Why we need a cyberfeminist perspective for quality online higher education

References

• Agud, I., M. Amat, M. Bertran, A. Caravaca, C. Chamorro, J. Empain, C. Flores, et al. 2020. Perspectiva de Gènere En l’educació. Marc Conceptual. Barcelona: Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona.
   Google Scholar
• Amnesty International. 2018. Toxic Twitter—a toxic place for women. 2018. Accessed February 15, 2024. https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/research/2018/03/online-violence-against-women-chapter-1-1/.
   Google Scholar
• Anagnostou, D. 2022. EU policy and gender mainstreaming in research and higher education: How well does it travel from North to South? In Overcoming the challenge of structural change in research organisations. A reflexive approach to gender equality, eds. Angela Wroblewski, and Rachel Palmén, 73–89. Emerald Publishing Limited. doi:10.1108/978-1-80262-119-820221005.
   Google Scholar
• ART + FEMINISM. 2020. Safe, brave space policy. Art and feminism. Art and Feminism (blog). https://artandfeminism.org/resources/safety/safe-space-brave-space/.
   Google Scholar
• Atkins, M. 2021. Increasing inclusivity and social justice in the post-secondary system through universal design. Canada: Adler University. Accessed February 15, 2024. https://acortar.link/eSX7Jf.
   Google Scholar
• Backe, E.L., P. Lilleston, and J. McCleary-Sills. 2018. Networked individuals, gendered violence: A literature review of cyberviolence. Violence and Gender 5, no. 3: 135–46. doi:10.1089/vio.2017.0056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benade, L. 2019. Flexible learning spaces: inclusive by design?’. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies 54, no. 1: 53–68. doi:10.1007/s40841-019-00127-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benítez-Eyzaguirre, L. 2019. Ciberfeminismo y apropiación tecnológica en América Latina. Virtualis 10, no. 18: 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Benito, E., and T. Verge. 2020. Gendering higher education quality assurance: a matter of (e)quality. Quality in Higher Education 26, no. 3: 355–70. doi:10.1080/13538322.2020.1769268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benton, D. 2022. Universal Design for Learning (UDL) for inclusion, diversity, equity, and accessibility (IDEA). Ontario: eCampus Ontario. https://ecampusontario.pressbooks.pub/universaldesignvls/.
   Google Scholar
• Bergermann, U. 1998. Pulse X (manifiesto no372). In Ciberfeminismo: de VNS Matrix a Laboria Cuboniks, ed. R. Zafra and T. López, 67–70. Barcelona: Holobonte Ediciones.
   Google Scholar
• Bianchi, F., P. Kalluri, E. Durmus, F. Ladhak, M. Cheng, D. Nozza, T. Hashimoto, D. Jurafsky, et al. 2023. Easily accessible text-to-image generation amplifies demographic stereotypes at large scale. In 2023 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 1493–1504. doi:10.1145/3593013.3594095.
   Google Scholar
• Chapman, L.A., and A.M. Jackson. 2021. Accessibility matters: universal design and the online professional practice doctorate. Impacting Education: Journal on Transforming Professional Practice 6, no. 3: 1–6. doi:10.5195/ie.2021.184.
   Google Scholar
• Chick, N., and H. Hassel. 2009. ‘Don’t Hate me Because I'm Virtual’: Feminist pedagogy in the online classroom. Feminist Teacher 19, no. 3: 195–215. doi:10.1353/ftr.0.0049.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, P.H. 2001. Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Coll-Planas, G., M. Rodó-Zárate, and G. García-Romeral. 2021. Miradas Poliédricas. Guía Para La Aplicación de La Interseccionalidad En La Prevención de Violencias de Género Con Jóvenes. Vic: Universitat de Vic, Universitat Central de Catalunya y Universitat Oberta de Catalunya.
   Google Scholar
• Cone, L., K. Brøgger, M. Berghmans, M. Decuypere, A. Förschler, E. Grimaldi, S. Hartong, et al. 2022. Pandemic acceleration: COVID-19 and the emergency digitalization of European education. European Educational Research Journal 21, no. 5: 845–68. doi:10.1177/14749041211041793.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Consortium for Benchmarking Framework and Data Set for Online, Open, Smart, and Technology-Enhanced Higher Education. 2024. Benchmarking framework for online, open, smart, and technology-enhanced higher education. https://benchmarking.hbmsu.ac.ae/.
