What do mid-career Melbourne planners profess?

References

• Abram, S. 2016. “Culture? And Planning?” Planning Theory and Practice 17 (4): 654–657. doi: 10.1080/14649357.2016.1230318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams, D., and J. Wiseman. 2003. “Navigating the Future: A Case Study of Growing Victoria Together.” Australian Journal of Public Administration 62 (2): 11–23. doi: 10.1111/1467-8497.00321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alam, Q., and J. Pacher. 2000. “Impact of Compulsory Competitive Tendering on the Structure and Performance of Local Government Systems in the State of Victoria.” Public Administration and Development 20: 359–371. doi: 10.1002/pad.146
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allmendinger, P. 2016. Neoliberal Spatial Governance. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bains, M. 1979. Board of Review of the Role, Structure and Administration of Local Government in Victoria. Victoria: Government Printer.
   Google Scholar
• Baum, H. 2015. “Planning with Half a Mind: why Planners Resist Emotion.” Planning Theory and Practice 16 (4): 498–516. doi: 10.1080/14649357.2015.1071870
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, N., and A. Kalinga. 2018. City of Whittlesea Community Environmental Park Feasibility Study, Planning Institute of Australia, Victorian Division, Outstanding Tertiary Student Award Winner 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Beed, C. 1981. Melbourne’s Development and Planning. Melbourne: Clewara Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brenner, N., and N. Theodore. 2002a. “Cities and Geographies of ‘Actually Existing Neoliberalism’.” Antipode 34: 349–379. doi: 10.1111/1467-8330.00246
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brenner, N., and N. Theodore, eds. 2002b. Spaces of Neoliberalism. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Buxton, M., T. Budge, and R. Goodman. 2005. “Planning and Deregulation: The Failure of the New Victorian Planning System.” Australian Planner 42 (2): 52–58. doi: 10.1080/07293682.2005.9982418
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, H., M. Tait, and C. Watkins. 2014. “Is There Space for Better Planning in a Neoliberal World? Implications for Planning Practice and Theory.” Journal of Planning Education and Research 34 (1): 45–59. doi: 10.1177/0739456X13514614
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cannon, M. 1988. “Sanitary Engineers to the Rescue.” Chap. 12 in Life in Cities. Ringwood, VIC: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, J. 2008. “Living with/in and Without Neo-Liberalism.” Focaal 51: 135–147. doi: 10.3167/fcl.2008.510110
   Google Scholar
• Clifford, B. 2016. “Clock-watching and Box-Ticking’: British Local Authority Planners, Professionalism and Performance Targets.” Planning Practice and Research 31 (4): 383–401. doi: 10.1080/02697459.2016.1178038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clifford, B., and M. Tewdwr-Jones. 2013. The Collaborative Planner? Practitioners in the Neoliberal age. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dawson, C. 2007. A Practical Guide to Research Methods: a User-Friendly Manual for Mastering Research Techniques and Projects. 3rd ed. Oxford: How to Books.
   Google Scholar
• Dunstan, D. 1984. Governing the Metropolis: Politics, Technology and Social Change in a Victorian City: Melbourne 1850–1891. Carlton, VIC: Melbourne University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Engels, B. 2000. “City Makeovers: the Place Marketing of Melbourne During the Kennett Years, 1992–99.” Urban Policy and Research 18 (4): 469–494. doi: 10.1080/08111140008727852
   Google Scholar
• Engels, B. 2018. “In the Shadow of Metropolitan Planning: Local Plan Making in Melbourne, 1946–1976.” Paper presented at the 14th Australasian Urban History Planning History Conference, Melbourne, January 31 to February 2.
   Google Scholar
• Fox-Rogers, L., and E. Murphy. 2016. “Self-perceptions of the Role of Planners.” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 43 (1): 74–92. doi: 10.1177/0265813515603860
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, L., and J. Quiggin. 1999. “Competitive Tendering and Service Quality.” Just Policy 17: 53–57.
   Google Scholar
• Friedmann, J. 1987. Planning in the Public Domain: From Knowledge to Action. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gleeson, B., J. Dodson, and M. Spiller. 2012. “Governance, Metropolitan Planning and City-Building: the Case for Reform.” In Australia's Unintended Cities: The Impact of Housing on Urban Development, edited by R. Tomlinson, 117–133. Collingwood: CSIRO.
   Google Scholar
• Good, R., J. Rivero, and A. Zitcer. 2017. “Confronting the Challenge of Humanist Planning.” Planning Theory and Practice 18 (2): 291–319. doi: 10.1080/14649357.2017.1297554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grange, K. 2013. “Shaping Action Space: in Search of a new Political Awareness among Local Authority Planners.” Planning Theory 12 (3): 225–243. doi: 10.1177/1473095212459740
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grange, K. 2017. “Planners – a Silenced Profession? The Politicisation of Planning and the Need for Fearless Speech.” Planning Theory 16 (3): 275–295. doi: 10.1177/1473095215626465
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, N. 2000. “Practice Through a Lens: A Metaphor for Planning Theory.” Journal of Planning Education and Research 19: 309–315. doi: 10.1177/0739456X0001900310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, P., and J. Underwood. 1978. “Professional Ideal and Planning Practice: a Report Into Planners’ Ideas in Practice in London Borough Planning Departments.” 9: 73–127.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, H. 2016. “Towards an Ethnographic Sensibility in Urban Research.” Australian Planner 53 (1): 28–36. doi: 10.1080/07293682.2015.1135817
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillier, J. 2002. Shadows on Power: An Allegory of Prudence in Land-use Planning. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hillier, J. 2014. “Revealing Melbourne’s Long-Obscured Planning Culture.” In The Public City: Essays in Honour of Paul Mees, edited by B. Gleeson, and B. Beza, 54–53. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hillier, J., and M. Gunder. 2009. Planning in Ten Words or Less. Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Howe, E., and J. Kaufman. 1979. “The Ethics of Contemporary American Planners.” Journal of the American Planning Association 45 (3): 243–255. doi: 10.1080/01944367908976965
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inch, A. 2018. “‘Open for Business’? Neoliberalism and the Cultural Politics of Modernising Planning in Scotland.” Urban Studies 55 (5): 1076–1092. doi: 10.1177/0042098016684731
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, J. 2009. “Neo-liberal or Third way? What Planners from Glasgow, Melbourne and Toronto say.” Urban Policy and Research 27 (4): 397–417. doi: 10.1080/08111140903318437
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, J. 2017. “Listening to and Learning from Some of Melbourne’s Younger Planning Practitioners.” Paper presented to the State of Australian Cities Conference, Adelaide, November 28.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, J. 2018. “Neoliberalism and Urban Planning in Toronto: how Seasoned Planners Adjust to Their Circumstances.” International Planning Studies 23 (2): 144–162. doi: 10.1080/13563475.2017.1358606
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, J. 2019. “How Senior Glaswegian Planners are Adjusting to the Scottish Government’s Modernization Agenda.” Planning Practice and Research 34 (2): 206–224. doi: 10.1080/02697459.2019.1571855
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, J., and A. Natoli. 2001. “The Victoria Planning Provisions: Is There Space for Place?” Urban Policy and Research 19 (3): 311–334. doi: 10.1080/08111140108727881
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, S., L. Porter, and L. Johnson. 2017. Planning in Indigenous Australia: From Imperial Foundations to Postcolonial Futures. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Keil, R. 2002. “‘Common-Sense’ Neoliberalism: Progressive Conservative Urbanism in Toronto, Canada.” Antipode 34 (3): 578–601. doi: 10.1111/1467-8330.00255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keynes, J. M. 1936. The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money Republished 2007. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kiss, R. 1999. “Local Government to Local Administration: The New Order.” In The Kennett Revolution: Victorian Politics in the 1990s, edited by B. Costar and N. Economou, 110–121. Sydney: University of NSW Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, M. 1999. Suburban Backlash: the Battle for the World's Most Liveable City. Hawthorn, VIC: Bloomings Books.
   Google Scholar
• Logan, A. 1981. Urban and Regional Planning in Victoria. Melbourne: Shillington House.
   Google Scholar
• Mazzucato, M. 2013. The Entrepreneurial State: Debunking Public vs. Private Sector Myths. London: Anthem Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mazzucato, M. 2018. The Value of Everything: Making and Taking in the Global Economy. New York: Public Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• McClure, L., and D. Baker. 2018. “How do Planners Deal with Barriers to Climate Change Adaptation? A Case Study in Queensland, Australia.” Landscape and Urban Planning 173: 81–88. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.01.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLoughlin, J. B. 1992. Shaping Melbourne’s Future? Town Planning, the State and Civil Society. Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mees, P. 2000. A Very Public Solution: Transport in the Dispersed City. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mees, P. 2009. Transport for Suburbia; Beyond the Automobile Age. London: Earthscan Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Reade, E. 1987. British Town and Country Planning. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reinhard, S., and L. Steel. 2006. “A Brief History of Australia's Tax System.” A Paper Presented to the 22nd APEC Finance Ministers’ Technical Working Group Meeting in Khanh Hoa, Vietnam, 15 June 2006. https://treasury.gov.au/publication/economic-roundup-winter-2006/a-brief-history-of-australias-tax-system/.
   Google Scholar
• Sager, T. 2009. “Planners’ Role: Torn Between Dialogical Ideals and neo-Liberal Realities.” European Planning Studies 17 (1): 65–84. doi: 10.1080/09654310802513948
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sager, T. 2015. “Ideological Traces in Plans for Compact Cities: Is neo-Liberalism Hegemonic?” Planning Theory 14 (3): 268–295. doi: 10.1177/1473095214527279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sager, T. 2016. “Activist Planning: a Response to the Woes of Neoliberalism.” European Planning Studies 24 (7): 1262–1280. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2016.1168784
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandercock, L. 1975. Cities for Sale: Property, Politics and Urban Planning in Australia. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Satorio, F., H. Thomas, and N. Harris. 2018. “Interpreting Planners’ Talk About Change: An Exploratory Study.” Planning Theory 17 (4): 605–627. doi: 10.1177/1473095217742183
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schatz, L., and D. Rogers. 2016. “Participatory, Technocratic and Neoliberal Planning: An Untenable Governance Menage a Trois.” Australian Planner 53 (1): 37–45. doi: 10.1080/07293682.2015.1135816
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorensen, A. 2018. “Institutions and Urban Space: Land, Infrastructure and Governance in the Production of Urban Property.” Planning Theory and Practice 19 (1): 21–38. doi: 10.1080/14649357.2017.1408136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanley, J., P. Brain, and J. Stanley. 2019. Melbourne: How Big, How Fast and at What Cost? MSSI Research Paper, Melbourne Sustainable Institute, The University of Melbourne.
   Google Scholar
• Steele, W. 2009. “Australian Urban Planners: Hybrid Roles and Professional Dilemmas.” Urban Policy and Research 27 (2): 189–203. doi: 10.1080/08111140902908873
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tasan-Kok, T. 2016. “‘Float Like a Butterfly, Sting Like a Bee’: Giving Voice to Planning Practitioners.” Planning Theory and Practice 17 (4): 621–625. doi: 10.1080/14649357.2016.1225711
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tasan-Kok, T., and M. Oranje, eds. 2018. From Student Planner to Urban Planner: Young Planners’ Reflections on Contemporary Ethical Challenges. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, Z. 2013. “Rethinking Planning Culture: a new Institutionalist Approach.” Town Planning Review 84 (6): 683–702. doi: 10.3828/tpr.2013.36
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, H., and P. Healey. 1991. Dilemmas of Planning Practice, Ethics, Legitimacy and the Validation of Knowledge. Aldershot: Avebury.
   Google Scholar
• Underwood, J. 1980. “Town Planners in Search of a Role: A Participant Observation Study of Local Government Planners in a London Borough.” Occasional Paper number 6, School for Advanced Urban Studies, University of Bristol.
   Google Scholar
• Valler, D., and N. Phelps. 2018. “Framing the Future: On Local Planning Cultures and Legacies.” Planning Theory and Practice 19 (5): 698–716. doi: 10.1080/14649357.2018.1537448
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Hayek, F. 1944. The Road to Serfdom. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, R. 1973. The Country and the City. London: Chatto and Windus.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, R. 1977. Marxism and Literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Winter, I., and T. Brooke. 1993. “Urban Planning and the Entrepreneurial State: The View from Victoria, Australia.” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 11 (3): 263–278. doi: 10.1068/c110263
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar