The Managerial Lineages of Neoliberalism

References

• Abella, A. (2008), Soldiers of Reason: The Rand Corporation and the Rise of the American Empire (New York: Harcourt).
   Google Scholar
• Amadae, S.M. (2003), Rationalizing Capitalist Democracy: The Cold War Origins of Rational Choice Liberalism (London: Chicago Press University).
   Google Scholar
• Amadae, S.M. (2016), Prisoners of Reason: Game Theory and Neoliberal Political Economy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Augier, M. and March, J. (2011), The Roots, Rituals, and Rhetorics of Change: North American Business Schools after the Second World War (Stanford: Stanford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Banzhaf, H.S. (2010), ‘Consumer Surplus with Apology: A Historical Perspective on Nonmarket Valuation and Recreation Demand’, Annual Review of Resources Economics, 18 (2), pp. 1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Berle, A. and Means G.C. (1967), The Modern Corporation and Private Property (New York: Harcourt, Brace & World).
   Google Scholar
• Berman, E.P. (Forthcoming), Thinking Like an Economist: How Economics Became the Language of U.S. Public Policy (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Bezes, Philippe, et al. (2012), ‘New Public Management and Professionals in the Public Sector. What new Patterns Beyond Opposition?’ Sociologie du Travail 54 (2012), pp. e1–e52.
   Google Scholar
• Bockman J. (2011), Markets in the Name of Socialism: The Left Wing Origins of Neoliberalism (Stanford: Stanford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Brenner, N., Peck, J. and Theodore, N. (2012), ‘Neoliberalism Interrupted’, in D. Cahill, L. Edwards and F. Stilwell (eds.), Neoliberalism: Beyond the Free Market (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar), pp. 15–30.
   Google Scholar
• Brinkley, A. (1989), ‘The New Deal and the Idea of the State,’ in Fraser, S. and Gerstle, G. (eds.), The Rise and Fall of the New Deal Order, 1930–1980 (Princeton: Princeton University Press), pp. 85–121.
   Google Scholar
• Cahill, D. (2014), The End of Laissez-Faire? On the Durability of Embedded Neoliberalism (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing).
   Google Scholar
• Campen, J. (1986), Benefit, Cost, and Beyond?: The Political Economy of Benefit-Cost Analysis (Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Pub. Co.)
   Google Scholar
• Chandler, A. (1962), Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of the American Industrial Enterprise (Cambridge: MIT Press).
   Google Scholar
• Chandler, A. (1977), The Visible Hand: Managerial Revolution in American Business (Boston: Harvard University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Colas, A. (2005), ‘Neoliberalism, Globalisation and International Relations’, in A. Saad-Filho and D. Johnston (eds.), Neoliberalism: A Critical Reader (London: Pluto Press), pp. 70–80.
   Google Scholar
• Collier, S. (2009), ‘Topologies of Power: Foucault’s Analysis of Political Government Beyond “Governmentality”’, Theory, Culture & Society, 26 (6), pp. 78–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crouch, C. (2011), The Strange Non-death of Neoliberalism (Cambridge: Polity Press).
   Google Scholar
• Dardot, P. and Laval, C. (2014), The New Way of the World: On Neoliberal Society (London: Verso).
   Google Scholar
• Davies, W. (2014), The Limits of Neoliberalism: Authority, Sovereignty and the Logic of Competition (London: Sage).
   Google Scholar
• Duarte, P.G. (2012), ‘Not Going Away? Microfoundations in the Making of a New Consensus in Macroeconomics’, in P.G. Duarte and G. Tadeu Lima (eds.), Microfoundations Reconsidered: The Relationship of Micro and Macroeconomics in Historical Perspective (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar), pp. 190–239.
   Google Scholar
• Enthoven, A. (1993), ‘The History and Principles of Managed Competition’, Health Affairs, 12 (1), pp. 24–48.
   Google Scholar
• Erickson, P., et al. (2013), How Reason Almost Lost its Mind: The Strange Career of Cold War Rationality (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
   Google Scholar
• Ewald, F. (1996), “Philosophie de la précaution’, L'Année sociologique, 46 (2), pp. 383–412.
   Google Scholar
• Ferlie, E., Pettigrew, P. and Ashburner, L. (1996), The New Public Management in Action (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Fesler, J. (1957), ‘Administrative Literature and the Second Hoover Commission Reports’, The American Political Science Review, 51 (1), pp. 135–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fligstein, N. (1990), The Transformation of Corporate Control (London: Harvard University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (2004), The Birth of Biopolitics (London: Palgrave).
   Google Scholar
• Fourcade, M. and Khurana, R. (2013), ‘From Social Control to Financial Economics: The Linked Ecologies of Economics and Business in 20th America’, Theory & Society, 42 (2), pp. 121–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamble, A. (2006), ‘Two Faces of Neo-liberalism’, in R. Robison (ed.) The Neo-Liberal Revolution: Forging the Market State (London: Palgrave), pp. 20–35.
   Google Scholar
• Gleeson, R.E. and Schlossman, S. (1992), ‘The Many Faces of the New Look: The University of Virginia, Carnegie Tech, and the Reform of American Management Education in the Postwar Era’, Selections, 8 (4), pp. 9–28.
   Google Scholar
• Gleeson, R.E. and Schlossman, S. (1995), ‘George Leland Bach and the Rebirth of Graduate Management Education in the United States, 1945–1975’, Selections, 11 (3): pp. 8–46.
   Google Scholar
• Graeber, D. (2015), The Utopia of Rules: On Technology, Stupidity and the Secret Joys of Bureaucracy Hardcover (London: Melville house).
   Google Scholar
• Hanlon, G. (2015), The Dark Side of Management: A Secret History of Management Theory (London: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Hanlon, G. (2017), ‘The First Neo-Liberal Science: Management and Neo-Liberalism’, Sociology Online First.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. (2005), A Brief History of Neoliberalism (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Hibou, B. (2012), La bureaucratisation du monde: à l’ère néolibérale (Paris: La Découverte).
   Google Scholar
• Hitch, C.J. (1996), ‘Management Problems of Large Organizations’, Operations Research, 44 (2), pp. 257–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood, C. (1995), ‘The “New Public Management” in the 1980s: Variations on a Theme’, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 20 (2/3), pp. 93–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood, C. and Dixon, R. (2015), A Government That Worked Better and Cost Less? Evaluating Three Decades of Reform and Change in UK Central Government (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Hoskin, K. and Macve, R. (1994), ‘Reappraising the Genesis of Managerialism: A Re-examination of the Role of Accounting at the Springfield Armory, 1815–1845’, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 7 (2), pp. 4–29.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, O. (2003), Public Management and Administration (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).
   Google Scholar
• Jardini, D.R. (2000), ‘Out of the Blue Yonder: The Transfer of Systems Thinking from the Pentagon to the Great Society, 1961–1965’, in A. C. Hughes and T. P. Hughes (eds.), Systems, Experts, and Computers: The Systems Approach in Management and Engineering, World War II and After (London: MIT Press), pp. 311–58.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, H.T. (1975), ‘Management Accounting in an Early Integrated Industrial: E.I. Dupont de Nemours Powder Company, 1903–1912’, Business History Review, 49 (2), pp. 185–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, H.T. and Kaplan, R. (1987), Relevance Lost: The Rise and Fall of Management Accounting (Boston: Harvard Business School Press).
   Google Scholar
• Khurana, R. (2007), From Higher Aims to Hired Hands: The Social Transformations of American Business Schools and the Unfulfilled Promise of Management as a Profession (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Kirby, M. (2003), Operational Research in War and Peace: The British Experience from the 1930s to 1970 (London: Imperial College Press).
   Google Scholar
• Klein, J.L. (2015), The Cold War Hot House for Modeling Strategies at the Carnegie Institute of Technology, Working Paper Series No. 19, Institute for New Economic Thinking.
   Google Scholar
• Knafo S. and Teschke B. (2017), The Rules of Reproduction of Capitalism: A Historicist Critique, Working Paper Series No. 12, University of Sussex Centre for Global Political Economy.
   Google Scholar
• Lemke, T. (2012), Foucault, Governmentality, and Critique (London: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Light, J. (2003), From Warfare to Welfare: Defense Intellectuals and Urban Problems in Cold War America (Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Locke, R.R. and Spencer, J.-C. (2011), Confronting Managerialism (London: Verso).
   Google Scholar
• Lynn, L. (2006), Public Management: Old and New (London: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Lynn, P. (2012), ‘Public Management’, in B.G. Peters and J. Pierre (eds), The SAGE Handbook of Public Administration (London: Sage), pp. 17–31.
   Google Scholar
• McKee, K. (2009), ‘Post-Foucauldian Governmentality: What Does It Offer Critical Social Policy Analysis?’ Critical Social Policy, 29 (3), pp. 465–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenna, C. (2010), The World’'s Newest Profession: Management Consulting in the Twentieth Century (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Miller, P. and Rose, N. (2008), Governing the Present: Administering Economic, Social and Personal Life (Cambridge: Polity).
   Google Scholar
• Mirowski, P. (2002), Machines Dreams: Ecomonics Becomes a Cyborg Science (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Mirowski, P. (2013), Never Let a Serious Crisis Go to Waste: How Neoliberalism Survived the Financial Meltdown (London: Verso).
   Google Scholar
• Mirowski, P. and Plehwe, D. (eds.) (2009), The Road from Mont Pèlerin: The Making of the Neo-Liberal Thought Collective (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Novick, D. (1954), Efficiency and Economy in Government Through New Budgeting and Accounting Procedures (Santa Monica: RAND Corporation).
   Google Scholar
• O'Sullivan, M. (2001), Contests for Corporate Control: Corporate Governance and Economic Performance in the United States and Germany (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Olson, M. (ed.) (1969), Toward a Social Report (Washington, DC: US Department of Health, Education and Welfare, Washington).
   Google Scholar
• Peck, J. (2010), Constructions of Neoliberal Reason (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Power, M. (2007), Organized Uncertainty: Designing a World of Risk Management (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Radin, B. (2000), Beyond Machiavelli: Policy Analysis Comes of Age (Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Robison, R. (2006), ‘Neo-liberalism and the Market State: What is the Ideal Shell?’ in R. Robison (ed.), The Neo-Liberal Revolution Forging the Market State (London: Palgrave), pp. 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, N., O’Malley, P. and Valverde, M. (2006), ‘Governmentality’, Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 2, pp. 83–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schick, A. (1966), ‘The Road to PPB: The Stages of Budget Reform’, Public Administration Review, 26 (4), pp. 243–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlossman, S., Sedlak, M. and Wechsler, H. (1998), ‘The ‘New Look’: The Ford Foundation and the Revolution in Business Education’, Selections, 14 (3), pp. 8–28.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A. (2000), ‘The Discipline of Cost–Benefit Analysis’, The Journal of Legal Studies, 29 (2), pp. 931–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stivers, C. (2003), ‘Administration Versus Management: A Reading Beyond the Boundaries’, Administration & Society, 35 (2), pp. 210–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Styhre, A. (2015), The Financialization of the Firm: Managerial and Social Implications (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar).
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, W. (2015), Rational Action: The Sciences of Policy in Britain and America, 1940–1960 (London: MIT Press).
   Google Scholar
• Tribe, K. (2015), The Economy of the World: Language, History, and Economics (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Wildavsky, A. (1966), ‘The Political Economy of Efficiency: Cost–Benefit Analysis, Systems Analysis, and Program Budgeting’, Public Administration Review, 26 (4), pp. 292–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar