Space, scale and jurisdiction in health service provision for drug users: the legal geography of a supervised injecting facility

References

• Bammer, G., Hall, W., Hamilton, M., & Ali, R. (2002). Harm minimisation in a prohibition context – Australia. Annals of the Academy of Political and Social Sciences, 582, 80–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett, D. (2010). Security, development and human rights: Normative, legal and policy challenges for the international drug control system. International Journal of Drug Policy, 21, 140–144. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2010.01.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartel, R. Graham, N. Jackson, S. Prior, J. H. Robinson, D. F. Sherval, M. & Williams, S. (2013). Legal geography: An Australian perspective.Geographical Research, 51, 339–353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein, S. E., & Bennett, D. (2013). Zoned out: ‘NIMBYism’, addiction services and municipal governance in British Columbia. International Journal of Drug Policy, 24, e61–e65. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2013.04.001
   Google Scholar
• Bessant, J.. (2008). From ‘harm minimization’ to ‘zero tolerance’ drugs policy in Australia: How the Howard government changed its mind. Policy Studies, 29, 197–214. doi: 10.1080/01442870802033498
   Google Scholar
• Bewley-Taylor, D. (2005). Emerging policy contradictions between the United Nations drug control system and the core values of the United Nations. International Journal of Drug Policy, 16, 423–431. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2005.06.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bewley-Taylor, D., & Jelsma, M. (2012). The UN drug control conventions: The limits of latitude. Series on legislative reform of drug policies No. 18. Amsterdam: Trans National Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Blomley, N. (1994). Law, space and the geographies of power. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blomley, N. (2011). Rights of passage: Sidewalks and the regulation of public flow. Oxford: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Blomley, N. (2013). Performing property, making the world. Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence, 26, 23–48.
   Google Scholar
• Blomley, N. (2014). What sort of legal space is a city? In A. M. Brighenti (Ed.), Interstices: The aesthetics and politics of urban in-betweens (pp. 1–20). Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Blomley, N., Delaney, D., & Ford, R. (2001). The legal geographies reader: Law, power, and space. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Braverman, I. (2014). Who's afraid of methodology? Advocating a methodological turn in legal geography. In I. Braverman, N. Blomley, D. Delaney, & A. Kedar (Eds.), The expanding spaces of law: A timely legal geography (pp. 120–141). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Braverman, I., Blomley, N., Delaney, D., & Kedar, A. (2014). Expanding the spaces of law. In I. Braverman, N. Blomley, D. Delaney, & A. Kedar (Eds.), The expanding spaces of law: A timely legal geography (pp. 1–29). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Butt, A. (2010). Regional autonomy and legal disorder: The proliferation of local laws in Indonesia. Sydney Law Review, 32, 177–191.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, G. (1982). Rights, property, and community. Economic Geography, 58, 120–138. doi: 10.2307/143792
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, G. (1985). Judges and the cities: Interpreting local autonomy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, D. (1998). Governing out of order: Space, law and the politics of belonging. London: Rivers Oram Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson, P. J., & Howe, M. (2013). Beyond NIMBYism: Understanding community antipathy toward needle distribution services. International Journal of Drug Policy, 25, 624–632. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2013.10.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delaney, D. (1998). Race, place and the law: 1836–1948. Austin: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Delaney, D. (2003). Law and nature. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Delaney, D. (2010). The spatial, the legal and the pragmatics of world-making: Nomospheric investigations. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Elliott, R., Csete, J., Wood, E., & Kerr, T. (2005). Harm reduction, HIV/AIDS, and the human rights challenge to global drug control policy. Health and Human Rights, 8, 104–138. doi: 10.2307/4065336
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Elliott, R., Malkin, I., & Gold, J. (2002). Establishing safe injection facilities in Canada: Legal and ethical issues. Toronto: Canadian HIV/AIDS Legal Network.
   Google Scholar
• Fearis, E. (2012). Kirk's new mission: Upholding the rule of law at the state level. Western Australian Jurist, 3, 61–101.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, B., Turnbull, S., Poland, B., & Haydon, E. (2004). Drug use, risk and urban order: Examining supervised injection sites (SISs) as ‘governmentality’. International Journal of Drug Policy, 15, 357–365. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2004.04.002
   Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, J. L. (2013). Supervised injecting facilities: A case study of contrasting narratives in a contested health policy arena. Critical Public Health, 23, 77–94. doi: 10.1080/09581596.2012.735360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, J. L., Burgess, M., & Snowball, L. (2010). Trends in property and illicit drug crime around the Medically Supervised Injecting Centre: An update (Crime and Justice Statistics: Bureau Brief 51). Sydney: NSW Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research.
   Google Scholar
• Ford, R. (1999). Law's territory (a history of jurisdiction). Michigan Law Review, 97, 843–930. doi: 10.2307/1290376
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frug, J. (1996). The geography of community. Stanford Law Review, 48, 1047–1108. doi: 10.2307/1229380
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fry, C., Cvetkovski, S., & Cameron, J. (2006). The place of supervised injecting facilities within harm reduction: Evidence, ethics and policy. Addiction, 101, 465–467. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2006.01386.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldsworthy, J. (2014). Kable, Kirk and judicial statesmanship. Monash Law Review, 40, 75–114.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, N. (2011). Lawscape. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gunaratnam, P. (2005). Drug policy in Australia: The supervised injecting facilities debate (Asia Pacific School of Economics and Government Discussion Papers). Canberra: Australian National University.
   Google Scholar
• Hedrich, D. (2004). European report on drug consumption rooms. Lisbon: European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction.
   Google Scholar
• Hedrich, D., Kerr, T., & Dubois-Arber, F. (2010). Drug consumption facilities in Europe and beyond. In T. Rhodes & D. Hedrich (Eds.), Harm reduction: Evidence, impacts, and challenges (pp. 306–331). Lisbon: European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction.
   Google Scholar
• Herbert, H., & Talbot, W. (2000). Theological perspectives on the Medically Supervised Injecting Centre to be operated by the uniting church board for social responsibility. Sydney: Uniting Church of Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Holder, J. & Harrison, C. (2003). Law and geography. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Houborg, E. & Frank, V. A. (2014). Drug consumption rooms and the role of politics and governance in policy processes. International Journal of Drug Policy, 25, 972–977. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2014.01.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, J. W. (2000, December 13). Illicit drugs policy. Media release. Retrieved from http://pmtranscripts.dpmc.gov.au/browse.php?did=11562
   Google Scholar
• IHRA. (2010). What is harm reduction? International Harm Reduction Association. Retrieved from http://www.ihra.net/files/2010/08/10/Briefing_What_is_HR_English.pdf
   Google Scholar
• INCB. (2002, September 30). Flexibility of treaty provisions as regards harm reduction approaches, prepared by the Legal Affairs Section of the United Nations Drug Control Programme, E/INCB/2002/W.13/SS.5.
   Google Scholar
• Irving, H. (2004). Advisory opinions, the rule of law, and the separation of powers. Macquarie Law Journal, 6, 105–34.
   Google Scholar
• IWG. (2006). The report of the Independent Working Group on drug consumption rooms. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Kimber, J., Dolan, K., Van Beek, I., Hedrich, D., & Zurhold, H. (2003). Drug consumption facilities: An update since 2000. Drug and Alcohol Review/Harm Reduction Digest, 22, 227–233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KPMG. (2010). Further evaluation of the Medically Supervised Injecting Centre during its extended trial period (2007–2011) final report. Sydney: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Malkin, I. (2001). Establishing supervised injecting facilities: A responsible way to help minimise harm. Melbourne University Law Review, 25, 680–756.
   Google Scholar
• Malkin, I., Elliott, R. & McRae, R. (2003). Supervised injection facilities and international law. Journal of Drug Issues, 33, 539–578. doi: 10.1177/002204260303300302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCann, E. (2008). Expertise, truth, and urban policy mobilities: Global circuits of knowledge in the development of Vancouver, Canada's ‘four pillar’ drug strategy. Environment and Planning A, 40, 885–904. doi: 10.1068/a38456
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCann, E., & Temenos, C. (2015). Mobilizing drug consumption rooms: Inter-place connections and the politics of harm reduction drug policy. Health & Place, 31, 216–223. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2014.12.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendes, P. (2002). Drug wars down under: The ill-fated struggle for safe injecting facilities in Victoria, Australia. International Journal of Social Welfare, 11, 140–149. doi: 10.1111/1468-2397.00208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, S. (2010). Revisiting extraterritorial jurisdiction: A territorial justification for extraterritorial jurisdiction under the European Convention. European Journal of International Law, 20, 1223–1246. doi: 10.1093/ejil/chp078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, T. J. (2005). Monograph No. 01: What is Australia's ‘drug budget’? The policy mix of illicit drug-related government spending in Australia (DPMP monograph series). Melbourne: Turning Point Alcohol and Drug Centre.
   Google Scholar
• MSIC. (2014). Background and evaluation. Medically Supervised Injecting Centre. Retrieved from http://www.sydneymsic.com/background-and-evaluation
   Google Scholar
• MSIC Evaluation Committee. (2003). Final report of the evaluation of the Sydney Medically Supervised Injecting Centre. Sydney: Author.
   Google Scholar
• NCHECR. (2006). Sydney Medically Supervised Injecting Centre interim evaluation report no. 2: Evaluation of community attitudes towards the Sydney MSIC. Sydney: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Neuman, G. (1987). Territorial discrimination, equal protection, and self-determination. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 135, 261–382. doi: 10.2307/3312101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nolan, T. (2003, December 1). Bob Carr attacks John Howard over heroin injecting room politics. ABC Radio.
   Google Scholar
• NSW Government. (1999). NSW Drug Summit 1999: Government plan of action. Sydney: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Parliament of New South Wales. (1998). Report on the establishment or trial of safe injecting rooms. Joint Select Committee into safe injecting rooms. Sydney: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Prior, J. H., & Crofts, P. (2015). Shooting up illicit drugs with God and the State: The legal–spatial constitution of Sydney's Medically Supervised Injecting Centre as a sanctuary. Geographical Research Advance online publication. doi:10.1111/1745-5871.12171
   Google Scholar
• Riles, A. (2011). Collateral knowledge: Legal reasoning in the global financial markets. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ritter, A. (2010). Illicit drugs policy through the lens of regulation. International Journal of Drug Policy, 21, 265–270. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2009.11.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritter, A., McLeod, R., & Shanahan, M. (2013). Monograph no. 24: Government drug policy expenditure in Australia – 2009/10 (DPMP monograph series). Melbourne: Turning Point Alcohol and Drug Centre.
   Google Scholar
• SCC. (2007). Drug and alcohol strategy. Sydney: Author.
   Google Scholar
• SCC. (2014a). Drug safety. Sydney: Author. Retrieved from http://www.cityofsydney.nsw.gov.au/community/health-and-safety/alcohol-and-drugs/drug-safety
   Google Scholar
• SCC. (2014b). Compliance policy. Sydney: Author. Retrieved from http://www.cityofsydney.nsw.gov.au/council/our-responsibilities/policies
   Google Scholar
• SCC. ( n.d.). Clean streets. Sydney: Author. Retrieved from http://www.cityofsydney.nsw.gov.au/live/waste-and-recycling/clean-streets
   Google Scholar
• Schatz, E., & Nougier, M. (2012). Drug consumption rooms: Evidence and practice. London: International Drug Policy Consortium.
   Google Scholar
• de Sousa Santos, B. (1987). Law: A map of misreading: Toward a postmodern conception of law. Journal of Law and Society, 14, 279–99. doi: 10.2307/1410186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tempalski, B., Friedman, R., Keem, M., Cooper, H. J., & Friedman, S. R. (2007). NIMBY localism and national inequitable exclusion alliances: The case of syringe exchange programs in the United States. Geoforum, 38, 1250–1263. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2007.03.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Totaro, P. (1999, October 29). Pope Vetoes Nuns’ injecting room role. Sydney Morning Herald.
   Google Scholar
• Valverde, M. (2009). Jurisdiction and scale: Legal ‘Technicalities’ as resources for theory. Social and Legal Studies, 18, 139–157. doi: 10.1177/0964663909103622
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valverde, M. (2011). Seeing like a city: The dialectic of modern and premodern ways of seeing in urban governance. Law and Society Review, 45, 247–312. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5893.2011.00441.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watkins, D., & Burton, M. (2013). Research methods in law. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, S. (2010). On islands, insularity and opium poppies: Australia's secret pharmacy. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 28, 290–310. doi: 10.1068/d5608
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, S. (2013). Licit narcotics production in Australia: Geographies nomospheric and topological. Geographical Research, 51, 364–374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wodak, A., Symonds, A., & Richmond, R. (2003). The role of civil disobedience in drug policy reform: How an illegal safer injection room led to a sanctioned Medically Supervised Injecting Centre. Journal of Drug Issues, 33, 609–623. doi: 10.1177/002204260303300304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, J. R. T. (1997). Royal Commission into the NSW Police Service final report. Volume II: Reform. Sydney: Government of New South Wales.
   Google Scholar
• Yamey, G. (2000). UN condemns Australian plans for ‘safe injecting rooms’. British Medical Journal, 320, 667. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7236.667
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zadjow, G. (2006). The narrative of evaluations: Medically supervised injecting centers. Contemporary Drug Problems, 33, 399–426.
   Google Scholar
• Zampini, G. F. (2014). Governance versus government: Drug consumption rooms in Australia and the UK. International Journal of Drug Policy, 25, 978–984. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2014.03.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar