When Overlapping Organisations Play Two-Level Games: IMF–EU Interaction in Credit Lending to Latvia and Greece

References

• Aslund, A. (2010), The Last Shall be the First. The East European Financial Crisis, 2008–10 , October (Washington, DC: Peterson Institute for International Economics).
   Google Scholar
• Bank for International Settlements (BIS) (2016), Consolidated Foreign Claims and Other Potential Exposures – Ultimate Risk, BIS Statistics Explorer, Table B3. Available from: http://www.bis.org/statistics/consstats.htm [accessed 23 September 2016].
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, M. and Finnemore, M. (2004), Rules for the World. International Organizations in Global Politics (Ithaca: Cornell University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Bastasin, C. (2012), Saving Europe: How National Politics Nearly Destroyed the Euro (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press).
   Google Scholar
• Breen, M. (2013), The Politics of IMF Lending (Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan).
   Google Scholar
• Buti, M. (2012), ‘Opening Remarks. In European Commission (EC), EU Balance-of Payments Assistance for Latvia. Foundations for Success’, Occasional Papers No. 120, November, 10–12.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, M. and Leblond, P. (2015), ‘All in: Market Expectations of Eurozone Integrity in the Sovereign Debt crisis’, Review of International Political Economy, 22 (3), pp. 626–55. doi: 10.1080/09692290.2014.941905
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Beaufort Wijnholds, J.O. (2003), ‘The Argentine Drama: A View from the IMF Board’, in J. Joost Teunissen and A. Akkerman (eds), The Crisis That was not Prevented. Lessons for Argentina, the IMF, and Globalisation (The Hague: FONDAD), pp. 101–19.
   Google Scholar
• Delreux, T. and Kerremans, B. (2010), ‘How Agents Weaken their Principals’ Incentives to Control: The Case of EU Negotiators and EU Member States in Multilateral Negotiations’, European Integration, 32 (4), pp. 357–74. doi: 10.1080/07036331003797554
   Google Scholar
• Deroose, S., et al. (2010), ‘The Tale of the Baltics: Experiences, Challenges Ahead and Main Lessons’, ECFIN Economic Brief No.10, July (Brussels: European Commission).
   Google Scholar
• Der Spiegel. (2015), Ich könnte zum Präsidenten gehen, Der Spiegel, No. 30: 30–3.
   Google Scholar
• Farrell, H. and Newman, A. (2014), ‘Domestic Institutions Beyond the Nation-State: Charting the New Interdependence Approach’, World Politics, 66 (2), pp. 331–63. doi: 10.1017/S0043887114000057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Featherstone, K. (2015), ‘External Conditionality and the Debt Crisis: The “Troika” and Public Administration Reform in Greece’, Journal of European Public Policy, 22 (3), pp. 295–314. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2014.955123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Financial Times (2016), ‘Greek Debt Deal Reflects Shifting Powers among IMF Members. Fund Steps Back from Confrontation with Eurozone’, Financial Times, 26 May.
   Google Scholar
• Fioretos, O. (2011), ‘Historical Institutionalism in International RELATIONS’, International Organization, 65 (2), pp. 367–99. doi: 10.1017/S0020818311000002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henning, C.R. (2017), Tangled Governance. International Regime Complexity, the Troika and the Euro Crisis (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Hodson, D. (2015), ‘The IMF as a de Facto Institution of the EU: A Multiple Supervisor Approach’, Review of International Political Economy, 22 (3), pp. 570–98. doi: 10.1080/09692290.2014.956136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Independent Evaluation Office of the IMF (IEO) (2016), ‘The IMF and the Crises in Greece, Ireland, and Portugal’, Report, 8 July (Washington, DC: IMF).
   Google Scholar
• International Monetary Fund (IMF) (2008), ‘IMF Announces Staff-level Agreement with Latvia on a €1.7 Billion Stand-by Agreement’, Press Release No. 08/332, 19 December (Washington, DC: IMF).
   Google Scholar
• International Monetary Fund (IMF) (2009a), ‘IMF Helping Counter Crisis Fallout in Emerging Europe’, IMF Survey Online, 14 January (Washington, DC: IMF).
   Google Scholar
• International Monetary Fund (IMF) (2009b), ‘Financial Sector Key to European Recovery’, IMF Survey Online, 24 April (Washington, DC: IMF).
   Google Scholar
• International Monetary Fund (IMF) (2009c), ‘IMF Reaches Staff-level Agreement with Latvian Authorities on First Review under Stand-by Arrangement’, Press Release No. 09/269, 27 July (Washington, DC: IMF).
   Google Scholar
• International Monetary Fund (IMF) (2009d), ‘Republic of Latvia: Request for Stand-by Arrangement – Staff Report: Staff Supplement: Press Release on the Executive Board Discussion; and Statement by the Executive Director for the Republic of Latvia’, IMF Country Report No.09/3, January (Washington, DC: IMF).
   Google Scholar
• International Monetary Fund (IMF) (2009e), ‘Republic of Latvia – Request for Stand-by Arrangement’, Minutes of the Executive Board Meeting 08/114-1, 23 December 2008, published 26 March (Washington, DC: IMF).
   Google Scholar
• International Monetary Fund (IMF) (2009f), ‘IMF Completes First Review under Stand-by Arrangement with Latvia and Approves €195.2 Million Disbursement’, Press Release No. 09/290, 27 August (Washington, DC: IMF).
   Google Scholar
• International Monetary Fund (IMF) (2010a), World Economic Outlook (WEO). Rebalancing Growth, World Economic and Financial Surveys, April (Washington, DC: IMF).
   Google Scholar
• International Monetary Fund (IMF) (2010b), ‘Greece – Request for Stand-by Arrangement; Rule K-1 Report on Breach of Obligations under Article VIII, Section 5 of the Articles of Agreement’, Minutes of Executive Board Meeting 10/45-1, 9 May, published 27 September (Washington, DC: IMF).
   Google Scholar
• International Monetary Fund (IMF) (2010c), ‘Greece: Staff Report on Request for Stand-by Arrangement’, IMF Country Report No. 10/110, May (Washington, DC: IMF).
   Google Scholar
• International Monetary Fund (IMF) (2010d), ‘Republic of Latvia – First Review and Financing Assurances Review Under the Stand-by Arrangement; Requests for Waivers of Nonobservance of Performance Criteria; and Rephasing of Purchases Under the Arrangement’, Minutes of the Executive Board Meeting 09/89-1, 27 August , published 6 January (Washington, DC: IMF).
   Google Scholar
• International Monetary Fund (IMF) (2011), ‘Greece: Fourth Review under the Stand-by Arrangement and Request for Modification and Waiver of Applicability of Performance Criteria’, IMF Country Report No. 11/175, July (Washington, DC: IMF).
   Google Scholar
• International Monetary Fund (IMF) (2014), The Fund's Lending Framework and Sovereign Debt – Preliminary Considerations, June (Washington, DC: IMF).
   Google Scholar
• International Monetary Fund (IMF) (2017a), IMF Executive Board Approves in Principle €1.6 Billion Stand-by Arrangement for Greece. Available from: https://www.imf.org/en/News/Articles/2017/07/20/pr17294-greece-imf-executive-board-approves-in-principle-stand-by-arrangement [accessed 15 September 2017].
   Google Scholar
• International Monetary Fund (IMF) (2017b), Key Questions on Approval in Principle and Greece. Available from: https://www.imf.org/en/About/FAQ/approval-in-principle#q2 [accessed 15 September 2017].
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, T. (2014), Organizational Progeny. Why Governments Are Losing Control Over the Proliferating Structures of Global Governance (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Kahler, M. (1993), ‘Bargaining with the IMF. Two-level Strategies and Developing Countries’, in P. Evans, H. Jacobson and R. Putnam (eds), Double Edged Diplomacy (Berkeley: University of California Press), pp. 363–94.
   Google Scholar
• Lütz, S. and Kranke, M. (2014), ‘The European Rescue of the Washington Consensus? EU and IMF Lending to Central and Eastern European countries’, Review of International Political Economy, 21 (2), pp. 310–38. doi: 10.1080/09692290.2012.747104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mabbett, D. and Schelkle, W. (2015) ‘What Difference Does Euro Membership Make to Stabilization? The Political Economy of International Monetary Systems revisited’, Review of International Political Economy, 22 (3), pp. 508–34. doi: 10.1080/09692290.2014.916625
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mody, A. (2014), The Ghost of Deauville, Available from: http://voxeu.org/article/ghost-deauville [accessed 14 September 2017].
   Google Scholar
• Mohan, R. and Kapur M. (2015), ‘Emerging Powers and Global Governance: Whither the IMF?’ IMF Working Paper, WP/15/219.
   Google Scholar
• Moravcsik, A. (1993), ‘Integrating International and Domestic Theories of International Bargaining’, in P. Evans, H. Jacobson and R. Putnam (eds), Double-edged Diplomacy: Interactive Games in International Affairs (Berkeley: University of California Press), pp. 3–42.
   Google Scholar
• Moschella, M. (2016), ‘Negotiating Greece. Layering, Insulation and the Design of Adjustment Programs in the Eurozone’, Review of International Political Economy, 23 (5), pp. 799–824. doi: 10.1080/09692290.2016.1224770
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papaconstantinou, G. (2016), Game Over. The Inside Story of the Greek Crisis (Athens: Papadopoulos Publishing).
   Google Scholar
• Pollack, M. (1997), ‘Delegation, Agency, and Agenda Setting in the European Community’, International Organization, 51 (1), pp. 99–134. doi: 10.1162/002081897550311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Presidency of the EcoFin Council and the EC (2008), Joint Statement of the Presidency of the EcoFin Council and the Commission on Providing EU Medium-term Financial Assistance to Latvia, IP/08/2045, 19 December (Brussels: European Commission). Available from: http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-08-2045_en.htm?locale=en [accessed 20 September 2016].
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. (1988), ‘Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: the Logic of Two-level games’, International Organization, 42 (3), pp. 427–60. doi: 10.1017/S0020818300027697
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinalda, B. and Verbeek, B. (2004), ‘The Issue of Decision Making Within International Organizations’, in B. Reinalda and B. Verbeek (eds), Decision Making Within International Organizations (London: Routledge), pp. 9–41.
   Google Scholar
• Schadler, S. (2016), ‘Living with Rules: The IMF’s Exceptional Access Framework and the 2010 Stand-by Arrangement with Greece’, IEO Background Paper, BP/16-02/08, July. Available from: http://www.ieo-imf.org/ieo/files/completedevaluations/EAC__BP_16-02_08__Living_with_Rules_-_The_IMF_s_Exceptional_Framework_and_the_2010_SBA_with_Greece.PDF [accessed 23 September 2016].
   Google Scholar
• Schoppa, L.J. (1993), ‘Two-level Games and Bargaining Outcomes: Why Gaiatsu Succeeds in Japan in Some Cases but Not Others’, International Organization, 47 (3), pp. 353–86. doi: 10.1017/S0020818300027995
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. House of Representatives (2015), ‘The Impact of the International Monetary Fund: Economic Stability or Moral Hazard?’ Hearing before the Subcommittee on Monetary Policy and Trade. Serial No. 114-35.
   Google Scholar
• Visvizi, A. (2014), ‘From Grexit to Grecovery: The Paradox of the Troika’s Engagement with Greece’, Perspectives on European Politics and Society, 15 (3), pp. 335–45. doi: 10.1080/15705854.2014.912401
   Google Scholar
• Wyplosz, C. and Sgherri, S. (2016), ‘The IMF’s Role in Greece in the Context of the 2010 Stand-by Arrangement’, IEO Background Paper, BP/16-02/11, July. Available from: http://www.ieo-imf.org/ieo/files/completedevaluations/EAC__BP_16-02_11__The_IMFs_Role_in_Greece_in_the_Context_of_the_2010_SBA.PDF [accessed 23 September 2016].
   Google Scholar
• Zettelmeyer, J., Trebesch, C. and Gulati, M. (2013), ‘The Greek Debt Restructuring: An Autopsy’, Economic Policy, 28 (75), pp. 513–63. doi: 10.1111/1468-0327.12014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar