The Political Feasibility of Consumption-Based Carbon Accounting

References

• Albin, C. (2003), ‘Negotiating International Cooperation: Global Public Goods and Fairness’, Review of International Studies, 29, pp. 365–85. doi: 10.1017/S0260210503003656
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andresen, S. and Agrawala, S. (2002), ‘Leaders, Pushers and Laggards in the Making of the Climate Regime’, Global Environmental Change, 12, pp. 41–51. doi: 10.1016/S0959-3780(01)00023-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Asselt, H. and Brewer, T. (2010), ‘Addressing Competitiveness and Leakage Concerns in Climate Policy: An Analysis of Border Adjustment Measures in the US and the EU’, Energy Policy, 38, pp. 42–51. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.08.061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bäckstrand, K. and Elgström, O. (2013), ‘The EU's Role in Climate Change Negotiations: from Leader to “Leadiator”’, Journal of European Public Policy, 20 (10), pp. 1369–86. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2013.781781
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bechtel, M.M. and Scheve, K.F. (2013), ‘Mass Support for Global Climate Agreements Depends on Institutional Design’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110 (34), pp. 13763–8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1306374110
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennear, L.S. and Stavins, R.N. (2007), ‘Second-Best Theory and the Use of Multiple Policy Instruments’, Environmental and Resource Economics, 37 (1), pp. 111–29. doi: 10.1007/s10640-007-9110-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernauer, T. and Böhmelt, T. (2013), ‘National Climate Policies in International Comparison. The Climate Change Cooperation Index’, Environmental Science & Policy, 25, pp. 196–206. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2012.09.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernauer, T. and Koubi, V. (2009), ‘Effects of Political Institutions on Air Quality’, Ecological Economics, 68 (5), pp. 1355–65. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernauer, T., et al. (2010), ‘A Comparison of International and Domestic Sources of Global Governance Dynamics’, British Journal of Political Science, 40 (3), pp. 509–38. doi: 10.1017/S0007123410000098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biermann, F. and Dingwerth, K. (2004), ‘Global Environmental Change and the Nation State’, Global Environmental Politics, 4 (1), pp. 1–22. doi: 10.1162/152638004773730185
   Google Scholar
• Bodansky, D. (1999), ‘The Legitimacy of International Governance: A Coming Challange for International Environmental Law?’ American Journal of International Law, 93 (3), pp. 596–624. doi: 10.2307/2555262
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodansky, D. (2007), ‘Legitimacy’, in D. Bodansky, J. Brunnée and E. Hey (eds), The Oxford Handbook of International Environmental Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 704–23.
   Google Scholar
• Bows, A. and Barrett, J. (2010), ‘Cumulative Emission Scenarios Using a Consumption-Based Approach: A Glimmer of Hope?’ Carbon Management, 1 (1), pp. 161–75. doi: 10.4155/cmt.10.17
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchanan, A. (2004), Justice, Legitimacy, and Self-Determination (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Burnell, P. (2012), ‘Democracy, Democratization and Climate Change: Complex Relationships’, Democratization, 19 (5), pp. 813–42. doi: 10.1080/13510347.2012.709684
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Centre for Low Carbon Future. (2012). GHG Emissions Embodied in Trade. Is Border Adjustment an Appropriate and Effective Response? Available from: http://www.lowcarbonfutures.org/sites/default/files/GHG%20Emissions%20Embodied%20in%20Trade.pdf [accessed 28 September 2015].
   Google Scholar
• Clapp, J. and Helleiner, E. (2012), ‘International Political Economy and the Environment: Back to the Basic?’ International Affairs, 88 (3), pp. 485–501. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2346.2012.01085.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crabbè, A. and Leroy, P. (2008), The Handbook of Environmental Policy Evaluation (London: Earthscan).
   Google Scholar
• Crompton, T. (2011), ‘Values Matter’, Nature Climate Change, 1, pp. 276–7. doi: 10.1038/nclimate1196
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahl, R.A. (1998), On Democracy (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Davis, S.J., and Caldeira, K. (2010), ‘Consumption-Based Accounting of CO2 Emissions’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107, pp. 5687–92. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0906974107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, S.J., Caldeira, K. and Peters, G.P. (2011), ‘The Supply Chain of CO2 Emissions’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108, pp. 18554–9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1107409108
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckersley, R. (2010), ‘The Politics of Carbon Leakage and the Fairness of Border Measures’, Ethics and International Affairs, 24 (4), pp. 367–93. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-7093.2010.00277.x
   Google Scholar
• Felder, S. and Schleiniger, R. (2002), ‘Environmental Tax Reform: Efficiency and Political Feasibility’, Ecological Economics, 42 (1–2), pp. 107–16. doi: 10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00109-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fredriksson, P.G., et al. (2005), ‘Environmentalism, Democracy, and Pollution Control’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 49 (2), pp. 343–65. doi: 10.1016/j.jeem.2004.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gampfer, R. (2014), ‘Do Individuals Care about Fairness in Burden Sharing for Climate Change Mitigation?’ Evidence from a Lab Experiment’, Climatic Change, 124 (1), pp. 65–77. doi: 10.1007/s10584-014-1091-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilabert, P. and Lawford-Smith, H. (2012), ‘Political Feasibility: A Conceptual Exploration’, Political Studies, 60, pp. 809–25. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2011.00936.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grasso, M. (2010), ‘An Ethical Approach to Climate Adaptation Finance’, Global Environmental Change, 20, pp. 74–81. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.10.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grasso, M. (2012), ‘Climate Ethics: With a Little Help from Moral Cognitive Neuroscience’, Environmental Politics, 22 (3), pp. 377–93. doi: 10.1080/09644016.2012.730263
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grasso, M. (2015), ‘The Social Dimension of Sustainable Development in the Top Emitting Countries’ Climate Change Policy’, in M.R. Redclift and D. Springett (eds), Handbook on Sustainable Development (London: Routledge), pp. 379–90.
   Google Scholar
• Grasso, M. and Roberts, J.T. (2014), ‘A Compromise to Break the Climate Impasse’, Nature Climate Change, 4, pp. 543–9. doi: 10.1038/nclimate2259
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grasso, M. and Sacchi, S. (2015), ‘Impure Procedural Justice in Climate Governance Systems’, Environmental Values, 24 (6), pp. 777–98.
   Google Scholar
• Grieco, J.M. (1990), Cooperation among Nations (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Grieco, J.M., Powell, R. and Snidal, D. (1993), ‘The Relative-Gains Problem for International Cooperation’, American Political Science Review, 87 (3), pp. 729–43. doi: 10.2307/2938747
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grundig, F. (2006), ‘Patterns of International Cooperation and the Explanatory Power of Relative Gains: An Analysis of Cooperation on Global Climate Change, Ozone Depletion, and International Trade’, International Studies Quarterly, 50, pp. 781–801. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2478.2006.00425.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grundig, F. and Ward, H. (2015), ‘Structural Group Leadership and Regime Effectiveness’, Political Studies, 63, pp. 221–39. doi: 10.1111/1467-9248.12056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, P.G. and Symons, J. (2013), ‘Norm Conflict in Climate Governance: Greenhouse Gas Accounting and the Problem of Consumption’, Global Environmental Politics, 13 (1), pp. 9–29. doi: 10.1162/GLEP_a_00151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hertwich, E.G. and Peters, G.P. (2009), ‘Carbon Footprint of Nations: A Global, Trade-Linked Analysis’, Environmental Science and Technology, 43 (16), pp. 6414–20. doi: 10.1021/es803496a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hovi, J., Sprinz, D.F. and Underdal, A. (2009), ‘Implementing Long-Term Climate Policy: Time Inconsistency, Domestic Politics, International Anarchy’, Global Environmental Politics, 9 (3), pp. 20–39. doi: 10.1162/glep.2009.9.3.20
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huitema, D., et al. (2011), ‘The Evaluation of Climate Policy: Theory and Emerging Practice in Europe’, Policy Sciences, 44, pp. 179–98. doi: 10.1007/s11077-011-9125-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2006), IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, prepared by the National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme. Tokyo: Institute for Global Environmental Strategies.
   Google Scholar
• Jakob, M. and Marschinski, R. (2013), ‘Interpreting Trade-Related CO2 Emission Transfers’, Nature Climate Change, 3 (1), pp. 19–23. doi: 10.1038/nclimate1630
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamieson, D. (2013), ‘Consequentialism, Climate Change, and the Road Ahead’, Chicago Journal of International Law, 13, pp. 439–68.
   Google Scholar
• Kanemoto, K., et al. (2014), ‘International Trade Undermines National Emission Reduction Targets: New Evidence from Air Pollution’, Global Environmental Change, 24, pp. 52–9. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.09.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawford-Smith, H. (2013), ‘Understanding Political Feasibility’, Journal of Political Philosophy, 21 (3), pp. 243–59. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9760.2012.00422.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Quéré, C. et al. (2012), ‘The Global Carbon Budget 1959–2011’, Earth System Science Data Discussions, 5, pp. 1107–57. doi: 10.5194/essdd-5-1107-2012
   Google Scholar
• Light, A. (2011), ‘Climate Ethics for Climate Action’, in D. Schmidtz and E. Willott (eds), Environmental Ethics: What Really Matters? What Really Works? (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 557–66.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, L. (2015), ‘A Critical Examination of the Consumption-Based Accounting Approach: Has the Blaming of Consumers Gone Too Far?’ WIREs Climate Change, 6, pp. 1–8. doi: 10.1002/wcc.325
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGuire, M.C. and Olson, M. (1996), ‘The Economics of Autocracy and Majority Rule: The Invisible Hand and the Use of Force’, Journal of Economic Literature, 34 (2), pp. 72–96.
   Google Scholar
• Nemet, G.F. (2010), ‘Cost Containment in Climate Policy and Incentives for Technology Development’, Climatic Change, 103, pp. 423–43. doi: 10.1007/s10584-009-9779-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neumayer, E. (2002), ‘Do Democracies Exhibit Stronger International Environmental Commitment? A Cross-Country Analysis’, Journal of Peace Research, 39 (2), pp. 139–64. doi: 10.1177/0022343302039002001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordhaus, W.D. (2008), Question of Balance: Weighing the Options on Global Warming Policy (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press).
   Google Scholar
• North, D.C. (1993), The New Institutional Economics and Developments (St. Louis, Mo: Mimeo, Washington University).
   Google Scholar
• Paavola, J. and Adger, W.N. (2006), ‘Fair Adaptation to Climate Change’, Ecological Economics, 56, pp. 594–609. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.03.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page, E.A. (2012), ‘The Hidden Cost of Carbon Commodification: Emissions Trading, Political Legitimacy and Procedural Justice’, Democratization, 19 (5), pp. 932–50. doi: 10.1080/13510347.2012.709689
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan, J., Phillips, J. and Chen, Y. (2008), ‘China's Balance of Emissions Embodied in Trade: Approaches to Measurement and Allocating International Responsibility’, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 24, pp. 354–76. doi: 10.1093/oxrep/grn016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, G.P. (2008), ‘From Production-Based to Consumption-Based National Emission Inventories’, Ecological Economics, 65, pp. 13–23. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.10.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, G.P., Davis, S.J. and Andrew, R. (2012), ‘A Synthesis of Carbon in International Trade’, Biogeosciences, 9, pp. 3247–76. doi: 10.5194/bg-9-3247-2012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, G.P. and Hertwich, E.G. (2008), ‘Post-Kyoto Greenhouse Gas Inventories: Production Versus Consumption’, Climatic Change, 86, pp. 51–66. doi: 10.1007/s10584-007-9280-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, G.P., et al. (2011), ‘Growth in Emission Transfers Via International Trade from 1990 to 2008’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108, pp. 8903–8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1006388108
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickering, J., Vanderheiden, S. and Miller, S. (2012), ‘If Equity's In, We're Out: Scope for Fairness in the Next Climate Agreement’, Ethics & International Affairs, 26 (4), pp. 423–43. doi: 10.1017/S0892679412000603
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Posner, E.A. (2006), ‘International Law: A Welfarist Approach’, The University of Chicago Law Review, 73 (2), pp. 487–583.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, R. (1991), ‘Absolute and Relative Gains in International Relations’, American Political Science Review, 85 (4), pp. 1303–20. doi: 10.2307/1963947
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purdon, M. (2014), ‘Neoclassical Realism and International Climate Change Politics: Moral Imperative and Political Constraint in International Climate Finance’, Journal of International Relations and Development, 17, pp. 301–38. doi: 10.1057/jird.2013.5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Räikkä, J. (1998), ‘The Feasibility Condition in Political Theory’, Journal of Political Philosophy, 6 (1), pp. 27–40. doi: 10.1111/1467-9760.00044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosati, C.S. (2009), ‘Moral Motivation’, in E.N. Zalta (eds), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2009 ed.). Available from: http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2009/entries/moral-motivation [accessed 28 September 2015].
   Google Scholar
• Rowlands, I.H. (2001), ‘Classical Theory of International Relations’, in U. Luterbacher and D.F. Sprinz (eds), International Relations and Global Climate Change (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press), pp. 43–65.
   Google Scholar
• Scharpf, F. (1999), Governing in Europe: Effective and Democratic? (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Serrano, M. and Dietzenbacher, E. (2010), ‘Responsibility and Trade Emission Balances: An Evaluation of Approaches’, Ecological Economics, 69 (11), pp. 2224–32. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.06.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Serres, A., Llewellyn, J. and Llewellyn, P. (2011), The Political Economy of Climate Change Mitigation Policies: How to Build a Constituency to Address Global Warming? Economics Department Working Papers No. 887 (Paris: OECD).
   Google Scholar
• Shue, H. (1994), ‘After You: May Action by the Rich Be Contingent upon Action by the Poor?’ Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 1, pp. 343–66.
   Google Scholar
• Skjærseth, J.B. and Wettestad, J. (2008), EU Emissions Trading: Initiation, Decision-Making and Implementation (Aldershot: Ashgate).
   Google Scholar
• Skodvin, T., Gullberg, A.T. and Aakre, S. (2010), ‘Target-Group Influence and Political Feasibility: The Case of Climate Policy Design in Europe’, Journal of European Public Policy, 17 (6), pp. 854–73. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2010.486991
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snidal, D. (1991), ‘International Cooperation Among Relative Gains Maximizers’, International Studies Quarterly, 35, pp. 387–402. doi: 10.2307/2600947
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stavins, R.N. and Ji, Z. (2014), ‘International Cooperation: Agreements & Instruments’, Chapter 13 of IPCC, Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Fifth Assessment Report.
   Google Scholar
• Steckel, J.C., Kalkuhl, M. and Marschinski, R. (2010), ‘Should Carbon Exporting Countries Strive for Consumption-Based Accounting in a Global Cap-and-Trade Regime?’ Climatic Change, 100, pp. 779–86. doi: 10.1007/s10584-010-9825-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinberger, J.K., et al. (2012), ‘Pathways of Human Development and Carbon Emissions Embodied in Trade’, Nature Climate Change, 2, pp. 81–5. doi: 10.1038/nclimate1371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steininger, K. et al. (2014), ‘Justice and Cost Effectiveness of Consumption-Based Versus Production-Based Approaches in the Case of Unilateral Climate Policies’, Global Environmental Change, 24, pp. 75–87. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern, N. (ed.) (2007), The Economics of Climate Change [The Stern Review] (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Steves, F., Treisman, D. and Teytelboym, A. (2011), ‘Political Economy of Climate Change Policy in the Transition Region’, in A. Chirmiciu and S. Fankhauser (eds), The Low Carbon Transition, Chapter 4 (London: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD)), pp. 56–71.
   Google Scholar
• Swyngedouw, E. (2013), ‘The Non-Political Politics of Climate Change’, ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies, 12 (1), pp. 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Tanner, T. and Allouche, J. (2011), ‘Towards a New Political Economy of Climate Change and Development’, IDS Bulletin, 42 (3), pp. 1–14. doi: 10.1111/j.1759-5436.2011.00217.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terhalle, M. and Depledge, J. (2013), ‘Great-Power Politics, Order Transition, and Climate Governance: Insights from International Relations Theory’, Climate Policy, 13 (5), pp. 572–88. doi: 10.1080/14693062.2013.818849
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, J.M. (2014), ‘Counting Carbon: The Politics of Carbon Footprints and Climate Governance from the Individual to the Global’, Global Environmental Politics, 14 (1), pp. 59–78. doi: 10.1162/GLEP_a_00214
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Underdal, A. (1994), ‘Leadership Theory: Rediscovering the Arts of Management’, in I.W. Zartman (ed.), International Multilateral Negotiation: Approaches to the Management of Complexity (San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass), pp. 178–97.
   Google Scholar
• Underdal, A., et al. (2012), ‘Can Conditional Commitments Break the Climate Change Negotiations Deadlock?’, International Political Science Review, 33 (4), pp. 475–93. doi: 10.1177/0192512111432564
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vezirgiannidou, S-E. (2008), ‘The Kyoto Agreement and the Pursuit of Relative Gains’, Environmental Politics, 17 (1), pp. 40–57. doi: 10.1080/09644010701811483
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, H. (2008), ‘Liberal Democracy and Sustainability’, Environmental Politics, 17 (3), pp. 386–409. doi: 10.1080/09644010802055626
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, O. (1991), ‘Political Leadership and Regime Formation: On the Development of Institutions in International Society’, International Organizations, 45 (3), pp. 281–308. doi: 10.1017/S0020818300033117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar