Governance of academic teaching: why universities introduce funding programs for teaching and why academic teachers participate

References

• Amaral, Alberto, V. Lynn Meek, and Ingvild M. Larsen, eds. 2003. The Higher Education Managerial Revolution? Higher education dynamics 3. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Arvaja, Maarit. 2018. “Tensions and Striving for Coherence in an Academic’s Professional Identity Work.” Teaching in Higher Education 23 (3): 291–306. doi:10.1080/13562517.2017.1379483.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bamkole, Peter, and Stanley Ibeku. 2020. “Entrepreneurial Universities: A Case Study of the Pan Atlantic University, Lagos, Nigeria.” In Entrepreneurial Universities, edited by Sola Adesola, and Surja Datta. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-48013-4_6.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, Ronald. 2003. Beyond all Reason. Living with Ideology in the University. Buckingham: The Society for Research into Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, Fred G., Reinhard Kreckel, and Elke Wild, eds. 2012. Gute Lehre in der Hochschule: Wirkungen von Anreizen, Kontextbedingungen und Reformen. Bielefeld: W. Bertelsmann Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Bleiklie, Ivar, Jürgen Enders, Benedetto Lepori, and Christine Musselin. 2011. “New Public Management, Network Governance and the University as a Changing Professional Organization.” In The Ashgate Research Companion to New Public Management, edited by Tom Christensen, and Per Lægreid, 161–176. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Bleiklie, Ivar, and Maurice Kogan. 2007. “Organization and Governance of Universities.” Higher Education Policy 20 (4): 477–493. doi:10.1057/palgrave.hep.8300167.
   Google Scholar
• Bloch, Roland, Monique Lathan, Alexander Mitterle, Doreen Trümpler, and Carsten Würmann. 2014. Wer lehrt warum? Strukturen und Akteure der akademischen Lehre an deutschen Hochschulen. Hochschulforschung Halle-Wittenberg. Leipzig: AVA.
   Google Scholar
• Bogumil, Jörg, Martin Burgi, Rolf G. Heinze, Sascha Gerber, Ilse-Dore Gräf, Linda Jochheim, Maren Schickentanz, and Manfred Wannöffel. 2013. Modernisierung der Universitäten: Umsetzungsstand und Wirkungen neuer Steuerungsinstrumente. Berlin: edition sigma.
   Google Scholar
• Bryman, Alan. 2016. Social Research Methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, Burton R. 1983. The Higher Education System: Academic Organization in Cross-national Perspective. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, Burton R. 1998. Creating Entrepreneurial Universities: Organizational Pathways of Transformation. Issues in Higher Education. Bingley: Emerald.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, Michael D., James G. March, and Johan P. Olsen. 1972. “A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice.” Administrative Science Quarterly 17 (1): 1–25. doi:10.2307/2392088.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, Bradley E., Kadian L. McIntosh, Robert D. Reason, and Patrick T. Terenzini. 2011. “A Culture of Teaching: Policy, Perception, and Practice in Higher Education.” Research in Higher Education 52 (8): 808–829. doi:10.1007/s11162-011-9223-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Boer, Harry, Jürgen Enders, and Liudvika Leisyte. 2007. “Public Sector Reform in Dutch Higher Education: The Organizational Transformation of the University.” Public Administration 85 (1): 27–46. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2007.00632.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Boer, Harry, Jürgen Enders, and Uwe Schimank. 2007. “On the Way towards New Public Management? The Governance of University Systems in England, the Netherlands, Austria, and Germany.” In New Forms of Governance in Research Organizations: Disciplinary Approaches, Interfaces and Integration, edited by Dorothea Jansen, 137–153. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Deem, Rosemary. 1998. “'New Managerialism’ and Higher Education: The Management of Performances and Cultures in Universities in the United Kingdom.” International Studies in Sociology of Education 8 (1): 47–70. doi:10.1080/0962021980020014.
   Google Scholar
• Deem, Rosemary, and Kevin J. Brehony. 2005. “Management as Ideology: The Case of ‘new Managerialism’ in Higher Education.” Oxford Review of Education 31 (2): 217–235. doi:10.1080/03054980500117827.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enders, Jürgen, Barbara Kehm, and Uwe Schimank. 2002. “Structures and Problems of Research in German Higher Education.” In Trends in American & German Higher Education, edited by Robert M. Adams, 85–119. Cambridge, MA: American Academy of Arts and Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Ferlie, Ewan, Christine Musselin, and Gianluca Andresani. 2008. “The Steering of Higher Education Systems: A Public Management Perspective.” Higher Education 56 (3): 325–348. doi:10.1007/s10734-008-9125-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harley, Sandra, Michael Muller-Camen, and Audrey Collin. 2004. “From Academic Communities to Managed Organisations: The Implications for Academic Careers in UK and German Universities.” Journal of Vocational Behavior 64 (2): 329–345. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2002.09.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, Suzy. 2005. “Rethinking Academic Identities in Neo-liberal Times.” Teaching in Higher Education 10 (4): 421–433. doi:10.1080/13562510500238986.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattke, Fabian, and Jetta Frost. 2018. “Governance of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education.” In Encyclopedia of International Higher Education Systems and Institutions, edited by Pedro Teixeira, and Jung Cheol Shin. Dordrecht: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-94-017-9553-1_549-1.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, Mick. 2005. “Linking Research and Teaching: Exploring Disciplinary Spaces and the Role of Inquiry-Based Learning.” In Reshaping the University: New Relationships between Research, Scholarship and Teaching, edited by Ronald Barnett, 67–78. New York: McGraw Hill/Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, Mick, and Allan Jenkins. 2009. Developing Undergraduate Research and Inquiry. York: Higher Education Academy.
   Google Scholar
• Henkel, Mary. 2005. “Academic Identity and Autonomy in a Changing Environment.” Higher Education 49 (1-2): 155–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houben, Daniel. 2013. “Governance der Hochschullehre.” Swiss Journal of Sociology 39 (2): 361–381.
   Google Scholar
• Hüther, Otto, and Georg Krücken. 2015. Hochschulen: Fragestellungen, Ergebnisse und Perspektiven der sozialwissenschaftlichen Hochschulforschung. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
   Google Scholar
• Hüther, Otto, and Georg Krücken. 2018. Higher Education in Germany – Recent Developments in an International Perspective. Higher education dynamics 49. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Jansen, Dorothea, ed. 2007. New Forms of Governance in Research Organizations: Disciplinary Approaches, Interfaces and Integration. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Jansen, Dorothea, Andreas Wald, Karola Franke, Ulrich Schmoch, and Torben Schubert. 2007. “Drittmittel als Performanzindikator der wissenschaftlichen Forschung.” Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 59 (1): 125–149. doi:10.1007/s11577-007-0006-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kehm, Barbara. 2012. “Hochschulen als besondere und unvollständige Organisationen? – Neue Theorien zur ,Organisation Hochschule‘.” In Hochschule als Organisation. Organisationssoziologie, edited by Uwe Wilkesmann, and Christian J. Schmid, 17–25. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
   Google Scholar
• Kehm, Barbara M., and Ute Lanzendorf. 2007. “The Impacts of University Management on Academic Work: Reform Experiences in Austria and Germany.” Management Revue 18 (2): 153–173. doi:10.5771/0935-9915-2007-2-153.
   Google Scholar
• Kleimann, Bernd, and Malte Hückstädt. 2018. “Auswahlkriterien im Berufungsverfahren: Universitäten und Fachhochschulen im Vergleich.” Beiträge zur Hochschulforschung 40 (2): 20–47.
   Google Scholar
• Kuckartz, Udo. 2014. Qualitative Text Analysis. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Lauer, Sabine, and Uwe Wilkesmann. 2017. “The Governance of Organizational Learning.” The Learning Organization 24 (5): 266–277. doi:10.1108/TLO-02-2017-0012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lauer, Sabine, and Uwe Wilkesmann. 2019. “How the Institutional Environment Affects Collegial Exchange about Teaching at German Research Universities: Findings from a Nationwide Survey.” Tertiary Education and Management 25 (2): 131–144. doi:10.1007/s11233-019-09020-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leisyte, Liudvika. 2015. “Changing Academic Identities in the Context of a Managerial University–Bridging the Duality between Professions and Organizations.” In The Relevance of Academic Work in Comparative Perspective, edited by William K. Cummings and Ulrich Teichler, 59–73. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Leisyte, Liudvika, and Jay R Dee. 2012. “Understanding Academic Work in a Changing Institutional Environment.” In Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, edited by John C. Smart, and Michael B. Paulsen, 123–206. Dordrecht: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-2950-6.
   Google Scholar
• Leisyte, Liudvika, Jürgen Enders, and Harry de Boer. 2009. “The Balance Between Teaching and Research in Dutch and English Universities in the Context of University Governance Reforms.” Higher Education 58 (5): 619–635. doi:10.1007/s10734-009-9213-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayntz, Renate, and F.W. Scharpf, eds. 1995. “Der Ansatz des akteurzentrierten Institutionalismus.” In Gesellschaftliche Selbstregulierung und politische Steuerung, edited by idem, 39–72. Frankfurt am Main: Campus Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Mayring, Philipp. 2014. Qualitative Content Analysis: Theoretical Foundation, Basic Procedures and Software Solution. http://nbnresolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-395173.
   Google Scholar
• Mintzberg, Henry. 1979. The Structuring of Organizations: A Synthesis of the Research. The Theory of Management Policy Series. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Mintzberg, Henry. 1983. Power in and around Organizations. Sage. doi:10.1177/017084068400500419.
   Google Scholar
• Mojescik, Katharina, Jessica Pflüger, and Caroline Richter. 2019. “Ökonomisierung universitärer Lehre? Befunde zur universitären Transformation am Beispiel des Forschenden Lernens.” In Komplexe Dynamiken globaler und lokaler Entwicklungen. Verhandlungen des 39. Kongresses der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Soziologie in Göttingen 2018, edited by Nicole Burzan. Göttingen.
   Google Scholar
• Musselin, Christine. 2007. The Transformation of Academic Work: Facts and Analysis. https://hal-sciencespo.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01066077/document.
   Google Scholar
• Musselin, Christine. 2008. “Towards a Sociology of Academic Work.” In From Governance to Identity, edited by Alberto Amaral, Ivar Bleiklie, and Christine Musselin, 47–56. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Prichard, Craig, and Hugh Willmott. 1997. “Just How Managed is the McUniversity? Craig Prichard, Hugh Willmott.” Organization Studies 18 (2): 287–316. doi:10.1177/017084069701800205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramirez, Francisco O., and Tom Christensen. 2013. “The Formalization of the University: Rules, Roots, and Routes.” Higher Education 65 (6): 695–708. doi:10.1007/s10734-012-9571-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schimank, Uwe. 2005. “‘New Public Management’ and the Academic Profession: Reflections on the German Situation.” Minerva 43 (4): 361–376. doi:10.1007/s11024-005-2472-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schimank, Uwe. 2014. “Der Wandel der ,Regelungsstrukturen‘ des Hochschulsystems und die Folgen für die wissenschaftliche Forschung.” In Wissensregulierung und Regulierungswissen, edited by Alfons Bora, Anna Henkel, and Carsten Reinhardt, 19–40. Weilerswist: Velbrück.
   Google Scholar
• Schmid, Christian J., and Sabine Lauer. 2016. “Institutional (Teaching) Entrepreneurs Wanted! – Considerations on the Professoriate’s Agentic Potency to Enhance Academic Teaching in Germany.” In Organizing Academic Work in Higher Education: Teaching, Learning and Identities, edited by Liudvika Leišytė and Uwe Wilkesmann, 109–131. Abingdon-on-Thames: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Serrano-Velarde, Kathia. 2008. Evaluation, Akkreditierung und Politik: Zur Organisation von Qualitätssicherung im Zuge des Bolognaprozesses. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. doi:10.1007/978-3-531-90997-4.
   Google Scholar
• Slaughter, Sheila, and Larry L. Leslie. 1997. Academic Capitalism: Politics, Policies, and the Entrepreneurial University. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stake, Robert E. 1995. The Art of Case Study Research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Teixeira, Pedro, Ben Jongbloed, David Dill, and Alberto Amaral. 2004. Markets in Higher Education: Rhetoric or Reality? Douro Series 6. Dordrecht: Kluwer Acad. Publ.
   Google Scholar
• Weick, Karl E. 1976. “Educational Organizations as Loosely Coupled Systems.” Administrative Science Quarterly 21 (1): 1. doi:10.2307/2391875.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitley, Richard. 2010. “Reconfiguring the Public Sciences: The Impact of Governance Changes on Authority and Innovation in Public Science Systems.” In Reconfiguring Knowledge Production: Changing Authority Relationships in the Sciences and their Consequences for Intellectual Innovation, edited by Richard Whitley, Jochen Gläser, and Lars Engwall, 3–47. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkesmann, Uwe, and Sabine Lauer. 2018. “The Influence of Teaching Motivation and New Public Management on Academic Teaching.” Studies in Higher Education 17 (1): 1–18. doi:10.1080/03075079.2018.1539960.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkesmann, Uwe, and Christian J. Schmid. 2012. “The Impacts of New Governance on Teaching at German Universities. Findings from a National Survey.” Higher Education 63: 33–52. doi:10.1007/s10734-011-9423-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witzel, Andreas. 2000. “The Problem-Centered Interview.” Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research 1 (1). http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/download/1132/2520.
   Google Scholar
• Witzel, Andreas, and Herwig Reiter. 2012. The Problem-Centred Interview: Principles and Practice. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, Robert K. 2014. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. 5th ed. Los Angeles: SAGE.
   Google Scholar