‘It is the easiest thing to do’: university students’ perspectives on the role of lecture recording in promoting inclusive education in the UK

References

• Bacon, J., and E. Pomponio. 2020. A call for radical over reductionist approaches to ‘inclusive’ reform in neoliberal times: An analysis of position statements in the United States. International Journal of Inclusive Education. doi:10.1080/13603116.2020.1858978.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayne, S. 2015. What’s the matter with ‘technology-enhanced learning’? Learning, Media and Technology 40, no. 1: 5–20. doi:10.1080/17439884.2014.915851.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bešić, E. 2020. Intersectionality: A pathway towards inclusive education? Prospects 49: 111–22. doi:10.1007/s11125-020-09461-6.
   Google Scholar
• Bhopal, K., and C. Pitkin. 2020. ‘Same old story, just a different policy’: Race and policy making in higher education in the UK. Race Ethnicity and Education 23, no. 4: 530–47. doi:10.1080/13613324.2020.1718082.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bigum, C., S.A. Bulfin, and N.F. Johnson. 2015. Critical is something others (don’t) do: Mapping the imaginative of educational technology. In Critical perspectives on technology and education, edited by S. Bulfin, N.F. Johnson, and C. Bigum, 1–13. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3, no. 2: 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
   Google Scholar
• Brittain, S., P. Glowacki, J. V. Ittersum, and L. Johnson. 2006. Podcasting lectures: Formative evaluation strategies helped identify a solution to a learning dilemma. Educause Quarterly 29, no. 3: 24–31.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, C., J. Erickson, J. Greer, and C. Gutwin. 2014. Modelling and quantifying the behaviours of students in lecture capture environments. Computers & Education 75, no. 1: 282–92. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.03.002.
   Google Scholar
• Bunn, M., A. Bennett, and P.J. Burke. 2019. In the anytime: Flexible time structures, student experience and temporal equity in higher education. Time & Society 28, no. 4: 1409–28. doi:10.1177/0961463X18787649.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, S., L. Macmillan, and G. Wyness. 2019. Mismatch in higher education: Prevalence, drivers and outcomes. Project report. London: Nuffield Foundation. Accessed November 14, 2022. https://www.nuffieldfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/Wyness-42856-Executive-Summary-Nov19.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, S. 2007. Academic perceptions of the use of Lectopia: A University of Melbourne example. In ICT: Providing choices for learners and learning, Proceedings Annual Conference of ASCILITE, 135–44, in Singapore.
   Google Scholar
• Cook-Sather, A. 2014. The trajectory of student voice in educational research. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies 49, no. 2: 131–48.
   Google Scholar
• Cooke, M., B. Watson, E. Blacklock, M. Mansah, M. Howard, A. Johnston, M. Tower, and J. Murfield. 2012. Lecture capture: First year student nurses’ experiences of a web-based lecture technology. Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing 29, no. 3: 14–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coyne, R. D., J. Lee, and D. Petrova. 2017. Re-visiting the flipped classroom in a design context. Journal of Learning Design 10, no. 2: 1–13. doi:10.5204/jld.v10i2.281.
   Google Scholar
• Cridland, E.K., S.C. Jones, P. Caputi, and C.A. Magee. 2015. Qualitative research with families living with autism spectrum disorder: Recommendations for conducting semistructured interviews. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability 40, no. 1: 78–91. doi:10.3109/13668250.2014.964191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Debevc, M., and Z. Peljhan. 2004. The role of video technology in on-line lectures for the deaf. Disability and Rehabilitation 26, no. 17: 1048–59. doi:10.1080/09638280410001702441.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donnelly, M., and Sol Gamsu. 2018. Home and away: Social, ethnic and spatial inequalities in student mobility. Project report. London: The Sutton Trust. Accessed November 14, 2022. https://www.suttontrust.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/Home_and_away_FINAL.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Draper, M. J., S. Gibbon, and J. Thomas. 2018. Lecture recording: A new norm. The Law Teacher 52, no. 3: 316–34. doi:10.1080/03069400.2018.1450598.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, M.R., and M.E. Clinton. 2019. A study exploring the impact of lecture capture availability and lecture capture usage on student attendance and attainment. Higher Education 77: 403–21. doi:10.1007/s10734-018-0275-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott, C., and D. Neal. 2016. Evaluating the use of lecture capture using a revealed preference approach. Active Learning in Higher Education 17, no. 2: 153–67. doi:10.1177/1469787416637463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fereday, J., and E. Muir-Cochrane. 2006. Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 5, no. 1: 80–92. doi:10.1177/160940690600500107.
   Google Scholar
• Greenstein, A. 2016. Radical inclusive education: Disability, teaching and struggles for liberation. Hove: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, E.C., and N. Friesen. 2013. Online education: A science and technology studies perspective. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology 39, no. 2: 1–21. doi:10.21432/T2001C.
   Google Scholar
• Helsper, E.J., and R. Eynon. 2009. Digital natives: Where is the evidence? British Educational Research Journal 36, no. 3: 503–20. doi:10.1080/01411920902989227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higher Education Statistics Agency. 2021. Who’s studying in HE? Accessed April 1, 2022. https://www.hesa.ac.uk/data-and-analysis/students/whos-in-he.
   Google Scholar
• Hillman, V., J.P. Martins, and E.C. Ogu. 2021. Debates about EdTech in a time of pandemics should include youth’s voices. Postdigital Science and Education 3, no. 3: 990–1007. doi:10.1007/s42438-021-00230-y.
   Google Scholar
• Jacoby, B. 2017. The new student activism: Supporting students as agents of social change. Journal of College and Character 18, no. 1: 1–8. doi:10.1080/2194587X.2016.1260479.
   Google Scholar
• Jisc. 2018. Supporting an inclusive learner experience in higher education. Accessed October 11, 2021. https://www.jisc.ac.uk/guides/supporting-an-inclusive-learner-experience-in-higher-education.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, A. N. B., H. Massa, and T. H. Burne. 2013. Digital lecture recording: A cautionary tale. Nurse Education in Practice 13, no. 1: 40–7. doi:10.1016/j.nepr.2012.07.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, M., and K. McLean. 2018. Personalising learning in teacher education. Singapore: Springer Nature.
   Google Scholar
• Kallio, H., A. Pietilä, M. Johnson, and M. Kangasniemi. 2016. Systematic methodological review: Developing a framework for a qualitative semi-structured interview guide. Journal of Advanced Nursing 72, no. 12: 2954–65. doi:10.1111/jan.13031.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendall, L. 2016. Higher education and disability: Exploring student experiences. Cogent Education 3, no. 1: 1256142. doi:10.1080/2331186X.2016.1256142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamb, J., and J. Ross. 2021. Lecture capture, social topology, and the spatial and temporal arrangements of UK universities. European Educational Research Journal. doi:10.1177/1474904121993982.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leadbeater, W., T. Shuttleworth, J. Couperthwaite, and K. P. Nightingale. 2013. Evaluating the use and impact of lecture recording in undergraduates: Evidence for distinct approaches by different groups of students. Computers & Education 61: 185–92. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.09.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liasidou, A. 2015. Inclusive education and the issue of change: Theory, policy and pedagogy. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y.S., and E. . Guba. 1985. Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Macgilchrist, F. 2021. What is ‘critical’ in critical studies of edtech? Three responses. Learning, Media and Technology 46, no. 3: 243–9. doi:10.1080/17439884.2021.1958843.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKay, J.R.D., E. Nordmann, L. Murray, A. Browitt, M. Anderson, and J. Hutchison. 2021. The cost of asking: ‘say that again?’: A social capital theory view into how lecture recording supports widening participation. Frontiers in Education 6: 734755. doi:10.3389/feduc.2021.734755.
   Google Scholar
• Manca, S., G. Valentina, A. Armellini, and C. Devecchi. 2017. Editorial: Student voice. Listening to students to improve education through digital technologies. British Journal of Educational Technology 48, no. 5: 1075–80. doi:10.1111/bjet.12568.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manolev, J., A. Sullivan, and R. Slee. 2019. The datafication of discipline: ClassDojo, surveillance and a performative classroom culture. Learning, Media and Technology 44, no. 1: 36–51. doi:10.1080/17439884.2018.1558237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, J. 2002. Qualitative researching. 2nd ed. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Maunder, R., M. Cunliffe, J. Galvin, S. Mjali, and J. Rogers. 2013. Listening to student voices: Student researchers exploring undergraduate experiences of university transition. Higher Education 66, no. 2: 139–52. doi:10.1007/s10734-012-9595-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLeod, J. 2011. Student voice and the politics of listening in higher education. Critical Studies in Education 52, no. 2: 179–89. doi:10.1080/17508487.2011.572830.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meuleman, A., R. Garrett, A. Wrench, and S. King. 2015. ‘Some people might say I’m thriving but  … ’: non-traditional students’ experiences of university. International Journal of Inclusive Education 19, no. 5: 503–17. doi:10.1080/13603116.2014.945973.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morozov, E. 2013. To save everything, click here: Technology, solutionism and the urge to fix problems that don’t exist. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, N. P., B. Swinnerton, and T. Coop. 2019. Lecture recordings to support learning: A contested space between students and teachers. Computers & Education 140: 103604. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103604.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naylor, R., M. Dollinger, M. Mahat, and M. Khawaja. 2021. Students as customers versus as active agents: Conceptualising the student role in governance and quality assurance. Higher Education Research & Development 40, no. 5: 1026–39. doi:10.1080/07294360.2020.1792850.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nightingale, K. P., V. Anderson, S. Onens, Q. Fazil, and H. Davies. 2019. Developing the inclusive curriculum: Is supplementary lecture recording an effective approach in supporting students with Specific Learning Difficulties (SpLDs)? Computers & Education 130: 13–25. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2018.11.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordmann, E., J. Hutchison, and J. R. D. MacKay. 2021. Lecture rapture: The place and case for lectures in the new normal. Teaching in Higher Education. doi:10.1080/13562517.2021.2015755.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordmann, E., and P. McGeorge. 2018. Lecture capture in higher education: Time to learn from the learners. PsyArXiv. doi:10.31234/osf.io/ux29v.
   Google Scholar
• Olssen, M., and M.A. Peters. 2005. Neoliberalism, higher education and the knowledge economy: From the free market to knowledge capitalism. Journal of Education Policy 20, no. 3: 313–45. doi:10.1080/02680930500108718.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, T. 2019. Not lazy, not faking: teaching and learning experiences of university students with disabilities. Disability & Society 34, no. 2: 228–52. doi:10.1080/09687599.2018.1515724.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pacheco, E., P. Yoong, and L. Miriam. 2021. Transition issues in higher education and digital technologies: The experiences of students with disabilities in New Zealand. Disability & Society 36, no. 2: 179–201. doi:10.1080/09687599.2020.1735305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pathirage, C.P., R.D.G. Amaratunga, and R.P. Haigh. 2008. The role of philosophical context in the development of theory: Towards methodological pluralism. The Built and Human Environment Review 1, no. 1: 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Perale, M. 2022. ‘I still see the elitism’. Classical languages and the language of class at Liverpool. The Journal of Classics Teaching, First View, 1–8. doi:10.1017/S2058631022000289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phipps, A., and I. Young. 2015. ‘Lad culture’ in higher education: Agency in the sexualization debates. Sexualities 18, no. 4: 459–79. doi:10.1177/1363460714550909.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuels, E., and E. Freeman. 2021. Introduction: Crip temporalities. South Atlantic Quarterly 120, no. 2: 245–54. doi:10.1215/00382876-8915937.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos, B. 2006. The university in the 21st century: Toward a democratic and emancipatory university reform. In The university, state, and market: The political economy of globalization in the Americas, edited by R. A. Rhoads and C. A. Torres, 60–100. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Saunders, B., J. Sim, T. Kingstone, S. Baker, J. Waterfield, B. Bartlam, H. Burroughs, and C. Jinks. 2018. Saturation in qualitative research: Exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Quality & Quantity 52, no. 4: 1893–907. doi:10.1007/s11135-017-0574-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Semper, J.V.O., and M. Blasco. 2018. Revealing the hidden curriculum in higher education. Studies in Philosophy and Education 37, no. 5: 481–98. doi:10.1007/s11217-018-9608-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skead, N., L. Elphick, F. McGaughey, M. Wesson, K. Offer, and M. Montalto. 2020. If you record, they will not come – but does it really matter? Student attendance and lecture recording at an Australian law school. The Law Teacher 54, no. 3: 349–67. doi:10.1080/03069400.2019.1697578.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slee, R. 2014. Discourses of inclusion and exclusion: Drawing wider margins. Power and Education 6, no. 1: 7–17. doi:10.2304/power.2014.6.1.7.
   Google Scholar
• Stentiford, L., and G. Koutsouris. 2021. What are inclusive pedagogies in higher education? A systematic scoping review. Studies in Higher Education 46, no. 11: 2245–61. doi:10.1080/03075079.2020.1716322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss, L. 1987. Qualitative analysis for social scientists. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sutherland, K. A., I. Lenihan-Ikin, and C. Rushforth. 2019. The value of working with students as partners. In Engaging student voices in higher education: Diverse perspective and expectations in partnership, edited by S. Lygo-Baker, I. M. Kinchin, and N. E. Winstone, 37–54. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Symonds, E. 2020. The depersonalised consumer subjectivity and its effect on fostering meaningful relationships between undergraduates and academics in higher education. Critical Studies in Education 62, no. 5: 624–40. doi:10.1080/17508487.2020.1755330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomlinson, M. 2016. Student perceptions of themselves as ‘consumers’ of higher education. British Journal of Sociology of Education 38, no. 4: 1–15. doi:10.1080/01425692.2015.1113856.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UCISA. 2018. 2018 Report on the technology enhanced learning survey. Accessed August 2, 2019. https://www.ucisa.ac.uk/en/Resources/2018/Technology-enhanced-learning-survey.
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO. 2019. Cali commitment to equity and inclusion in education. Accessed April 1, 2022. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000370910.
   Google Scholar
• University and College Union. 2021. ‘Hands off’ online lecture recordings, UCU tells universities and colleges. Accessed November 15, 2021. https://www.ucu.org.uk/article/11746/Hands-off-online-lecture-recordings-union-tells-universities-and-colleges.
   Google Scholar
• University of Aberdeen. n.d. Lecture capture: Frequently asked questions. Accessed November 15, 2021. https://www.abdn.ac.uk/staffnet/teaching/lecture-capture-faqs-11690.php#panel11692.
   Google Scholar
• University of Leeds. 2019. Learning analytics strategy for taught student education. Accessed December 6, 2021. https://forstaff.leeds.ac.uk/info/30402/university_news/1883/learning_analytics_strategy_for_taught_student_education.
   Google Scholar
• Vickerman, P., and M. Blundell. 2010. Hearing the voices of disabled students in higher education. Disability & Society 25, no. 1: 21–32. doi:10.1080/09687590903363290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y. 2021. ‘Teachers did not let me do it.’: Disabled children’s experiences of marginalisation in regular primary schools in China. Disability & the Global South 8, no. 2: 2053–70.
   Google Scholar
• Watters, A. 2013. Click here to save education: Evgeny Morozov and Ed-Tech solutionism. Accessed March 22, 2022. http://hackeducation.com/2013/03/26/ed-tech-solutionism-morozov.
   Google Scholar
• Witzenberger, K., and K.N. Gulson. 2021. Why EdTech is always right: Students, data and machines in pre-emptive configurations. Learning, Media and Technology 46, no. 4: 420–34. doi:10.1080/17439884.2021.1913181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, B., R. Elmorally, M. Copsey-Blake, E. Highwood, and J. Singarayer. 2020. Is race still relevant? Student perceptions and experiences of racism in higher education. Cambridge Journal of Education 51, no. 3: 359–75. doi:10.1080/0305764X.2020.1831441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wrigley, T. 2019. The problem of reductionism in educational theory: Complexity, causality, values. Power and Education 11, no. 2: 145–62. doi:10.1177/1757743819845121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zajda, J., and V. Rust. 2016. Research in globalisation and higher education reforms. In Globalisation and higher education reforms, edited by J. Zajda and V. Rust, 179–87. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar