The Political Economy of Brexit and the Future of British Capitalism First Symposium

References

• Alexander, K., et al., 2017. Brexit and financial services law and policy. London: Hart.
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong, K., 2018. Regulatory alignment and divergence after Brexit. Journal of European public policy. doi:10.1080/13501763.2018.1467956.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, A., 1999. Nebuleuse and the ‘internationalization of the state’ in the UK? The case of HM treasury and the Bank of England. Review of international political economy, 6 (1), 79–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, S. and Hindmoor, A., 2015a. Taming the city? Ideas, structural power and the evolution of British banking policy amidst the great financial meltdown. New political economy, 20 (3), 454–474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, S. and Hindmoor, A., 2015b. Masters of the universe, slaves of the market. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 2017. Special issue on 'Studying Brexit causes and consequences', guest editors D . Wincott, J. Peterson, A. Convery. 19 (3), 429–591. http://journals.sagepub.com/toc/bpia/19/3.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carney, M. 2017. Hearing before the Treasury Committee, January, London.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, J., Shaxson, N., and Wigan, D., 2016. The finance curse: Britain and the world economy. British journal of politics and international relations. doi:10.1177/1369148115612793.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dennison, J. and Geddes, A., 2018. ‘Brexit and the perils of “Europeanised” immigration’. Journal of European public policy. doi:10.1080/13501763.2018.1467953.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrell, H. and Newman, A., 2017. BREXIT, voice and loyalty: rethinking electoral politics in an age of interdependence. Review of international political economy, 24 (2), 232–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferran, E. 2016. The UK as a Third Country in EU financial services regulation. University of Cambridge Faculty of Law Research Paper No. 47/2016, Available from: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2845374.
   Google Scholar
• Hay, C., 2013. The failure of Anglo-liberal capitalism. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Hopkin, J. and Alexander Shaw, K., 2016. Organized combat or structural advantage? The politics of inequality and the winner-take-all economy in the United Kingdom. Politics & society, 44 (3), 345–371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howarth, D. and Quaglia, L., 2017. Brexit and the single European financial market. Journal of common market studies annual review, 55 (S1), 149–164.
   Google Scholar
• Howarth, D. and Quaglia, L., 2018. Brexit and the battle for finance. Journal of European public policy, doi:10.1080/13501763.2018.1467950.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, S. and Quaglia, L. 2018. Brexit, the city and the contingent power of finance. New political economy. doi:10.1080/13563467.2018.1484717.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Journal of European public policy, 2018. Special issue: The politics and economics of Brexit, guest editors S Bulmer and L. Quaglia, 25 (8).
   Google Scholar
• Lavery, S., 2018. The legitimation of post-crisis capitalism in the United Kingdom: real wage decline, finance-led growth and the state. New political economy, 23 (1), 27–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindstrom, N., 2018. What’s left for ‘social Europe’? Brexit and transnational labour market regulation in the UK-1 and the EU-27. New political economy. doi:10.1080/13563467.2018.1484719.
   Google Scholar
• Moloney, N. 2017. Brexit, the EU and its investment Banker: rethinking ‘equivalence’ for the EU capital market. LSE Legal Studies Working Paper No. 5/2017.
   Google Scholar
• Owen, E. and Walter, S., 2017. Open economy politics and Brexit: insights, puzzles, and ways forward. Review of international political economy, 24 (2), 179–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pagliari, S. 2017. Financial regulatory arbitrage after Brexit: how feasible? CITYPERC Policy Report, May.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, O., 2017. Critical political economy, free movement and Brexit: beyond the progressive’s dilemma. British journal of politics and international relations, 19 (3), 480–497.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perraton, J. and Spreafico, M., 2018. Paying our way in the world? Visible and invisible dangers of Brexit. New political economy. doi:10.1080/13563467.2018.1484718.
   Google Scholar
• Quaglia, L., 2012. The ‘old’ and ‘new’ politics of financial services regulation in the European Union. New political economy, 17 (4), 515–535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rees, W., 2017. America, Brexit and the security of Europe. British journal of politics and international relations, 19 (3), 559–573.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Review of International Political Economy, 2016. Special issue ‘International Political Economy’ meets the unexpected: Brexit, Trump and global populism. 24 (2), 177–287.
   Google Scholar
• Rosamond, B. 2018. Brexit and the politics of UK growth models. New political economy. doi:10.1080/13563467.2018.1484721.
   Google Scholar
• Siles-Brugge, G. 2018. Bound by gravity or living in a ‘post geography trading world’?. New political economy. doi:10.1080/13563467.2018.1484722.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, H., 2017a. Inevitability and contingency: the political economy of Brexit. British journal of politics and international relations, 19 (3), 480–497.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, H., 2017b. How the city of London lost at Brexit: a historical perspective. Economy and society. doi:10.1080/03085147.2017.1359916.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, G., 2017. Brexit, Trump and the special relationship. British journal of politics and international relations, 19 (3), 544–558.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar