487
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Assessment as pedagogy: inviting authenticity through relationality, vulnerability and wonder

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Received 05 Feb 2024, Accepted 04 Jun 2024, Published online: 18 Jun 2024

References

  • Ahmed, S. 2003. Feminist futures. In A concise companion to feminist theory, 236–54. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. doi:10.1002/9780470756683.ch12.
  • Ahmed, S. 2014. The cultural politics of emotion, NED-New edition, 2. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.3366j.ctt1g09x4q.
  • Ajjawi, R., J. Tai, M. Dollinger, P. Dawson, D. Boud, and M. Bearman. 2023. From authentic assessment to authenticity in assessment: broadening perspectives. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 1–12. doi:10.1080/02602938.2023.2271193.
  • Amin, A., and N. Thrift. 2013. Arts of the political: New openings for the left. Duke University Press. doi:10.2307/j.ctv1220n4d.
  • Arao, B., and K. Clemens. 2023. From safe spaces to brave spaces. In The Art of effective facilitation, ed. Lisa M. Landreman, 1st ed., 135–50. New York: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003447580-11.
  • Birden, H.H., and T. Usherwood. 2013. ‘They liked it if you said You cried’: How medical students perceive the teaching of professionalism. Medical Journal of Australia 199, no. 6: 406–9. doi:10.5694/mja12.11827.
  • Boud, D., and M. Bearman. 2024. The assessment challenge of social and collaborative learning in higher education. Educational Philosophy and Theory 56, no. 5: 459–68. doi:10.1080/00131857.2022.2114346.
  • Burton, K. 2011. A framework for determining the authenticity of assessment tasks: Applied to an example in law. Journal of Learning Design 4, no. 2: 20–28.
  • Brantmeier, E.J. 2013. Pedagogy of vulnerability: definitions, assumptions, and applications. In Re-Envisioning higher education: embodied pathways to wisdom and social transformation, edited by Jing Lin, Rebecca L. Oxford, and Edward J. Brantmeier, 95–106. Charlotte, NC: Information age publishing.
  • Byrd, J.A. 2011. The transit of empire: Indigenous critiques of colonialism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Freire, P. 1993. Pedagogy of the oppressed / Paulo Freire. Trans. Myra Bergman Ramos. New rev. 20th-Anniversary ed. New York: Continuum.
  • Gravett, K., C.A. Taylor, and N. Fairchild. 2024. Pedagogies of mattering: Re-conceptualising relational pedagogies in higher education. Teaching in Higher Education 29, no. 2: 388–403. doi:10.1080/13562517.2021.1989580.
  • Harland, T. 2016. Deliberate subversion of time: Slow scholarship and learning through research. In Educating the deliberate professional: Preparing for future practices, eds. Franziska Trede, and Celina McEwen, 175–88. Professional and Practice-Based Learning. Cham: Springer International Publishing. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-32958-1_12.
  • Henderson, A., and F. Trede. 2017. Strengthening attainment of student learning outcomes during work-integrated learning: A collaborative governance framework across academia, industry and students. Asia-Pacific Journal of Cooperative Education 18, no. 1: 73–86.
  • Higgins, D., A. Dennis, A. Stoddard, A.G. Maier, and S. Howitt. 2019. ‘Power to empower’: Conceptions of teaching and learning in a pedagogical Co-design partnership. Higher Education Research & Development 38, no. 6: 1154–67. doi:10.1080/07294360.2019.1621270.
  • hooks, b. 2003. Teaching community: A pedagogy of hope. New York: Psychology Press.
  • hooks, b. 2009. Teaching critical thinking: Practical wisdom. New York: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203869192.
  • Inayatullah, N. 2022. Pedagogy as encounter: Beyond the teaching imperative. Abingdon, Oxon: Rowman & Littlefield.
  • Jenks, A.B. 2022. Access Is love: Equity-minded pandemic pedagogy. In Pandemic pedagogy: Teaching international relations amid COVID-19, ed. Andrew A. Szarejko, 141–55. Political Pedagogies. Cham: Springer International Publishing. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-83557-6_9.
  • Jopp, R. 2020. A case study of a technology enhanced learning initiative that supports authentic assessment. Teaching in Higher Education 25, no. 8: 942–58. doi:10.1080/13562517.2019.1613637.
  • Kiefer, M., and N.M. Trumpp. 2012. Embodiment theory and education: The foundations of cognition in perception and action. Trends in Neuroscience and Education 1, no. 1: 15–20. doi:10.1016/j.tine.2012.07.002.
  • Kim, M. 2023. Embrained, embodied values: pedagogical insights from developmental neuroscience. In Second international research handbook on values education and student wellbeing, eds. Terence Lovat, Ron Toomey, Neville Clement, and Kerry Dally, 175–89. Cham: Springer International Publishing. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-24420-9_9.
  • Koh, K.H. 2017. Authentic assessment. In Oxford research encyclopedia of education. doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.013.22.
  • Kohn, A., and S.D. Blum. 2020. Ungrading: Why rating students undermines learning (and what to do instead). Morgantown: West Virginia University Press. https://muse.jhu.edu/pub/20/edited_volume/book/78367.
  • Krystalli, R. 2023. Teaching and learning reflexivity in the world politics classroom. International Political Sociology 17, no. 4: olad018. doi:10.1093/ips/olad018.
  • Krystalli, R., S. Tripathi, and K. Hunfeld. 2023. Making friends with uncertainty: Hopeful futurities in telling stories about global politics. In Uncertainty in global politics, edited by Anastasia Shesterinina and Miriam Matejova, 252–69. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
  • Maloney, S., J. Hong-Meng Tai, K. Lo, E. Molloy, and D. Ilic. 2013. Honesty in critically reflective essays: An analysis of student practice. Advances in Health Sciences Education 18, no. 4: 617–26. doi:10.1007/s10459-012-9399-3.
  • Mangione, D., and L. Norton. 2023. Problematising the notion of ‘The excellent teacher’: Daring to be vulnerable in higher education. Teaching in Higher Education 28, no. 2: 373–88. doi:10.1080/13562517.2020.1812565.
  • Mann, B. 2018. Feminist phenomenology and the politics of wonder. AVANT. The Journal of the Philosophical-Interdisciplinary Vanguard 9, no. 2: 43–61. doi:10.26913/avant.2018.02.03.
  • Mastro, O.S. 2021. Teach what You preach: A comprehensive guide to the policy memo as a methods teaching tool. Journal of Political Science Education 17, no. sup1: 326–40. doi:10.1080/15512169.2020.1865990.
  • Motta, S.C., and A. Bennett. 2018. Pedagogies of care, care-full epistemological practice and ‘other’ caring subjectivities in enabling education. Teaching in Higher Education 23, no. 5: 631–46. doi:10.1080/13562517.2018.1465911.
  • Nieminen, J.H. 2022. Assessment for inclusion: rethinking inclusive assessment in higher education. Teaching in Higher Education, 1–19. doi:10.1080/13562517.2021.2021395.
  • Nieminen, J.H., and J. Lahdenperä. 2021. Assessment and epistemic (in)justice: How assessment produces knowledge and knowers. Teaching in Higher Education, 1–18. doi:10.1080/13562517.2021.1973413.
  • Pallant, J.I., J.L. Pallant, and R. Jopp. 2022. The case for scaling authentic learning across undergraduate and postgraduate research skills courses. Teaching in Higher Education, 1–18. doi:10.1080/13562517.2022.2066468.
  • Ramos, F., and L. Roberts. 2021. Wonder as feminist pedagogy: Disrupting feminist complicity with coloniality. Feminist Review 1, no. July: 28–43. doi:10.1177/01417789211013702.
  • Sambell, K., S. Brown, and P. Race. 2019. Assessment as a locus for engagement: Priorities and practicalities. Italian Journal of Educational Research, June, 45–62.
  • Schick, K. 2018. ‘The tree Is really rooted in the sky’: Beside difficulty in Gillian Rose’s political theory. In Misrecognitions: Gillian Rose and the task of political theology, edited by Joshua B Davis, 87–106. Eugene Oregon: Cascade Books.
  • Schick, K. 2020. Pedagogical micro-communities: Sites of relationality, sites of transformation. In Pedagogical journeys through world politics, ed. Jamie Frueh, 27–39. Political Pedagogies. Cham: Springer International Publishing. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-20305-4_3.
  • Schick, K. 2021. Uncertain pedagogies: cultivating micro-communities of learning. In Subversive pedagogies: Radical possibility in the academy, eds. Kate Schick, and Claire Timperley, 92–107. Milton, UNITED KINGDOM: Taylor & Francis Group. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/vuw/detail.action?docID=6784064.
  • Schick, K., and C. Timperley, eds. 2022. Subversive pedagogies: Radical possibility in the academy. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/edit/10.43249781003217183/subversive-pedagogies-kate-schick-claire-timperley.
  • Shapiro, S.B. 1999. Pedagogy and the politics of the body a critical praxis. garland reference library of social science ; v. 1153. critical education practice ; v. 16. New York: Garland Pub.
  • Shilliam, R. 2015. The black pacific : Anti-colonial struggles and oceanic connections. Bloomsbury Academic. doi:10.5040/9781474218788.
  • Simpson, L.B. 2014. Land as pedagogy: Nishnaabeg intelligence and rebellious transformation. Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society 3, no. 3: 1–25. https://jps.library.utoronto.ca/index.php/des/article/view/22170.
  • Straumsheim, C. 2017. “‘Access moves’: How one instructor seeks accessibility.” Inside Higher Ed. 2017. https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2017/03/07/how-one-instructor-pursuing-accessibility-online-education.
  • Timperley, C. 2021. ‘To read what was never written’: Embracing embodied pedagogies. In Subversive pedagogies: Radical possibility in the academy, eds. Claire Timperley, and Kate Schick, 108–26. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003217183.
  • Timperley, C. 2024. ‘Be here now’: Feminist futures as present. Feminist Review 136, no. 1: 26–42. doi:10.1177/01417789231221130.
  • Timperley, C., and K. Schick. 2022. Hiding in plain sight: Pedagogy and power. International Studies Perspectives 23, no. 2: 113–28. doi:10.1093/isp/ekab002.
  • Villarroel, V., D. Boud, S. Bloxham, D. Bruna, and C. Bruna. 2020. Using principles of authentic assessment to redesign written examinations and tests. Innovations in Education and Teaching International 57, no. 1: 38–49. doi:10.1080/14703297.2018.1564882.
  • Vu, T.T., and G. Dall’Alba. 2014. Authentic assessment for student learning: An ontological conceptualisation. Educational Philosophy and Theory 46, no. 7: 778–91. doi:10.1080/00131857.2013.795110.
  • Young, I.M. 1997. Feminism and the public sphere. Constellations 3, no. 3: 340–63. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8675.1997.tb00064.x.
  • Zembylas, M. 2022. Revisiting the notion of critical thinking in higher education: Theorizing the thinking-feeling entanglement using affect theory. Teaching in Higher Education, 1–15. doi:10.1080/13562517.2022.2078961.