Two Tails of Housing-led Urban Regeneration Policy Network: The UK and South Korea

References

• Agranoff, R. 1986. Intergovernmental Management: Human Service Problem Solving in Six Metropolitan Areas, Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Agranoff, R. 2006. “Inside Collaborative Networks: Ten Lessons for Public Managers”. Public Administration Review, , 66 (Suppl. s1): 56–65
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agranoff, R., and M. McGuire 2001. “Big Questions in Public Network Management Research”. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 11 (3): 295–326. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a003504
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alder, J., and C. Handy 2003. Housing Associations: Law and Practice, London: Sweet & Maxwell.
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, R., and K. Kintrea 2002. “Area Effects: What Do They Mean for British Housing and Regeneration Policy?”. European Journal of Housing Policy, 2 (2): 147–166. doi: 10.1080/14616710210140349
   Google Scholar
• Bae, S. 2009. “Urban Regeneration for Housing Welfare”. Planning and Policy, 332, 38–46. (in Korean)
   Google Scholar
• Bae, W., Y. Lee, Y. Kim, Y. Jang, S. Cho, D. Maeng, and S. Lee 2008. “Current Status and Future Direction of Urban Regeneration”. Urban Information Service, 314, 3–20. (in Korean)
   Google Scholar
• Ball, M., and M. Harloe 1992. “Rhetorical Barriers to Understanding Housing Provision: What the Provision Thesis Is and Is Not”. Housing Studies, 7 (1): 3–15. doi: 10.1080/02673039208720719
   Google Scholar
• Ball, M., and P. Maginn 2005. “Urban Change and Conflict: Evaluating the Role of Partnership in Urban Regeneration in the UK”. Housing Studies, 20 (1): 9–28. doi: 10.1080/0267303042000308705
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berry, F., R. Brower, S. Choi, W. Goa, H. Jang, M. Kwon, and J. Word 2004. “Three Traditions of Network Research: What the Public Management Research Agenda Can Learn from Other Research Communities”. Public Administration Review, 64 (5): 539–552. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00402.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blom-Hansen, J. 1997. “A New Institutional Perspective on Policy Networks”. Public Administration, 75 (4): 669–693. doi: 10.1111/1467-9299.00080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borgatti, S., and P. Foster 2003. “The Network Paradigm in Organisational Research: A Review and Typology”. Journal of Management, 29 (6): 991–1013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borzel, T. 1998. “Organising Babylon: On the Different Concepts of Policy Networks”. Public Administration, 76 (2): 253–273. doi: 10.1111/1467-9299.00100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bridger, J., and A. Luloff 1999. “Toward and Interactional Approach to Sustainable Community Development”. Journal of Rural Studies, 15 (4): 377–387. doi: 10.1016/S0743-0167(98)00076-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchanan, J., and G. Tullock 1962. The Calculus of Consent: Logical Foundation of Constitutional Democracy, Ann Arbor: Univ. of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Butetown Connected. 2011. Funding Sources. Accessed September 15, 2011. http://www.butetownconnected.org.uk/
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, S. 2006. “From Low Demand to Rising Aspirations: Housing Market Renewal within Regional and Neighbourhood Regeneration Policy”. Housing Studies, 21 (1): 3–16. doi: 10.1080/02673030500391015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron, S., and J. Doling 1994. “Housing Neighbourhoods and Urban Regeneration”. Urban Studies, 31 (7): 1211–1223. doi: 10.1080/00420989420081031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardiff and Vale University Health Board. 2009. Loudoun Square Health Centre. Agenda Item 5.3.1 for Board Meeting. Accessed September 19, 2010. http://www.cardiffandvaleuhb.wales.nhs.uk/sitesplus/documents/864/5%203%201%20Loudoun%20Square.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cardiff and Vale University Health Board. 2010. Loudoun Square Development Contractor Warranties. Agenda Item 3.3 for Strategic Planning Committee. Accessed September 19, 2010. http://www.cardiffandvaleuhb.wales.nhs.uk/sitesplus/documents/864/3%203%20Report%20Loudoun%20Warranties.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cardiff Community Housing Association. 2008. Loudoun Square Newsletter. Accessed September 9, 2011. http://www.cardiff.gov.uk%2Fobjview.asp%3FObject_ID%3D14510%26&ei=1-bjUP_8JKW7iwK1toGYCA&usg=AFQjCNG9UT6Kz-A_crWjh_G4aa14usIMLA&cad=rjt
   Google Scholar
• Cardiff Community Housing Association 2011. New Loudoun Square: The Facts, Cardiff: CCHA.
   Google Scholar
• Cardiff Community Housing Association. 2012. Loudoun Square Regeneration Update. Accessed January, 2 2013. http://www.loudounsquare.org.uk/content/files/home/loudoun-newsletter-spring-2012.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cardiff Council. 2007. Cardiff Community Strategy 2007–2017. Accessed January 6, 2013. http://www.cardiff.gov.uk/content.asp?nav=2%2C2872%2C3257%2C5423%2C5579%2C5611
   Google Scholar
• Cardiff Council. 2009. Cardiff Partnering Scheme: Report of Corporate Director. Accessed September 6, 2011. http://cardiff.gov.uk/objview.asp?object_id..
   Google Scholar
• Cardiff Council. 2010. Butetown Regeneration Scheme. Neighbourhood Regeneration, July 2010. Accessed September 15, 2011. http://www.cardiff.gov.uk/content.asp?nav=2867,5636,3477&parent_directory_id=2865&id=2331&d1p1=1
   Google Scholar
• Cardiff Council. 2011a. Neighbourhood Regeneration Annual Report 2010/11. Strategic Planning. Accessed September 6, 2011. http://www.cardiff.gov.uk/content.asp?nav=2%2C2870%2C3139%2C5563
   Google Scholar
• Cardiff Council. 2011b. Butetown Community First LPG Meeting Notice. Accessed January 2, 2013. http://www.cardiff.gov.uk/objview.asp?object_ID
   Google Scholar
• Carley, M. 2000. “Urban Partnerships, Governance and the Regeneration of Britain's Cities”. International Planning Studies, 5 (3): 273–297. doi: 10.1080/713672858
   Google Scholar
• Chaskin, R. 2001. “Building Community Capacity: A Definitional Framework and Case Studies from a Comprehensive Community Initiative”. Urban Affairs Review, 36 (3): 291–323. doi: 10.1177/10780870122184876
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chinman, M., G. Hannah, A. Wandersman, P. Ebener, S. Hunter, P. Imm, and J. Sheldon 2005. “Developing a Community Science Research Agenda for Building Community Capacity for Effective Preventive Interventions”. American Journal of Community Psychology, 35 (3/4): 143–157. doi: 10.1007/s10464-005-3390-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, S., Y. Kim, and Y. Lee 2010. Comparison the Role of Housing and Urban Agencies of Developed Countries, Seoul: KLH. (in Korean)
   Google Scholar
• Cole, I., and B. Goodchild. 2001. “Social Mix and the Balanced Community in British Housing Policy: A Tale of Two epochs.” GeoJournal 51 (4): 351–360
   Google Scholar
• Davis, J. S. 2002. “The Governance of Urban Regeneration: A Critique of the ‘Governing without Government’ Thesis”. Public Administration, 80 (2): 301–322. doi: 10.1111/1467-9299.00305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denhardt, R., and J. Denhardt 2000. “The New Public Service: Serving Rather than Steering”. Public Administration Review, 60 (6): 549–559. doi: 10.1111/0033-3352.00117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department for Communities and Local Government 2011. Regeneration to Enable Growth: What Government Is Doing in Support of Community-led Regeneration, London: DCLG.
   Google Scholar
• Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions 1998. New Deal for Communities: Guidance for Pathfinder Applicants, London: DETR.
   Google Scholar
• Doak, J., and N. Karadimitriou 2007. “(Re)development, Complexity and Networks: A Framework for Research”. Urban Studies, 44 (2): 209–229. doi: 10.1080/00420980601074953
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dowding, K. 1995. “Model or Metaphor? A Critical Review of the Policy Network Approach”. Political Studies, 43 (1): 136–158. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.1995.tb01705.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herranz, J. 2010. “Network Performance and Coordination: A Theoretic Review and Framework”. Public Performance and Management Review, 33 (3): 311–341. doi: 10.2753/PMR1530-9576330301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, M., and P. Hupe 2002. Implementing Public Policy, London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hong, G., Y. Park, and Y. Woo. 2009. Research Proposal for Happy House Project. Unpublished paper prepared by Research Institute for Public Organization Management (in Korean)
   Google Scholar
• Housing and Urban Research Institute 2007. Housing and Urban Handbook, Seoul: Korea Housing Corporation. (in Korean)
   Google Scholar
• Human, S., and K. Provan 2000. “Legitimacy Building in the Evolution of Small-Firm Networks: A Comparative Study of Success and Demise”. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45 (2): 327–365. doi: 10.2307/2667074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joo, K. 2008. , From Urban Renewal to Urban Regeneration towards Paradigm Shift of Redevelopment. HURI Focus 27. Seoul: Korea Housing Corporation (in Korean)
   Google Scholar
• Kang, E. 2001. “Study of the Factors of Policy Changes focusing on Greenbelt Case.” PhD thesis, Seoul National University, Republic of Korea (in Korean)
   Google Scholar
• Kenis, P., and D. Knoke 2002. “How Organizational Field Networks Shape Interorganizational Tie-Formation Rates”. Academy of Management Review, 27 (2): 275–293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenis, P., and K. Provan 2006. “The Control of Public Networks”. International Public Management Journal, 9 (3): 227–247. doi: 10.1080/10967490600899515
   Google Scholar
• Kenis, P., and V. Schneider 1991. “Policy Networks and Policy Analysis: Scrutinizing a New Analytical Toolbox”. In Policy Networks: Empirical Evidence and Theoretical Considerations, edited by B. Martin and R. Mayntz, 25–62. New York: Frankfurt am Maine.
   Google Scholar
• King, C., and C. Stivers 1998. Government Is Us: Public Administration in an Anti-government Era, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Kleinhans, R. 2004. “Social Implications of Housing Diversification in Urban Renewal: A Review of Recent Literature”. Journal of Housing and Built Environment, 19 (4): 367–390. doi: 10.1007/s10901-004-3041-5
   Google Scholar
• Klievink, B., and M. Janssen 2008. “Improving Government Service Delivery with Private Sector Intermediaries”. European Journal of ePractice, 5, 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Klijn, E. 1997. “Policy Networks: An Overview”. In Managing Complex Networks: Strategies for the Public Sector, edited by W. Kickert, E. Klijn and F. Koppenjan, 1–13. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Kolderie, T. 1986. “The Two Different Concepts of Privatization”. Public Administration Review, 46 (July/August): 285–291. doi: 10.2307/976301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korea Housing Corporation. 2009. Field-specific Residential Service Delivery. Unpublished Report of Division of Business Development. Seoul: KHC (in Korean)
   Google Scholar
• Korea Land & Housing Corporation (KLH). 2009. A Plan of a Happy House Pilot Project. Unpublished Internal Report (in Korean)
   Google Scholar
• Korea Land & Housing Corporation (KLH). 2010. Result of Happy House Pilot Project. Unpublished Internal Report (in Korean)
   Google Scholar
• Lee, W. 2009. “Future Direction of Korean Urban Regeneration Policy.” Urban Information Service 325: 2 (in Korean)
   Google Scholar
• Lee, A., J. Kim, and J. Lee 2009. , Changes of Future Housing and Response. CEO Information 726. Seoul: SERI (in Korean)
   Google Scholar
• Loudoun Square. 2011. CCHA Is First in Wales To Be Awarded London 2012 Games Inspire Mark. Accessed September 13, 2011. http://www.loudounsquare.org.uk/Home/
   Google Scholar
• Lowe, S. 2004. Housing Policy Analysis: British Housing in Cultural and Comparative Context, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Malpass, P. 2000. Housing Associations and Housing Policy: A Historical Perspective, London: Macmillan Press Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Malpass, P. 2010. “The Rise (and Rise?) of Housing Associations”. In Housing, Markets and Policy, edited by P. Malpass and R. Rowlands, 101–121. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mapo District Government. 2009. Happy House Pilot Project Plan. Unpublished Internal Report (in Korean)
   Google Scholar
• Marin, B., and R. Mayntz 1991. Policy Networks: Empirical Evidence and Theoretical Considerations, Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marrs, C. 2010. Cameron sets out Government's principles for regeneration. Regeneratin+Renewal 14/June/2010. Accessed August 30, 2011. http://www.regen.net/news/1009446/Cameron-sets-Governments-principles-regeneration?DCMP=EMC-Regen%2520Daily%2520Bulletin
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, D. 1998. “The Development of the Policy Network Approach”. In Comparing Policy Networks, edited by D. Marsh, 3–20. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Min, B. 2008. “Vitalizing Measures for Urban Regeneration”. Planning and Policy, 326, 25–32. (in Korean)
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs. 2009. Plan for Selecting Happy House Pilot Project Areas. Unpublished Internal Document for Meeting (in Korean)
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs. 2010. Manual for Housing Policy. Accessed August 27, 2011. http://www.mltm.go.kr/USR/BORD0201/m_40/DTL.jsp?mode=view&idx=170124
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs. 2011a. Media Briefing of 25/07/2011. Accessed August 22, 2011. http://www.mltm.go.kr/USR/NEWS/m_71/dtl.jsp?id=95068594
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs. 2011b. Plan for 2011 Happy House Pilot Project. Unpublished Internal Document for Meeting (in Korean)
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, D., and T. Gaebler 1992. Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, V., and E. Ostrom 1971. “Public Choice: A Different Approach to the Study of Public Administration”. Public Administration Review, 31 (2): 203–216. doi: 10.2307/974676
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Toole, L. 1997. “Treating Networks Seriously: Practical and Research-Based Agendas in Public Administration”. Public Administration Review, 57 (1): 45–52. doi: 10.2307/976691
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, J., T. Han, and S. Sung 2011. , Structure of Housing Market and the Future from 2010 Census Data. SERI Economic Focus 323 (in Korean)
   Google Scholar
• Poplin, D. 1972. Communities: A Survey of Theories and Methods of Research, London: Collier-Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, W. 1990. “Neither Market Nor Hierarchy: Network Forms of Organisations”. Research on Organisational Behaviour, 12, 295–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Protheroe, K. 2011. “Regenerating Communities.” Welsh Housing Quarterly, 82, March, 35
   Google Scholar
• Provan, K., A. Fish, and J. Sydow 2007. “Interorganisational Networks at the Network Level: A Review of the Empirical Literature on Whole Networks”. Journal of Management, 33 (3): 479–516. doi: 10.1177/0149206307302554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Provan, K., and P. Kenis 2008. “Modes of Network Governance: Structure, Management, and Effectiveness”. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18 (2): 229–252. doi: 10.1093/jopart/mum015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Provan, K., and H. Milward 1991. “Institutional-Level Norms and Organizational Involvement in a Service Implementation Network”. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 1 (4): 391–417.
   Google Scholar
• Provan, K., and H. Milward 1995. “A Preliminary Theory of Interorganizational Network Effectiveness: A Comparative Study of Four Community Mental Health System”. Administration Science Quarterly, 40 (1): 1–33. doi: 10.2307/2393698
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Provan, K., and H. Milward 2001. “Do Networks Really Work? A Framework for Evaluating Public-Sector Organizational Networks”. Public Administration Review, 61 (4): 414–423. doi: 10.1111/0033-3352.00045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeves, P. 2005. An Introduction to Social Housing, Oxford: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, R. A. W. 1996. “The New Governance: Governing Without Government”. Political Studies, 44 (4): 652–667. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb01747.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhodes, R. A. W., and D. Marsh 1992. “Policy Networks in British Politics: A Critique of Existing Approaches”. In Policy Networks in British Government, edited by D. Marsh and R. A. W. Rhodes, 2–27. Oxford: Clarendon.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, L., and K. Mumford 2002. “Community, Neighbourhood, and Social Infrastructure”. In Understanding Social Exclusion, edited by J. Hills, Le GrandJ. and D. Piachaud, 202–225. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Room, G. 1995. “Poverty in Europe: Competing Paradigms of Analysis”. Policy and Politics, 23 (2): 103–113. doi: 10.1332/030557395782453473
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roseland, M. 2000. “Sustainable Community Development: Integrating Environmental, Economical, and Social Objectives”. Progress in Planning, 54 (2): 73–132. doi: 10.1016/S0305-9006(00)00003-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowlands, R. 2010. “Sustainable Communities: Housing, Dogma and the Opportunities missed”. In Housing, Markets and Policy, edited by P. Malpass and R. Rowlands, 203–223. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Slatter, P. 2001. After the Crossroads: Housing Associations as Community Investors, York: YPS for Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Tiesdell, S., and P. Allmendinger 2001. “Neighbourhood Regeneration and New Labour's Third Way”. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 19 (6): 903–926. doi: 10.1068/c0047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Waarden, F. 1992. “Dimensions and Types of Policy Networks”. European Journal of Political Research, 21 (1–2): 29–52. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.1992.tb00287.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webster, C. J., and S. Lee 2005. “The Global Emergence of Private Planning and Governance”. In Network Society: A New Context for Planning, edited by S. Mandelbaum and L. Albrechts, 229–246. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Welsh Assembly Government (WAG) 2007. Community First Guidance, Cardiff: WAG.
   Google Scholar
• Welsh Housing Quarterly (WHQ). 2011. “Partnership in Practice: Looking at Butetown.” WHQ 82, March
   Google Scholar
• Williams, A. 2004. “Governance and Sustainability: An Investigation of the Role of Policy Mediators in the European Union Policy Process”. Policy and Politics, 32 (1): 95–110. doi: 10.1332/030557304772860076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woo, Y. 2012. “Housing-led Urban Regeneration in Korea: Happy House of Seoul”. Seoul Studies, 13 (3): 225–240.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, J., and N. Jang 2010. “Policy Direction towards Low-income Household Friendly Urban Regeneration”. Planning and Policy, 348, 15–25. (in Korean)
   Google Scholar