   Google Scholar
• Costanza-Chock, S. 2020. Design justice: community-led practices to build the worlds We need. London: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cothren Cook, S., and K. Rao. 2018. Systematically applying UDL to effective practices for students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly 41, no. 3: 179–91. doi:10.1177/0731948717749936.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czerniewicz, L., R. Mogliacci, S. Walji, A. Cliff, B. Swinnerton, and N. Morris. 2023. Academics teaching and learning at the nexus: Unbundling, marketisation and digitisation in higher education. Teaching in Higher Education 28, no. 6: 1295–309. doi:10.1080/13562517.2021.1876019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deller, R. 2019. Safer spaces. In Handbook of radical politics, eds. R. Kinna, and U. Gordon, 222–39. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Donoso, T., S. Estradé, and N. Vergés. 2022. Brecha digital de género. Fundación Carolina. doi:10.33960/issn-e.1885-9119.DT70.
   Google Scholar
• Eynon, R. 2018. Feminist perspectives on learning, media and technology: recognition and future contributions. Learning, Media and Technology 43, no. 1: 1–2. doi:10.1080/17439884.2018.1442848.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández, M., and F. Wilding. 2002. Situar los ciberfeminismos. In Ciberfeminismo: de VNS Matrix a Laboria Cuboniks, ed. R. Zafra and T. López, 305–318. Barcelona: Holobonte Ediciones.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrari, V., P. Martins, and P. Peña. 2023. A framework for devolping gender-reponsive cybersegurity policy: Assessment tool. Association for Progressive Communications (APC). Accessed February 15, 2024. https://acortar.link/jNuIaT.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia, I., and M.A. Conejo. 2021. Dòcencia en línia amb perspectiva de gènere. Guies per a una docència universitària amb perspectiva de gènere. Xarxa Vives d’universitats.
   Google Scholar
• García Andrés, A., F.G. Minotre, and S.J. Mata. 2022. Adolescencia y violencia de género en línea: revisión comparativa entre Costa Rica, México y España. Sociedad e Infancias 6, no. 2: 165–77. doi:10.5209/soci.83596.
   Google Scholar
• Goulden, A., S.L. Baird, K. Romme, L. Pacheco, S.E. Norris, D. Norris, L. Faye, et al. 2023. Experiences of gender-based violence among disabled women: A qualitative systematic review and meta-synthesis protocol. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 22. doi:10.1177/16094069231183763.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ging, D., and E. Siapera. 2018. Special issue on online misogyny. Feminist Media Studies 18, no. 4: 515–24. doi:10.1080/14680777.2018.1447345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. 1990. Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, L.M., and K.B. Mathuews. 2022. Three priorities for the future of online education. Journal of Thougth Spring/summer, 3–16.
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins, T. 2015. ‘Can You Tweet That?’: Twitter in the classroom. Feminist Teacher 25, no. 2–3: 153–68. doi:10.5406/femteacher.25.2-3.0153.
   Google Scholar
• Henry, N., and A. Powell. 2022. Technology-facilitated sexual violence. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse 19, no. 2: 143–58. doi:10.1177/1524838016650189.
   Google Scholar
• Herman, C., and G. Kirkup. 2017. Combining feminist pedagogy and transactional distance to create gender-sensitive technology-enhanced learning. Gender and Education 29, no. 6: 781–95. doi:10.1080/09540253.2016.1187263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hester, H. 2018. Xenofeminism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hicks, J. 2021. Global evidence on the prevalence and impact of Online Gender-Based Violence (OGBV). Institute of Development Studies (IDS). doi:10.19088/K4D.2021.140.
   Google Scholar
• Houston, L. 2018. Efficient strategies for integrating universal design for learning in the online classroom. Journal of Educators Online 15, no. 3. doi:10.9743/jeo.2018.15.3.4.
   Google Scholar
• Hudhayri, K. 2021. Linguistic harassment against Arab LGBTs on cyberspace. International Journal of English Linguistics 11, no. 4: 58. doi:10.5539/ijel.v11n4p58.
   Google Scholar
• Ismailov, M., and T.K.F. Chiu. 2022. Catering to inclusion and diversity With universal design for learning in asynchronous online education: A self-determination theory perspective. Frontiers in Psychology 13, no. February: 819884. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.819884.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• ITU. 2022. Measuring digital development facts and figures 2022. ITUPublications. Geneva: International Telecommunication Union. Accessed February 15, 2024. https://acortar.link/7o7lDx.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, R., A.C. Lange, and A. Duran. 2021. A whitened rainbow: The In/visibility of race and racism in LGBTQ+ higher education scholarship. JCSCORE 7, no. 2: 173–206. doi:10.15763/issn.2642-2387.2021.7.2.173-206.
   Google Scholar
• Kerssens, N., and J. Van Dijck. 2021. The platformization of primary education in The Netherlands. Learning, Media and Technology 46, no. 3: 250–63. doi:10.1080/17439884.2021.1876725.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knoll, K. 2008. Feminist disability studies pedagogy. Feminist Teacher 19, no. 1: 122–33.
   Google Scholar
• Komljenovic, J. 2022. The future of value in digitalised higher education: Why data privacy should not be our biggest concern. Higher Education 83, no. 1: 119–35. doi:10.1007/s10734-020-00639-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konstantinidou, A., and E. Nisiforou. 2022. Assuring the quality of online learning in higher education: adaptations in design and implementation. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 38, no. 4: 127–42. doi:10.14742/ajet.7910.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koo, J. 2020. South Korean cyberfeminism and trolling: The limitation of online feminist community womad as counterpublic. Feminist Media Studies 20, no. 6: 831–46. doi:10.1080/14680777.2019.1622585.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koseoglu, S. 2020. Access as pedagogy: A case for embracing feminist pedagogy in open and distance learning. Asian Journal of Distance Education 15, no. 1: 277–90. doi:10.5281/zenodo.3893260.
   Google Scholar
• Koseoglu, S., T. Ozturk, H. Ucar, E. Karahan, and A. Bozkurt. 2020. 30 years of gender inequality and implications on curriculum design in open and distance learning. Journal of Interactive Media in Education 2020, no. 1: 1–11. doi:10.5334/jime.553.
   Google Scholar
• LaFranco, R., and C. Peterson-Withron. 2023. Forbes world`s billionaires list. Forbes. Accessed February 15, 2024. https://www.forbes.com/billionaires/.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, S., J. Holloway, and B. Lingard. 2022. Emergent developments in the datafication and digitalization. In Reimagining globalization and education,, 1st ed. New York: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003207528.
   Google Scholar
• Lomba, N., C. Navarra, and M. Fernandes. 2021. Combating gender-based violence: European added value assessment. EPRS European Parliamentary Research Service. Accessed February 15, 2024. https://acortar.link/0F55aT.
   Google Scholar
• López Mojica, M. 2022. Encontrarnos en la virtualidad: la creación de espacios (más) seguros en internet desde una perspectiva (trans)feminista e interseccional. La Laguna: Universidad de La laguna. http://riull.ull.es/xmlui/handle/915/31784.
   Google Scholar
• Luxán Serrano, M., and B. Biglia. 2011. Pedagogía cyberfeminista: Entre utopía y realidades. Education in the Knowledge Society (EKS) 12, no. 2: 149–83. doi:10.14201/eks.8277.
   Google Scholar
• Manzanares, G. 2018. Mapeo de iniciativas ciberfeministas latinoamericanas. https://enredadas.org/2018/08/08/mapeo-de-iniciativasciberfeministaslatinoamericanas/.
   Google Scholar
• Migueliz Valcarlos, M., J.R. Wolgemuth, S. Haraf, and N. Fisk. 2020. Anti-oppressive pedagogies in online learning: A critical review. Distance Education 41, no. 3: 345–60. doi:10.1080/01587919.2020.1763783.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, R.A. 2018. Toward intersectional identity perspectives on disability and LGBTQ identities in higher education. Journal of College Student Development 59, no. 3: 327–46. doi:10.1353/csd.2018.0030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mobley, S.D., L.D. Taylor, and C. Haynes. 2020. (Un)seen work: The pedagogical experiences of black queer men in faculty roles. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 33, no. 6: 604–20. doi:10.1080/09518398.2020.1747659.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, C., and T. Mildenberger. 2021. Facilitating flexible learning by replacing classroom time with an online learning environment: A systematic review of blended learning in higher education. Educational Research Review 34, no. November: 100394. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2021.100394.
   Google Scholar
• Müller, C., T. Mildenberger, and D. Steingruber. 2023. Learning effectiveness of a flexible learning study programme in a blended learning design: Why are some courses more effective than others? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education 20, no. 1: 10. doi:10.1186/s41239-022-00379-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nave, L. 2021. UDL in online environments: The WHAT of learning. Journal of Developmental Education 44, no. 2: 30–2.
   Google Scholar
• Opp, R. 2023. Committing to bridging the digital divide in least developed countries. UNPD. 8 March 2023. https://www.undp.org/blog/committing-bridging-digital-divide-least-developed-countries.
   Google Scholar
• Parry, D., L. Cousineau, C. Johnson, and S. Fullagar. 2019. Digital dilemmas: transforming gender identities and power relations in everyday life. In Digital dilemmas, eds. D. Parry, C. Johnson, and S. Fullagar. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-95300-7_1.
   Google Scholar
• Quality and Qualifications Ireland (QQI). 2023. Topic-specific quality assurance (QA) guidelines for blended and fully online programmes. https://www.qqi.ie/news/quality-assurance-guidelines-for-providers-of-programmes-supported-by-digital-education.
   Google Scholar
• Raghavan, S., and T.S. Hussen. 2023. Global attention to Technology-Facilitated Gender-Based Violence (TFGBV): Feminist perspectives. GenderIT.org. August 2023. https://genderit.org/editorial/global-attention-technology-facilitated-gender-based-violence-tfgbv-feminisperspectives#_ftn1.
   Google Scholar
• Renz, A., and R. Hilbig. 2021. Correction to: prerequisites for artificial intelligence in further education: identification of drivers, barriers, and business models of educational technology companies. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education 18, no. 1: 11. doi:10.1186/s41239-021-00245-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resnick, M. 2017. Creative learning. In Lifelong kindergarten: cultivating creativity through projects, passion, peers, and play, ed. M. Resnick. Cambridge: MIT Press. doi:10.7551/mitpress/11017.003.0003.
   Google Scholar
• Ringrose, J. 2018. Digital feminist pedagogy and post-truth misogyny. Teaching in Higher Education 23, no. 5: 647–56. doi:10.1080/13562517.2018.1467162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saura, G., E. Cancela, and J. Adell. 2022. New Keynesianism or smart austerity? Digital technologies and educational privatization post COVID-19. Education Policy Analysis Archives 30, no. August. doi:10.14507/epaa.30.6926.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schlesselman-Tarango, G. 2014. Cyborgs in the academic library: A cyberfeminist approach to information literacy instruction. Behavioral & Social Sciences Librarian 33, no. 1: 29–46. doi:10.1080/01639269.2014.872529.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, F.J., and Z. Nicolazzo. 2020. Whiteness and antiracist pedagogy: A critical discourse analysis of two trans* educators’ classroom experiences. Whiteness and Education 5, no. 2: 147–66. doi:10.1080/23793406.2020.1734963.
   Google Scholar
• Sepúlveda-Parrini, P., P. Valdivia-Vizarreta, and P. Pineda-Herrero. 2022. Enseñar y aprender en el ciberespacio: Aportes desde las pedagogías ciberfeministas a la educación virtual. Revisión sistemática de literatura. Teknokultura. Revista de Cultura Digital y Movimientos Sociales 19, no. 2: 123–35. doi:10.5209/tekn.77868.
   Google Scholar
• Šimonović, D. 2018. Report of the special rapporteur on violence against women, its causes and consequences. UN Human Rights Council. Accessed February 15, 2024. https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/1641160?ln = en.
   Google Scholar
• Sollfrank, C. 1998. La verdad sobre el ciberfeminismo. In Ciberfeminismo: de VNS Matrix a Laboria Cuboniks, ed. R. Zafra and T. López, 251–257. Barcelona: Holobonte Ediciones.
   Google Scholar
• Srnicek, N. 2016. Plataforms capitalisims. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stracke, C.M. 2019. Quality frameworks and learning design for open education. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning 20, no. 2: 180–203. doi:10.19173/irrodl.v20i2.4213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suzor, N., M. Dragiewicz, B. Harris, R. Gillett, J. Burgess, and T. Van Geelen. 2019. Human rights by design: The responsibilities of social media platforms to address gender-based violence online: gender-based violence online. Policy & Internet 11, no. 1: 84–103. doi:10.1002/poi3.185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• University of Melbourne – United and Nations Population Fund. 2023. Measuring technology-facilitated gender based violence. A discussion paper. Accessed February 15, 2024. https://acortar.link/31FQru.
   Google Scholar
• UN Women. 2022. Accelerating efforts to tackle online and technology facilitated violence against women and girls. New York: UN Women. Accessed February 15, 2024. https://acortar.link/xbzAnE.
   Google Scholar
• Valcarce de Veer, V., and P. Valdivia-Vizarreta. 2021. Approaching informal learning about #feminism on Twitter. On the Horizon 29, no. 4: 160–73. doi:10.1108/OTH-06-2020-0021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veletsianos, G., S. Houlden, J. Hodson, and C. Gosse. 2018. ‘Women scholars’ experiences with online harassment and abuse: self-protection, resistance, acceptance, and self-blame. New Media & Society 20, no. 12: 4689–708. doi:10.1177/1461444818781324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vergés, N. 2019. Gender and ICT: Are we making progress in CyberFeministisation? Idees 2019: 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Vergés, N. 2021. Un recorregut pels diversos feminismes de les tecnologies. Compàs d’amalgama 4: 78–81.
   Google Scholar
• Vergés, N., E. Guillén, and E. Cruells. 2022. Violencias machistas digitales: implicaciones de su abordaje en el marco de los circuitos de violencia machista. Revista Idees 59: 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Wajcman, J. 2004. Technofeminism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wajcman, J. 2010. Feminist theories of technology. Cambridge Journal of Economics 34, no. 1: 143–52. doi:10.1093/cje/ben057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilding, F., and Critical Art Ensemble. 1998. Notes on the political condition of cyberfeminism. Art Journal 57, no. 2: 47–60. doi:10.1080/00043249.1998.10791878
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson, B. 2018. The hidden architecture of higher education: building a big data infrastructure for the ‘smarter university’. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education 15, no. 1: 12. doi:10.1186/s41239-018-0094-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson, B. 2019. Policy networks, performance metrics and platform markets: charting the expanding data infrastructure of higher education. British Journal of Educational Technology 50, no. 6: 2794–809. doi:10.1111/bjet.12849.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright-Mair, R. 2023. The costs of staying: experiences of racially minoritized LGBTQ + faculty in the field of higher education. Innovative Higher Education 48, no. 2: 329–50. doi:10.1007/s10755-022-09620-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wyatt-Smith, C., B. Lingard, and E. Heck. 2019. Digital learning assessments and big data: implications for teacher professionalism. UNESCO. Accessed February 15, 2024. https://acortar.link/RGVvNp.
   Google Scholar
• Yalcinoz-Ucanand, B., and H. Eslen-Ziya. 2023. Disclosing gender-based violence online: strengthening feminist collective agency or creating further vulnerabilities? Feminist Media Estudies, doi:10.1080/14680777.2023.2229060.
   Google Scholar
• Yoon, H. 2021. Digital flesh: A feminist approach to the body in cyberspace. Gender and Education 33, no. 5: 578–93. doi:10.1080/09540253.2020.1802408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zarfa R. 2019. Ciberfeminismos. Tres décadas de alianza entre feminismo, tecnología y futuro. In Ciberfeminismo: de VNS Matrix a Laboria Cuboniks, ed. R. Zafra and T. López, 11–39. Barcelona: Holobonte Ediciones.
   Google Scholar
• Zawacki-Richter, O., V.I. Marín, M. Bond, and F. Gouverneur. 2019. Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education. where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education 16, no. 1: 39. doi:10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuboff, S. 2020. The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. New York: PublicAffairs.
   Google Scholar