Seeing like a macroeconomist: varieties of formalisation, professional incentives and academic ideational change

References

• Abbott, A., 1988. The system of professions: an essay on the division of expert labor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Babb, S., 2007. Embeddedness, inflation, and international regimes: the IMF in the early postwar period. American journal of sociology, 113 (1), 128–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, A., 2015. Varieties of economic crisis, varieties of ideational change: how and why financial Regulation and macroeconomic policy differ. New political economy, 20 (3), 342–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ban, C., 2015. Austerity versus stimulus? Understanding fiscal policy change at the international monetary fund since the Great Recession. Governance, 28 (2), 167–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ban, C., 2016. Ruling ideas: How global neoliberalism goes local. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ban, C., and Patenaude, B., 2019. The professional politics of the austerity debate: a comparative field analysis of the European Central Bank and the International Monetary Fund. Public administration, 97 (3), 530–545.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayoumi, T. 2004. GEM: A new international macroeconomic model. No. 239, IMF.
   Google Scholar
• Bergson, A., 1943. Price flexibility and the level of income. The review of economic statistics, 2–5.
   Google Scholar
• Best, J., 2004. Hollowing out Keynesian norms: how the search for a technical fix undermined the Bretton Woods regime. Review of international studies, 30 (3), 383–404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best, J., et al., 2020. Seeing and not-seeing like a political economist: the historicity of contemporary political economy and its blind spots. New political economy, 26 (2), 217–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanchard, O., 2018. On the future of macroeconomic models. Oxford review of economic policy, 34 (1–2), 43–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blyth, M., 2002. Great transformations: economic ideas and institutional change in the twentieth century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blyth, M., and Matthijs, M., 2017. Black swans, lame ducks, and the mystery of IPE's missing macroeconomy. Review of international political economy, 24 (2), 203–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Botman, D., and Karam, P. 2007. DSGE modeling at the fund: applications and further developments. IMF Working Paper.
   Google Scholar
• Boughton, J., 2003. On the origins of the Fleming-Mundell model. IMF staff papers, 50 (1), 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P., 1988. Homo academicus. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, B., 2014. Why models matter: the making and unmaking of governability in macroeconomic discourse. Journal of critical globalisation studies, 1 (7), 48–79.
   Google Scholar
• Bronfenbrenner, M., 1943. The role of money in equilibrium capital theory. Econometrica, Journal of the econometric society, 35–60.
   Google Scholar
• Broome, A., and Seabrooke, L., 2012. Seeing like an international organisation. New political economy, 17 (1), 1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, H.G., 1942. Basic principles of economics and their significance for public policy. Columbia, MO: Lucas Brothers.
   Google Scholar
• Carver, T.N., 1936. The theory of the shortened working week. The American economic review, 26 (3), 451–462.
   Google Scholar
• Christiano, L., Eichenbaum, M., and Trabandt, M., 2018. On DSGE models. Journal of economic perspectives, 32 (3), 113–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chwieroth, J., 2007. Neoliberal economists and capital account liberalization in emerging markets. International organization, 61 (2), 443–463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clift, B., 2018. The IMF and the Politics of austerity in the wake of the global financial crisis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clift, B., 2019. Contingent Keynesianism: the IMF’s model answer to the post-crash fiscal policy efficacy question in advanced economies. Review of international political economy, 26 (6), 1211–1237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colander, D., 2012. Economics. 9th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Education.
   Google Scholar
• de Vroey, M., 2016. A history of macroeconomics from Keynes to Lucas and beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dezalay, Y., and Garth, B.G., 2002. The internationalization of palace wars. Lawyer, economists, and the contest to transform Latin American states. Chicago: University Of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Farrell, H., and Quiggin, J., 2017. Consensus, dissensus, and economic ideas: economic crisis and the rise and fall of Keynesianism. International studies quarterly, 61 (2), 269–283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faruqee, H., et al., 1988. Introduction. Multimod mark III : the core dynamic and steady state model. Washington, DC: IMF.
   Google Scholar
• Fort, D.M., 1945. A theory of general short-run equilibrium. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 293–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fourcade, M., 2006. The construction of a global profession: the transnationalization of economics. American journal of society, 112 (1), 145–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fourcade, M., 2009. Economists and societies: discipline and profession in the United States, Britain, and France, 1890s to 1990s. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fourcade, M., and Healy, K., 2017. Seeing like a market. Socio-economic review, 15 (1), 9–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fourcade, M., Ollion, E., and Algan, Y., 2015. The superiority of economists. Journal of economic perspectives, 29 (1), 89–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galbacs, P., 2020. The Friedman-Lucas transition in macroeconomics: a structuralist approach. London: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goutsmedt, A., Guizzo, D., and Sergi, F., 2019. An agenda without a plan. Robert E. Lucas’s trajectory through the public debate. Œconomia. History, methodology, philosophy, 9 (2), 289–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grabel, I., 2017. When things don’t fall apart: global financial governance and developmental finance in an age of productive incoherence. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, P., 1989. The political Power of economic ideas: Keynesianism across nations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, P., 1993. Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state: the case of economic policymaking in Britain. Comparative politics, 25 (3), 275–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haney, H.L., 1939. Value and distribution: some leading principles of economic science. New York: Appleton-Century
   Google Scholar
• Hay, C., 2001. The ‘crisis’ of Keynesianism and the rise of neo-liberalism in Britain: An ideational institutionalist approach. In: J.L. Campbell, and O.K. Pedersen, eds. The rise of neo-liberalism and institutional analysis. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Uni. Press, 193–218.
   Google Scholar
• Heimberger, P., Huber, J., and Kapeller, J., 2020. The power of economic models: the case of the EU’s fiscal regulation framework. Socio-economic review, 18 (2), 337–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helgadóttir, O., and Ban, C., 2021. Managing macroeconomic neoliberalism: capital and the resilience of the rational expectations assumption since the Great Recession. New political economy, 1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henriksen, L., 2013. Economic models as devices of policy change: policy paradigms, paradigm shift, and performativity. Regulation & governance, 7 (4), 481–495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hicks, J.R., 1937. Mr. Keynes and the ‘classics’; a suggested interpretation. Econometrica: journal of the econometric society, 147–159.
   Google Scholar
• Ise, J., 1938. Principles of economics by Frederic B. Garver and Alvin H. Hansen Review. The American economic review, 28, 110–112.
   Google Scholar
• Kehoe, P.J., Midrigan, V., and Pastorino, E., 2018. Evolution of modern business cycle models: Accounting for the great recession. Journal of economic perspectives, 32 (3), 141–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight, F.H., 1934. The nature of economic science in some recent discussion. The American economic review, 24 (2), 225–238.
   Google Scholar
• Kydland, F.E., and Prescott, E.C., 1982. Time to build and aggregate fluctuations. Econometrica, 50 (6), 1345–1370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamont, M., 2009. How professors think. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B., 1987. Science in action: how to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Laxton, D., 2008. Getting to know the global economy model and its philosophy. IMF staff papers, 55 (2), 213–242.
   Google Scholar
• Laxton, D., and Pesenti, P., 2003. Monetary rules for small, open, emerging economies. Journal of monetary economics, 50 (5), 1109–1146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lo, A., 2004. The adaptive markets hypothesis. The journal of portfolio management, 30 (5), 15–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKenzie, D., 2005. Opening the black boxes of global finance. Review of international political economy, 12 (4), 555–576.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mankiw, N.G., 1989. Real business cycles: a new Keynesian perspective. Journal of economic perspectives, 3 (3), 79–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann, G., 2017. In the long run we are all dead: Keynesianism, political economy, and revolution. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• McNamara, K., 1998. The currency of ideas: monetary politics in the European Union. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mcnamara, K.R., 2009. Of intellectual monocultures and the study of IPE. Review of International Political Economy, 16 (1), 72–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendoza, E., 1991. Real business cycles in a small open economy. American economic review, 81 (4), 797–818.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirowski, P., 2002. Machine dreams: economics becomes a cyborg science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moschella, M., 2012. IMF surveillance in crisis: the past, present and future of the reform process. Global society, 26 (1), 43–60.
   Google Scholar
• Mussa, M., 1986. Nominal exchange rate regimes and the behavior of real exchange rates: evidence and implications. In Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 25:117–214. Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, C., and Plosser, C., 1982. Trends and random walks in macroeconmic time series: some evidence and implications. Journal of monetary economics, 10 (2), 139–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parrish, J.B., 1949. Principles of economics prerequisite to courses in public finance: A rejoinder. The American economic review, 31 (1), 102.
   Google Scholar
• Pegrum, D.F., 1941. Economic planning and the science of economics: rejoinder. The American economic review, 31 (4), 831–833.
   Google Scholar
• Plosser, C.I., 1989. Understanding real business cycles. Journal of economic perspectives, 3 (3), 51–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prasad, M., 2006. The politics of free markets: the rise of neoliberal economic policies in Britain, France, Germany, and the United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Prescott, E.C., 2006. Nobel lecture: the transformation of macroeconomic policy and research. Journal of political economy, 114 (2), 203–235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajan, R., 2004. GEM: a new international macroeconomic model. Washington, DC: IMF.
   Google Scholar
• Rebelo, S., 2005. Real business cycle models: past, present and future. The Scandinavian journal of economics, 107 (2), 217–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed, H.L., 1933. Reserve bank policy and economic planning. The American economic review 23 (1). Supplement, Papers and Proceedings of the Forty-fifth Annual Meeting of the American Economic Association, 108–118.
   Google Scholar
• Rodrik, D., 2015. Economics rules: the rights and wrongs of the dismal science. New York City, NY: WW Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Romer, P., 2015. Mathiness in the theory of economic growth. American economic review, 105 (5), 89–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roos, C.F., and Von Szeliski, V., 1942. The determination of interest rates. Journal of political economy, 50 (4), 501–535.
   Google Scholar
• Salz, A., 1944. The present position of economics. The American economic review 34(1), Part 2, Supplement, Papers and Proceedings of the Fifty-sixth Annual Meeting of the American Economic Association, 15–24.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J.C., 1998. Seeing like a state: how certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Seabrooke, L., 2014. Epistemic arbitrage: transnational professional knowledge in action. Journal of professions and organization, 1 (1), 49–64.
   Google Scholar
• Seabrooke, L., and Henriksen, L.F., 2017. Professional networks in transnational governance. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Seabrooke, L., and Nilsson, E., 2015. Professional skills in international financial surveillance: assessing change in IMF policy teams. Governance, 28 (2), 237–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seabrooke, L., and Tsingou, E., 2020. Revolving doors in international financial governance. Global networks, 21 (2), 294–319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stahl, R., 2020. From depoliticisation to dedemocratisation: revisiting the neoliberal turn in macroeconomics. New political economy, 26 (3), 406–421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, G.R., 1938. Elements of modern economics by Albert L. Meyers. The American Economic Review, 28, 112–113.
   Google Scholar
• Thiemann, M., Melches, C.R., and Ibrocevic, E., 2020. Measuring and mitigating systemic risks: how the forging of new alliances between central bank and academic economists legitimize the transnational macroprudential agenda. Review of international political economy, 1–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tintner, G., 1946. Multiple Regression for Systems of Equations. Econometrica, Journal of the Econometric Society, 5–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Gunten, T.S., 2015. Cohesion, consensus, and conflict: technocratic elites and financial crisis in Mexico and Argentina. International journal of comparative sociology, 56 (5), 366–390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warburton, C., 1946. The misplaced emphasis in contemporary business-fluctuation theory. The Journal of Business of the University of Chicago, 19 (4), 199– 220.
   Google Scholar
• Widmaier, W., 2016. Economic ideas in political time. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yonay, Y.P., 1998. The struggle over the soul of economics: institutionalist and neoclassical economists in America between the wars. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Young, W., 2014. Real business cycle models in economics. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar