Clean Energy Trade Governance: Reconciling Trade Liberalism and Climate Interventionism?

References

• Ang, G. (2015), Overcoming Barriers to International Investment in Clean Energy (Paris: OECD).
   Google Scholar
• Bevir, M. (2013), Governance: A Very Short Introduction (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Bigdeli, S.Z. (2011), ‘Resurrecting the Dead: The Expired Non-Actionable Subsidies and the Lingering Question of Green Space’, Manchester Journal of International Economic Law, 8 (2), pp. 2–37.
   Google Scholar
• Brander, J.A. and Spencer, B.J. (1985), ‘Export Subsidies and International Market Share Rivalry’, Journal of International Economics, 18, pp. 83–100. doi: 10.1016/0022-1996(85)90006-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, N. (2016), ‘The ‘New’ Impacts of the Implementation of Climate Change Response Measures’, Review of European, Comparative and International Environmental Law, 25 (2), pp. 228–37. doi: 10.1111/reel.12161
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, H.J. (1996), The Political Economy of Industrial Policy (Basingstoke: Palgrave McMillan).
   Google Scholar
• Charnovitz, S. (2003), Trade and Climate: Potential Conflicts and Synergies (Washington, DC: Pew Centre on Global Climate Change).
   Google Scholar
• Cimino, C. and Hufbauer, G.C. (2014), Trade Remedies Targeting the Renewable Energy Sector (Washington, DC: Peterson Institute for International Economics).
   Google Scholar
• Corry, O. (2013), ‘The Rise and Fall of the Global Climate Polity’, in J. Strippel and H. Bulkeley (eds.), Governing Climate: Rethinking Rationality, Power and Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 219–234.
   Google Scholar
• Cosbey, A. (2011), Renewable Energy Subsidies and the WTO: The Wrong Law and the Wrong Venue (Geneva: Global Subsidies Initiative).
   Google Scholar
• Cosbey, A. and Mavroidis, P. (2014), ‘A Turquoise Mess: Green Subsidies, Blue Industrial Policy and Renewable Energy: The Case for Redrafting the Subsidies Agreement of the WTO’, Journal of International Economic Law, 17 (1), pp. 11–47. doi: 10.1093/jiel/jgu003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cosbey, A. and Rubini, L. (2013), Does It FIT? An Assessment of the Effectiveness of Renewable Energy Measures and of the Implications of the Canada – Renewable Energy/FIT disputes, E15 Expert Group on Clean Energy Technologies and the Trade System Think Piece (Geneva: ICTSD and World Economic Forum).
   Google Scholar
• Cottier, T., et al. (2009), ‘Energy in WTO Law And Policy’, NCCR Working Paper Series, No 2009/25 (May) (Bern: National Centre for Competence in Research).
   Google Scholar
• Dent, C.M. (2010), ‘Free Trade Agreements in the Asia-Pacific a Decade On: Evaluating the Past, Looking to the Future’, International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 10 (2), pp. 201–45. doi: 10.1093/irap/lcp022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dent, C.M. (2014), Renewable Energy in East Asia: Towards a New Developmentalism (London: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Dicken, P. (2011), Global Shift (London: Sage).
   Google Scholar
• Dyer, H. (2014), ‘Climate Anarchy: Creative Disorder in World Politics’, International Political Sociology, 8 (2), pp. 182–200. doi: 10.1111/ips.12051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E15 Initiative (2013), Clean Energy Technologies and the Trade System: Proposals and Analysis (Geneva: ICTSD/E15 Initiative).
   Google Scholar
• E15 Initiative (2016), Enabling the Energy Transition and Scale-Up of Clean Energy Technologies: Options for the Global Trade System (Geneva: ICTSD / E15 Initiative).
   Google Scholar
• Epps, T. and Green, A. (2010), Reconciling Trade and Climate: How the WTO Can Help Address Climate Change (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar).
   Google Scholar
• Espa, I. and Rolland, S.E. (2015), Subsidies, Clean Energy, and Climate Change (Geneva: ICTSD/E15 Initiative).
   Google Scholar
• Evans, J.P.M. (2012), Environmental Governance (London: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Florini, A. and Sovacool, B.K. (2009), ‘Who Governs Energy? The Challenges Facing Global Energy Governance’, Energy Policy, 37, pp. 5239–48. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.07.039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldthau, A. and Witte, J.M. (2010), Global Energy Governance: The New Rules of the Game (Berlin: Global Public Policy Institute).
   Google Scholar
• Green, A. (2006), ‘Trade Rules and Climate Change Subsidies’, World Trade Review, 5 (3), pp. 377–414. doi: 10.1017/S1474745606002928
   Google Scholar
• Hart, J.A. and Prakash, A. (1997), ‘Strategic trade and investment policies: implications for the study of international political economy’, World Economy, 20 (4), pp. 457–76.
   Google Scholar
• Hoppe, R. (2011), The Governance of Problems: Puzzling, Powering, Participation (Bristol: Policy Press).
   Google Scholar
• Howse, R. (2010), Climate Mitigation Subsidies and the WTO Legal Framework: A Policy Analysis (Winnipeg: International Institute for Sustainable Development).
   Google Scholar
• Hufbauer, G.C. and Kim, J. (2009), ‘The World Trade Organisation and Climate Change: Challenges and Options’, Peterson Institute for International Economics Working Paper Series, No. WP 09-9 (Washington, DC: Peterson Institute for International Economics).
   Google Scholar
• International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development (ICTSD) (2006), Linking Trade, Climate Change and Energy (Geneva: ICTSD).
   Google Scholar
• International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development (ICTSD) (2015), Climate Change and Sustainable Energy Measures in Regional Trade Agreements (RTAs): An Overview (Geneva: ICTSD).
   Google Scholar
• International Energy Agency (IEA) (2013), CO2 Emissions from Fuel Combustion: Highlights (Paris: IEA).
   Google Scholar
• International Energy Agency (IEA) (2015a), Global Electric Vehicles Outlook 2015: Data Update (Paris: IEA).
   Google Scholar
• International Energy Agency (IEA) (2015b), National Survey Report of PV Power Applications in China, 2014 (Paris: IEA).
   Google Scholar
• Jagers, S.C., and Stripple, J. (2003), ‘Climate Governance Beyond the State’, Global Governance, 9 (3), pp. 385–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janzen, B.G. (2010), ‘The Cleantech Subsidy Wave: A New Source of Trade Conflicts?’ International Law News, 39 (3), Available from: www.international.law.com
   Google Scholar
• Jha, V. (2009), Trade Flows, Barriers and Market Drivers in Renewable Energy Supply Goods: The Need to Level the Playing Field (Geneva: ICTSD).
   Google Scholar
• Kirkegaard, J.F., Hanemann, T. and Weischer, L. (2009), ‘It Should Be a Breeze: Harnessing the Potential of Open Trade and Investment Flows in the Wind Energy Industry’, Peterson Institute for International Economics Working Paper Series, No. 09–14, December.
   Google Scholar
• Krugman, P. (ed.) (1986), Strategic Trade Policy and the New International Economics (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
   Google Scholar
• Krugman, P. (1987), ‘Is Free Trade Passé?’ Journal of Economic Perspectives, Autumn, 1 (2), pp. 131–41. doi: 10.1257/jep.1.2.131
   Google Scholar
• Krugman, P. and Obstfeld, M. (2000), International Economics: Theory and Practice, 5th ed. (London: Addison Wesley Longman).
   Google Scholar
• Lall, S. (2003), ‘Reinventing Industrial Strategy: The Role of Government Policy in Building Industrial Competitiveness’, QEH Working Paper Series, No. 111 (Oxford: Queen Elizabeth House).
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, J. (2014), ‘The Rise of Renewable Energy Protectionism: Emerging Trade Conflicts and Implications for Low Carbon Development’, Global Environmental Politics, 14 (4), pp. 10–35. doi: 10.1162/GLEP_a_00255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marceau, G. (2012), ‘The WTO in the Emerging Energy Governance Debate’, Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Society of International Law, 106, pp. 385–89. doi: 10.5305/procannmeetasil.106.0385
   Google Scholar
• Morris, A.C., Nivola, P.S. and Schultze, C.L. (2012), ‘Clean Energy: Revisiting the Challenges of Industrial Policy’, Energy Economics, 34, pp. S34–42. doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2012.08.030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okereke, C., Bulkeley, H. and Schroeder, H. (2009), ‘Conceptualizing Climate Governance Beyond the International Regime’, Global Environmental Politics, 9 (1), pp. 58–78. doi: 10.1162/glep.2009.9.1.58
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olawuyi, D.S. (2014), ‘Harmonizing International Trade and Climate Change Institutions: Legal and Theoretical Basis for Systemic Integration’, Law and Development Review, 7 (1), pp. 107–29. doi: 10.1515/ldr-2014-0023
   Google Scholar
• Pew Charitable Trusts (2013), The U.S.–China Clean Energy Technology Relationship in 2011 (Washington, DC: Pew Charitable Trusts).
   Google Scholar
• Prognos (2013), The Impact of Anti-Dumping and/or Countervailing Measures on Imports of Solar Modules, Cells, and Wafers from China on EU Employment and Value Added (Basel: Prognos AG).
   Google Scholar
• REN21 (2014), Global Status Report on Renewable Energy 2014 (Paris: REN21).
   Google Scholar
• REN21 (2015), Global Status Report on Renewable Energy 2015 (Paris: REN21).
   Google Scholar
• REN21 (2016), Global Status Report on Renewable Energy 2016 (Paris: REN21).
   Google Scholar
• Rodrik, D. (2004), ‘Industrial Policy for the Twenty-First Century’, KSG Working Paper Series, No. RWP04-047 (Cambridge, MA: Kennedy School of Government).
   Google Scholar
• Rodrik, D. (2007), ‘Normalizing Industrial Policy’, paper prepared for the Commission on Growth and Development (Harvard University, September 2007).
   Google Scholar
• Rodrik, D. (2014), ‘Green Industrial Policy’, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 30 (3), pp. 469–91. doi: 10.1093/oxrep/gru025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubini, L. (2012), ‘Ain’t Wastin’ Time No More: Subsidies for Renewable Energy, the SCM Agreement, Policy Space and Law Reform’, Journal of International Economic Law, 15 (2), pp. 525–79. doi: 10.1093/jiel/jgs020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitz, H. (2007), ‘Reducing Complexity in the Industrial Policy Debate’, Development Policy Review, 25 (4), pp. 417–28. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7679.2007.00378.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schreurs, M.A. (2008), ‘From the Bottom Up: Local and Subnational Climate Change Politics’, The Journal of Environment and Development, 17 (4), pp. 343–55. doi: 10.1177/1070496508326432
   Google Scholar
• Schreurs, M.A. (2010), ‘Multi-Level Governance and Global Climate Change in East Asia’, Asian Economic Policy Review, 5 (1), pp. 88–105. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-3131.2010.01150.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selivanova, Y. (ed.) (2011), Regulation of Energy in International Trade Law. WTO, NAFTA and Energy Charter (The Hague: Kluwer Law International).
   Google Scholar
• Selivanova, Y. (2015), Clean Energy and Access to Infrastructure: Implications for the Global Trade System (Geneva: ICTSD / E15 Initiative).
   Google Scholar
• Simmons, Z.S. (2014), ‘Subsidising Solar: The Case for an Environmental Goods and Services Carve-Out from the Global Subsidies Regime’, Journal of Environmental Law, 32 (2), pp. 422–84.
   Google Scholar
• Solar Power Europe (2015), Global Market Outlook 2015–2019 (Brussels: Solar Power Europe).
   Google Scholar
• Stegemann, K. (1996), ‘Strategic Trade Policy’, in D. Greenaway (ed.), Current Issues in International Trade (London: MacMillan), pp. 82–99.
   Google Scholar
• Stepp, M. and Atkinson, R.D. (2012), Green Mercantilism: Threat to the Clean Energy Economy (Washington, DC: Information Technology and Innovation Foundation).
   Google Scholar
• Stern, N. (2006), Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change (London: HM Treasury).
   Google Scholar
• Stoker, G. (1998), ‘Governance as Theory: Five Propositions’, International Social Science Journal, 50 (155), pp. 17–28. doi: 10.1111/1468-2451.00106
   Google Scholar
• Swedish National Board of Trade (2013), Targeting the Environment: Exploring a New Trend in the EU’s Trade Defence Investigations (Stockholm: Swedish National Board of Trade). Available from: www.kommers.se/Documents/dokumentarkiv/publikationer/2013/rapporter/Targetingthe-environment.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Tyson, L.D. (1992), Who’s Bashing Whom? Trade Conflict in High-Technology Industries (Washington DC: Institute for International Economics).
   Google Scholar
• UNFCCC (2003), ‘Co-operation with Relevant International Organizations: WTO’, Subsidiary Body for Scientific and Technological Advice: Eighteenth Session, Bonn, 4–13 June.
   Google Scholar
• UNFCCC (2011), Submission by Singapore to the Ad-hoc Working Group on Long-term Cooperative Action under the Convention (AWG-LCA) Pursuant to Paragraph 93 of Dec. 1/CP 16 (New York: UNFCCC).
   Google Scholar
• United Nations (1992), United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (Geneva: United Nations).
   Google Scholar
• United Nations (1997), Kyoto Protocol of the UNFCCC (Geneva: United Nations).
   Google Scholar
• United Nations (2015), COP21 Paris Agreement (Geneva: United Nations).
   Google Scholar
• United Nations (2017), United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) (Geneva: United Nations). Available from: http://unfccc.int/2860.php
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Conference on Trade and Development / UNCTAD (2008), World Trade Law and Renewable Energy: The Case of Non-Tariff Barriers (Geneva: UNCTAD).
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP) (2013), Green Economy and Trade (Geneva: United Nations).
   Google Scholar
• Van De Graaf, T. (2013), The Politics and Institutions of Global Energy Governance (New York: Palgrave Macmillan).
   Google Scholar
• Vatn, A. (2015), Environmental Governance: Institutions, Policies and Actions (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar).
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, T.G. (2013), Global Governance: What? Why? Whither? (Cambridge: Polity).
   Google Scholar
• Whitman, J. (2009), Global Governance (Basingstoke: Palgrave).
   Google Scholar
• Wilke, M. (2011), Feed-in Tariffs for Renewable Energy and WTO Subsidy Rules: An Initial Legal Review (Geneva: ICTSD).
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, R. (2000), Multilateralism and the World Trade Organisation (London: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, R. (2006), The WTO: Crisis and the Governance of Global Trade (London: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, R. and Hughes, S. (eds.) (2002), Global Governance: Critical Perspectives (London: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, O.E. (1996), The Mechanisms of Governance (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, J.D. (2012), ‘Resource Security: A New Motivation for Free Trade Agreements in the Asia-Pacific Region’, Pacific Review, 25 (4), pp. 429–53. doi: 10.1080/09512748.2012.685098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Bank (2008), International Trade and Climate Change: Economic, Legal and Institutional Perspectives (Washington, DC: World Bank).
   Google Scholar
• World Bank (2010), Doing a Dam Better: The Lao People’s Democratic Republic and the Story of the Nam Theun 2 (NT2) (Washington, DC: World Bank).
   Google Scholar
• World Summit on Sustainable Development / WSSD (2002), Plan of Implementation (Johannesburg: WSSD).
   Google Scholar
• World Trade Organisation (2007), Existing Forms of Cooperation and Information Exchange between UNEP/MEAs and the WTO, note TN/TE/S/2/REV.2, 16 January.
   Google Scholar
• World Trade Organisation (2016), Committee on Trade and Environment: List of Documents, note WT/CTE/INF/5/Rev.12, 29 February.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, M. and Salzman, J. (2014), ‘The Next Generation of Trade and Environment Conflicts: The Rise of Green Industry Policy’, Northwestern University Law Review, 108 (2), pp. 401–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar