Five methodological dilemmas when implementing an activity theory transformative intervention in higher education

References

• Airaj, M. 2024. Ethical artificial intelligence for teaching-learning in higher education. Education and Information Technologies 1–23. doi:10.1007/s10639-024-12545-x.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Naabi, I. 2023. Exploring Moodle usage in higher education in the post-pandemic era: An activity-theoretical investigation of systemic contradictions. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research 22, no. 10: 190–208. doi:10.26803/ijlter.22.10.11.
   Google Scholar
• Berg, D.A.G., A.C. Gunn, M.F. Hill, and M. Haigh. 2016. Research in the work of New Zealand teacher educators: A cultural-historical activity theory perspective. Higher Education Research & Development 35, no. 6: 1125–1138. doi:10.1080/07294360.2016.1149694.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackler, F. 2009. Cultural-historical activity theory and organization studies. In Learning and expanding with activity theory, eds. Annalisa Sannino, Harry Daniels, and Kris D Gutiérrez, 19–39. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bligh, B., and M. Flood. 2015. The change laboratory in higher education: research-intervention using activity theory. In Theory and method in higher education research, eds. Jeroen Huisman, and Malcolm Tight, 141–168. Bingley: Emerald.
   Google Scholar
• Bligh, B., and M. Flood. 2017. Activity theory in empirical higher education research: choices, uses and values. Tertiary Education and Management 23, no. 2: 125–152. doi:10.1080/13583883.2017.1284258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blin, F., and M. Munro. 2008. Why hasn’t technology disrupted academics’ teaching practices? understanding resistance to change through the lens of activity theory. Computers & Education 50, no. 2008: 475–490. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2007.09.017.
   Google Scholar
• Cliff, A., S. Walji, R.J. Mogliacci, N. Morris, and M. Ivancheva. 2022. Unbundling and higher education curriculum: a cultural-historical activity theory view of process. Teaching in Higher Education 27, no. 2: 217–232. doi:10.1080/13562517.2019.1711050.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colasante, M. 2021. Co-constructing digital teaching practice in higher education: An activity theory perspective. Unpublished PhD thesis, Deakin University.
   Google Scholar
• Colasante, M. 2022. Not drowning, waving: The role of video in a renewed digital learning world. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 38, no. 4: 176–189. doi:10.14742/ajet.7915.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colasante, M. Manuscript in preparation. Examining agentic actions: university teachers as a community of learners during systemic digital change.
   Google Scholar
• Coles, R., and P. Thomson. 2016. Beyond records and representations: inbetween writing in educational ethnography. Ethnography and Education 11, no. 3: 253–266. doi:10.1080/17457823.2015.1085324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. 1987/2015. Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research,2 ed). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. 1999a. Communication, discourse and activity. The Communication Review 3, no. 1-2: 165–185. doi:10.1080/10714429909368577.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. 1999b. Expansive visibilization of work: An activity-theoretical perspective. Computer Supported Cooperative Work 8: 63–93. doi:10.1023/A:1008648532192.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. 2000. Activity theory as a framework for analyzing and redesigning work. Ergonomics 43, no. 7: 960–974.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. 2001. Expansive learning at work: toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work 14, no. 1: 133–156. doi:10.1080/13639080020028747.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. 2004. New forms of learning in co-configuration work. Journal of Workplace Learning 16, no. 1/2: 11–21. doi:10.1108/13665620410521477.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. 2009. The future of activity theory: A rough draft. In In learning and expanding with activity theory, eds. A Sannino, Harry Daniels, and Kris D Gutiérrez, 303–328. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. 2011. From design experiments to formative interventions. Theory & Psychology 21, no. 5: 598–628. doi:10.1177/0959354311419252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. 2016. Foreword: making use of activity theory in educational research. In Activity theory in education: research and practice, vii-ix, eds. Dilani S. P Gedera, and P. John Williams. Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y., and F. Blackler. 2005. On the life of the object. Organization 12, no. 3: 307–330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y., and V. Glăveanu. 2012. On third generation activity theory: interview with Yrjö Engeström. Europe's Journal of Psychology 8, no. 4: 515–518. doi:10.5964/ejop.v8i4.555.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y., J. Nuttall, and N. Hopwood. 2022. Transformative agency by double stimulation: advances in theory and methodology. Pedagogy, Culture & Society 30, no. 1: 1–7. doi:10.1080/14681366.2020.1805499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y., and A. Sannino. 2010. Studies of expansive learning: foundations, findings and future challenges. Educational Research Review 5: 1–24. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2009.12.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y., and A. Sannino. 2011. Discursive manifestations of contradictions in organizational change efforts: A methodological framework. Journal of Organizational Change Management 24, no. 3: 368–387. doi:10.1108/09534811111132758.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y., and A. Sannino. 2012. Concept formation in the wild. Mind, Culture, and Activity 19, no. 3: 201–206. doi:10.1080/10749039.2012.690813.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y., and A. Sannino. 2021. From mediated actions to heterogenous coalitions: four generations of activity-theoretical studies of work and learning. Mind, Culture, and Activity 28, no. 1: 4–23. doi:10.1080/10749039.2020.1806328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y., J. Virkkunen, M. Helle, J. Pihlaja, and R. Poikela. 1996. The change laboratory as a tool for transforming work. Lifelong Learning in Europe 1, no. 2: 10–17.
   Google Scholar
• Englund, C. 2018. Exploring interdisciplinary academic development: The change laboratory as an approach to team-based practice. Higher Education Research & Development 37, no. 4: 698–714. doi:10.1080/07294360.2018.1441809.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foot, K.A. 2002. Pursuing an evolving object: A case study in object formation and identification. Mind, Culture, and Activity 9, no. 2: 132–149. doi:10.1207/S15327884MCA0902_04.
   Google Scholar
• Gale, T., R. Cross, and C. Mills. 2020. Researching teacher practice: social justice dispositions revealed in activity. In Practice methodologies in education research, edited by Julianne Lynch, Julie Rowlands, Trevor Gale, and Stephen Parker, 48–62. Abingdon, OX: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Garraway, J., X. Cupido, H. Dippenaar, V. Mntuyedwa, N. Ndlovu, A. Pinto, and J. Purcell van Graan. 2023. The change laboratory as an approach to harnessing conversation for academic development. International Journal for Academic Development 28, no. 3: 362–377. doi:10.1080/1360144X.2021.2019039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gedera, D.S.P. 2016. The application of activity theory in identifying contradictions in a university blended learning course. In Activity theory in education: research and practice, eds. Dilani S. P Gedera, and P. John Williams, 53–69. Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, A. 2017. Using activity theory to inform sessional teacher development: what lessons can be learned from tutor training models? International Journal for Academic Development 22, no. 1: 56–69. doi:10.1080/1360144X.2016.1261358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardman, J. 2007. Making sense of the meaning maker: tracking the object of activity in a computer-based mathematics lesson using activity theory. International Journal of Education and Development Using Information and Communication Technology (IJEDICT) 3, no. 4: 110–130.
   Google Scholar
• Hopwood, N., K. Pointon, A. Dadich, K. Moraby, and C. Elliot. 2022. Forward anchoring in transformative agency: How parents of children with complex feeding difficulties transcend the status quo. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction 33: 100616. doi:10.1016/j.lcsi.2022.100616.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopwood, N., and A. Sannino. 2023. Motives, mediation and motion: towards an inherently learning- and development-orientated perspective on agency. In Agency and transformation, eds. Nick Hopwood, and Annalisa Sannino, 1–34. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hopwood, N., and C. Stocks. 2008. Teaching development for doctoral students: what can we learn from activity theory? International Journal for Academic Development 13, no. 3: 187–198. doi:10.1080/13601440802242358.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, L., and M. Webb. 2009. Integrating ICT to higher education in China: from the perspective of activity theory. Education and Information Technologies 14: 143–161. doi:10.1007/s10639-008-9084-6.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, A.Y., and L.A. Mazzei. 2018. Thinking with theory: A new analytic for qualitative inquiry. In The SAGE handbook of qualitative research, eds. Norman K Denzin, and Yvonna S Lincoln, 717–737. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Kaptelinin, V. 2005. The object of activity: making sense of the sense-maker. Mind, Culture, and Activity 12, no. 1: 4–18. doi:10.1207/s15327884mca1201_2.
   Google Scholar
• Karanasios, S. 2018. Toward a unified view of technology and activity: The contribution of activity theory to information systems research. Information, Technology & People 31, no. 1: 134–155. doi:10.1108/ITP-04-2016-0074.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, K., M. Fanguy, B. Bligh, and X.S. Lu. 2022. Adoption of online teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic analysis of changes in university teaching activity. Educational Review 74, no. 3: 460–483. doi:10.1080/00131911.2021.1978401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leont'ev, A.N. 1972. The problem of activity in psychology. Voprosy filosofii (Problems of Philosophy) 9: 95–108.
   Google Scholar
• Ludvigsen, S., and T.Ø. Digernes. 2009. Research leadership: productive research communities and the integration of research fellows. In Learning and expanding with activity theory, eds. Annalisa Sannino, Harry Daniels, and Kris D Gutiérrez, 240–254. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ludvigsen, S.R., I. Rasmussen, I. Krange, A. Moen, and D. Middleton. 2011. Intersecting trajectories of participation: temporality and learning. In Learning across aites: New tools, infrastructures and practices, eds. Sten R Ludvigsen, Andreas Lund, Ingvill Rasmussen, and Roger Säljö, 105–121. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lund, V., and H. Kerosuo. 2019. The reciprocal development of the object of common space and the emergence of the collective agency in residents’ workshops. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction 22: 100327. doi:10.1016/j.lcsi.2019.100327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Major, C.H., and M. Savin-Baden. 2011. Integration of qualitative evidence: towards construction of academic knowledge in social science and professional fields. Qualitative Research 11, no. 6: 645–663. doi:10.1177/1468794111413367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markham, A.N. 2018. Ethnography in the digital internet era: from fields to flows, descriptions to interventions. In The SAGE handbook of qualitative research, eds. Norman K Denzin, and Yvonna S Lincoln, 650–668. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Mathieson, S., K. Black, L. Allin, H. Hooper, R. Penlington, L. Mcinnes, L. Orme, and E. Anderson. 2023. New academics’ experiences of induction to teaching: using cultural historical activity theory (CHAT) to understand and improve induction experiences. International Journal for Academic Development, 1–15. doi:10.1080/1360144X.2023.2217799.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miettinen, R., S. Paavola, and P. Pohjola. 2012. From habituality to change: contribution of activity theory and pragmatism to practice theories. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 42, no. 3: 345–360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moffitt, P., and B. Bligh. 2021. Video and the pedagogy of expansive learning: insights from a researchintervention in engineering education. In Video pedagogy, eds. Dilani Gedera, and Arezou Zalipour, 123–145. Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Paul, A. 2017. Using cultural-historical activity theory to describe a university-wide blended learning initiative. Paper presented at the ASCILITE2017: 34th international conference on innovation, practice and research in the Use of educational technologies in tertiary education, Toowoomba, QLD.
   Google Scholar
• Postholm, M.B. 2015. Methodologies in cultural–historical activity theory: The example of school-based development. Educational Research 57, no. 1: 43–58. doi:10.1080/00131881.2014.983723.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell, D.R. 2009. Uses of activity theory in written communication research. In Learning and expanding with activity theory, eds. Annalisa Sannino, Harry Daniels, and Kris D Gutiérrez, 40–52. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sannino, A. 2011. Activity theory as an activist and interventionist theory. Theory & Psychology 21, no. 5: 571–597. doi:10.1177/0959354311417485.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sannino, A. 2015. The emergence of transformative agency and double stimulation. Learning, Culture, and Social Interaction 4: 1–3. doi:10.1016/j.lcsi.2014.07.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sannino, A. 2022. Transformative agency as warping: How collectives accomplish change amidst uncertainty. Pedagogy, Culture & Society 30, no. 1: 9–33. doi:10.1080/14681366.2020.1805493.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sannino, A., and Y. Engeström. 2018. Cultural-historical activity theory: founding insights and new challenges. Cultural-Historical Psychology 14, no. 3: 43–56. doi:10.17759/chp.2018140304.
   Google Scholar
• Schwandt, T.A. 1998. The landscape of qualitative research: theories and issues. In Constructivist, interpretivist approaches to human inquiry, eds. Norman K Denzin, and Yvonna S Lincoln, 221–259. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Scribner, S. 1985. “Vygotsky’s Uses of History.” In Culture, Communication, and Cognition: Vygotskian Perspectives, edited by J. V. Wertsch, 119–145. London: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spante, M., J. Garraway, C. Winberg, F. Nofemela, and T.P. Duma. 2023. Cultural historical activity theory as a tool for reimagining WIL: Conducting contradiction analysis workshops and the implications for Change Laboratory work. Bureau de Change Laboratory, Accessed February 2, 2024. https://bureaudechangelab.pubpub.org/pub/cultural-historical-activity-theory-as-a-tool-for-reimagining-wil/release/2.
   Google Scholar
• Spinuzzi, C. 2002. Toward integrating our research scope: A sociocultural field methodology. Journal of Business and Technical Communication 16, no. 1: 3–32. doi:10.1177/1050651902016001001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spinuzzi, C. 2007. Accessibility scans and institutional activity: An activity theory analysis. College English 70, no. 2: 189–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, J.R. 2009. The communicative construction of community: authority and organizing. In Learning and expanding with activity theory, eds. A Sannino, H Daniels, and K.D Gutiérrez, 228–239. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Virkkunen, J., and S. Newnham. 2013. The change laboratory: A tool for collaborative development of work and education. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Westberry, N., and M. Franken. 2015. Pedagogical distance: explaining misalignment in student-driven online learning activities using activity theory. Teaching in Higher Education 20, no. 3: 300–312. doi:10.1080/13562517.2014.1002393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamagata-Lynch, L.C. 2010. Activity systems analysis methods: understanding complex learning environments. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar