3,203
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Teaching-learning in virtual learning environments: a matter of forced compromises away from student-centredness?

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Received 16 Mar 2022, Accepted 18 Mar 2023, Published online: 19 Apr 2023

References

  • Åkerlind, Gerlese S. 2003. Growing and developing as a university teacher–variation in meaning. Studies in Higher Education 28, no. 4: 375–390. doi:10.1080/0307507032000122242.
  • Åkerlind, Gerlese S. 2004. A new dimension to understanding university teaching. Teaching in Higher Education 9, no. 3: 363–375. doi:10.1080/1356251042000216679.
  • Åkerlind, Gerlese S. 2005. Variation and commonality in phenomenographic research methods. Higher Education Research & Development 24, no. 4: 321–334. doi:10.1080/07294360500284672.
  • Åkerlind, Gerlese S. 2008. A phenomenographic approach to developing academics’ understanding of the nature of teaching and learning. Teaching in Higher Education 13, no. 6: 633–644. doi:10.1080/13562510802452350.
  • Åkerlind, Gerlese S. 2012. Variation and commonality in phenomenographic research methods. Higher Education Research & Development 31, no. 1: 115–127. doi:10.1080/07294360.2011.642845.
  • Anthony Jr., Bokolo. 2022. An exploratory study on academic staff perception towards blended learning in higher education. Education and Information Technologies 27, no. 3: 3107–3133. doi:10.1007/s10639-021-10705-x.
  • Ashworth, Peter, and Ursula Lucas. 2000. Achieving empathy and engagement: A practical approach to the design, conduct and reporting of phenomenographic research. Studies in Higher Education 25, no. 3: 295–308. doi:10.1080/713696153.
  • Badia, Antoni, Consuelo Garcia, and Julio Meneses. 2017. Approaches to teaching online: Exploring factors influencing teachers in a fully online university. British Journal of Educational Technology 48, no. 6: 1193–1207. doi:10.1111/bjet.12475.
  • Barman, Linda. 2015. Striving for autonomy: Health sciences teachers’ enactment of policy. Solna, Sweden: Karolinska Institutet.
  • Barman, Linda, Klara Bolander-Laksov, and Charlotte Silén. 2014. Policy enacted – Teachers' approaches to an outcome-based framework for course design. Teaching in Higher Education 19, no. 7: 735–746.
  • Barman, Linda, Cormac McGrath, and Christian Stöhr. 2019. Higher education; for free, for everyone, for real? Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) and the responsible university: History and enacting rationalities for MOOC initiatives at three Swedish universities. In The responsible university, edited by Mads P. Sørensen, Lars Geschwind, Jouni Kekäle, and Rómulo Pinheiro, 117–143. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Bearman, Margaret, Rola Ajjawi, and Marcus O’Donnell. 2022. Life-on-campusormy-time-and-screen: Identity and agency in online postgraduate courses. Teaching in Higher Education, 1–16. doi:10.1080/13562517.2022.2109014.
  • Bearman, Margaret, Sarah Lambert, and Marcus O’Donnell. 2021. How a centralised approach to learning design influences students: A mixed methods study. Higher Education Research & Development 40, no. 4: 692–705. doi:10.1080/07294360.2020.1792849.
  • Bennett, Sue, Phillip Dawson, Margaret Bearman, Elizabeth Molloy, and David Boud. 2017. How technology shapes assessment design: Findings from a study of university teachers. British Journal of Educational Technology 48, no. 2: 672–682. doi:10.1111/bjet.12439.
  • Biesta, Gert. 2015. What is education for? On good education, teacher judgement, and educational professionalism. European Journal of Education 50, no. 1: 75–87.
  • Biesta, Gert, Mark Priestley, and Sarah Robinson. 2015. The role of beliefs in teacher agency. Teachers and Teaching 21, no. 6: 624–640.
  • Booth, Shirley. 1997. On phenomenography, learning and teaching. Higher Education Research & Development 16, no. 2: 135–158.
  • Booth, Shirley, and Åke Ingerman. 2002. Making sense of Physics in the first year of study. Learning and Instruction 12, no. 5: 493–507. doi:10.1016/S0959-4752(01)00028-7.
  • Børte, Kristin, Katrine Nesje, and Sølvi Lillejord. 2023. Barriers to student active learning in higher education. Teaching in Higher Education, 597–615. doi:10.1080/13562517.2020.1839746.
  • Boulton, Chris A., Carmel Kent, and Hywel T. P. Williams. 2018. Virtual learning environment engagement and learning outcomes at a ‘bricks-and-mortar’ UNiversity. Computers & Education 126: 129–142. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2018.06.031.
  • Caravias, Vicki. 2018. Teachers conceptions and approaches to blended learning: A literature review. In Online course management: Concepts, methodologies, tools, and applications, 912–934. doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-5472-1.
  • Collier-Reed, Brandon, and Åke Ingerman. 2013. Phenomenography: From critical aspects to knowledge claim. In Theory and method in higher education research, edited by Malcom Tight and Jeroen Huisman, 243–260. Bingley: Emerald.
  • Collins, Hilary J., Hayley Glover, and Fran Myers. 2022. behind the digital curtain: A study of academic identities, liminalities and labour market adaptations for the ‘Uber-Isation’ of HE. Teaching in Higher Education 27, no. 2: 201–216. doi:10.1080/13562517.2019.1706163.
  • Dahlgren, Lars Owe, and Ference Marton. 1978. Students’ conceptions of subject matter: An aspect of learning and teaching in higher education. Studies in Higher Education 3, no. 1: 25–35.
  • De Vries, Marc J. 2016. Teaching about technology: An introduction to the philosophy of technology for non-philosophers. Cham: Springer.
  • Dhillon, Sundeep, and Neil Murray. 2021. An investigation of EAP teachers’ views and experiences of e-learning technology. Education Sciences 11, no. 2: 54.
  • Dunn, Thomas J., and Mark Kennedy. 2019. Technology enhanced learning in higher education; motivations, engagement and academic achievement. Computers & Education 137: 104–113. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2019.04.004.
  • Englund, Claire, Anders D. Olofsson, and Linda Price. 2017. Teaching with technology in higher education: Understanding conceptual change and development in practice. Higher Education Research & Development 36, no. 1: 73–87. doi:10.1080/07294360.2016.1171300.
  • Facer, Keri, and Neil Selwyn. 2021. Digital technology and the futures of education: Towards ‘non-stupid’ optimism. Paper commissioned for the UNESCO Futures of Education report.
  • Fernández-Batanero, José María, Marta Montenegro-Rueda, José Fernández-Cerero, and Inmaculada García-Martínez. 2022. Digital competences for teacher professional development. Systematic review. European Journal of Teacher Education 45, no. 4: 513–531.
  • Hopkins, Susan. 2021. Computer says no? Limitations of tech-focused transitions to higher education for Australian LSES students. Teaching in Higher Education, 1–17. doi:10.1080/13562517.2021.1931837.
  • Jääskelä, Päivikki, Päivi Häkkinen, and Helena Rasku-Puttonen. 2017. Teacher beliefs regarding learning, pedagogy, and the use of technology in higher education. Journal of Research on Technology in Education 49, no. 3-4: 198–211.
  • Jump, Lynne. 2011. Why university lecturers enhance their teaching through the use of technology: A systematic review. Learning, Media and Technology 36, no. 1: 55–68. doi:10.1080/17439884.2010.521509.
  • Kearns, Lorna R. 2016. The experience of teaching online and its impact on faculty innovation across delivery methods. The Internet and Higher Education 31: 71–78. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.06.005.
  • Kember, David. 1997. A reconceptualisation of the research into university academics’ conceptions of teaching. Learning and Instruction 7, no. 3: 255–275. doi:10.1016/S0959-4752(96)00028-X.
  • Kirkwood, Adrian, and Linda Price. 2013. Missing: Evidence of a scholarly approach to teaching and learning with technology in higher education. Teaching in Higher Education 18, no. 3: 327–337. doi:10.1080/13562517.2013.773419.
  • Kirkwood, Adrian, and Linda Price. 2014. Technology-enhanced learning and teaching in higher education: What is ‘enhanced’ and how do we know? A critical literature review. Learning, Media and Technology 39, no. 1: 6–36. doi:10.1080/17439884.2013.770404.
  • Kvale, Steinar, and Svend Brinkmann. 2009. Interviews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing. Los Angeles: Sage.
  • Lacka, Ewelina, T. C. Wong, and Mohamed Yacine Haddoud. 2021. Can digital technologies improve students’ efficiency? Exploring the role of virtual learning environment and social media use in higher education. Computers & Education 163: 104099. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104099.
  • Lai, Jennifer W.M., and Matt Bower. 2019. How is the use of technology in education evaluated? A systematic review. Computers & Education 133: 27–42. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2019.01.010.
  • Lee, Jihyun, and Hyoseon Choi. 2017. What affects learner's higher-order thinking in technology-enhanced learning environments? The effects of learner factors. Computers & Education 115: 143–152. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2017.06.015.
  • Leighton, R.H., and D.M.E. Griffioen. 2021. Lecturers’ curational behaviour in higher education. Teaching in Higher Education, 1–20. doi:10.1080/13562517.2021.1872530.
  • Lindblom-Ylänne, Sari, Keith Trigwell, Anne Nevgi, and Paul Ashwin. 2006. How approaches to teaching are affected by discipline and teaching context. Studies in Higher Education 31, no. 03: 285–298. doi:10.1080/03075070600680539.
  • Lunn, Stephanie, and Monique Ross. 2021. Methodology matters: Employing phenomenography to investigate experiences in computing fields and the application of theoretical frameworks. 2021 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE).
  • Martin, Elaine, Michael Prosser, Keith Trigwell, Paul Ramsden, and Joan Benjamin. 2002. What university teachers teach and how they teach it. In Teacher thinking, beliefs and knowledge in higher education, edited by Nira Hativa and Peter Goodyear, 103–126. Dordrecht: Springer.
  • Martin, Florence, Ting Sun, and Carl D. Westine. 2020. A systematic review of research on online teaching and learning from 2009 to 2018. Computers & Education 159: 104009. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104009.
  • Marton, Ference. 1981. Phenomenography - Describing Conceptions of the World around us. Instructional Science 10: 177–200.
  • Marton, Ference, and Shirley Booth. 2013. Learning and awareness. Routledge.
  • Matthew, Robert G.S., and Jane Pritchard. 2010. Hard and soft–a useful way of thinking about disciplines? Reflections from engineering education on disciplinary identities. In The university and its disciplines, edited by Carolin Kreber, 82–92. New York: Routledge.
  • Mitcham, Carl. 1994. Thinking through technology: The path between engineering and philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Osberg, Deborah, and Gert Biesta. 2021. Beyond curriculum: Groundwork for a non-instrumental theory of education. Educational Philosophy and Theory 53, no. 1: 57–70.
  • Pang, Ming Fai, and Wing Wah Ki. 2016. Revisiting the Idea of “Critical Aspects”. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 60, no. 3: 323–336.
  • Phillips, Perry, John Wells, Philip Ice, Reagan Curtis, and Rachel Kennedy. 2008. A case study of the relationship between socio-epistemological teaching orientations and instructor perceptions of pedagogy in online environments. Electronic Journal for the Integration of Technology in Education 6, no. 1: 3–27.
  • Postareff, Liisa, Nina Katajavuori, Sari Lindblom-Ylänne, and Keith Trigwell. 2008. Consonance and dissonance in descriptions of teaching of university teachers. Studies in Higher Education 33, no. 1: 49–61. doi:10.1080/03075070701794809.
  • Prosser, Michael, Elaine Martin, Keith Trigwell, Paul Ramsden, and Gillian Lueckenhausen. 2005. Academics’ experiences of understanding of their subject matter and the relationship of this to their experiences of teaching and learning. Instructional Science 33, no. 2: 137–157. doi:10.1007/s11251-004-7687-x.
  • Rasheed, Rasheed Abubakar, Amirrudin Kamsin, and Nor Aniza Abdullah. 2020. Challenges in the online component of blended learning: A systematic review. Computers & Education 144: 103701. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103701.
  • Ross, Jen, Christine Sinclair, Jeremy Knox, Siân Bayne, and Hamish Macleod. 2014. Teacher experiences and academic identity: The missing components of MOOC pedagogy. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching 10, no. 1: 57–69.
  • Rovio-Johansson, Airi, and Åke Ingerman. 2016. Continuity and development in the phenomenography and variation theory tradition. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 60, no. 3: 257–271.
  • Sadler, Ian. 2012. The challenges for new academics in adopting student-centred approaches to teaching. Studies in Higher Education 37, no. 6: 731–745. doi:10.1080/03075079.2010.543968.
  • Selwyn, Neil. 2010. Looking beyond learning: Notes towards the critical study of educational technology. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 26, no. 1: 65–73.
  • Swedish Research Council. 2017. Good research practice. Stockholm.
  • Tondeur, Jo, Johan Van Braak, Peggy A Ertmer, and Anne Ottenbreit-Leftwich. 2017. Understanding the relationship between teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and technology use in education: A systematic review of qualitative evidence. Educational Technology Research and Development 65, no. 3: 555–575. doi:10.1007/s11423-016-9481-2.
  • Trigwell, Keith. 2006. Phenomenography: An approach to research into geography education. Journal of Geography in Higher Education 30, no. 2: 367–372. doi:10.1080/03098260600717489.
  • Watson, Jessica Herring, and Amanda Rockinson-Szapkiw. 2021. Predicting preservice teachers’ intention to use technology-enabled learning. Computers & Education 168: 104207. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104207.