Politics, planning, and ruling: the art of taming public participation

References

• Public notes, political documents, etc.
   Google Scholar
• Agger, Annika, and Karl Löfgren. 2008. “Democratic Assessment of Collaborative Planning Processes.” Planning Theory 7 (2): 145–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Althusser, Louis. 1983. Ideologiske statsapparater. Ålborg: GRUS.
   Google Scholar
• Althusser, Louis. 2000. Machiavelli and Us. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Bäcklund, Pia, and Raine Mäntysalo. 2010. “Agonism and Institutional Ambiguity: Ideas on Democracy and the Role of Participation in the Development of Planning Theory and Practice – The Case of Finland.” Planning Theory 9 (4): 333–350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BYB. 2018. Bystyrets vedtak 06.09.2017, Sak 235. The Council Department for Urban Development, 1–10, January 29.
   Google Scholar
• BYB2. 2016. Plan- og bygningsetatens praksis for medvirkning. The Planning and Building Etat, 1–11, November 30, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Davoudi, Simon, Daniel Galland, and Dominic Stead. 2019. “Reinventing Planning and Planners: Ideological Deconstetations and Rhetorical Appeals.” Planning Theory 19 (1): 17–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dean, Michel. 1999. Governmentality. Power and Rule in Modern Society. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G. (1986) 2004. Foucault. København: Det lille Forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, Gilles. 1988. Foucault. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Falleth, Eva, and Gro S. Hanssen. 2012. “Medvirkning i planlegging [Participation in Planning].” In Utfordringer for norsk planlegging [Challenges to Norwegian Planning], edited by Niels Aarsæther, Eva Falleth, Toril Nyseth, and Ronny Kristiansen, 187–204. Oslo: Cappelen Damm.
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, Bent. 1991. Magt og rationalitet I & II. Frederiksberg: Akademisk Forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Forester, John. 2008. “Participation as Dialogue, Debate and Negotiation: Entangled Promises and Practices.” In Governance Reform Under Real-World Conditions, edited by Sim Odugbemi and Thomas Jacobson, 209–218. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, Michel. 1980. Power/Knowledge. Selected Interviews & Other Writings 1972–1977. New York: Pantheon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, Michel. 1978. Dispositive der Macht. München: Merve Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, Michel. 1982. “The Subject and Power.” In Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics, edited by Hubert L. Dreyfuss and Paul Rabinow, 208–226. New York: Harvester Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, Michel. 1986. The Foucault Reader. New York: Peregrine.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, Michel. 1991. “Governmentality.” In The Foucualt Effect. Studies in Governmentality, edited by, Graham Burchell, Colin Gordon, and, Peter Miller, 87–104. London: Harvester Wheatsleaf.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, Michel. 1996. Foucault Live. Collected Interviews, 1961–1984. New York: Semiotixt(e).
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, Michel. 2007. Security, Territory, Population. Lectures at the Collège de France 1977–1978. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• GG. 2018. Felles planlegging av Cecilie Thoresensveu, 1–15, June 27. Lambertseter.
   Google Scholar
• Grange, Kristina. 2016. “Planners – A Silenced Profession? The Politicization of Planning and the Need for Fearless Speech.” Planning Theory 16 (3): 275–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, Patsy. 2008. “The Pragmatic Tradition in Planning Thought.” Journal of Planning Education and Research 28: 277–292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Innes, Judith, and David E Booher. 2010. Planning With Complexity. An Introduction to Collaborative Rationality for Public Policy. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Joyce, Patrick. 2003. The Rule of Freedom. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Laws, David, and John Forester. 2007. “Learning in Practice: Public Policy Mediation.” Critical Policy Studies 1 (4): 342–370.
   Google Scholar
• Legacy, Crystal. 2016. “Is There a Crisis of Participatory Planning?” Planning Theory 16 (4): 425–442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legacy, Crystal, Jonathan Metzger, Wendy Steele, and Enrico Guilani. 2019. “Beyond the Post-Political: Exploring the Relational and Situated Dynamics of Consensus and Conflict in Planning.” Planning Theory 19 (3): 273–281.
   Google Scholar
• Mäntysalo, Raine, Alessandro Balducci, and Jonna Kangasoja. 2011. “Planning as Agonistic Communication in a Trading Zone: Re-examining Lindblom’s Partisan Mutual Adjustment.” Planning Theory 10 (3): 257–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mäntysalo, Raine, Inger-Lise Saglie, and Göran Cars. 2011. “Between Input Legitimacy and Output Efficiency: Defensive Routines and Agonistic Reflectivity in Nordic Land-Use Planning.” European Planning Studies 19 (12): 2109–2126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metzger, Jonathan, Philip Allmendinger, and Stijn Oosterlynck. 2015. Planning Against the Political. Democratic Deficits in European Territorial Governance. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Metzger, Jonathan, Linda Soneryd, and Kristina Tamm Hallström. 2017. “‘Power’ Is That Which Remains to Be Explained: Dispelling the Ominous Dark Matter of Critical Planning Studies.” Planning Theory 16 (2): 203–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mouffe, Chantal. 2005. On the Political. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mouffe, Chantal. 2013. Agonistics. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• OFV-1. 2019. Oppsummering fra verksted, April 29. Oslo: Plan- og bygningsetaten.
   Google Scholar
• Panagia, Davide. 2019. “On the Political Ontology of the Dispositif.” Critical Inquiry 45 (3): 714–746.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PBE. 2019. Medvirkning i innsendte reguleringsplaner. En veileder for forslagsstillere og fagkyndige [Participation in Submitted Regulation Plans]. Oslo: Plan- og bygningsetaten.
   Google Scholar
• PBEMR2. 2018. Møtereferat grunneiermøte 28.06.18. Områderegulering for Lambertseter og Karlsrud. Plan- og bygningsetaten, October 12.
   Google Scholar
• PBEMV. 2012. Forslag til helhetlig strategi for medvirkning i større planprosesser og byplanlegging. Plan- og bygningsetaten, 1–31.
   Google Scholar
• PBEOP. 2018. Oppstartnotat for områderegulering for Lambertseter og Karlsrud (godkjent av byråd for byutvikling 18.10.2018). Plan &.
   Google Scholar
• Purcell, Mark. 2016. “For Democracy: Plannings and Publics Without the State.” Planning Theory 15 (4): 386–401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabinow, Paul. 1989. French Modern: Norms and Forms of the Social Environment. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ringholm, Toril, Torill Nyseth, and Gro S Hanssens. 2018. “Participation According to the Law. The Research Based Knowledge on Citizen’s Participation in Norwegian Municipal Planning.” European Journal of Spatial Development (67): 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Sennett, Richard. 1991. Conscience of the Eye. New York: Faber and Faber.
   Google Scholar
• Van Wymeersch, Elisabet, Stijn Oosterlynck, and Thomas Vanoutrive. 2018. “The Political Ambivalence of Participatory Planning Initiatives.” Planning Theory 18 (3): 359–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar