Dynamics of an Evolving City-Region in the Developing World: The National Capital Region of Delhi Revisited

References

• Bähr, G. 1976. Die Achsenkonzeption als Leitvorstelling für die Städtebauliche Ordnung in Hamburg. Veröffentlichungen der Akademie für Raumforschung und Landesplanung 113: 201–240.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, D. 1973. The Coming of Post-industrial Society. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bose, A. 1994. India’s Urban Population. New Delhi: Wheeler Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Castells, M. 1996. The Rise of Network Society. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Census of India 1991. 1991. Provisional Population Total: Rural-Urban Distribution. New Delhi: Registrar General/Census Commissioner, Government of India.
   Google Scholar
• Census of India 2001. 2001. Provisional Population Total: Rural-Urban Distribution. New Delhi: Registrar General/Census Commissioner, Government of India.
   Google Scholar
• Census of India 2011. 2011. Provisional Population Total. New Delhi: Registrar General/Census Commissioner, Government of India.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, C. 1967. Population Growth and Land Use. New York: St. Martin's Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davoudi, S. 2003. “European Briefing: Polycentricity in the European Spatial Planning: From an Analytical Tool to a Normative Agenda.” European Planning Studies 11 (8): 979–999. doi: 10.1080/0965431032000146169
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dieleman, F. M., and A. Faludi. 1998. “Polynucleated Metropolitan Regions in Northwest Europe: Theme of the Special Issue.” European Planning Studies 6 (4): 365–377. doi: 10.1080/09654319808720468
   Google Scholar
• Drucker, P. F. 1967. The Effective Executive. London: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Florida, R. 2002. The Rise of the Creative Class. And How It's Transforming Work, Leisure, Community and Everyday Life. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Geyer, H. S. 1989. “The Terminology, Definition, and Classification of Development Axes.” The South African Geographer 16 (1/2): 113–129.
   Google Scholar
• Geyer, H. S. 2009. “The Continuing Urban form Controversy: Toward Bridging the Divide.” In International Handbook of Urban Policy, Volume 2: Issues in the Developed World, edited by H. S. Geyer, 195–259. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Geyer, H. S., D. Du Plessis, A. van Eeden, and H. S. Geyer Jr. Forthcoming. “Recent Morphological Trends in Metropolitan South Africa.” In Urban Transformations: Cities, Peripheries and Systems, edited by D. O'Donoghue. London: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Geyer, H. S., D. Du Plessis, H. S. Geyer Jr., and A. van Eeden. 2012. Recent Migration Trends in South Africa — Updating the Differential Urbanization Concept. OECD. doi:10.1787/9789264174108-en
   Google Scholar
• Geyer, H. S., and T. M. Kontuly. 1993. “A Theoretical Foundation for the Concept of Differential Urbanization.” International Regional Science Review 15 (2): 157–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaeser, E. L., and M. E. Kahn. 2004. “Sprawl and Urban Growth.” In Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, edited by J. V. Henderson and J. F. Thisse, 2481–2527. Cambridge, MA: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, P. 1979. “Deconcentration Without a ‘Clean Break’.” Environment and Planning A 11 (3): 281–290. doi: 10.1068/a110281
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon, P., and H. W. Richardson. 1996. “Beyond Polycentricity: The Dispersed Metropolis, Los Angeles 1970–1990.” Journal of the American Planning Association 62 (3): 289–295. doi: 10.1080/01944369608975695
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, N. 2007. “Functional Polycentricity: A Formal Definition in Terms of Social Network Analysis.” Urban Studies 44 (11): 2077–2103. doi: 10.1080/00420980701518941
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, P. 1971. London 2000. Northampton: Faver and Faber.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, P. 2009. “Polycentricity.” In The International Encyclopedia of Human Geography, Vol. 8, edited by R. Kitchin and N. Thrift, 260–264. Oxford: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, P., and K. Pain, eds. 2006. The Polycentric Metropolis: Learning from Mega-City Regions in Europe. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• House, J. W. 1978. France: An Applied Geography. London: Methuen.
   Google Scholar
• Machlup, F. 1973. The Production and Distribution of Knowledge in the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mookherjee, D., H. S. Geyer, and E. Hoerauf. Forthcoming. “Delhi and Its Peripheral Region: Perspectives of Settlement Growth.” In Urban Transformations: Cities, Peripheries and Systems, edited by D. O'Donoghue. London: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Mookherjee, D., and J. White. 2011. “Urban-Regional Dualism in India: An Exploration of Developmental Indicators across Urban Size Classes.” Asian Geographer 28 (1): 21–31. doi: 10.1080/10225706.2011.577976
   Google Scholar
• Morrill, R. 1987. “Theoretical Imperative.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 77 (4): 535–542. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8306.1987.tb00179.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Commission on Urbanization. 1988. Report of the National Commission on Urbanization. New Delhi: Government of India.
   Google Scholar
• NCRPB (National Capital Region Planning Board). 1988. Regional Plan 2001: National Capital Region. New Delhi: NCRPB. http://www.ncrpb.nic.in/
   Google Scholar
• NCRPB (National Capital Region Planning Board). 2000. National Capital Region Directory. New Delhi: NCRPB.
   Google Scholar
• NCRPB (National Capital Region Planning Board). 2005. Regional Plan-2021: National Capital Region. New Delhi: NCRPB.
   Google Scholar
• Neuman, M. 2005. “The Compact City Fallacy.” Journal of Planning Education and Research 25 (1): 11–26. doi: 10.1177/0739456X04270466
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pottier, P. 1963. “Axes de Communication et Developpement Economique.” Revue Economique 14 (1): 58–132.
   Google Scholar
• Pumain, D. 2002. “The French Urban System.” In International Handbook of Urban Systems: Studies of Urbanization and Migration in Advanced and Developing Countries, edited by H. S. Geyer, 121–145. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Raghuram, P., and C. Madge. 2006. “Towards a Method for Postcolonial Development Geography: Possibilities and Challenges.” Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography 27 (3): 270–288. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9493.2006.00262.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, H. W. 1977. City Size and National Strategies in Developing Countries. Staff Working Paper No. 252. Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, H. W. 1980. “Polarization Reversal in Developing Countries.” Papers of the Regional Science Association 45 (1): 67–85. doi: 10.1007/BF01934655
   Google Scholar
• Sivaramakrishnan, K. C., A. Kundu, and B. N. Singh. 2005. Handbook of Urbanization in India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• UNFPA (United Nations Population Fund). 2007. State of World Population 2007. Unleashing the Potential of Urban Growth. Washington, DC: United Nations Population Fund.
   Google Scholar