Comparative Capitalism, Growth Models and Emerging Markets: The Development of the Field

References

• Allen, M.C., 2004. The varieties of capitalism paradigm: not enough variety? Socio-Economic Review, 2 (1), 87–108.
   Google Scholar
• Amable, B., 2003. The diversity of modern capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Amable, B., et al., 2019. New approaches to political economy. Socio-economic review, 17 (2), 433–459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baccaro, L., 2019. The politics of growth. Presentation. Available from: https://www.iwkoeln.de/fileadmin/user_upload/Institut_der_deutschen_Wirtschaft/Veranstaltungen/2019/Vortrag_Lucio_Baccaro_Politics_of_Growth.pdf [Accessed 2 May 2019].
   Google Scholar
• Baccaro, L. and Pontusson, J., 2016. Rethinking comparative political economy: the growth model perspective. Politics & society, 44 (2), 175–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baccaro, L. and Pontusson, J., 2018. Comparative political economy and varieties of macroeconomics. MPIfG discussion paper, 18/10.
   Google Scholar
• Ban, C. and Blyth, M., 2013. The BRICs and the Washington consensus: an introduction. Review of international political economy, 20 (2), 241–255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, U., 2007. Open systemness and contested reference frames and change: a reformulation of varieties of capitalism theory. Socio-economic Review, 5 (2), 261–286.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, U., ed. 2013. The BRICs and emerging economies in comparative perspective: political economy, liberalisation and institutional change. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, J. and Jäger, J., 2012. Integration in crisis: a regulationist perspective on the interaction of European varieties of capitalism. Competition and change, 16 (3), 169–187.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, U. and Vasileva, A., 2017. Russia's political economy re-conceptualised: a changing hybrid of liberalism, statism and patrimonialism. Journal of Eurasian studies, 8 (1), 83–96.
   Google Scholar
• Benney, T.M., 2014. Making environmental markets work: the varieties of capitalism in emerging economies. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bizberg, I., 2014. Types of capitalism in Latin America. Revue Interventions économiques, 49, 1–31.
   Google Scholar
• Bizberg, I., 2019. Diversity of capitalisms in Latin America. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Blyth, M. and Matthijs, M., 2017. Black swans, lame ducks, and the mystery of IPE's missing macroeconomy. Review of international political economy, 24 (2), 203–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohle, D., 2018. European integration, capitalist diversity and crises trajectories on Europe’s eastern periphery. New political economy, 23 (2), 239–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohle, D. and Greskovits, B., 2012. Capitalist diversity on Europe’s periphery. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bonizzi, B., Kaltenbrunner, A., and Powell, J., 2020. Subordinate financialization in emerging capitalist economies. In: P. Mader, D. Mertens, and N. van der Zwan, eds. International handbook of financialization. London: Routledge, 177–187.
   Google Scholar
• Boschi, R.R., 2011. Variedades de capitalismo, política e desenvolvimento na América Latina. Belo Horizonte: Editora UFMG.
   Google Scholar
• Boschi, R.R. and Gaitán, F., 2009. Politics and development: Lessons from Latin America. Brazilian political science review, 3 (2), 11–29.
   Google Scholar
• Boyer, R., 1990. The regulation school: a critical introduction. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boyer, R., 2005. How and why capitalisms differ. Economy and society, 34 (4), 509–557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bril Mascarenhas, T. 2016. How states shape markets in Latin America. Thesis (PhD). University of California, Berkeley.
   Google Scholar
• Bruff, I., Ebenau, M., and May, C., 2015. Fault and fracture? The impact of new directions in comparative capitalisms research on the wider field. In: M. Ebenau, I. Bruff, and C. May, ed. New directions in comparative capitalisms research: critical and global perspectives. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 28–44.
   Google Scholar
• Buhr, D. and Frankenberger, R., 2014a. Emerging varieties of incorporated capitalism: theoretical considerations and empirical evidence. Business and politics, 16 (3), 393–427.
   Google Scholar
• Buhr, D. and Frankenberger, R., 2014b. Spielarten des inkorporierten Kapitalismus. In: A. Nölke, C. May, and S. Claar, ed. Die großen Schwellenländer: Ursachen und Folgen ihres Aufstiegs in der Weltwirtschaft. Wiesbaden: Springer VS, 61–84.
   Google Scholar
• Cahnman, W.J., 1965. Ideal type theory: Max Weber’s concept and some of its derivations. Sociological quarterly, 6 (3), 268–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carney, R.W., 2016. Varieties of hierarchical capitalism: family and state market economies in East Asia. The pacific review, 29 (2), 137–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carney, M., Gedajlovic, E., and Yang, X., 2009. Varieties of Asian capitalism: toward an institutional theory of Asian enterprise. Asia pacific journal of management, 26 (3), 361–380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carvalho, L. and Rugitsky, F. 2015. Growth and distribution in Brazil in the 21st century: revisiting the wage-led versus profit-led debate. Department of economics FEA/USP working paper series, no. 25. São Paulo: University of São Paulo.
   Google Scholar
• Crouch, C. 2005. Capitalist diversity and change: recombinant governance and institutional entrepreneur. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cusack, T.R., Iversen, T., and Soskice, D., 2007. Economic interests and the origins of electoral systems. American political science review, 101 (3), 373–391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demirbag, M. and Wood, G., 2018. Comparative capitalism and the transitional periphery: firm centred perspectives. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• De Podestá Gomes, A., 2018. Institutional complementarities and regional economic growth in China: a comparative study of Nanjing and Suzhou. London: SOAS.
   Google Scholar
• Drahokoupil, J. and Myant, M., 2015. Putting comparative capitalisms research in its place: varieties of capitalism in transition economies. In: M. Ebenau, I. Bruff, and C. May, ed. New directions in comparative capitalisms research: critical and global perspectives. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 155–171.
   Google Scholar
• Ebenau, M., 2012. Varieties of capitalism or dependency? A critique of the VoC approach for Latin America. Competition & Change, 16 (3), 206–223.
   Google Scholar
• Fainshmidt, S., et al., 2018. Varieties of institutional systems: a contextual taxonomy of understudied countries. Journal of world business, 53 (3), 307–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feijó, C.A., Camara, F.F., and Cerqueira, L.F., 2016. Inflation, growth, and distribution: the Brazilian economy after the post war. Journal of post-keynesian economics, 38 (4), 616–636.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldmann, M., 2019. Global varieties of capitalism. World politics, 71 (1), 162–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaitán, F. and Boschi, R.R., 2015. State-business-labour relations and patterns of development in Latin America. In: M. Ebenau, I. Bruff, and C. May, ed. New directions in comparative capitalisms research: critical and global perspectives. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 172–188.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, P.A. and Soskice, D., 2001. An introduction to varieties of capitalism. In: P.A. Hall and D. Soskice, ed. Varieties of capitalism: the institutional foundations of comparative advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1–68.
   Google Scholar
• Hammer, A., 2019. Comparative capitalism and emerging economies: formal-informal economy interlockages and implications for institutional analysis. Review of International Political Economy, 26 (2), 337–360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hancké, B., Rhodes, M., and Thatcher, M., 2007. Introduction: beyond varieties of capitalism. In: B. Hancké, M. Rhodes, and M. Thatcher, ed. Beyond varieties of capitalism: conflict, contradictions, and complementarities in the European economy. New York: Oxford University Press, 3–38.
   Google Scholar
• Hay, C., 2020. Does capitalism (still) come in varieties? Review of International Political Economy, 27 (2), 302–319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hope, D., 2016. The political economy of growth models and macroeconomic imbalances in advanced democracies. Thesis (PhD). The London School of Economics and Political Science.
   Google Scholar
• Höpner, M. and Lutter, M., 2018. The diversity of wage regimes: why the Eurozone is too heterogeneous for the Euro. European political science review, 10 (1), 71–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iversen, T. and Soskice, D., 2012. Modern capitalism and the advanced nation state. In: N. Bermeo and J. Pontusson, ed. Coping with crisis: government reactions to the great recession. New York: Russell Sage, 35–64.
   Google Scholar
• Iversen, T., Soskice, D., and Hope, D., 2016. The Eurozone and political institutions. Annual review of political science, 19, 163–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jessop, B., 2015. Comparative capitalisms and/or variegated capitalism. In: M. Ebenau, I. Bruff, and C. May, ed. New directions in comparative capitalisms research: critical and global perspectives. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 65–82.
   Google Scholar
• Kiran, J., 2018. Expanding the framework of the varieties of capitalism: Turkey as a hierarchical market economy. Journal of Eurasian studies, 9 (1), 42–51.
   Google Scholar
• Kitschelt, H., et al., 1999. Convergence and divergence in advanced capitalist democracies. In: H. Kitschelt et al., ed. Continuity and change in contemporary capitalism. New York: Cambridge University Press, 427–460.
   Google Scholar
• Kohli, V., 2018. Functional income distribution and effective demand in India: an applied post-Keynesian model. Journal of post-Keynesian economics, 41 (3), 399–429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kühnen, S., 2018. Investment im chinesischen Wirtschaftswachstum aus der Growth Model-Perspektive. Thesis (BA). Goethe University Frankfurt.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, N., 2010. Capitalism in China: a centrally managed capitalism (CMC) and its future. Management and organization review, 7 (1), 63–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loureiro, P.M. and Saad-Filho, A., 2019. The limits of pragmatism: the rise and fall of the Brazilian workers’ party (2002–2016). Latin American Perspectives, 46 (1), 66–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mader, P., Mertens, D., and Van der Zwan, N., eds. 2020. The Routledge international handbook of financialization. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• May, C. and Nölke, A., 2018. Dangers of residual dependency in state-permeated capitalism: the case of Brazil during labor party rule. Revue de la régulation, 24 (2).
   Google Scholar
• McDonough, T., 2015. Social structures of accumulation: a Marxist comparison of capitalisms? In: M. Ebenau, I. Bruff, and C. May, ed. New directions in comparative capitalisms research: critical and global perspectives. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 118–133.
   Google Scholar
• McNally, C.A., 2012. Sino-capitalism: China’s reemergence and the international political economy. World politics, 64 (4), 741–776.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menezes, T.C. and de Souza, L.R., 2019. The main determinants of economic growth in Brazil between 2003 and 2010: exports or domestic markets? Contextualizaciones Latinemaericanas, 11 (20), 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Mertens, D., 2017. Putting ‘merchants of debt’ in their place: the political economy of retail banking and credit-based financialisation in Germany. New political economy, 22 (1), 12–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musacchio, A. and Lazzarini, S.G., 2014. Reinventing state capitalism: Leviathan in business, Brazil and beyond. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nattrass, N., 2014. A South African variety of capitalism? New political economy, 19 (1), 56–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nölke, A., et al., 2015. Domestic structures, foreign economic policies and global economic order: implications from the rise of large emerging economies. European journal of international relations, 21 (3), 538–567.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nölke, A., 2016. Economic causes of the Eurozone crisis: the analytical contribution of comparative capitalism. Socio-economic review, 14 (1), 141–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nölke, A., et al., 2020. State-permeated capitalism in large emerging economies. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nölke, A. and Claar, S., 2013. Varieties of capitalism in emerging economies. Transformation: critical perspectives on Southern Africa, 81 (1), 33–54.
   Google Scholar
• Nölke, A. and Vliegenthart, A., 2009. Enlarging the varieties of capitalism: the emergence of dependent market economies in East Central Europe. World politics, 61 (4), 670–702.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Padayachee, V., 2013. Introducing varieties of capitalism into the South African debate: uses and limits. Transformation: critical perspectives on Southern Africa, 81 (1), 5–32.
   Google Scholar
• Puente, I. and Schneider, B.R., 2020. Business and development: how organization, ownership and networks matter. Review of International Political Economy (online first).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rada, C. and von Arnim, R. 2011. Structural transformation in China and India: the role of macroeconomic policies. Department of economics working paper series, No. 2011–05. Salt Lake City: University of Utah.
   Google Scholar
• Regan, A. and Brazys, S., 2018. Celtic Phoenix or Leprechaun economics? The politics of an FDI-led growth model in Europe. New political economy, 23 (2), 223–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reslinger, C., 2013. Is there an Asian model of technological emergence? Socio-economic Review, 11 (2), 371–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, N., 2011. Russian patrimonial capitalism and the international financial crisis. Journal of communist studies and transition politics, 27 (3–4), 434–455.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, S., 2019. China, Hungary and the Belgrade-Budapest railway upgrade: new politically –induced dimensions of FDI and the trajectory of Hungarian economic development. Journal of East-West business, 25 (1), 84–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rolim, L.N. 2018. Investment, aggregate demand and wages: Brazilian economic regimes and the possibility of a regime switch. Unpublished paper. Available from: https://www.boeckler.de/pdf/v_2018_10_26_rolim.pdf [Accessed 2 May 2019].
   Google Scholar
• Rougier, E. and Combarnous, F., 2017. The diversity of emerging capitalisms in developing countries: globalization, institutional convergence and experimentation. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Sallai, D. and Schnyder, G. 2018. The transformation of post-socialist capitalism: from developmental state to clan state? Greenwich papers in political economy, No. 57. Greenwich: University of Greenwich.
   Google Scholar
• Sánchez-Ancochea, D., 2009. State, firms and the process of industrial upgrading: Latin America’s variety of capitalism and the Costa Rican experience. Economy & society, 38 (1), 62–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlumberger, O., 2008. Structural reform, economic order, and development: patrimonial capitalism. Review of international political economy, 15 (4), 622–649.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V.A., 2003. French capitalism – transformed, yet still a third variety of capitalism. Economy & Society, 32 (4), 526–554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V.A., 2009. Putting the political back into political economy by bringing the state back in yet again. World politics, 61 (3), 516–546.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, B.R., 2009. Hierarchical market economies and varieties of capitalism in Latin America. Journal of Latin American Studies, 41 (3), 553–575.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, B.R., 2013. Hierarchical capitalism in Latin America: business, labor, and the challenges of equitable development. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, B.R., and Soskice, D., 2009. Inequality in developed countries and Latin America: coordinated, liberal and hierarchical systems. Economy & society, 38 (1), 17–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva de Jesus, C., Araujo, R.A., and Drumond, C.E., 2018. An empirical test of the post-Keynesian growth model applied to functional income distribution and the growth regime in Brazil. International review of applied economics, 32 (4), 428–449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinha, A., 2003. Rethinking the developmental state model: divided Leviathan and subnational comparisons in India. Comparative Politics, 35 (4), 459–476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soskice, D., 2007. Macroeconomics and varieties of capitalism. In: B. Hancké, M. Rhodes, and M. Thatcher, ed. Beyond varieties of capitalism: conflict, contradictions, and complementarities in the European economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 89–121.
   Google Scholar
• Strange, S., 1997. The future of global capitalism; or, will divergence persist forever? In: C. Crouch and W. Streeck, ed. Political economy of modern capitalism. Mapping convergence and diversity. London: Sage, 182–191.
   Google Scholar
• Suau Arinci, L., Pessina, N., and Ebenau, M., 2015. All varieties are equal … contributions from dependency approaches to critical comparative capitalisms research. In: M. Ebenau, I. Bruff, and C. May, ed. New directions in comparative capitalisms research: critical and global perspectives. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 189–206.
   Google Scholar
• Swedberg, R., 2018. How to use Max Weber’s ideal type in sociological analysis. Journal of classical sociology, 18 (3), 181–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ten Brink, T., 2019. China's capitalism: a paradoxical route to economic prosperity. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Pijl, K., 1998. Transnational classes and international relations. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Vasileva-Dienes, A. and Schmidt, V.A., 2019. Conceptualising capitalism in the twenty-first century: the BRICs and the European periphery. Contemporary Politics, 25 (3), 255–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walter, A. and Zhang, X., eds. 2012. East Asian capitalism: diversity, continuity, and change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M., 1949 [1922]. Methodology of the social sciences (E. A. Shils & H. A. Finch, Trans.). Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Witt, M.A., et al., 2018. Mapping the business systems of 61 major economies: a taxonomy and implications for varieties of capitalism and business systems research. Socio-economic Review, 16 (1), 5–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witt, M.A. and Redding, G., eds. 2014. The Oxford handbook of Asian business systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, X. and Whitley, R., 2013. Changing macro-structural varieties of East Asian capitalism. Socio-economic review, 11 (2), 301–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhigang, Y., Vercueil, J., and Boyer, R., 2017. A growth model with Chinese characteristics: interview with Yuan Zhigang by Julien Vercueil et Robert Boyer. Revue de la régulation, 21, 1.
   Google Scholar