Is Green Growth Possible?

References

• Alexander, S., Rutherford, J., and Floyd, J., 2018. A critique of the Australian national outlook decoupling strategy: a ‘limits to growth’ perspective. Ecological economics, 145, 10–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alier, J.M., 2009. Socially sustainable economic de-growth. Development and change, 40 (6), 1099–1119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, K., and Bows, A., 2011. Beyond ‘dangerous’ climate change: emission scenarios for a new world. Philosophical transactions of the royal society of London a: mathematical, physical and engineering sciences, 369 (1934), 20–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, K., and Peters, G., 2016. The trouble with negative emissions. Science, 354 (6309), 182–183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics (ABARE), 2008. Energy in Australia. Canberra: ABARE.
   Google Scholar
• Ayres, R.U., and Simonis, U.E., 1993. Industrial metabolism: restructuring for sustainable development. Tokyo, New York: UN University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bringezu, S., 2015. Possible target corridor for sustainable use of global material resources. Resources, 4, 25–54.
   Google Scholar
• Ceballos, G., et al., 2015. Accelerated modern human–induced species losses: entering the sixth mass extinction. Science advances, 1 (5), e1400253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceballos, G., Ehrlich, P.R., and Dirzo, R., 2017. Biological annihilation via the ongoing sixth mass extinction signaled by vertebrate population losses and declines. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences, 114 (30), E6089–E6096.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dale, G., Mathai, M.V., and de Oliveira, J.A.P., eds., 2016. Green growth: ideology, political economy and the alternatives. London: Zed Books Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Dasgupta, S., et al., 2002. Confronting the environmental Kuznets curve. Journal of economic perspectives, 16 (1), 147–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Coninck, H., and Benson, S.M., 2014. Carbon dioxide capture and storage: issues and prospects. Annual review of environment and resources, 39, 243–270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dittrich, M., et al., 2012. Green economies around the world: implications of resource use for development and the environment. Vienna: SERI.
   Google Scholar
• Ekins, P., 2012. Sustainable growth revisited: technology, economics and policy. Mineral economics, 24 (2–3), 59–77.
   Google Scholar
• European Academies Science Advisory Council. 2018. Negative emission technologies: what role in meeting Paris agreement targets? EASAC Policy Report 35.
   Google Scholar
• Fuss, S., et al., 2014. Betting on negative emissions. Nature climate change, 4 (10), 850–853.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giljum, S., et al., 2014. Global patterns of material flows and their socio-economic and environmental implications: a MFA study on all countries world-wide from 1980 to 2009. Resources, 3 (1), 319–339.
   Google Scholar
• Global Carbon Budget. 2018. Global carbon project. Available from: http://www.globalcarbonproject.org/carbonbudget/ [Accessed 15 Dec 2018].
   Google Scholar
• Global CCS Institute, 2015. Global status of CCS 2015: summary report. Melbourne.
   Google Scholar
• Goodall, C. 2011. ‘Peak Stuff’: Did the UK reach a maximum use of material resources in the early part of the last decade. A research paper for Carbon Commentary, 13.
   Google Scholar
• Gough, I., 2017. Heat, greed and human need: climate change, capitalism and sustainable wellbeing. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Grossman, G.M. and Krueger, A.B., 1995. Economic growth and the environment. The quarterly journal of economics, 110 (2), 353–377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grubler, A., et al., 2018. A low energy demand scenario for meeting the 1.5C target and sustainable development goals without negative emissions technologies. Nature energy, 3, 515–527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutowski, T., Cooper, D., and Sahni, S., 2017. Why we use more materials. Philosophical transactions of the royal society a: mathematical, physical and engineering sciences, 375, 20160368.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haas, W., et al., 2015. How circular is the global economy? An assessment of material flows, waste production, and recycling in the European Union and the world in 2005. Journal of industrial ecology, 19 (5), 765–777.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatfield-Dodds, S., et al., 2015. Australia is ‘free to choose’ economic growth and falling environmental pressures. Nature, 527 (7576), 49–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heck, V., et al., 2018. Biomass-based negative emissions difficult to reconcile with planetary boundaries. Nature climate change, 8, 151–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herring, H. and Sorrell, S., 2009. Energy efficiency and sustainable consumption. Hampshire: The Rebound Effect.
   Google Scholar
• Hickman, L. 2016. The history of BECCS. Carbon Brief. https://www.carbonbrief.org/beccs-the-story-of-climate-changes-saviour-technology.
   Google Scholar
• Hoekstra, A.Y., and Wiedmann, T.O., 2014. Humanity’s unsustainable environmental footprint. Science, 344, 1114–1117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holz, C., et al., 2018. Ratcheting ambition to limit warming to 1.5 C–trade-offs between emission reductions and carbon dioxide removal. Environmental research letters, 13 (6), 064028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Energy Agency, October 2016. Decoupling of global emissions and economic growth confirmed. https://www.iea.org/newsroom/news/2016/march/decoupling-of-global-emissions-and-economic-growth-confirmed.html
   Google Scholar
• IPCC, 2000. Special report on emissions scenarios.
   Google Scholar
• IPCC, 2014. Climate change 2014 synthesis report – summary for policymakers.
   Google Scholar
• IPCC, 2018. Global warming of 1.5C – summary for policymakers. Geneva: IPCC.
   Google Scholar
• IRENA, 2018. Global energy transformation: a roadmap to 2050. Abu Dhabi: International Renewable Energy Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, T. 2009. Prosperity without growth: the transition to a sustainable economy.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, M., 2013. Green growth. In: Robert Falkner, ed. The Handbook of global climate and environment policy. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell, 197–214.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobson, M.Z., and Delucchi, M., 2011. Providing all global energy with wind, water, and solar power, part i: technologies, energy resources, quantities and areas of infrastructure, and materials’. Energy policy, 39 (3), 1154–1169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kallis, G., 2011. In defence of degrowth. Ecological economics, 70 (5), 873–880.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kallis, G., 2017. Radical dematerialization and degrowth. Philosophical transactions of the royal society a: mathematical,physical and engineering sciences, 375 (2095), 20160383.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kallis, G., 2018. Degrowth. Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Agenda Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Kallis, G., Kerschner, C., and Martinez-Alier, J., 2012. The economics of degrowth. Ecological economics, 84, 172–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keith, D.W., 2001. Sinks, energy crops and land use: coherent climate policy demands an integrated analysis of biomass. Climatic change, 49 (1), 1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krausmann, F., et al., 2009. Growth in global materials use, GDP and population during the 20th century. Ecological economics, 68 (10), 2696–2705.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhnhenn, K., 2018. Economic growth in mitigation scenarios: a blind spot in climate science. Berlin: Heinrich Boll Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Larkin, A., et al., 2017. What if negative emissions technologies fail at scale? Climate policy, 18, 690–714.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, R. April 2016. Not doomed yet: the biggest political-economy news this millennium. The Atlantic. Available from: http://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2016/04/flat-emissions-economy-growth/.
   Google Scholar
• Obersteiner, M., et al., 2001. Managing climate risk. Laxenburg: International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.
   Google Scholar
• O’Neill, J., 2017. Happiness, austerity and inequality. In: H. Rosa, ed. Good life beyond growth: critical perspectives. Abingdon: Routledge, 141–152.
   Google Scholar
• O’Neill, D.W., et al., 2018. A good life for all within planetary boundaries. Nature sustainability, 1 (2), 88–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), 2011. Towards green growth. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), 2017. Green Growth Indicators 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Pearce, F., 2012. Peak planet: are we starting to consume less? New scientist, 214, 38–43.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, G., 2017. Does the carbon budget mean the end of fossil fuels? Climate News. Available from: https://www.cicero.oslo.no/en/posts/klima/does-the-carbon-budget-mean-the-end-of-fossil-fuels.
   Google Scholar
• Polimeni, J.M., et al., 2008. The Jevons paradox and the myth of resource efficiency improvements. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Rockström, J., et al., 2009. Planetary boundaries: exploring the safe operating space for humanity. Ecology and society, 14 (2), 32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sagoff, M., 2008. On the economic value of Ecosystem services. Environmental values, 17 (2), 239–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schandl, H., et al., 2016. Decoupling global environmental pressure and economic growth: scenarios for energy use, materials use and carbon emissions. Journal of cleaner production, 132 (2016), 45–56.
   Google Scholar
• Schroder, E., and Storm, S. 2018. Economic growth and carbon emissions: the road to ‘hothouse earth’ is paved with good intentions. Institute for New Economic Thinking, Working Paper 84.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, P., et al., 2016. Biophysical and economic limits to negative CO2 emissions. Nature climate change, 6 (1), 42–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smulders, S., Toman, M., and Withagen, C. 2014. Growth theory and ‘green growth’. Oxford review of economic policy, 30 (3), 423–446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solow, R.M., 1973. Is the end of the world at hand? Challenge, 16, 39–50.
   Google Scholar
• Steffen, W., et al., 2015. Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet. Science, 347 (6223), 1259855.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, A.J., et al., 2016. A large increase in U.S. methane emissions over the past decade inferred from satellite data and surface observations. Geophysical research letters, 43 (5), 2218–2224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNEP, 2014. Managing and conserving the natural resource base for sustained economic and social development. Nairobi: United Nations Environment Programme.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations, 2012. The world we want.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), 2011. Towards a green economy: pathways to sustainable development and poverty eradication – a synthesis for policy makers. Nairobi: UNEP.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), 2017a. Assessing global resource use. Nairobi: UNEP.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), 2017b. Resource efficiency: potential and economic implications. A report from the International Resource Panel.
   Google Scholar
• Van Vuuren, D.P., et al., 2017. Open discussion of negative emissions is urgently needed. Nature energy, 2, 902–904.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Vuuren, D.P., et al., 2018. Alternative pathways to the 1.5C target reduce the need for negative emission technologies. Nature climate change, 8, 391–397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaughan, N.E., and Gough, C., 2016. Expert assessment concludes negative emissions scenarios may not deliver. Environmental research letters, 11, 095003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Victor, P., 2008. Managing without growth: slower by design, not disaster. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Voet, E., Oers, L., and Nikolic, I., 2004. Dematerialization: not just a matter of weight. Journal of industrial ecology, 8 (4), 121–137.
   Google Scholar
• Wackernagel, M. and Rees, W., 1998. Our ecological footprint: reducing human impact on the earth (No. 9). Gabriola Island: New Society Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Ward, J.D., et al., 2016. Is decoupling GDP growth from environmental impact possible? Plos one, 11 (10), e0164733.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weizsäcker, E.U., Lovins, A.B., and Lovins, L.H., 1998. Factor four: doubling wealth, halving resource use. Club of Rome. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Wiedmann, T.O., et al., 2015. The material footprint of nations. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences, 112 (20), 6271–6276.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Bank, 2012. Inclusive green growth: the Pathway to sustainable development. Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar