Integration and decentralization: the evolution of Dutch regional land policy

References

• Albrechts, L. 2004. “Strategic (Spatial) Planning Re-Examined.” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 31: 743–758. doi: 10.1068/b3065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allmendinger, P., and G. Haughton. 2010. “Spatial Planning, Devolution, and New Planning Spaces.” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 28: 803–818. doi: 10.1068/c09163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alterman, R. 2010. Takings International, a Comparative Perspective on Land Use Regulations and Compensations Rights. Chicago, IL: ABA Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Arts, B., and P. Leroy, eds. 2006. Institutional Dynamics in Environmental Governance. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Arts, B., and J. Van Tatenhove. 2006. “Political Modernisation.” In Institutional Dynamics in Environmental Governance, edited by B. Arts and P. Leroy, 21–43. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Boelens, L., and T. Spit. 2006. “Planning Zonder Overheid? Op Weg Naar een Relativering Van De Betekenis van de Overheid in Planning.” In Planning Zonder Overheid, Een Toekomst Voor Planning, edited by L. Boelens, T. Spit, and B. Wissink, 25–40. Rotterdam: Uitgeverij 010.
   Google Scholar
• Bosma, K. 1990. “Town and Regional Planning in The Netherlands, 1900–1945.” Planning Perspectives 5: 125–147. doi: 10.1080/02665439008725699
   Google Scholar
• Cheshire, L., A. T. Rosenblatt, G. Lawrence, and P. Walters. 2009. “The Governmentality of Master Planning: Housing Consumption, Aesthetics and Community on a New Estate.” Housing Studies 24: 653–667. doi: 10.1080/02673030903082302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davy, B. 2012. Land Policy, Planning and the Spatial Consequences of Property. London: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• De Vries, J. 1989. Grondpolitiek en Kabinetscrises. Leiden: De Vries.
   Google Scholar
• De Weerd-Van de Poll, H., and A. Van den Brink. 2005. “Provincies Op Weg Naar Ontwikkelend Grondbeleid.” Landwerk 6: 38–41.
   Google Scholar
• Doevendans, K., H. Lörzing, and A. Schram. 2007. “From Modernist Landscapes to New Nature: Planning of Rural Utopias in The Netherlands.” Landscape Research 32: 333–354. doi: 10.1080/01426390701318270
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duyvendak, J. W., and A. Krouwel. 2001. “Interactieve Beleidsvorming: Voortzetting Van een Rijke Nederlandse Traditie.” In Lokale Interactieve Beleidsvorming. Een Vergelijkend Onderzoek Naar De Consequenties Van Interactieve Beleidsvorming Voor Het Functioneren Van De Lokale Overheid, edited by J. Edelenbos and R. Monnikhof, 17–33. Utrecht: Lemma.
   Google Scholar
• Dutt, A. K., and F. J. Costa, eds. 1985. Public Planning in the Netherlands. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eckerberg, K., and M. Joas. 2004. “Multi-Level Environmental Governance, a Concept Under Stress?” Local Environment 9: 405–412. doi: 10.1080/1354983042000255315
   Google Scholar
• Faludi, A., and A. J. Van der Valk. 1994. Rule and Order, Dutch Planning Doctrine in the 20th Century. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Fliervoet, J. M., R. J. G. Van den Born, A. J. M. Smits, and L. Knippenberg. 2013. “Combining Safety and Nature: A Multi-Stakeholder Perspective on Integrated Floodplain Management.” Journal of Environmental Management 128: 1033–1042. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.06.023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fürst, C., H. König, K. Pietzsch, H. P. Ende, and F. Makeskin. 2010. “Pimp Your Landscape – A Generic Approach for Integrating Regional Stakeholder Needs into Land Use Planning.” Ecology and Society 15 (3): 34–58.
   Google Scholar
• Geelhoed, L. A., A. H. G. Rinnooy Kan, G. H. N. L. Van Woerkom, U. Rosenthal, G. J. Cerfontaine, W. B. J. H. Van de Donk, P. L. B. A. Van Geel, P. G. A. Noordanus, A. Kraaijeveld, and G. Beukema. 2002. Op Schaal Gewogen, Regionaal Bestuur in Nederland in de 21ste Eeuw. Den Haag: IPO.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. 1984. The Constitution of Society. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hajer, M., D. Sijmons, and F. Feddes. 2006. Een Plan dat Werkt, Ontwerp en politiek in de Regionale Planvorming. Rotterdam: NAi Uitgevers.
   Google Scholar
• Hartmann, T., and B. Needham. 2012. Planning by Law and Property Rights Reconsidered. London: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P. 1997. Collaborative Planning, Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hofstee, E. W. 1972. “Landownership in Densely Populated and Industrialized Countries.” In Sociologia Ruralis 12 (1): 6–26.
   Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L., G. Marks, and A. H. Schakel. 2010. The Rise of Regional Authority: A Comparative Study of 42 Democracies. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• IPO (Interprovinciaal Overleg), Adviescommissie Ruimtelijke Ordening, Volkshuisvesting, Economie en Mobiliteit, Onderzoeksinstituut OTB, Buck Consultants International. 2000. Rolbepaling Provinciaal Grondbeleid, Vol. 143 van IPO publicatie. Den Haag: IPO.
   Google Scholar
• IPO (Interprovinciaal Overleg). 2001. Van Ordenen Naar Ontwikkelen, Provincies Investeren in de Kwaliteit van de Ruimte, Advies van de ad hoc IPO-commissie Ruimtelijke Ontwikkelingspolitiek. Den Haag: IPO.
   Google Scholar
• Janssen, J. 2009. “Protected Landscapes in The Netherlands: Changing Ideas and Approaches.” Planning Perspectives 24: 435–455. doi: 10.1080/02665430903145689
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, A., S. Van Bommel, A. Branth Pedersen, H. Ørsted Nielsen, and W. Kuindersma. 2013. “Framing Climate Change: New Directions in Dutch and Danish Planning Strategies.” Planning Theory and Practice 14 (2): 233–247. doi: 10.1080/14649357.2013.784347
   Google Scholar
• Kantor, P. 2006. “Regionalism and Reform: A Comparative Perspective of Dutch Urban Politics.” Urban Affairs Review 41 (6): 800–829. doi: 10.1177/1078087406286847
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerselaers, E., E. Rogge, E. Vanempten, L. Lauwers, and G. Van Huylenbroeck. 2013. “Changing Land Use in the Countryside: Stakeholders’ Perception of the Ongoing Rural Planning Processes in Flanders.” Land Use Policy 32: 197–206. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.10.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korthals Altes, W. K. 2000. “Economic Forces and Dutch Strategic Planning.” In The Revival of Strategic Spatial Planning, edited by W. Salet and A. Faludi, 67–78. Amsterdam: Royal Netherlands Academy of Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Korthals Altes, W. K. 2006. “Towards Regional Development Planning in The Netherlands.” Planning, Practice and Research 21: 309–321. doi: 10.1080/02697450601090807
   Google Scholar
• Liefferink, D. 2006. “The Dynamics of Policy Arrangements: Turning Round the Tetrahedron.” In Institutional Dynamics in Environmental Governance, edited by B. Arts and P. Leroy, 45–68. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lijphart, A. 1984. Democracies: Patterns of Majoritarian and Consensus Government in Twenty-One Countries. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lodders-Eifferich, P. C., J. G. M. Alders, G. Beukema, A. C. Van Es, and A. N. Van der Zande. 2008. Ruimte, Regie en Rekenschap, Rapport van de Gemengde Commissie Decentralisatievoorstellen Provincies. Den Haag: Ministerie van binnenlandse zaken en koninkrijksrelaties.
   Google Scholar
• Louw, E., E. Van der Krabben, and H. Priemus. 2003. “Spatial Development Policy: Changing Roles for Local and Regional Authorities in The Netherlands.” Land Use Policy 20: 357–366. doi: 10.1016/S0264-8377(03)00059-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, T. 1996. “Regional Planning in Western Europe: The Contemporary Context.” International Planning Studies 1: 357–367. doi: 10.1080/13563479608721662
   Google Scholar
• Mills, M., J. G. Álvarez-Romero, K. Vance-Borland, P. Cohen, R. L. Pressey, A. M. Guerrero, and H. Ernstson. 2014. “Linking Regional Planning and Local Action: Towards Using Social Network Analysis in Systematic Conservation Planning.” Biological Conservation 169: 6–13. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2013.10.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment and the Ministry of Finances. 2001. Op Grond van Nieuw Beleid, Nota Grondbeleid. Den Haag: Ministerie van Volkshuisvesting, Ruimtelijke Ordening en Milieubeheer.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Infrastructure and the Environment. 2012. Structuurvisie Infrastructuur en Ruimte, Nederland Concurrerend, Bereikbaar, Leefbaar En Veilig. Den Haag: Ministerie van Infrastructuur en Milieu.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of the Interior and Kingdom Relations. 2013. Wet Tot Samenvoeging van de Provincies Flevoland, Noord-Holland en Utrecht. Den Haag: Ministerie van binnenlandse zaken en koninkrijk relaties.
   Google Scholar
• Molema, M. 2012. “The Urban West and the Rural Rest: Framing in Dutch Regional Planning in the 1950s.” Landscape Research 37: 437–450. doi: 10.1080/01426397.2012.687444
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Needham, B. 2007. “Final Comment: Land-Use Planning and the Law.” Planning Theory 6: 183–189. doi: 10.1177/1473095207077588
   Google Scholar
• Overwater, P. S. A. 2002. Naar een Sturend (gemeentelijk) Grondbeleid; Wie de Grond Heeft, Die Bouwt. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Pierre, J., and B. G. Peters. 2000. Governance, Politics and the State. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Priemus, H., and E. Louw. 2003. “Changes in Dutch Land Policy: From Monopoly Towards Competition in the Building Market.” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 30: 369–378. doi: 10.1068/b12982
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roodbol-Mekkes, P. H., A. J. J. Van der Valk, and W. K. Korthals Altes. 2012. “The Netherlands Spatial Planning Doctrine in Disarray in the 21th Century.” Environment and Planning A 44: 377–395. doi: 10.1068/a44162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samsura, D. A. A., E. Van der Krabben, and A. M. A. Van Deemen. 2010. “A Game Theory Approach to the Analysis of Land and Property Development Processes.” Land Use Policy 27: 564–578. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.07.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sohl, T. L., and P. R. Claggett. 2013. “Clarity versus Complexity: Land-Use Modeling as a Practical Tool for Decision-Makers.” Journal of Environmental Management 129: 235–243. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.07.027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van den Brink, A. 2009. “From Land Consolidation to Area Development in the Netherlands.” In Land Development Strategies: Patterns, Risks and Responsibilities, edited by E. Hepperle and H. Lenk, 47–60. Zurich: European Faculty of Land Use and Development.
   Google Scholar
• Van den Brink, A., and M. Molema. 2008. “The Origins of Dutch Rural Planning: A Study of the Early History of Land Consolidation in The Netherlands.” Planning Perspectives 23: 427–453. doi: 10.1080/02665430802319005
   Google Scholar
• Van den Brink, A., A. Van der Valk, and T. Van Dijk. 2006. “Planning and the Challenges of the Metropolitan Landscape: Innovation in The Netherlands.” International Planning Studies 11: 147–165. doi: 10.1080/13563470601097295
   Google Scholar
• Van der Krabben, E., and H. M. Jacobs. 2013. “Public Land Development as Strategic Tool for Redevelopment: Reflections on the Dutch Experience.” Land Use Policy 30: 774–783. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, T., and R. Beunen. 2009. “Laws, People and Land Use: A Sociological Perspective on the Relation Between Laws and Land Use.” European Planning Studies 17: 1797–1815. doi: 10.1080/09654310903322314
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Rij, H. E., and W. K. Korthals Altes. 2010. “Looking for the Optimum Relationship Between Spatial Planning and Land Development.” Town Planning Review 81: 283–306. doi: 10.3828/tpr.2010.2
   Google Scholar
• Van Straalen, F. M., L. B. Janssen-Jansen, and A. Van den Brink. 2014. “Delivering Planning Objectives Through Regional-Based Land Use Planning and Land Policy Instruments: An Assessment of Recent Experiences in the Dutch Provinces.” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 32: 567–584. doi: 10.1068/c1277
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VROM-raad. 2009. Grond Voor Kwaliteit, Voorstellen Voor Verbetering Van Verheidsregie Op (binnen)Stedelijke Ontwikkeling. Den Haag: VROM-raad.
   Google Scholar