Political and public engagement as topological boundary-making: a critique of ‘Deficit’ approaches in post-communist CEE

References

• Adut, A. (2012). A theory of the public sphere. Sociological Theory, 30(4), 238–262. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735275112467012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, J. (2016). Topologies of power. Beyond territory and networks. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, J., & Cochrane, A. (2010). Assemblages of state power: Topological shifts in the organization of government and politics. Antipode, 42(5), 1071–1089. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8330.2010.00794.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey, J. (2002). From public to private: The development of the concept of the ‘private’. Social Research, 69(1), 15–31. https://doi.org/10.1353/sor.2002.0012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benhabib, S. (1997). The embattled public sphere: Hannah Arendt, Juergen Habermas and beyond. Theoria: A Journal of Social and Political Theory, 44(90), 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Bertsou, E., & Pastorella, G. (2017). Technocratic attitudes: A citizens’ perspective of expert decision-making. West European Politics, 40(2), 430–458. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2016.1242046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boltanski, L., & Thévenot, L. (2006). On justification: Economies of worth by Luc Boltanski, Laurent Thévenot and Catherine Porter. Perspectives of Politics, 5, 144–146.
   Google Scholar
• Brighenti, A. M. (2010). On territorology: Towards a general science of territory. Theory, Culture & Society, 27(1), 52–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276409350357
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cizewska, E. (2015). The meaning of the 1980s’ anti-politics’ legacy within the contemporary east-central European civil societies. Intersections East European Journal of Society and Politics, 1, 37–58. https://doi.org/10.17356/ieejsp.v1i3.103
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, N. (2012). Urban policy mobility, anti-politics, and histories of the transnational municipal movement. Progress in Human Geography, 36(1), 25–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132511407952
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collier, S. J., & Way, L. (2004). Beyond the deficit model: Social welfare in post-soviet Georgia. Post-Soviet Affairs, 20(3), 258–284. https://doi.org/10.2747/1060-586X.20.3.258
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fawcett, P., Flinders, M., Hay, C., & Wood, M. (2017). Anti-politics, depoliticization, and governance. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, N. (1992). Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. In C. Calhoun (Ed.), Habermas and the public sphere (pp. 109–142 ). MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (1991). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, P. (2012). The topological quality of infrastructural relation: An ethnographic approach. Theory, Culture & Society, 29(4-5), 76–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276412448827
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Havlík, V. (2019). Technocratic populism and political illiberalism in central Europe. Problems of Post-Communism, 66(6), 369–384. https://doi.org/10.1080/10758216.2019.1580590
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirt, S. (2012). Iron curtains: Gates, suburbs and privatization of space in the post-socialist city. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffmann, E. P., & Laird, R. F. (1984). The soviet polity in the modern Era. Transaction Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Hooghe, M., & Quintelier, E. (2014). Political participation in European countries: The effect of authoritarian rule, corruption, lack of good governance and economic downturn. Comparative European Politics, 12(2), 209–232. https://doi.org/10.1057/cep.2013.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hübner, P. (1999). Menschen-Macht-Maschinen. Technokratie in Der DDR. In Peter Hübner (Ed.), Eliten im Sozialismus. Beiträge zur Sozialgeschichte der DDR (pp. 325–360). Zentrum für Zeithistorische Forschung.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobsson, K. (2017). Rethinking civic privatism ina PostsoCialist context. In Civil Society Revisited: Lessons from Poland.
   Google Scholar
• Jehlička, P., & Jacobsson, K. (2021). The importance of recognizing difference: Rethinking central and east European environmentalism. Political Geography, 87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2021.102379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenis, A. (2019). Post-Politics contested: Why multiple voices on climate change do not equal politicisation. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 37(5), 831–848. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263774X18807209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitanova, M. (2020). Youth political participation in the EU: Evidence from a cross-national analysis. Journal of Youth Studies, 23(7), 819–836. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2019.1636951
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kopeček, M., Gjuričová, A., Roubal, P., Spurný, M., & Vilímek, T. (2019). Architects of long change: The expert roots of postsocialism in Czechoslovakia. Argo.
   Google Scholar
• Kostelka, F. (2014). The state of political participation in post-communist democracies: Low but surprisingly little biased citizen engagement. Europe - Asia Studies, 66(6), 945–968. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2014.905386
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manning, N. (2013). ‘I mainly look at things on an issue by issue basis’: Reflexivity and Phronêsis in young people’s political engagements. Journal of Youth Studies, 16(1), 17–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2012.693586
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manning, N. (2014). The relational self and the political engagements of young adults. Journal of Sociology, 50(4), 486–500. https://doi.org/10.1177/1440783312467094
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, K. B. (2017). Analysis of Czech institutional culture. Transformations of the boundaries between private and public spheres in the conditions of everyday life and festivity from the mid-19th century to the present. Sociální Studia / Social Studies, 14(2), 73–97. https://doi.org/10.5817/SOC2017-2-73
   Google Scholar
• Pelikán, V., Galčanová, L., & Kala, L. (2020). Ecological habitus intergenerationally reproduced: The children of Czech ‘voluntary simplifiers’ and their lifestyle. Journal of Consumer Culture, 20(4), 419–439. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540517736560
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelikán, V., & Librová, H. (2015). Motivation for environmental direct action in the Czech republic: The case of the 2011 blockade at the Šumava National Park. Sociální Studia/Social Studies, 12(3), 27–52. https://doi.org/10.5817/SOC2015-3-27
   Google Scholar
• Pop-Eleches, G., & Tucker, J. A. (2013). Associated with the past?: Communist legacies and civic participation in post-communist countries. East European Politics and Societies, 27(1), 45–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888325412465087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prince, R. (2016). The spaces in between: Mobile policy and the topographies and topologies of the technocracy. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 34(3), 420–437. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263775815618401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prince, R. (2017). Local or global policy? Thinking about policy mobility with assemblage and topology. Area, 49(3), 335–341. https://doi.org/10.1111/area.12319
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutherford, A. (2017). B.F. Skinner and technology’s nation: Technocracy, social engineering, and the good life in 20th-century America. History of Psychology, 20(3), 290–312. https://doi.org/10.1037/hop0000062
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Semenova, E. (2020). Expert ministers in new democracies: Delegation, communist legacies, or technocratic populism? Politics and Governance, 8(4), 590–602. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v8i4.3397
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheller, M., & Urry, J. (2003). Mobile transformations of ‘public’ and ‘private’ life. Theory, Culture & Society, 20(3), 107–125. https://doi.org/10.1177/02632764030203007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Somers, M. (2008). Genealogies of citizenship. Markets, Statelessnes, and the Right to Have Rights. London: Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Sommer, V., Mrňka, J., & Spurný, M. (2019). Run socialism like a business. Technocratic governance in czechoslovakia, 1956–1989. Nakladatelství Lidové noviny.
   Google Scholar
• Stark, D. (1991). Path dependence and privatization strategies in East Central Europe. East European Politics and Societies, 6(1), 17–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888325492006001003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swyngedouw, E. (2011). Interrogating post-democratization: Reclaiming egalitarian political spaces. Political Geography, 30(7), 370–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2011.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavory, I. (2020). Interviews and inference: Making sense of interview data in qualitative research. Qualitative Sociology, 43(4), 449–465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-020-09464-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thévenot, L. (2015). Making commonality in the plural, on the basis of binding engagements. In Paul Dumouchel & Reiko Gotoh (Eds.), Social bonds as freedom: Revising the dichotomy of the universal and the particular (pp. 82–108). Berghahn.
   Google Scholar
• Zagórski, P. (2021). Electoral turnout in central and Eastern Europe: The legacies of communist socialisation. Europe-Asia Studies, 73(10), 1–35. doi:10.1080/09668136.2021.1991892
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar