59
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Initial teacher education seminars and minority ethnic students: exploring dialogic teaching and engagement

ORCID Icon
Received 05 Aug 2023, Accepted 26 Apr 2024, Published online: 15 Jun 2024

References

  • Ajjawi, R., K. Gravett, and S. O’Shea. 2023. The politics of student belonging: Identity and purpose. Teaching in Higher Education 1–14. doi:10.1080/13562517.2023.2280261.
  • Alexander, R.J. 2017. Towards dialogic teaching: Re-thinking classroom talk. 5th ed. York: Dialogos.
  • Appleton, J., S. Christenson, D. Kim, and A. Reschly. 2006. Measuring cognitive and psychological engagement: Validation of the student engagement instrument. Journal of School Psychology 44, no. 5: 427–45. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2006.04.002.
  • Baptiste, H.P., and J.H. Writer, eds. 2021. Visioning multicultural education: Past, present, future. London: Routledge.
  • Barnes, D. 1976. From communication to curriculum. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
  • Barnes, D. 2010. Why talk is important. English Teaching: Practice and Critique 9, no. 2: 7–10.
  • Basturkmen, H. 2016. Dialogic interaction. In The Routledge handbook of English for academic purposes, eds. K. Hyland, and P. Shaw, 152–64. London: Routledge.
  • Baumfield, V., E. Hall, and K. Wall. 2013. Action research in education: Learning through practitioner enquiry. 2nd ed. London: Sage.
  • BERA. 2018. Ethical guidelines for educational research. 4th ed. https://www.bera.ac.uk/researchers-resources/publications/ethical-guidelines-for-educational-research-2018
  • Berger, R. 2015. Now I see it, now I don’t: researcher’s position and reflexivity in qualitative research. Qualitative Research 15, no. 2: 219–34. doi: 10.1177/1468794112468475
  • Bond, B. 2020. Making language visible in the university: English for academic purposes and internationalisation. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
  • Bovill, C. 2020. Co-creating learning and teaching: Towards relational pedagogy in higher education. St Albans: Critical Publishing.
  • Boyd, M.P., and W.C. Markarian. 2011. Dialogic teaching: Talk in service of dialogic stance. Language and Education 25, no. 6: 515–34. doi:10.1080/09500782.2011.597861.
  • Bradbury, H. 2015. The SAGE handbook of action research. 3rd ed. London: SAGE Publications.
  • Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3, no. 2: 77–101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  • Callender, C. 2020. Black teachers, white education spaces: Troubling school practices of othering and surveillance. British Educational Research Journal 46, no. 5: 1081–98. doi:10.1002/berj.3614.
  • Coates, H. 2005. The value of student engagement for higher education quality assurance. Quality in Higher Education 11, no. 1: 25–36. doi:10.1080/13538320500074915.
  • Cushing, I. 2023. “Miss, can you speak English?”: Raciolinguistic ideologies and language oppression in initial teacher education. British Journal of Sociology of Education 44, no. 5: 896–911. doi:10.1080/01425692.2023.2206006.
  • Cushing, I., and J. Snell. 2023. The (white) ears of Ofsted: A raciolinguistic perspective on the listening practices of the schools inspectorate. Language in Society 52, no. 3: 363–86. doi:10.1017/S0047404522000094.
  • Demie, F. 2019. Educational inequality: Closing the gap. London: UCL Institute of Education Press.
  • Demie, F., and B.H. See. 2023. Ethnic disproportionality in the school teaching workforce in England. Equity in Education and Society 2, no. 1: 3–27. doi:10.1177/27526461221134291.
  • DfE. 2022. Initial teacher training census academic year 2022/23. https://explore-education-statistics.service.gov.uk/find-statistics/initial-teacher-training-census/2022-23.
  • DfE. 2023. School workforce in England, reporting year 2022. https://explore-education-statistics.service.gov.uk/find-statistics/school-workforce-in-england.
  • Engin, M. 2017. Contributions and silence in academic talk: Exploring learner experiences of dialogic interaction. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction 12: 78–86. doi:10.1016/j.lcsi.2016.11.001.
  • Fredricks, J.A., P. Blumenfeld, and A. Paris. 2004. School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research 74: 59–109. doi: 10.3102/00346543074001059
  • Freire, P. 1982. Creating alternative research methods: Learning to do it by doing it. In Creating knowledge: A monopoly? Participatory research in development, edited by B. Hall, A. Gillette, and R. Tandon, 29–37. New Delhi: Society for Participatory Research in Asia.
  • Goodman, S.B., K.B. Murphy, and M.L. D’Andrea. 2014. Discussion dilemmas: An analysis of beliefs and ideals in the undergraduate seminar. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 27, no. 1: 1–22. doi:10.1080/09518398.2012.731529.
  • Gorard, S., W. Chen, Y. Tan, C. Gazmuri, B.H. See, A. Tereshchenko, F. Demie, and N. Siddiqui. 2023. The disproportionality of ethnic minority teachers in England: Trends, patterns, and problems. Routledge Open Research 2, no. 13: 1–20. doi:10.12688/routledgeopenres.17798.2.
  • Gourlay, L. 2015. ‘Student engagement’ and the tyranny of participation. Teaching in Higher Education 20, no. 4: 402–11. doi:10.1080/13562517.2015.1020784.
  • Gravett, K. 2019. Making learning happen: Students’ development of academic and information literacies. In Engaging student voices in higher education: Diverse perspectives and expectations in partnership, edited by S. Lygo-Baker, I. M. Kinchin, and N. E. Winstone, 297–313. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Gravett, K., C.A. Taylor, and N. Fairchild. 2021. Pedagogies of mattering: Re-conceptualising relational pedagogies in higher education. Teaching in Higher Education 29, no. 2: 388–403. doi:10.1080/13562517.2021.1989580.
  • Gravett, K., and N.E. Winstone. 2022. Making connections: Alienation and authenticity within students’ relationships in higher education. Higher Education Research and Development 41, no. 2: 360–74. doi:10.1080/07294360.2020.1842335.
  • Hammond, J., and P. Gibbons. 2005. Putting scaffolding to work: The contribution of scaffolding in articulating ESL education. Prospect 20, no. 1: 6–30.
  • Haque, Z., and S. Elliot. 2018. Visible and invisible barriers: The impact of racism on BME teachers. https://neu.org.uk/sites/default/files/2023-02/Barriers%20Report.pdf.
  • Hardman, J. 2016. Tutor-student interaction in seminar teaching: Implications for professional development. Active Learning in Higher Education 17, no. 1: 63–76. doi:10.1177/1469787415616728.
  • Hardman, J. 2019. Developing and supporting the implementation of a dialogic pedagogy in primary schools in England. Teaching and Teacher Education 86: 1–14. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2019.102908.
  • Hardman, J. 2021. Pedagogical renewal: promoting a dialogic pedagogy in the internationalised 21st-century higher education. In Meaningful teaching interaction at the internationalised university: Moving from research to impact, eds. D. Dippold, and M. Heron, 25–38. London: Routledge.
  • Heron, M. 2019. Pedagogic practices to support international students in seminar discussion. Higher Education Research and Development 38, no. 2: 266–79. doi:10.1080/07294360.2018.1512954.
  • Heron, M., S. Baker, K. Gravett, and E. Irwin. 2023. Scoping academic Oracy in higher education: Knotting together forgotten connections to equity and academic literacies. Higher Education Research and Development 42, no. 1: 62–77. doi:10.1080/07294360.2022.2048635.
  • Herreid, C.F. 2011. Case study teaching. New Directions for Teaching and Learning 2011: 31–40. doi:10.1002/tl.466.
  • Holliday, A. 2016. Doing and writing qualitative research. 3rd ed. London: Sage.
  • Howe, C., and M. Abedin. 2013. Classroom dialogue: a systematic review across four decades of research. Cambridge Journal of Education 43: 325–56. doi:10.1080/0305764X.2013.786024.
  • Jackson, C. 2018. Affective dimensions of learning. In Contemporary theories of learning: Learning theorists … in their own words, ed. K. Illeris, 139–51. London: Routledge.
  • Kahu, E.R., and K. Nelson. 2018. Student engagement in the educational interface: understanding the mechanisms of student success. Higher Education Research & Development 37, no. 1: 58–71. doi:10.1080/07294360.2017.1344197.
  • Karas, M. 2017. Turn-taking and silent learning during open class discussions. ELT Journal 71, no. 1: 13–23. doi:10.1093/elt/ccw051.
  • Kember, D., A. Ho, and C. Hong. 2010. Characterising a teaching and learning environment capable of motivating student learning. Learning Environments Research 13, no. 1: 43–57. doi:10.1007/s10984-009-9065-8.
  • Krause, K., and H. Coates. 2008. Students’ engagement in first-year university. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 33, no. 5: 493–505. doi:10.1080/02602930701698892.
  • Kuh, G.D., J. Kinzie, J.H. Schuh, and E.J. Whitt. 2010. Student success in college: Creating conditions that matter. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Lefstein, A. 2010. More helpful as problem than solution: some implications of situating dialogue in classrooms. In Educational dialogues: Understanding and promoting productive interaction, edited by K. Littleton, and C. Howe, 170–91. London: Routledge.
  • Mann, S.J. 2001. Alternative perspectives on the student experience: Alienation and engagement. Studies in Higher Education 26, no. 1: 7–19. doi:10.1080/03075070020030689.
  • Marton, F., D. Hounsell, and N. Entwistle, eds. 2005. The experience of learning: Implications for teaching and studying in higher education. 3rd ed. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh, Centre for Teaching, Learning and Assessment.
  • Maunder, R. 2018. Students’ peer relationships and their contribution to university adjustment: The need to belong in the university community. Journal of Further and Higher Education 42, no. 6: 756–68. doi:10.1080/0309877X.2017.1311996.
  • McAlpine, L. 2004. Designing learning as well as teaching: A research-based model for interaction that emphasises learner practice. Active Learning in Higher Education 5, no. 2: 119–34. doi:10.1177/146978740404380.
  • McArthur, J. 2021. The inclusive university: A critical theory perspective using a recognition-based approach. Social Inclusion 9, no. 3: 6–15. doi:10.17645/si.v9i3.4122.
  • Mercer, N. 2019. Language and the joint creation of knowledge: The selected works of Neil Mercer. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
  • Mercer, N., and L. Dawes. 2014. The study of talk between teachers and students, from the 1970s until the 2010s. Oxford Review of Education 40: 430–45. doi:10.1080/03054985.2014.934087.
  • Michaels, S., C. O’Connor, and L.B. Resnick. 2008. Deliberative discourse idealized and realized: Accountable talk in the classroom and in civic life. Studies in Philosophy and Education 27, no. 4: 283–97. doi:10.1007/s11217-007-9071-1.
  • Murray, N., and T. McConachy. 2018. “Participation” in the internationalised higher education classroom: An academic staff perspective. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication 11, no. 3: 254–70. doi:10.1080/17513057.2018.1459789.
  • Nelson Laird, T., R. Shoup, G. Kuh, and M. Schwarz. 2008. The effects of discipline on deep approaches to student learning and college outcomes. Research in Higher Education 49: 469–94. doi: 10.1007/s11162-008-9088-5
  • Northedge, A. 2003a. Rethinking teaching in the context of diversity. Teaching in Higher Education 8, no. 1: 17–32. doi:10.1080/1356251032000052302.
  • Northedge, A. 2003b. Enabling participation in academic discourse.. Teaching in Higher Education 8, no. 2: 169–80. doi:10.1080/1356251032000052429.
  • Ogden, J., and J. Lo. 2011. How meaningful are data from Likert scales? An evaluation of how ratings are made and the role of the response shift in the socially disadvantaged. Journal of Health Psychology 17, no. 3: 350–61. doi:10.1177/1359105311417192.
  • Pearson. 2021. Crunching the numbers: The state of student data in higher education a report on how student engagement data can actively support their success. https://go.pardot.com/l/518251/2021-10-26/th4t6v/518251/1635246297mFrOo5cA/Crunching_the_Numbers_final.pdf.
  • Pekrun, R. 1992. The impact of emotions on learning and achievement: Towards a theory of cognitive/motivational mediators. Applied Psychology: An International Review 41, no. 4: 359–76. doi:10.1111/j.1464-0597.1992.tb00712.x.
  • Pekrun, R., and L. Linnenbrink-Garcia, eds. 2014. International handbook of emotions in education. London: Routledge.
  • Penn, M.L., C.S.M. Currie, K.A. Hoad, and F.A. O’Brien. 2016. The use of case studies in OR teaching. Higher Education Pedagogies 1, no. 1: 16–25. doi:10.1080/23752696.2015.1134201.
  • Prosser, M., P. Ramsden, K. Trigwell, and E. Martin. 2003. Dissonance in experience of teaching and its relation to the quality of student learning. Studies in Higher Education 28, no. 1: 37–48. doi:10.1080/03075070309299.
  • Punch, K. and A. Oancea. 2014. Introduction to research methods in education. London: Sage Publications.
  • Remedios, L., D. Clarke, and L. Hawthorne. 2008. The silent participant in small group collaborative learning contexts. Active Learning in Higher Education 9, no. 3: 201–16. doi:10.1177/1469787408095846.
  • Schleppegrell, M.J. 2013. The role of metalanguage in supporting academic language development. Language Learning 63, no. Supplement 1: 153–70. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00742.x.
  • Shor, I. and P. Freire. 1987. A pedagogy for liberation: Dialogues on transforming education. Westport: Bergin and Garvey.
  • Simpson, A. 2016. Dialogic teaching in the initial teacher education classroom: “Everyone's voice will be heard. Research Papers in Education 31, no. 1: 89–106. doi:10.1080/02671522.2016.1106697.
  • Skidmore, D., and K. Murakami. 2012. Claiming our own space: polyphony in teacher–student dialogue. Linguistics and Education 23, no. 2: 200–10. doi:10.1016/j.linged.2012.02.003.
  • Teo, P. 2016. Exploring the dialogic space in teaching: A study of teacher talk in the Pre-university classroom in Singapore. Teaching and Teacher Education 56: 47–60. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2016.01.019.
  • Teo, P. 2019. Teaching for the 21st century: A case for dialogic pedagogy. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction 21: 170–8. doi:10.1016/J.LCSI.2019.03.009.
  • Trowler, V., and P. Trowler. 2010. Student engagement evidence summary. York, UK: The Higher Education Academy.
  • UNESCO. 2021. Reimagining our futures together: A new social contract for education. Report from the International Commission on the Futures of Education. https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/reimagining-our-futures-together-new-social-contract-education.
  • Vygotsky, L.S. 1962. Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Warner, D. 2022. Black and minority ethnic student teachers’ stories as empirical documents of hidden oppression: Using the personal to turn towards the structural. British Educational Research Journal 48, no. 6: 1145–60. doi:10.1002/berj.3819.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.