Temporary urbanism as a new policy strategy: a contemporary panacea or a trojan horse?

References

• Ambrosino, C., V. Guillon, and D. Sagot-Duvauroux. 2016. “Genius Loci Reloaded: The Creative Renaissance of Nantes and Saint-Etienne.” In Tourism and the Creative Industries, edited by P. Long, and N. D. Morpeth, 116–133. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Andres, L. 2013. “Differential Spaces, Power Hierarchy and Collaborative Planning: A Critique of the Role of Temporary Uses in Shaping and Making Places.” Urban Studies 50 (4): 759–775.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baing, A. S. 2010. “Containing Urban Sprawl? Comparing Brownfield Reuse Policies in England and Germany.” International Planning Studies 15 (1): 25–35.
   Google Scholar
• Berwyn, E. 2012. “Mind the gap: Creating Opportunities from Empty Space.” Journal of Urban Regeneration & Renewal 6 (2): 148–153.
   Google Scholar
• Bey, H. 1991. TAZ: The Temporary Autonomous Zone, Ontological Anarchy, Poetic Terrorism. Brooklyn: Autonomedia.
   Google Scholar
• Bishop, P., and L. Williams. 2012. The Temporary City. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bonnin, J. L. 2009. “Nantes, a Creative City?” In Creative City Perspectives, edited by A. C. F. Reis, and P. Kageyama, 87–98. Sao Paulo: Garimpo de Soluções & Creative City Productions.
   Google Scholar
• Booth, P. 2009. “Planning and the Culture of Governance: Local Institutions and Reform in France.” European Planning Studies 17 (5): 677–695.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bragaglia, F. 2020. “Social Innovation as a ‘Magic Concept’ for Policy-Makers and its Implications for Urban Governance.” Planning Theory, 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bragaglia, F., and N. Caruso. 2020. “Temporary Uses: A new Form of Inclusive Urban Regeneration or a Tool for Neoliberal Policy?” Urban Research & Practice, 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brenner, N., and N. Theodore. 2002. “Cities and the Geographies of “Actually Existing Neoliberalism.” Antipode 34 (3): 349–379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bródy, L. S. 2016. “Hail to the Temporary: What Vacancy Can Offer to the Temporary City.” International Doctoral Programme Working Paper Gran Sasso Science Institute, 1–15. Accessed 29 May 2020. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Luca_Brody3/publication/309428936_Hail_to_the_temporary_What_vacancy_can_offer_to_the_contemporary_city/links/58108a6c08ae009606be311b.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Campo, D. 2016. “Book Review: Tactical Urbanism: Short-Term Action for Long-Term Change.” Journal of Urban Design 21 (3): 388–390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carballo-Cruz, F. 2012. “New Patterns in Global Localization: Delocalization and Relocalization of Economic Activities.” In Globalization Trends and Regional Development: Dynamics of FDI and Human Capital Flows, edited by R. Capello, and T. P. Dentinho, 127–154. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, J. 2016. “Assembling Multi-Level Governance in Regeneration: An International Comparison Between France and Britain.” In Cities as Political Objects, edited by A. Cole, and R. Payre, 265–288. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, R. A. 2018. “Temporary Use & Collective Action: How Urban Planning Practices Contribute to Adaptive Capacity Building for Economic Resilience.” PlaNext – Next Generation Planning 7: 82–99.
   Google Scholar
• Chatterton, P. 2000. “Will the Real Creative City Please Stand up?” City 4 (3): 390–397.
   Google Scholar
• Chatterton, P., and J. Pickerill. 2010. “Everyday Activism and Transitions Towards Post-Capitalist Worlds.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 35 (4): 475–490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colomb, C. 2012. “Pushing the Urban Frontier: Temporary Uses of Space, City Marketing, and the Creative City Discourse in 2000s Berlin.” Journal of Urban Affairs 34 (2): 131–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Correia, M. 2018. “L’envers des Friches Culturelles.” Revue du Crieur 3: 52–67.
   Google Scholar
• De Certeau, M. 1984. The Practice of Everyday Life. Translated by S. Rendall. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• De la Pena, D. 2013. “Experiments in Participatory Urbanism: Reform and Autogestion as Emerging Forms of Urban Activism in Barcelona.” Doctoral thesis UC Berkeley. Accessed 28 May 2020. http://escholarship.org/uc/item/1×0646mf.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• D’Ovidio, M. 2016. The Creative City Does not Exist. Critical Essays on the Creative and Cultural Economy of Cities. Milano: Ledizioni.
   Google Scholar
• Dumont, M., and E. Vivant. 2016. “Du Squat au Marché Public.” Reseaux 6: 181–208.
   Google Scholar
• Ferreri, M. 2015. “The Seductions of Temporary Urbanism.” Ephemera 15 (1): 181–191.
   Google Scholar
• Finn, D. 2014. “DIY Urbanism: Implications for Cities.” Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability 7 (4): 381–398.
   Google Scholar
• Florida, R. 2002. The Rise of the Creative Class (Vol. 9). New York: Basic books.
   Google Scholar
• Freire Trigo, S. 2020. “Vacant Land in London: A Planning Tool to Create Land for Growth.” International Planning Studies 25 (3): 261–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galdini, R. 2020. “Temporary Uses in Contemporary Spaces. A European Project in Rome.” Cities 96: 1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerometta, J., H. Haussermann, and G. Longo. 2005. “Social Innovation and Civil Society in Urban Governance: Strategies for an Inclusive City.” Urban Studies 42 (11): 2007–2021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonon, A. 2017. “Les «nouveaux territoires de l’art» ont-ils muté?” Nectart 1: 107–119.
   Google Scholar
• Grands Voisins. 2020. Intentions initiales, impacts réels et beaux imprévus, essaimage et perspectives. Accessed 30 October 2020. https://lesgrandsvoisins.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Les-Grands-Voisins-Dossier-de-cloture-de-l-experience.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, E. 2015. “Navigating pop-up Geographies: Urban Space–Times of Flexibility, Interstitiality and Immersion.” Geography Compass 9 (11): 592–603.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haydn, F., and R. Temel. 2006. Temporary Urban Spaces: Concepts for the use of City Spaces. Basel: Birkhäuser.
   Google Scholar
• Hou, J. 2010. Insurgent Public Space: Guerrilla Urbanism and the Remaking of Contemporary Cities. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hou, J. 2020. “Guerrilla Urbanism: Urban Design and the Practices of Resistance.” URBAN DESIGN International 25: 117–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Institut d’Aménagement et d’Urbanisme Île de France. 2018. L’urbanisme transitoire. Optimisation foncière ou fabrique partagée?. Accessed 28 May 2020. https://www.iau-idf.fr/nos-travaux/publications/lurbanisme-transitoire-1.html.
   Google Scholar
• Jacquot, S., and M. Morelle. 2018. Urbanisme temporaire/Informalité, migrations et «urbanisme temporaire». Accessed 25 May 2020. http://www.revue-urbanites.fr/informalite-migrations-et-urbanisme-temporaire/.
   Google Scholar
• Kearns, G. 2015. “Vacancy and Housing in Dublin: 1798–1911.” Irish Geography 48 (1): 13–36.
   Google Scholar
• Kearns, A., and R. Paddison. 2000. “New Challenges for Urban Governance.” Urban Studies 37 (5–6): 845–850.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotval-K, Z., C. Meitl, and Z. Kotval. 2017. “Should the Public Sector Play a Greater Role Funding Brownfield Redevelopment Projects? A Transatlantic Comparison.” International Planning Studies 22 (4): 366–383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lefebvre, H. 1967. “The Right to the City.” In Writings on Cities, edited by E. Kofman, and E. Lebas, 63–184. London: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Lefebvre, H., and D. Nicholson-Smith. 1991. The Production of Space (Vol. 142). Blackwell: Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Lever, W. F. 1991. “Deindustrialisation and the Reality of the Post-Industrial City.” Urban Studies 28 (6): 983–999.
   Google Scholar
• Lydon, M., and A. Garcia. 2015. “A Tactical Urbanism how-to.” In Tactical Urbanism, edited by M. Lydon, and A. Garcia, 171–208. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Madanipour, A. 2017. Cities in Time: Temporary Urbanism and the Future of the City. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Madanipour, A. 2018. “Temporary use of Space: Urban Processes Between Flexibility, Opportunity and Precarity.” Urban Studies 55 (5): 1093–1110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, M., S. Hincks, and I. Deas. 2020. “Temporary use in England’s Core Cities: Looking Beyond the Exceptional.” Urban Studies 57 (16): 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matoga, A. 2019. “How Media Shape the Perception of Temporary Uses: A Qualitative Media Analysis on Vacancy and Temporary Uses in Vienna.” disP-The Planning Review 55 (1): 85–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, M. 2013. “First World Urban Activism: Beyond Austerity Urbanism and Creative City Politics.” City 17 (1): 5–19.
   Google Scholar
• Moore-Cherry, N., and L. McCarthy. 2016. “Debating Temporary Uses for Vacant Urban Sites: Insights for Practice from a Stakeholder Workshop.” Planning Practice & Research 31 (3): 347–357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morice, J. R., and P. Violier. 2009. “De l'événementiel culturel à la destination touristique: les cas de Lille et Nantes (from Special Cultural Event Management to Tourist Destinations: Lille and Nantes as Case Studies).” Bulletin de l'Association de géographes français 86 (3): 377–387.
   Google Scholar
• Mould, O. 2014. “Tactical Urbanism: The new Vernacular of the Creative City.” Geography Compass 8 (8): 529–539.
   Google Scholar
• Mulgan, G., S. Tucker, R. Ali, and B. Sanders. 2007. Social innovation: what it is, why it matters and how it can be accelerated. Oxford Said Business School. Accessed 29 May 2020. http://eureka.sbs.ox.ac.uk/761/1/Social_Innovation.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Nappi-Choulet, I., and T. P. Maury. 2011. “A Spatial and Temporal Autoregressive Local Estimation for the Paris Housing Market.” Journal of Regional Science 51 (4): 732–750.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Németh, J., and J. Langhorst. 2014. “Rethinking Urban Transformation: Temporary Uses for Vacant Land.” Cities 40: 143–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novarina, G. 2012. “L'ancrage territorial de l'économie: du district industriel à la métropole.” L'économie politique 1: 16–25.
   Google Scholar
• O’Callaghan, C., C. Di Feliciantonio, and M. Byrne. 2018. “Governing Urban Vacancy in Post-Crash Dublin: Contested Property and Alternative Social Projects.” Urban Geography 39 (6): 868–891.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Callaghan, C., and P. Lawton. 2016. “Temporary Solutions? Vacant Space Policy and Strategies for re-use in Dublin.” Irish Geography 48 (1): 69–87.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2018. Working Together for Local Integration of Migrants and Refugees in Paris. Accessed 29 May 2020. https://read.oecd-ilibrary.org/social-issues-migration-health/working-together-for-local-integration-of-migrants-and-refugees_9789264085350-en#page1.
   Google Scholar
• Oswalt, P., K. Overmeyer, and P. Misselwitz. 2013. Urban Catalyst. The Power of Temporary Use. Berlin: DOM.
   Google Scholar
• Overmeyer, K. 2007. Urban Pioneers: Temporary use and Urban Development in Berlin. Berlin: Jovis.
   Google Scholar
• Peck, J. 2005. “Struggling with the Creative Class.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 29: 740–770.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peck, J. 2012. “Austerity Urbanism: American Cities Under Extreme Economy.” City 16 (6): 626–655.
   Google Scholar
• Pickerill, J., and P. Chatterton. 2006. “Notes Towards Autonomous Geographies: Creation, Resistance and Self-Management as Survival Tactics.” Progress in Human Geography 30 (6): 730–746.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinard, J., and H. Morteau. 2019. “Professionnels de l’occupation temporaire, nouveaux acteurs de la fabrique de la ville? Du renouvellement des méthodes en urbanisme à l’émergence de nouveaux métiers.” Revue Internationale d’Urbanisme 8: 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Renard, J. 2000. “Nantes, métropole inachevée?” L'information géographique 64 (2): 117–133.
   Google Scholar
• Soja, E. 1999. “Thirdspace: Expanding the Scope of the Geographical Imagination.” In Human Geography Today, edited by D. Massey, J. Allen, and P. Sarre, 260–278. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stevens, Q., and M. Ambler. 2010. “Europe's City Beaches as Post-Fordist Placemaking.” Journal of Urban Design 15 (4): 515–537.
   Google Scholar
• Tardiveau, A., and D. Mallo. 2014. “Unpacking and Challenging Habitus: An Approach to Temporary Urbanism as a Socially Engaged Practice.” Journal of Urban Design 19 (4): 456–472.
   Google Scholar
• Temel, R. 2006. “The Temporary in the City.” In Temporary Urban Spaces: Concepts for the Use of City Spaces, edited by R. Temel, and F. Haydn, 55–62. Basel: Birkhauser Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Till, K. E., and R. McArdle. 2015. “The Improvisional City: Valuing Urbanity Beyond the Chimera of Permanence.” Irish Geography 48 (1): 37–68.
   Google Scholar
• Tonkiss, F. 2013. “Austerity Urbanism and the Makeshift City.” City 17 (3): 312–324.
   Google Scholar
• Transfert. 2018. Privatisez Transfert pour vos événements professionnels. Accessed 28 May 2020. https://www.transfert.co/.
   Google Scholar
• Urban Catalyst. 2003. Urban Catalysts Strategies for temporary uses – potential for development of urban residual areas in European metropolises. Accessed 30 October 2020. http://www.templace.com/think-pool/attach/download/1_UC_finalR_synthesis007b.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Vasudevan, A. 2015. “The Autonomous City: Towards a Critical Geography of Occupation.” Progress in Human Geography 39 (3): 316–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ville de Paris. 2019. Charte en faveur du développement de l'occupation temporaire comme outil au service du territoire parisien. Accessed 30 October 2020. https://cdn.paris.fr/paris/2019/08/26/b54e18dc9eafbf7a692027283d4bb83e.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Vivant, E. 2020. “From Margins to Capital: The Integration of Spaces of Artistic Critique Within Capitalist Urbanism.” Journal of Urban Affairs, 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar