Governing Fintech and Fintech as Governance: The Regulatory Sandbox, Riskwashing, and Disruptive Social Classification

References

• Acxiom, 2019. Global Data | Consumer Data | Acxiom. [online] Available from: https://www.acxiom.com/what-we-do/data/ [Accessed 14 November 2019].
   Google Scholar
• Allen, H., 2019. Regulatory sandboxes. The George Washington law review, 87, 579–645.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arner, D.W., Barberis, J., and Buckley, R.P., 2015. The evolution of fintech: a new post-crisis paradigm. Georgetown journal of international law, 47, 1271–1319.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, A., 2013. The New Political Economy of the macroprudential ideational shift. New political economy, 18 (1), 112–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barefoot, J.A., 2020. Digital technology risks for finance: dangers embedded in fintech and regtech. M-RCBG Associate Working Paper No. 151.
   Google Scholar
• Bayliss, K., Fine, B., and Robertson, M., 2017. Introduction to special issue on the material cultures of financialisation. New political economy, 22 (4), 355–370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernards, N., 2019. The poverty of fintech? Psychometrics, credit infrastructures, and the limits of financialization. Review of international political economy, 26 (5), 815–838.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernards, N. and Campbell-Verduyn, M., 2019. Understanding technological change in global finance through infrastructures. Review of international political economy, 26 (5), 773–789.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birch, K. and Muniesa, F., eds., 2020. Assetization: turning things into assets in technoscientific capitalism. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Black, J., 2013. Reconceiving financial markets—From the economic to the social. Journal of corporate law studies, 13 (2), 401–442.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, B., 2016. From performativity to political economy: index investing, ETFs and asset manager capitalism. New political economy, 21 (3), 257–273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell-Verduyn, M., Goguen, M., and Porter, T., 2017. Big data and algorithmic governance: the case of financial practices. New political economy, 22 (2), 219–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, C., 2019. Platform lending and the politics of financial infrastructures. Review of international political economy, 26 (5), 863–885.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobbins, M., 2009. Urban design and people. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Ertürk, I., 2018. “FinTech as Financial Innovation: A New Source of Instability in Financialised Capitalism or a Revolutionary Disruptive Technology in Banking?” Presented at the ECPR Joint Session of Workshops, University of Nicosia, Nicosia. Available from: https://ecpr.eu/Events/PaperDetails.aspx?PaperID=38101&EventID=112.
   Google Scholar
• Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), 2015. Regulatory Sandbox. https://www.fca.org.uk/publication/research/regulatory-sandbox.pdf [Accessed 21 November 2019].
   Google Scholar
• Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), 2017. Regulatory Sandbox Lessons Learned Report. https://www.fca.org.uk/publication/research-and-data/regulatory-sandbox-lessons-learned-report.pdf. [Accessed 21 November 2019].
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M., 1980. Confessions of the flesh. In: Colin Gordon, ed. Power/Knowledge: selected interviews and other writings. New York: Pantheon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1995. Discipline and punish: the birth of the prison. 2nd ed. New York: Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• Fourcade, M., 2016. Ordinalization: Lewis A. Coser memorial award for theoretical agenda setting 2014. Sociological theory, 34 (3), 175–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fourcade, M. and Healy, K., 2017. Seeing like a market. Socio-economic review, 15 (1), 9–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabor, D. and Brooks, S., 2017. The digital revolution in financial inclusion: international development in the fintech era. New political economy, 22 (4), 423–436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabor, D., 2019. Securitization for sustainability does it help achieve the sustainable development goals? Washington, DC: Published by the Heinrich Böll Stiftung.
   Google Scholar
• Hardie, I., et al., 2013. Banks and the false dichotomy in the comparative political economy of finance. World politics, 65 (4), 691–728.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayek, F., 1945. The Use of knowledge in society. American economic review, XXXV (4), 519–530.
   Google Scholar
• Hayek, F., 1976 [1998]. Laws, legislation, and liberty. Volume 2: The myth of social justice. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Introna, L.D., 2015. Algorithms, governance, and governmentality: on governing academic writing. Science, technology, & Human Values, 41 (1), 17–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kvangraven, I.H., Koddenbrock, K., and Sylla, N.S., 2021. Financial subordination and uneven financialization in 21st century Africa. Community development journal, 56 (1), 119–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langevin, M., 2019. Big data for (not so) small loans: technological infrastructures and the massification of fringe finance. Review of international political economy, 26 (5), 790–814.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langley, P., 2010. The performance of liquidity in the subprime mortgage crisis. New political economy, 15 (1), 71–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laufer, W.S., 2003. Social accountability and corporate greenwashing. Journal of business ethics, 43 (3), 253–261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine, R., 2002. Bank-based Or market-based financial systems: which Is better? Journal of financial intermediation, 11 (4), 398–428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lysandrou, P. and Nesvetailova, A., 2015. The role of shadow banking entities in the financial crisis: a disaggregated view. Review of international political economy, 22 (2), 257–279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mader, P., Mertens, D., and van der Zwan, N., eds. 2019. The Routledge international handbook of financialization. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mertens, D. and Thiemann, M., 2018. Market-based but state-led: The role of public development banks in shaping market-based finance in the European Union. Competition & change, 22 (2), 184–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magnuson, W., 2018. Regulating fintech. Vanderbilt law review, 71, 1167–1226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morozov, E., 2013. To save everything click here: the folly of technological solutionism. New York: Public Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Musthaq, F., 2020. Development finance or financial accumulation for asset managers?: The perils of the Global shadow Banking System in developing countries. New political economy, 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nesvetailova, A., 2015. A crisis of the overcrowded future: shadow banking and the political economy of financial innovation. New political economy, 20 (3), 431–453.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Omarova, S.T., 2020. Technology v. Technocracy: Fintech as a Regulatory Challenge (SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 3545468). Social Science Research Network.
   Google Scholar
• Paquet, G., 2003. Governance as subversive bricolage in the 21st Century. Governance: Canada/Ireland. Canadian Embassy, Dublin Craig Dobbin Chair of Canadian Studies (University College Dublin) and the Association for Canadian Studies in Ireland.
   Google Scholar
• Pozsar, Z., Adrian, T., Ashcraft, A.B., and Boesky, H., 2010. Shadow Banking (SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 1645337). Social Science Research Network.
   Google Scholar
• Sassen, S., 2017. Predatory formations dressed in wall street suits and algorithmic math. Science, technology and society, 22 (1), 6–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soriano, M., 2018. How fintech startups succeed in financial inclusion. Asian management insights, 5 (1), 58–63.
   Google Scholar
• Thiemann, M., 2012. ‘Out of the shadows?’ accounting for special purpose entities in European banking systems. Competition & change, 16 (1), 37–55.
   Google Scholar
• UNSGSA FinTech Working Group and CCAF, 2019. Early lessons on regulatory innovations to enable inclusive FinTech: innovation offces, regulatory sandboxes, and RegTech. New York, NY and Cambridge, UK: Offce of the UNSGSA and CCAF.
   Google Scholar
• Walport, M., 2015. FinTech Futures: The UK As a World Leader in Financial Technologies, UK Government Chief Scientific Adviser Report, Mar. 2015. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/413095/gs-15-3-fintech-futures.pdf [Accessed 10 March 2021].
   Google Scholar
• Woolard, C., 2017. Innovating for the future: The next phrase of Project Innovate. FCA, 10th April. Available from: https://www.fca.org.uk/news/speeches/innovating-future-next-phase-projectinnovate [Accessed 10 March 2021].
   Google Scholar
• Wu, T., 2010. Agency threats. Duke law journal, 60, 1841–1857.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeung, K., 2018. Algorithmic regulation: a critical interrogation. Regulation & governance, 12 (4), 505–523.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Zwan, N., 2014. Making sense of financialization. Socio-economic review, 12 (1), 99–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar