “Does the h α -Index Reinforce the Matthew Effect in Science? The Introduction of Agent-Based Simulations Into Scientometrics.” Quantitative Science Studies 1 (1): 331–346..
  • Braun, Tibor, Wolfgang Glänzel, and András Schubert. 2001. “Publication and Cooperation Patterns of the Authors of Neuroscience Journals.” Scientometrics 51 (3): 499–510. doi:10.1023/A:1019643002560.
  • Cabanac, Guillaume, Gilles Hubert, and Béatrice Milard. 2015. “Academic Careers in Computer Science: Continuance and Transience of Lifetime Co-Authorships.” Scientometrics 102 (1): 135–150. doi:10.1007/s11192-014-1426-0.
  • Celis, Sergio, and Jeongeun Kim. 2018. “The Making of Homophilic Networks in International Research Collaborations: A Global Perspective from Chilean and Korean Engineering.” Research Policy 47 (3): 573–582. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2018.01.001.
  • Core Team, R. 2016. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
  • Csardi, Gabor, and Nepusz Tamas. 2006. “The Igraph Software Package for Complex Network Research.” InterJournal, Complex Systems 1695 (5): 1–6. https://igraph.org.
  • Dávila, Patricio, ed. 2019. Diagrams of Power: Visualizing, Mapping and Performing Resistance. Onomatopee.
  • Deb, Verhoeven, Katarzyna Musial, Stuart Palmer, Sarah Taylor, Shaukat Abidi, Vejune Zemaityte, and Lachlan Simpson. 2020. “Controlling for Openness in the Male- Dominated Collaborative Networks of the Global Film Industry.” PLoS ONE 15 (6): e0234460..
  • D’Ignazio, Catherine, and Lauren F Klein. 2020. Data Feminism. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
  • Dworkin, Jordan D., Kristin A. Linn, Erin G. Teich, Perry Zurn, Russell T. Shinohara, and Danielle S. Bassett. 2020. “The Extent and Drivers of Gender Imbalance in Neuroscience Reference Lists.” Nature Neuroscience 23 (8): 918–926. doi:10.1038/s41593-020-0658-y.
  • Elliot, Dely Lazarte, and Sofie Kobayashi. 2019. “How Can PhD Supervisors Play a Role in Bridging Academic Cultures?” Teaching in Higher Education 24 (8): 911–929. doi:10.1080/13562517.2018.1517305.
  • Fortunato, Santo, and Claudio Castellano. 2012. “Community Structure in Graphs.” In Computational Complexity, edited by Robert A Meyers, 490–512. New York, NY: Springer New York..
  • Guimera, Roger, and Luis A. Nunes Amarla. 2005. “Functional Cartography of Complex Metabolic Networks.” Nature 433 (7028): 892–895. doi:10.1038/nature03286.
  • Guimera, Roger, Marta Sales-Pardo, and A. N. Luis Amarl. 2007. “Classes of Complex Networks Defined by Role-to-Role Connectivity Profiles.” Nature Physics 3 (1): 63–69. doi:10.1038/nphys489.
  • Gurumurthy, Anita. 2011. “Feminist Visions of the Network Society.” Development 54 (4): 464–469. doi:10.1057/dev.2011.82.
  • Heffernan, Troy. 2020. “Academic Networks and Career Trajectory: ‘There’s No Career in Academia Without Networks.’.” Higher Education Research and Development, 1–14. doi:10.1080/07294360.2020.1799948.
  • Horta, Hugo, and João M Santos. 2016. “The Impact of Publishing During PhD Studies on Career Research Publication, Visibility, and Collaborations.” Research in Higher Education 57 (1): 28–50. doi:10.1007/s11162-015-9380-0.
  • Jackson, Denise. 2013. “Completing a PhD by Publication: A Review of Australian Policy and Implications for Practice.” Higher Education Research & Development 32 (3): 355–368. doi:10.1080/07294360.2012.692666.
  • Jacomy, Mathieu, Tommaso Venturini, Sebastien Heymann, and Mathieu Bastian. 2014. “ForceAtlas2, a Continuous Graph Layout Algorithm for Handy Network Visualization Designed for the Gephi Software.” PLoS ONE 9 (6): 1–12..
  • Kamler, Barbara. 2008. “Rethinking Doctoral Publication Practices: Writing from and Beyond the Thesis.” Studies in Higher Education 33 (3): 283–294. doi:10.1080/03075070802049236.
  • Lee, Alison, and Barbara Kamler. 2008. “Bringing Pedagogy to Doctoral Publishing.” Teaching in Higher Education 13 (5): 511–523. doi:10.1080/13562510802334723.
  • Lewis, Jenny M, Sandy Ross, and Thomas Holden. 2012. “The how and why of academic collaboration: disciplinary differences and policy implications.” Higher Education 64 (5): 693–708. doi:10.1007/s10734-012-9521-8.
  • Li, Weihua, Tomaso Aste, Fabio Caccioli, and Giacomo Livan. 2019. “Early Coauthorship with Top Scientists Predicts Success in Academic Careers.” Nature Communications 10 (1): 1–9. doi:10.1038/s41467-019-13130-4.
  • Majeti, Dinesh, Ergun Akleman, Mohammed Emtiaz Ahmed, Alexander M Petersen, Brian Uzzi, and Ioannis Pavlidis. 2020. “Scholar Plot : Design and Evaluation of an Information Interface for Faculty Research Performance.” Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics 4 (January): 1–14.
  • Martin-Sardesai, Ann, James Guthrie, Stuart Tooley, and Sally Chaplin. 2019. “History of Research Performance Measurement Systems in the Australian Higher Education Sector.” Accounting History 24 (1): 40–61. doi:10.1177/1032373218768559.
  • McAlpine, Lynn, and Cheryl Amundsen. 2012. “Challenging the Taken-for-Granted: How Research Analysis Might Inform Pedagogical Practices and Institutional Policies Related to Doctoral Education.” Studies in Higher Education 37 (6): 683–694. doi:10.1080/03075079.2010.537747.
  • Mcculloch, Sharon. 2017. “Hobson’s Choice: The Effects of Research Evaluation on Academics’ Writing Practices in England.” Aslib Journal of Information Management 69 (5): 503–515. doi:10.1108/AJIM-12-2016-0216.
  • Merton, Robert K. 1968. “The Matthew Effect in Science: The Reward and Communication Systems of Science are Considered.” Science 159 (3810): 56–63.
  • Mihaljević, Helena, Marco Tullney, Lucía Santamaría, and Christian Steinfeldt. 2019. “Reflections on Gender Analyses of Bibliographic Corpora.” Frontiers in Big Data 2 (August): 1–6..
  • Milojević, Staša. 2013. “Accuracy of Simple, Initials-Based Methods for Author Name Disambiguation.” Informetrics 7 (4): 1–11.
  • Mott, Carrie, and Daniel Cockayne. 2017. “Citation Matters: Mobilizing the Politics of Citation Toward a Practice of ‘Conscientious Engagement’.” Gender, Place and Culture 24 (7): 954–973. doi:10.1080/0966369X.2017.1339022.
  • NHMRC. 2020. “Research Quality.” 2020. https://www.nhmrc.gov.au/research-policy/research-quality.
  • Niven, Penelope, and Carolyn Grant. 2012. “PhDs by Publications: An ‘Easy Way Out’?” Teaching in Higher Education 17 (1): 105–111. doi:10.1080/13562517.2012.640086.
  • Paul-Hus, Adèle, Nadine Desrochers, Sarah de Rijcke, and Alexander D. Rushforth. 2017. “The Reward System of Science.” Aslib Journal of Information Management 69 (5): 478–485. doi:10.1108/AJIM-07-2017-0168.
  • Penders, Bart, and David M. Shaw. 2020. “Civil Disobedience in Scientific Authorship: Resistance and Insubordination in Science.” Accountability in Research 27 (6): 347–371. doi:10.1080/08989621.2020.1756787.
  • Pentland, Alex Sandy. 2012. “The New Science of Building Great Teams.” Harvard Business Review 90 (4): 60–69.
  • Price, Derek De Solla, and Suha Gürsey. 2013. “Studies in Scientometrics I: Transience and Continuance in Scientific Authorship.” Ciência Da Informação 58 (1): 3288–3290..
  • Qi, Mengjiao, An Zeng, Menghui Li, Ying Fan, and Zengru Di. 2017. “Standing on the Shoulders of Giants: The Effect of Outstanding Scientists on Young Collaborators’ Careers.” Scientometrics 3 (111): 1839–1850.
  • Rossiter, W. Margaret. 1993. “The Matthew Matilda Effect in Science.” Social Studies of Science 23 (2): 325–341. doi:10.1177/030631293023002004.
  • Rosvall, M., and C. T. Bergstrom. 2007. “An Information-Theoretic Framework for Resolving Community Structure in Complex Networks.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104 (18): 7327–7331. doi:10.1073/pnas.0611034104.
  • Sanscartier, Matthew D., and Matthew S. Johnston. 2019. “Learning the Language of Craft: A Publishing Workshop for Graduate Students.” Teaching in Higher Education, 1–14. doi:10.1080/13562517.2019.1648411.
  • Sekara, Vedran, Pierre Deville, Sebastian E. Ahnert, Albert-László Barabási, Roberta Sinatra, and Sune Lehmann. 2018. “The Chaperone Effect in Scientific Publishing.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115 (50): 12603–7. doi:10.1073/pnas.1800471115.
  • Sweitzer, Vicki (Baker). 2008. “Towards a Theory of Doctoral Student Professional Identity Development: A Developmental Networks Approach.” The Journal of Higher Education 80 (1): 1–33. doi:10.1353/jhe.0.0034.
  • Velden, Theresa, Asif-ul Haque, and Carl Lagoze. 2010. “A New Approach to Analyzing Patterns of Collaboration in Co- Authorship Networks - Mesoscopic Analysis and Interpretation.” Scientometrics 85 (1): 219–242. doi:10.1007/s11192-010-0224-6.
  • Verhoeven, Deb, Paul S Moore, Amanda Coles, Bronwyn Coate, Katarzyna Musial, Elizabeth Prommer, Michelle Mantsio, et al. 2020. “Disciplinary Itineraries and Digital Methods : Examining the Kinomatics Collaboration Networks.” NECSUS 9 (2): 273–298..
  • Walker, Margath A, and Emmanuel Frimpong Boamah. 2019. “Making the Invisible Hyper-Visible : Knowledge Production and the Gendered Power Nexus in Critical Urban Studies.” Human Geography 12 (2): 36–50.
  • Zeng, Xiao Han T., Jordi Duch, Marta Sales-Pardo, João A.G. Moreira, Filippo Radicchi, Haroldo V. Ribeiro, Teresa K. Woodruff, and Luís A. Nunes Amaral. 2016. “Differences in Collaboration Patterns Across Discipline, Career Stage, and Gender.” PLoS Biology..
  • Zuccala, Alesia. 2006. “Modeling the Invisible College.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 57 (2): 152–168. doi:10.1002/asi.20256.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.