Gendered discipline, gendered space: an ethnographic approach to gendered violence in India

References

• Abu-Lughod, L. (1991). Writing against culture. In R. Fox (Ed.), Recapturing anthropology: Working in the present (pp. 137–162). Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research.
   Google Scholar
• Ackerly, B., Stern, M., & True, J. (2006). Feminist methodologies for international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ackerly, B., & True, J. (2010). Doing feminist research in political and social science. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Ackerly, B., & True, J. (2013). Methods and methodologies. In G. Waylen, K. Celis, J. Kantola, & S. L. Weldon (Eds.), The Oxford university handbook of gender and politics (pp. 135–159). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Alanen, L., & Witt, C. (2005). Feminist reflections on the history of philosophy. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Baaz, M. E., & Stern, M. (2009). Why do soldiers rape? Masculinity, violence, and sexuality in the armed forces in the Congo (DRC). International Studies Quarterly, 53(2), 495–518. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2478.2009.00543.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayard de Volo, L., & Schatz, E. (2004). From the inside out: Ethnographic methods in political research. PS: Political Science & Politics, 37, 267–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beer, C. (2009). Democracy and gender equality. Studies in Comparative International Development, 44(3), 212–227. doi: 10.1007/s12116-009-9043-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behl, N. (2014). Situated citizenship: Understanding Sikh citizenship through women’s exclusion. Politics, Groups, and Identities, 2(3), 386–401. doi: 10.1080/21565503.2014.927775
   Google Scholar
• Behl, N. (2016). Diasporic researcher: An autoethnographic analysis of gender and race in political science. Politics, Groups, and Identities. doi:10.1080/21565503.2016.1141104
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, A. (2014). Trapped in America’s safety net: One family’s struggle. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, A. (2015). Family story as political science: Reflections on writing trapped in America’s safety net. Perspectives on Politics, 13(4), 1043–1052. doi: 10.1017/S1537592715002303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caraway, T. (2004). Inclusion and democratization: Class, gender, race, and the extensions of suffrage. Comparative Politics, 36(4), 443–460. doi: 10.2307/4150170
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clifford, J., & Marcus, G. (1986). Writing culture: The poetics and politics of ethnography. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohn, C. (1987). Sex and death in the rational world of defense intellectuals. Signs, 12, 687–718. doi: 10.1086/494362
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collier, D., & Levitsky, S. (1997). Democracy with adjectives: Conceptual innovation in comparative research. World Politics, 49(3), 430–451. doi: 10.1353/wp.1997.0009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coppedge, M., Gerring, J., Altman, D., Bernhard, M., Fish, S., Hicken, A.,  … Teorell, J. (2011). Conceptualizing and measuring democracy: A new approach. Perspectives on Politics, 9(2), 247–267. doi: 10.1017/S1537592711000880
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das, V., & Randeria, S. (2014). Democratic strivings, social sciences, and public debates: The case of India. American Anthropologist, 116(1), 160–165. doi: 10.1111/aman.12078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dauphinee, E. (2010). The ethics of autoethnography. Review of International Studies, 36(3), 799–818. doi: 10.1017/S0260210510000690
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doty, R. (2004). Maladies of our souls: Identity and voice in the writing of academic international relations. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 17(2), 377–392. doi: 10.1080/0955757042000245951
   Google Scholar
• Elman, R. A. (2013). Gender violence. In G. Waylen, K. Celis, J. Kantola, & S. L. Weldon (Eds.), The Oxford university handbook of gender and politics (pp. 236–258). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Enloe, C. (1990). Bananas, beaches, and bases: Making feminist sense of international politics. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fenno, R. (1978). Home style: House members in their districts. Boston: Little, Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Finifter, A. (1983). Political science: The state of the discipline. Washington, DC: American Political Science Association.
   Google Scholar
• Forrest, M. D. (this issue). Engaging and disrupting power: The public value of political ethnography. PS: Political Science & Politics, 50(1).
   Google Scholar
• Geddes, B. (2003). Paradigms and sand castles: Theory building and research design in comparative politics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Geertz, C. (1988). Works and lives: The anthropologist as author. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ghosh, S. (2015). The political economy of domestic violence in a Mumbai slum: An ethnographic analysis. Journal of Interdisciplinary Economics, 27(2), 175–198. doi: 10.1177/0260107915582297
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenstein, F., & Polsby, N. (1975). Handbook of political science (Vols. 1–7). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta, A., & Ferguson, J. (1997). Anthropological locations: Boundaries and grounds of a field science. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminist and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575–599. doi: 10.2307/3178066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harding, S. (1986). The science question in feminism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haritaworn, J., Kuntsman, A., & Posocco, S. (2013). Murderous inclusions. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 15(4), 445–452. doi: 10.1080/14616742.2013.841568
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harper, R. (this issue). Deconstructing naturalization ceremonies as public spectacles of citizenship. Space & Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Harstock, N. (1983). The feminist standpoint: Developing the ground for a specifically feminist historical materialism. In S. Harding & M. Hintikka (Eds.), Discovering reality: Feminist perspectives on epistemology, metaphysics, methodology and philosophy of science (pp. 283–310). Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Hawkesworth, M. (2005). Engendering political science: An immodest proposal. Politics & Gender, 1(1), 141–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkesworth, M. (2006a). Feminist inquiry: From political conviction to methodological innovation. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hawkesworth, M. (2006b). Contending conceptions of science and politics: Methodology and the constitutions of the political. In D. Yanow & P. Schwartz-Shea (Eds.), Interpretation and method: Empirical research methods and the interpretive turn (pp. 27–49). Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Hawkesworth, M. (2013). Sex, gender, and sexuality: From naturalized presumption to analytical categories. In G. Waylen, K. Celis, J. Kantola, & S. L. Weldon (Eds.), The Oxford university handbook of gender and politics (pp. 31–56). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, F. (2009). “We thought you would be white”: Race and gender in fieldwork. PS: Political Science & Politics, 42(2), 291–294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Htun, M., & Weldon, S. (2010). When do governments promote women’s right? A framework for the comparative analysis of sex equality policy. Perspectives on Politics, 8(1), 207–216. doi: 10.1017/S1537592709992787
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isin, E. (2012). Citizenship after orientalism: An unfinished project. Citizenship Studies, 16(5–6), 563–572. doi: 10.1080/13621025.2012.698480
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Islam, N. (2000). Research as an act of betrayal: Researching race in an Asian community in Los Angeles. In F. W. Twine & J. Warren (Eds.), Racing research, researching race: Methodological dilemmas in critical race studies (pp. 35–66). New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johansson, P., & Liou, S. (this issue). Public spheres on the move: An autoethnography of mobility events in Los Angeles. Space & Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Kapur, R. (2007). Challenging the liberal subject: Law and gender justice in south Asia. In M. Mukhopadhyay & N. Singh (Eds.), Gender justice, citizenship and development (pp. 116–170). New Delhi: Zubaan, an imprint of Kali for Women and International Development Research Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Kapur, R., & Cossman, B. (1999). On women, equality and the constitution: Through the looking glass of feminism. In N. Menon (Ed.), Gender and politics in India (pp. 197–261). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keating, C. (2007). Framing the postcolonial sexual contract: Democracy, fraternalism, and state authority in India. Hypatia, 22(4), 130–145.
   Google Scholar
• Khan, S. (2005). Reconfiguring the native informant: Positionality in the global age. Signs, 30(4), 2017–2037. doi: 10.1086/428423
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, G., Keohane, R., & Verba, S. (1994). Designing social inquiry. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Löwenheim, O. (2010). The “I” in IR: An autoethnographic account. Review of International Studies, 36(4), 1023–1045. doi: 10.1017/S0260210510000562
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majic, S. (2014). Sex work politics: from protest to service provision. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mandhana, N., & Trivedi, A. (2012, December 18). Indians outraged over rape on moving bus in New Delhi. The New York Times. Retrieved from Retrieved from http://india.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/12/18/outrage-in-delhi-after-latest-gang-rape-case/
   Google Scholar
• Marcus, G., & Fischer, M. (1999). Anthropology as cultural critique: An experimental moment in the human sciences. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nagar, R., & Geiger, S. (2007). Reflexivity and positionality in feminist fieldwork revisited. In A. Tickell, E. Sheppard, J. Peck, & T. Barnes (Eds.), Politics and practice in economic geography (pp. 267–278). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Narayan, K. (1993). How native is a “native” anthropologist? American Anthropology, 95(3), 671–686. doi: 10.1525/aa.1993.95.3.02a00070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, M. (2001). India: Implementing sex equality through Law. Chicago Journal of International Law, 2(1), 35–58.
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, M. (2002). Sex, laws, and inequality: What India can teach the United State. Daedalus, 131(1), 95–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okin, S. (1979). Women in western political thought. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ortbals, C., & Rincker, M. (2009). Embodied researchers: Gendered bodies, research activity, and pregnancy in the field. PS: Political Science & Politics, 42(2), 315–319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pachirat, T. (2009). The political in political ethnography: Dispatches from the kill floor. In E. Schatz (Ed.), Political ethnography (pp. 143–162). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pachirat, T. (2011). Every twelve seconds: Industrialized slaughter and the politics of sight. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pachirat, T. (2012, March 8). Working undercover in a slaughterhouse: An interview with timothy Pachirat. Retrieved from http://boingboing.net/2012/03/08/working-undercover-in-a-slaugh.html
   Google Scholar
• Pateman, C. (1988). The sexual contract. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pateman, C. (1989). The disorder of women. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Paxton, P. (2000). Women’s suffrage in the measurement of democracy: Problems of operationalization. Studies in Comparative International Development, 35(3), 92–111. doi: 10.1007/BF02699767
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pokharel, K., Chaturvedi, S. Agarwal, V., & Lahiri, T. (2013, January 9). New Delhi attack: The victim’s story. Wall Street Journal. Retrieved from http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424127887323482504578227751166162988
   Google Scholar
• Rabinow, P. (1977). Reflections on fieldwork in Morocco. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rai, S. (1994). Gender and democratization: Or what does democracy mean for women in the third world? Democratization, 1(1), 209–228. doi: 10.1080/13510349408403388
   Google Scholar
• Rocco, R. (2014). Transforming citizenship: Democracy, membership, and belonging in Latino communities. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sangtin Writers, and Nagar, R. (2006). Playing with fire: Feminist thought and activism through seven lives in India. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schatz, E. (2009). Introduction: Ethnographic immersion and the study of politics. In E. Schatz (Ed.), Political ethnography (pp. 1–22). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz-Shea, P. (2006). Judging quality: Evaluative criteria and epistemic communities. In D. Yanow & P. Schwartz-Shea (Eds.), Interpretation and method: Empirical research methods and the interpretive turn (pp. 89–113). Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz-Shea, P., & Yanow, D. (2012). Interpretive research design: Concepts and processes. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J. (1985). Weapons of the weak. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Seawright, J., & Collier, D. (2013). Rival strategies of validation: Tools for evaluating measures of democracy. Comparative Political Studies, 47(1), 111–138. doi: 10.1177/0010414013489098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seidelman, R., & Harpham, E. (1985). Disenchanted realists: Political science and the American crisis, 1884–1994. Albany: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, A., Agarwal, V., & Malhotra, A. (2013, January 20). In Delhi rape, new details about accused. The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved from http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424127887324081704578233762362733262
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, B. (2013, December 16). A year later, family of Delhi gang rape victim press for “full justice.” New York Times. Retrieved from http://india.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/12/16/a-year-later-family-of-delhi-gang-rape-victim-press-for-full-justice/
   Google Scholar
• Shehata, S. (2006). Ethnography, identity and the production of knowledge. In D. Yanow & P. Schwartz-Shea (Eds.), Interpretation and method: Empirical research methods and the interpretive turn (pp. 244–263). Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Somit, A., & Tanenhaus, J. (1967). The development of political science: From burgess to behaviorism. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Soss, J. (2002). Unwanted claims: The politics of participation in the U.S. welfare system. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tickner, J. A. (1992). Gender in international relations: Feminist perspective on achieving global security. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tickner, J. A. (2006). Feminism meets international relations: Some methodological issues. In B. Ackerly, M. Stern, & J. True (Eds.), Feminist methodologies for international relations (pp. 19–41). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tickner, J. A. (2015). Revisiting IR in a time of crisis. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 17(4), 536–553. doi: 10.1080/14616742.2015.1071995
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tippler, K., & Chang, C. (this issue). Reflexivity, participatory art, and the failures of monist representation. Space & Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Trinh, T. M. (1989). Woman, native, other: Writing postcoloniality and feminism. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tripp, A. (2013). Political systems and gender. In G. Waylen, K. Celis, J. Kantola, & S. L. Weldon (Eds.), The oxford university handbook of gender and politics (pp. 514–535). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Trivedi, L. (2003). Women in India. In N. DeVotta & S. Ganguly (Eds.), Understanding contemporary India (pp. 181–208). Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
   Google Scholar
• True, J. (2015). Winning the battle but losing the war on violence. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 17(4), 554–572. doi: 10.1080/14616742.2015.1046269
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. (2010). International statistics on crime and justice. Helsinki: HEUNI Publication.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Women. (2012). Survey, safer cities free of violence against women and girls initiative. New Delhi: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Visweswaran, K. (1994). Fictions of feminist ethnography. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, D. (2012). Does the quality of democracy matter for women’s rights? Just debate and democratic transition in Chile and South Africa. Comparative Political Studies, 45(11), 1323–1350. doi: 10.1177/0010414012437165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waylen, G. (2007). Engendering transitions: Women’s mobilization, institutions and gender outcomes. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Waylen, G., Celis, K., Kantola, J., & Weldon, L. (2013). The oxford university handbook of gender and politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wies, J., & Haldane, H. (2015). Return to the local: Lessons for global change. In J. Wies & H. Haldane (Eds.), Applying anthropology to gender-based violence: Global responses, local practices (pp. 1–13). New York, NY: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Wirtz, E. (2015). Bureaucratic bindings: Refugee resettlement and intimate partner abuse. In J. Wies & H. Haldane (Eds.), Applying anthropology to gender-based violence: Global responses, local practices (pp. 29–44). New York, NY: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Yanow, D., & Schwartz-Shea, P. (2006). Interpretation and method: Empirical research methods and the interpretive turn. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Zirakzadeh, C. (2009). When nationalists are not separatists: Discarding and recovering academic theories while doing fieldwork in the Basque region of Spain. In E. Schatz (Ed.), Political ethnography (pp. 97–118). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar