865
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

The Political Economy of Policy Vacuums: The European Commission on Demographic Change

ORCID Icon, &

References

  • Andor, L., 2010. Opportunities and challenges of demographic change in Europe. Available from: http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_SPEECH-10-385_en.htm [Accessed 4 September 2017].
  • Bachrach, P. and Baratz, M.S., 1963. Decisions and nondecisions: an analytical framework. American political science review, 57, 632–42. doi: 10.2307/1952568
  • Bailey, D., 2015. The environmental paradox of the welfare state: the dynamics of sustainability. New political economy, 20, 793–811. doi: 10.1080/13563467.2015.1079169
  • Bertelsmann Stiftung, 2017. Entwicklung der Altersarmut bis 2036. Available from: https://www.bertelsmann-stiftung.de/fileadmin/files/BSt/Publikationen/GrauePublikationen/Entwicklung_der_Altersarmut_bis_2036.pdf [Accessed 4 September 2017].
  • Bickerton, C., Hodson, D., and Puetter, U., 2015. The new intergovernmentalism: European integration in the post-Maastricht era. Journal of common market studies, 53, 703–22. doi: 10.1111/jcms.12212
  • Bieling, H.J., 2012. EU facing the crisis: social and employment policies in times of tight budgets. Transfer: European review of labour and research, 18, 255–71. doi: 10.1177/1024258912448591
  • Birkland, T.A., 1997. After disaster: agenda setting, public policy, and focusing events. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
  • Blondel, V.D., et al., 2008. Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. Journal of statistical mechanics: theory and experiment, 10, P10008. doi: 10.1088/1742-5468/2008/10/P10008
  • Blyth, M., 2002. Great transformations: economic ideas and institutional change in the twentieth century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Boin, A., et al., 2005. The politics of crisis management: public leadership under pressure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Boussemart, J.M. and Godet, M.E., 2018. 2050: Demographic suicide and low growth on the old continent. European Issues n. 462. Fondation Robert Schuman. Available from: https://www.robert-schuman.eu/en/european-issues/0462-europe-2050-demographic-suicide [Accessed 1 May 2019].
  • Bowen, G.A., 2009. Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative research journal, 9, 27–40. doi: 10.3316/QRJ0902027
  • Bürgin, A., 2018. The impact of Juncker’s reorganization of the European Commission on the internal policy-making process: evidence from the Energy Union project. Public administration. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/padm.12388.
  • Campbell, J.L., 1998. Institutional analysis and the role of ideas in political economy. Theory and society, 27, 377–409. doi: 10.1023/A:1006871114987
  • Carstensen, M.B., and Schmidt, V.A., 2017. Power and changing modes of governance in the euro crisis. Governance, 31, 609–24. doi: 10.1111/gove.12318
  • Chorev, N., 2012. Changing global norms through reactive diffusion. American sociological review, 77, 831–53. doi: 10.1177/0003122412457156
  • Coman, R., 2018. Why and how do think tanks expand their networks in times of crisis? The case of Bruegel and the centre for European policy studies. Journal of European public policy, 26, 286–301. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2017.1415953
  • Copeland, P. and Daly, M., 2018. The European Semester and EU social policy. Journal of common market studies, 56, 1001–18. doi: 10.1111/jcms.12703
  • Cox, R.H. and Béland, D., 2012. Valence, policy ideas and the rise of sustainability. Governance, 26, 307–28. doi: 10.1111/gove.12003
  • Crespy, A. and Menz, G., 2015. Commission entrepreneurship and the debasing of social Europe before and after the Eurocrisis. Journal of common market studies, 53, 753–68. doi: 10.1111/jcms.12241
  • Crombez, C., Huysmans, M., and Van Gestel, W., 2017. Choosing an informative agenda setter: the appointment of the Commission in the European Union. European union politics, 18, 145–67. doi: 10.1177/1465116516688102
  • Danken T., 2017. Coordination of wicked problems: comparing inter-departmental coordination of demographic change policies in five German states. Doctoral dissertation. Faculty of Economic and Social Science, University of Potsdam.
  • de la Porte, C. and Heins, E., 2014. Game change in EU and social policy: towards more European integration. In: M. J. Rodrigues and E. Xiarchogiannopoulou, eds. The Eurozone crisis and the transformation of EU governance: internal and external implications. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing, 157–72.
  • de la Porte, C. and Natali, D., 2018. Agents of institutional change in EU policy: the social investment moment. Journal of European public policy, 25, 828–43. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2017.1401110
  • Demeny, P., 2016. Europe’s two demographic crises: the visible and the unrecognized. Population and development review, 42, 111–20. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2016.00110.x
  • Eagleton-Pierce, M., 2018. Professionalizing protest: scientific capital and advocacy in trade politics. International political sociology, 12, 233–55. doi: 10.1093/ips/oly011
  • Eberlein, B. and Radaelli, C.M., 2010. Mechanisms of conflict management in EU regulatory policy. Public administration, 88, 782–99. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2010.01844.x
  • European Commission, 2006. The demographic future of Europe – from challenge to opportunity, COM(2006) 571 final. Available from: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52006DC0571&from=EN.
  • European Commission, 2012. The 2012 ageing report. Vol. 2. Brussels: European Commission.
  • European Commission, 2013a. Evidence on demographic and social trends social policies' contribution to inclusion, employment and the economy. Staff Working Document, SWD(2013), 38 final.
  • European Commission, 2013b. Communication towards social investment for growth and cohesion - including implementing the European social Fund 2014-2020; COM(2013) 83 final. Brussels: European Commission.
  • European Commission, 2015a. Demography report - short analytical web note. Brussels: European Commission.
  • European Commission, 2015b. The 2015 ageing report. Brussels: European Commission. Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/publications/european_economy/2015/pdf/ee3_en.pdf.
  • Eurostat, 2017. Baseline projections: demographic balances and indicators. Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database?node_code=proj.
  • Gieryn, T., 1983. Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. American sociological review, 48, 781–95. doi: 10.2307/2095325
  • Gieryn, T., 1999. Cultural boundaries of science: credibility on the line. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Gornitzka, Å. and Sverdrup, U., 2008. Who consults? The configuration of expert groups in the European Union. West European politics, 31, 725–50. doi: 10.1080/01402380801905991
  • Haas, P.M., 1992. Introduction: epistemic communities and international policy coordination. International organization, 46, 1–35. doi: 10.1017/S0020818300001442
  • Hall, P.A., 1993. Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state : the case of economic policymaking in Britain. Comparative politics, 25, 275–96. doi: 10.2307/422246
  • Haverland, M., De Ruiter, M., and Van de Walle, S., 2018. Agenda-setting by the European Commission: seeking public opinion? Journal of European public policy, 25, 327–45. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2016.1249014
  • Head, B.W. and Alford, J., 2015. Wicked problems: implications for public policy and management. Administration & society, 47, 711–39. doi: 10.1177/0095399713481601
  • Hofäcker, D., 2015. In line or at odds with active ageing policies? Exploring patterns of retirement preferences in Europe. Ageing & society, 35, 1529–56. doi: 10.1017/S0144686X1400035X
  • Hooghe, L., 2012. Images of Europe: how Commission officials conceive their institution’s role. Journal of common market studies, 50, 87–111. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5965.2011.02210.x
  • Hopkin, J. and Rosamond, B., 2018. Post-truth politics, bullshit and bad ideas: ‘deficit Fetishism’in the UK. New political economy, 23, 641–55. doi: 10.1080/13563467.2017.1373757
  • Hustedt, T. and Seyfried, M., 2016. Co-ordination across internal organizational boundaries: how the EU Commission co-ordinates climate policies. Journal of European public policy, 23, 888–905. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2015.1074605
  • Jacobs, A.M. and Weaver, R.K., 2015. When policies undo themselves: self-undermining feedback as a source of policy change. Governance, 28, 441–57. doi: 10.1111/gove.12101
  • Kassim, H., et al., 2017. Managing the house: the presidency, agenda control and policy activism in the European Commission. Journal of European public policy, 24, 653–74. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2016.1154590
  • Kentikelenis, A.E. and Seabrooke, L., 2017. The politics of world polity: script-writing in international organizations. American sociological review, 82, 1065–92. doi: 10.1177/0003122417728241
  • Kingdon, J.W., 1984. Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. Boston, MA: Little, Brown & Co.
  • Knill, C., Steinebach, Y., and Fernández-i-Marín, X., 2018. Hypocrisy as a crisis response? Assessing changes in talk, decisions, and actions of the European Commission in EU environmental policy. Public administration. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/padm.12542.
  • Kvist, J., 2015. A framework for social investment strategies: integrating generational, life course and gender perspectives in the EU social investment strategy. Comparative European politics, 13, 131–49. doi: 10.1057/cep.2014.45
  • Lindvall, J., 2009. The real but limited influence of expert ideas. World politics, 61, 703–30. doi: 10.1017/S0043887109990104
  • Littoz-Monnet, A., 2015. Ethics experts as an instrument of technocratic governance: evidence from EU medical biotechnology policy. Governance, 28, 357–72. doi: 10.1111/gove.12102
  • Lodge, M. and Hood, C., 2012. Into an age of multiple austerities? Public management and public service bargains across OECD countries. Governance, 25, 79–101. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0491.2011.01557.x
  • Luxon, E.M., 2019. What do advocates know about policymaking? Revealing process in the advocacy coalition framework. Journal of European public policy, 26, 106–25. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2017.1400088
  • May, J.F., 2005. Population policy. In: D. L. Poston and M. Micklin, eds. Handbook of population. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic, 827–52.
  • Menz, G., 2019. Understanding the identity of a policy field: the European Commission and liberal modernization in the domain of labour and social policy. Comparative European politics, 17, 603–18. doi:10.1057/s41295-019-00176-3.
  • Minns, R., 1996. The political economy of pensions. New political economy, 1, 375–91. doi: 10.1080/13563469608406268
  • OECD, 2015. Pensions at a glance 2015: OECD and G20 indicators. Paris: OECD. doi:10.1787/pension_glance-2015-en.
  • Pagliari, S. and Young, K.L., 2015. The interest ecology of financial regulation: interest group plurality in the design of financial regulatory policies. Socio-economic review, 14, 309–37. doi: 10.1093/ser/mwv024
  • Parker, O. and Pye, R., 2018. Mobilising social rights in EU economic governance: a pragmatic challenge to neoliberal Europe. Comparative European politics, 16 (5), 805–24. doi: 10.1057/s41295-017-0102-1
  • Peters, B.G., 1994. Agenda-setting in the European community. Journal of European public policy, 1, 9–26. doi: 10.1080/13501769408406945
  • Radaelli, C.M., 1999. The public policy of the European Union: whither politics of expertise? Journal of European public policy, 6, 757–74. doi: 10.1080/135017699343360
  • Radaelli, C.M., 2005. Diffusion without convergence: how political context shapes the adoption of regulatory impact assessment. Journal of European public policy, 12, 924–43. doi: 10.1080/13501760500161621
  • Rittel, H.W. and Webber, M.M., 1973. Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy sciences, 4, 155–69. doi: 10.1007/BF01405730
  • Rosamond, B., 2002. Imagining the European economy: ‘competitiveness’ and the social construction of ‘Europe’ as an economic space. New political economy, 7, 157–77. doi: 10.1080/13563460220138826
  • Rosamond, B., 2012. Supranational governance as economic patriotism? The European Union, legitimacy and the reconstruction of state space. Journal of European public policy, 19, 324–41. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2011.638119
  • Schattschneider, E.E., 1960. The semisovereign people: a realist's view of democracy in America. Chicago, IL: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
  • Schmidt, V.A., 2016. Reinterpreting the rules “by stealth” in times of crisis: the European Commission. West European politics, 39, 1032–52. doi: 10.1080/01402382.2016.1186389
  • Schön-Quinlivan, E. and Scipioni, M., 2017. The Commission as policy entrepreneur in European economic governance: a comparative multiple stream analysis of the 2005 and 2011 reform of the Stability and growth Pact. Journal of European public policy, 24, 1172–90. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2016.1206140
  • Seabrooke, L. and Tsingou, E., 2014. Distinctions, affiliations, and professional knowledge in financial reform expert groups. Journal of European public policy, 21, 389–407. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2014.882967
  • Seabrooke, L. and Tsingou, E., 2015. Professional emergence on transnational issues: linked ecologies on demographic change. Journal of professions and organization, 2, 1–18. doi: 10.1093/jpo/jou006
  • Seabrooke, L. and Tsingou, E., 2016. Bodies of knowledge in reproduction: epistemic boundaries in the political economy of fertility. New political economy, 21, 69–89. doi: 10.1080/13563467.2015.1041482
  • Seabrooke, L. and Tsingou, E., 2018. Europe’s fast- and slow-burning crises. Journal of European public policy, 26, 468–81. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2018.1446456
  • Shwed, U. and Bearman, S., 2010. The temporal structure of scientific consensus formation. American sociological review, 75, 817–40. doi: 10.1177/0003122410388488
  • ‘t Hart, P., 2013. After Fukushima: reflections on risk and institutional learning in an era of mega-crises. Public administration, 91, 101–13. doi: 10.1111/padm.12021
  • ‘t Hart, P. and Boin, A., 2001. Between crisis and normalcy: the long shadow of post-crisis politics. In: U. Rosenthal, A.R. Boin, and L.K. Comfort, eds. Managing crises: threats, dilemmas. Springfield: Charles C. Thomas Publisher, 28–46.
  • Zeitlin, J., 2010. Towards a stronger OMC in a more social Europe 2020: a new governance architecture for EU policy coordination. In: E. Marlier and D. Natali, eds. Europe, 2020. Brussels: Peter Lang, 253–73.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.