‘Let me tell you a story’: the politics of macroeconomic models

References

• Barro, R., 1977. Unanticipated money growth and unemployment in the United States. American economic review, 67 (2), 101–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanchard, O. 2017. The need for different classes of macroeconomic models. Available from: https://www.piie.com/blogs/realtime-economic-watch/need-different-classes-macroeconomic-models.
   Google Scholar
• Boumans, M., 1999. Built-in justification. In: M. Morgan, and M. Morrison, eds. Models as mediators: perspectives on natural and social science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 66–96.
   Google Scholar
• Cartwright, N., 2007. Hunting causes and using them: approaches to philosophy and economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chari, V. 2010. Testimony. Hearing before the Committee on Science and Technology, US House of Representatives, July 20 2010. Available from: https://www.congress.gov/111/chrg/CHRG-111hhrg57604/CHRG-111hhrg57604.pdf, 32-4.
   Google Scholar
• Clarida, R., Galì, J., and Gertler, M., 1999. The science of monetary policy: a new Keynesian perspective. Journal of economic literature, 37 (4), 1661–707. doi:10.1257/jel.37.4.1661
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vroey, M., 2016. A history of macroeconomics: from Keynes to Lucas and beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, M., 1953. Essays in positive economics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frydman, R., and Phelps, E., 2013. Which way forward for macroeconomics and policy analysis?. In: R. Frydman, and E. Phelps, eds. Rethinking expectations: the way forward for macroeconomics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1–46.
   Google Scholar
• Gelfert, A., 2011. Mathematical formalisms in scientific practice: from denotation to model-based representation. Studies in history and philosophy of science, Part A, 42 (2), 272–86. doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2010.11.035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodfriend, M., and King, R., 1997. The new neoclassical synthesis and the role of monetary policy. In: B. Bernanke, and J. Rotemberg, eds. NBER macroeconomics annual 1997. London: MIT Press, 231–96.
   Google Scholar
• Greenspan, A., 2013. Never saw it coming. Foreign affairs, 92 (6), 88–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helgadóttir, O., 2022. Seeing like a macroeconomist: varieties of formalisation, professional incentives and academic ideational change. New political economy, 27 (3), 426–40. doi:10.1080/13563467.2021.1967910
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helgadóttir, O., 2023. How to make a super-model: professional incentives and the birth of contemporary macroeconomics. Review of international political economy, 30 (1), 252–80. doi:10.1080/09692290.2021.1997786
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurtado, S., 2014. DSGE models and the Lucas critique. Economic modelling, 44 (S1), 12–9.
   Google Scholar
• Inoue, A., and Rossi, B., 2011. Identifying the sources of instability in macroeconomic fluctuations. Review of economics and statistics, 93 (4), 1186–204. doi:10.1162/REST_a_00130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knuuttila, T., 2011. Modelling and representing: an artefactual approach to model-based representation. Studies in history and philosophy of science, Part A, 42 (2), 262–71. doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2010.11.034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krugman, P., 2018. Good enough for government work? Macroeconomics since the crisis. Oxford review of economic policy, 34 (1–2), 156–68. doi:10.1093/oxrep/grx052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuorikoski, J., 2021. There are no mathematical explanations. Philosophy of science, 88 (2), 189–212. doi:10.1086/711479
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucas, R., 1972. Expectations and the neutrality of money. Journal of economic theory, 4 (2), 103–24. doi:10.1016/0022-0531(72)90142-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucas, R., 1980. The death of Keynesian economics. In: R. Lucas, and M. Gillman, eds. 2013. Collected papers on monetary theory. London: Harvard University Press, 500–3.
   Google Scholar
• Lucas, R., 1981. Studies in business-cycle theory. London: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lucas, R., and Sargent, T., 1979. After Keynesian macroeconomics. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis quarterly review, 3 (2), 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Mäki, U., 2009. MISSing the world. Models as isolations and credible surrogate systems. Erkenntnis, 70 (1), 29–43. doi:10.1007/s10670-008-9135-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCallum, B., and Nelson, E., 1999. An optimizing IS-LM specification for monetary policy and business cycle analysis. Journal of money, credit and banking, 31 (3/1), 296–316. doi:10.2307/2601113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirowski, P., 1991. More heat than light: economics as social physics, physics as nature’s economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, M., 2001. Models, stories and the economic world. Journal of economic methodology, 8 (3), 361–84. doi:10.1080/13501780110078972
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, M., 2012. The world in the model: how economists work and think. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morrison, M., 1999. Models as autonomous agents. In: M. Morgan, and M. Morrison, eds. Models as mediators: perspectives on natural and social science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 38–65.
   Google Scholar
• Pfleiderer, P., 2020. Chameleons: the misuse of theoretical models in finance and economics. Economica, 87 (345), 81–107. doi:10.1111/ecca.12295
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prendergast, C., 2000. The triangle of representation. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Saatsi, J., 2016. On the ‘indispensable explanatory role’ of mathematics’. Mind: a quarterly review of psychology and philosophy, 125 (500), 1045–70. doi:10.1093/mind/fzv175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sargent, T., and Wallace, N., 1975. “Rational” expectations, the optimal monetary instrument, and the optimal money supply rule. Journal of political economy, 83 (2), 241–54. doi:10.1086/260321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sergi, F., 2020. The standard narrative about DSGE models in central banks’ technical reports. European journal of the history of economic thought, 27 (2), 163–93. doi:10.1080/09672567.2019.1651365
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheffrin, S., 1996. Rational expectations. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Storm, S., 2021. Cordon of conformity: why DSGE models are not the future of macroeconomics. International journal of political economy, 50 (2), 77–98. doi:10.1080/08911916.2021.1929582
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strassman, D., and Polanyi, L., 1995. The economist as storyteller: what the texts reveal. In: S. Feiner, E. Kuiper, N. Ott, J. Sap, and Z. Tzannatos, eds. Out of the margin: feminist perspectives on economic theory. London: Routledge, 94–109.
   Google Scholar
• Suárez, M., 2004. An inferential conception of scientific representation. Philosophy of science, 71 (5), 767–79. doi:10.1086/421415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sugden, R., 2000. Credible worlds: the status of theoretical models in economics. Journal of economic methodology, 7 (1), 1–31. doi:10.1080/135017800362220
   Google Scholar
• Sugden, R., 2009. Credible worlds, capacities and mechanisms. Erkenntnis, 70 (1), 3–27. doi:10.1007/s10670-008-9134-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh, C., 2010. Monetary theory and policy. 3rd ed. London: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weintraub, R., 1985. General equilibrium analysis: studies in appraisal. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Woodford, M., 1998. Control of the public debt: a requirement for price stability? In: G. Calvo, and M. King, eds. The debt burden and its consequences for monetary policy. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 117–54.
   Google Scholar
• Wren-Lewis, S., 2016. Unravelling the new classical counter revolution. Review of Keynesian economics, 4 (1), 20–35. doi:10.4337/roke.2016.01.03
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar