Accountability and ecological sustainability challenges under NPM-based public sector-led urban development: four international comparative cases

References

• Arts, W., and J. Gelissen. 2002. “Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism or More? A State-of-the-Art Report.” Journal of European Social Policy 12 (2): 137–158
   Google Scholar
• Aucoin, P. 2002. “Beyond the ‘New’ in Public Management Reform in Canada: Catching the Next Wave?” In The Handbook of Canadian Public Administration, edited by C. Dunn, 36–52. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Aulich, C., J. Halligan, and S. Nutley. 2001. “Public Sector Management.” In Australian Handbook of Public Sector Management, edited by C. Aulich, J. Halligan, and S. Nutley, 11–19. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Balchin, P. N., G. H. Bull, and J. L. Kieve. 1995. Urban Land Economics and Public Policy. 5th ed. Basingstoke: Macmillian.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, M., and P. J. Maginn. 2005. “Urban Change and Conflict: Evaluating the Role of Partnerships in Urban Regeneration in the UK.” Housing Studies 20 (1): 9–28. doi: 10.1080/0267303042000308705
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bovens, M. 2010. “Two Concepts of Accountability: Accountability as a Virtue and as a Mechanism.” West European Politics 33 (5): 946–967. doi: 10.1080/01402382.2010.486119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CEC (Commission of the European Communities). 1997. The EU Compendium of Spatial Planning Systems and Policies (Regional Development Studies). Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, T. 2003. “Narratives of Norwegian Governance: Elaborating the Strong State Tradition.” Public Administration 81 (1): 163–190. doi: 10.1111/1467-9299.00341
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, T., and P. Laegreid. 2007. “Introduction.” In Transcending New Public Management, edited by T. Christensen and P. Laegreid, 1–16. Hampshire: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Corrigan, P., and P. Joyce. 1997. “Reconstructing Public Management: A New Responsibility for the Public and a Case Study of Local Government.” International Journal of Public Sector Management 10 (6): 417–432. doi: 10.1108/09513559710190799
   Google Scholar
• Davison, G., and C. Legacy. 2014. “Positive Planning and Sustainable Brownfield Regeneration: The Role and Potential of Government Land Development Agencies.” International Planning Studies 19 (2): 154–172. doi: 10.1080/13563475.2013.878286
   Google Scholar
• Dühr, S., C. Colomb, and V. Nadin. 2010. European Spatial Planning and Territorial Cooperation. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Friedmann, J. 1987. Planning in the Public Domain: From Knowledge to Action. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Friedmann, J. 2000. “The Good City: In Defense of Utopian Thinking.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 24 (2): 460–472. doi: 10.1111/1468-2427.00258
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gleeson, B., and E. Coiacetto. 2007. “Positive Planning in Australia: A Review of Historical and Emergent Rationales.” Urban Policy and Research 25 (1): 5–19. doi: 10.1080/08111140701225545
   Google Scholar
• Graddy, E. A., and J. M. Ferris. 2007. “Public-private Alliances: Why, When, and to What End.” In Institutions and Planning, edited by N. Verma, 175–186. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• van Gramberg, B., and J. Teicher. 2000. “Managerialism in Local Government – Victoria, Australia.” International Journal of Public Sector Management 13 (5): 476–492. doi: 10.1108/09513550010350869
   Google Scholar
• Granberg, M. 2009. “Almost Like Government … .” Urban Policy and Research 27 (4): 333–336. doi: 10.1080/08111140903312760
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guy, S., and J. Henneberry. 2002. “Approaching Development.” In Development and Developers: Perspectives on Property, edited by S. Guy and J. Henneberry, 1–18. Oxford: Blackwell Science Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Hanssen, G. S. 2010. “Ensuring Local Community Interests in Market-oriented Urban Planning? The Role of Local Politicians.” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 28 (4): 714–732. doi: 10.1068/c09102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haque, M. S. 2001. “The Diminishing Publicness of Public Service Under the Current Mode of Governance.” Public Administration Review 61 (1): 65–82. doi: 10.1111/0033-3352.00006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, J. 2000. Urban Land Economics. 5th ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P. 1997/2006. Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P., M. Purdue, and F. Ennis. 1995. Negotiating Development. Rationales and Practice for Development Obligations and Planning Gain. London: E & FN Spon.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P., and R. Williams. 1993. “European Urban Planning Systems: Diversity and Convergence.” Urban Studies 30: 701–720. doi: 10.1080/00420989320081881
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henneberry, J., and S. Rowley. 2002. “Developers’ Decisions and Property Market Behaviour.” In Development and Developers: Perspectives on Property, edited by S. Guy and J. Henneberry, 96–114. Oxford: Blackwell Science Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Heurkens, E. W. T. M. 2010. “Private Sector-led Urban Development.” Real Estate Research Quarterly 9 (2): 29–34.
   Google Scholar
• Heurkens, E. W. T. M. 2012. Private Sector-led Urban Development - Projects Management, Partnerships & Effects in the Netherlands and the UK. Rotterdam: Sirene Ontwerpers.
   Google Scholar
• Hillier, J. 2002. Shadows of Power: An Allegory of Prudence in Land-use Planning. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hodge, G. A., and C. Greve. 2009. “PPP’s: The Passage of Time Permits a Sober Reflection.” Economic Affairs 29 (1): 33–39. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0270.2009.01864.x
   Google Scholar
• Innes, J. E., and D. N. Booher. 2010. Planning with Complexity. An Introduction to Collaborative Rationality for Public Policy. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, G., and J. Stewart. 2009. “New Development: Accountability in Public Partnerships – The Case of Local Strategic Partnerships.” Public Money & Management 29 (1): 59–64. doi: 10.1080/09540960802617376
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koppenjan, J. F. 2005. “The Formation of Public–private Partnerships: Lessons from Nine Transport Infrastructure Projects in The Netherlands.” Public Administration 83 (1): 135–157. doi: 10.1111/j.0033-3298.2005.00441.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuronen, M. 2011. The Role of Partnerships in Sustainable Urban Residential Development. Espoo: Aalto University.
   Google Scholar
• Kuronen, M., S. Junnila, W. Majamaa, and I. Niiranen. 2010. “Public-private-people Partnership as a Way to Reduce Carbon Dioxide Emissions from Residential Development.” International Journal of Strategic Property Management 14 (3): 200–216. doi: 10.3846/ijspm.2010.15
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuronen, M., W. Majamaa, C. Heywood, and P. Raisbeck. 2012. “Including Prospective Tenants and Homeowners in the Urban Development Process in Finland.” Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 27 (3): 359–372. doi: 10.1007/s10901-012-9269-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurunmäki, K. 2005. Partnerships in Urban Planning. ‘Development Area’ in National and Local Contexts in Finland, Germany and Britain. Tampere: Tampere University.
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. 1989. Ecological Communication. Cambridgde: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• March, A. 2010. “Practicing Theory: When Theory Affects Urban Planning.” Planning Theory 9 (2): 108–125. doi: 10.1177/1473095209357864
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• March, A., and N. Low. 2004. “Knowing and Steering: Mediatization, Planning and Democracy in Victoria, Australia.” Planning Theory 3 (1): 41–69. doi: 10.1177/1473095204042317
   Google Scholar
• Nadin, V., and D. Stead. 2008. “European Spatial Planning Systems, Social Models and Learning.” disP – The Planning Review 44 (172): 35–47.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, P., and A. Thornley. 1996. Urban Planning in Europe. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, D. E., and T. Gaebler. 1992. Reinventing Government; How the Entrepreneurial Spirit Is Transforming the Public Service. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Peltonen, L. 2006. Land Use Conflicts and Their Resolution in Planning: Mapping the Situation in Finland. Helsinki: Finnish Ministry of Environment.
   Google Scholar
• Reff Pedersen, A., K. Sehested, and E. Sørensen. 2011. “Emerging Theoretical Understanding of Pluricentric Coordination in Public Governance.” The American Review of Public Administration 41 (4): 375–394. doi: 10.1177/0275074010378159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Rij, E. 2007. “Collaborative Planning in Practice.” Proceedings of ENHR International Conference on Sustainable urban areas, Rotterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Rydin, Y. 2010. Governing for Sustainable Urban Development. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Sager, T. 1994. Communicative Planning Theory. Aldershot: Avebury.
   Google Scholar
• Sager, T., and C. H. Sørensen. 2011. “Planning Analysis and Political Steering with New Public Management.” European Planning Studies 19 (2): 217–241. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2011.532666
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sørensen, E. 2014. “Conflict as Driver of Pluricentric Coordination.” Planning Theory 13 (2): 152–169. doi: 10.1177/1473095213496099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stilwell, F., and P. Troy. 2000. “Multilevel Governance and Urban Development in Australia.” Urban Studies 37 (5–6): 909–930. doi: 10.1080/00420980050011154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treasury of Finland. 2009. Municipal Management – Democracy, Responsibility and the Division of Tasks. Helsinki: Ministry of Finance.
   Google Scholar
• Verma, N. 2007. “Institutions and Planning: An Analogical Inquiry.” In Institutions and Planning, edited by N. Verma, 1–16. Oxford: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. 2009. Case Study Research. Design and Methods. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar