Local Grounding of Transnational Private Governance Authority: Translation, Contestation, Legitimation and Communities of Practice

References

• Adler, Emanuel, and Pouliot, Vincent, 2011. International practices. International theory, 3 (1), 1–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartley, Tim, and Smith, Shawna N., 2010. Communities of practice as cause and consequence of transnational governance: the evolution of social and environmental certification. In: Marie-Laure Djelic, and Sigrid Quack, ed. Transnational communities: Shaping global economic governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 347–374.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, Steven, and Cashore, Benjamin, 2007. Can non-state global governance be legitimate? an analytical framework. Regulation and governance, 1 (4), 347–371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, Julia, 2008. Constructing and contesting legitimacy and accountability in polycentric regulatory regimes. Regulation and governance, 2 (2), 137–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busch, Lawrence, 2011. Standards: recipes for reality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cotterrell, Roger, 2016. Transnational legal authority: a socio-legal perspective. In: Roger Cotterrell, and Maksymilian Del Mar, ed. Authority in transnational legal theory: theorising across disciplines. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 253–279.
   Google Scholar
• Dietz, Thomas and Janina Grabs, 2021. Additionality and implementation gaps in voluntary sustainability standards. New political economy. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2021.1881473.
   Google Scholar
• Djelic, Marie-Laure, and Quack, Sigrid, 2010a. Transnational communities and governance. In: Marie-Laure Djelic, and Sigrid Quack, ed. Transnational communities: shaping global economic governance. Cambride, UK: Cambridge University Press, 3–36.
   Google Scholar
• Djelic, Marie-Laure, and Quack, Sigrid, 2010b. Transnational communities and their impact on the governance of business and economic activity. In: Marie-Laure Djelic, and Sigrid Quack, ed. Transnational communities: shaping global economic governance. Cambride, UK: Cambridge University Press, 377–413.
   Google Scholar
• Fransen, Luc, 2012. Multi-stakeholder governance and voluntary programme interactions: legitimation politics in the institutional design of corporate social responsibility. Socio-Economic review, 10 (1), 163–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graz, Jean-Christophe, 2019. The power of standards: hybrid authority and the globalisation of services. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Graz, Jean-Christophe, 2021. Grounding the politics of transnational private governance: introduction to the special section. New political economy. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2021.1881472.
   Google Scholar
• Grégoire, Etienne Roy and Monzón, Luz Marina, 2017. Institutionalising CSR in colombia’s extractive sector: disciplining society, destabilising enforcement? Canadian Journal of development Studies /Revue Canadienne d’études du développement, 38 (2), 253–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez, Roberto and Lobo, Iván Darío, 2007. Corporate social engagement in Colombia. Social responsibility journal, 3 (1), 40–51.
   Google Scholar
• ICONTEC, 2008. GTC 180:2008, Guía Técnica Colombiana: Responsabilidad social. Bogotá, Colombia: ICONTEC.
   Google Scholar
• ISO, 2010. ISO 26000:2010, guidance on social responsibility. 1st ed. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization.
   Google Scholar
• ISO. 2020a. “Benefits of Standards.” 2020. https://www.iso.org/benefits-of-standards.html.
   Google Scholar
• ISO. 2020b. “Developing Standards.” 2020. https://www.iso.org/developing-standards.html.
   Google Scholar
• ISO. 2020c. “ISO in Figures.” 2020. https://www.iso.org/iso-in-figures.html.
   Google Scholar
• ISO. 2020d. “The ISO Survey.” 2020. https://www.iso.org/the-iso-survey.html.
   Google Scholar
• ISO, 2004. ISO/IEC guide 2:2004, standardization and related activities – general vocabulary. 8th ed. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization.
   Google Scholar
• Kane, Patrick Kenneth, 2013. Appropriation of discourses: justice and corporate social responsibility in an artisanal mining community of rural Colombia. Northern Ireland legal quarterly, 64 (3), 281–297.
   Google Scholar
• Levinson, Marc, 2006. The box: how the shipping container made the world smaller and the world economy bigger. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Livingstone, Grace, 2003. Inside Colombia: drugs, democracy and war. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Loconto, Allison, and Busch, Lawrence, 2010. Standards, techno-economic networks, and playing fields: performing the global market economy. Review of international political economy, 17 (3), 507–536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palacios, Marco. 2006. Between legitimacy and violence: a history of Colombia, 1875-2002. Translated by Richard Stoller. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pasternak, Shiri, 2017. Grounded authority: the Algonquins of Barriere Lake against the state. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Restrepo Moreno, Alfonso, 1963. Subsidios Familiares y Cajas de Compensación. Revista Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana, 26 (92), 3–15.
   Google Scholar
• Rojas-Méndez, José I. and Chapa, Sindy, 2020. X-scale: a new scale to measure consumer xenocentrism. Marketing intelligence & planning, 38 (3), 354–368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salter, Liora, 1993. The housework of capitalism: standardization in the communications and information technology sectors. International journal of political economy, 23 (4), 105–133.
   Google Scholar
• Star, Susan Leigh, and Lampland, Martha, 2009. Reckoning with standards. In: Martha Lampland, and Susan Leigh Star, ed. Standards and their stories: how quantifying, classifying, and formalizing practices shape everyday life. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 3–24.
   Google Scholar
• Suchman, Mark C., 1995. Managing legitimacy: strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of management review, 20 (3), 571–610.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamm Hallström, Kristina, and Boström, Magnus, 2010. Transnational multi-stakeholder standardization: organizing fragile non-state authority. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Tavernor, Robert, 2007. Smoot’s ear: the measure of humanity. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ueltschy, Linda C., 1998. Brand perceptions as influenced by consumer ethnocentrism and country-of-origin effects. Journal of marketing management, 8 (1), 12–23.
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, Etienne, McDermott, Richard A., and Snyder, William, 2002. Cultivating communities of practice: a guide to managing knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, Stepan, 2005. Three questions about corporate codes: problematizations, authorizations and the public/private divide. In: Wesley Cragg, ed. Ethics codes, corporations and the challenge of globalization. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 245–288.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, Stepan, 2016. Exploring the relationship between administrative norms and competence in transnational governance: ISO, ISEAL and sustainability standards. Tilburg law review, 21, 193–229.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, Stepan, 2019. Interactive strategies for advancing marginalized actors in transnational governance contests: labour and the making of ISO 26000. In: Stepan Wood, etal, ed. Transnational business governance interactions: advancing marginalized actors and enhancing regulatory quality. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, 338–361.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, Stepan, et al., 2019. Transnational business governance interactions, regulatory quality and marginalized actors: an introduction. In: Stepan Wood, Rebecca Schmidt, Errol Meidinger, Burkard Eberlein, and Kenneth W. Abbott, ed. Transnational business governance interactions: advancing marginalized actors and enhancing regulatory quality. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, 1–26.
   Google Scholar
• Yates, JoAnne, and Murphy, Craig N., 2019. Engineering rules: global standard setting since 1880. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar