Railways and urban expansion: how does rail transport affect urban expansion in metropolitan areas? (Warsaw and Copenhagen case)

References

• Aljoufie, M., M. Zudigeest, M. Brussel, and M. F. A. M. Van Maarseveen. 2011. Urban Growth and Transport: Understanding the Spatial-Temporal Relationship, WIT Transactions on The Built Environment, Vol 116. Jeddah City, Saudi Arabia: WIT Press. www.witpress.com, ISSN 1743-3509 (online).
   Google Scholar
• Anas, A., R. Arnott, and K. A. Smal. 1998. “Urban Spatial Structure.” Journal of Economic Literature 46: 1426–1464.
   Google Scholar
• Assink, M., and N. Groenendijk. 2009. “Spatial Quality, Location Theory, and Spatial Planning.” Applied Optics - APPL OPT 12 (3): 7–6.
   Google Scholar
• Batty, M., X. Yichun, and S. Zhanli. 1999. “Modeling Urban Dynamics through GIS-Based Cellular Automata.” Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 23 (1999): 205–233.
   Google Scholar
• Baron, N. 2015. “Railways and Demographic Change.” In Rail Economics, Policy, and Regulation in Europe, edited by Matthias Finger, and Pierre Messulam, 22–37. Turkey, Istanbul: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Baum-Snow, N. 2007. “Did Highways Cause Suburbanization?” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 122: 775–805.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behzadfar, M. 2013. Design & Plan in Urban Development. Tehran: Shahr press. [Persian].
   Google Scholar
• Bertolini, L., and T. Spit. 1998. “Cities on Rails.” In The Redevelopment of Railway Station Areas, 117–119. London: E&FN Spon.
   Google Scholar
• Congalton, R. G. 1991. “A Review of Assessing the Accuracy of Classifications of Remotely Sensed Data.” Remote Sensing of Environment 37 (1): 35–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danish Ministry of The Environment (DME) (Nature Agency). 2015. The Finger Plan: A Strategy for the Development of the Greater Copenhagen Area, Haraldsgade 53, DK - 2100 Copenhagen. Retrieved 19 April 2019 from http://www.naturstyrelsen.dk.
   Google Scholar
• Dicks, S. E., and T. H. Lo. 1990. Evaluation of Thematic Map Accuracy in a Land-Use and Land-Cover Mapping Program. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens (USA) ISSN 0099-1112.
   Google Scholar
• Droes, M. I., and P. Rietveld. 2015. “Rail-Based Public Transport and Urban Spatial Structure: The Interplay Between Network Design, Congestion, and Urban Form.” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 81 (2): 421–439. doi:10.1016/j.trb.2015.07.004.
   Google Scholar
• Federal office for spatial development. 2003. The Spatial Impact of Transport Infrastructures “Learning from the Past”, Report of Project Summary. Available at http://www.bbl.admin.ch/bundespublikationen.
   Google Scholar
• Filion, P. 2001. “Suburban Mixed-use Centres and Urban Dispersion: What Difference Do They Make?” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 33 (2): 141–160.
   Google Scholar
• Foroutan-Pour, K., P. Dutiluel, and D. L. Smith. 1999. “Advances in the Implementation of the Box-Counting Method of Fractal Dimension Estimation.” Applied Mathematics and Computation 105: 195–210. doi:10.1016/S0096-3003(98)10096-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fotheringham, A. S., M. E. Charlton, and C. Brunsdon. 1998. “Geographically Weighted Regression: A Natural Evolution of the Expansion Method for Spatial Data Analysis.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 30 (11): 1905–1927.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frankhauser, P. 1994. L’Aspect Fractal des Structures Urbaines (in French). In L’Espace Géographique, Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Frankhauser, P. 1998. The Fractal Approach. A New Tool for the Spatial Analysis of Urban Agglomerations. In: Population, an English selection, 10e année, n°1,. New methodological approaches in the social sciences. (pp 205-240). Retrieved 28 August 2019 from https://www.persee.fr/docAsPDF/pop_0032-4663_1998_hos_10_1_6828.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Fung, T. and E. LeDrew. 1988. “The Determination of Optimal Threshold Levels for Change Detection Using Various Accuracy Indices.” Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 54(10): 1449–1454.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galster G., Hanson, R. Ratcliffe M, H. Wolman, S. Colmen, and J. Freihage. 2001. “Wrestling Sprawl to the Ground: Defining and Measuring an Elusive Concept.” Housing Policy Debate 12 (4): 681–717. doi:10.1080/10511482.2001.9521426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia-López, M. A. 2012. “Urban Spatial Structure, Suburbanization, and Transportation in Barcelona.” Journal of Urban Economics 72: 176–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giuliano, G. 2004. “Land Use Impacts of Transportation Investments: Highway and Transit.” In The Geography of Urban Transportation, edited by S. Hanson, and G. Giuliano, 237–273. New York: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glaeser, E. L. 1998. “Are Cities Dying?” Journal of Economic Perspectives 12 (2): 139–160. Retrieved 14 May 2019 from https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257jep.12.2.139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grams, A. 2015. Spielräume für Dichte. Problemorientierter Verfahrensansatz für Verdichtung als Element der Innenentwicklung am Beispiel kleiner und mittlerer Gemeinden im Schweiz er Mittelland” (Manoeuvrability of Spatial Densification. Threshold Values of Important Spatial Quantities and their Effect on Spatial Quality, Using Central Switzerland as an Example). (Doctoral Dissertation). Institute for Spatial and Landscape Development (IRL), ETH Zurich.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, P., and R. Roy. 1994. “On the Relationship Between Fractal Dimension and Fractal Index for Stationary Stochastic Processes.” The Annals of Applied Probability 4: 241–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henrique, M, R. Periera, V. Nadalin, L. Monasterio, M. Henrique, and P. Albuquerque. 2015. Quantifying Urban Centrality: A Simple Index Proposal and International Comparison. Discussion paper / Institute for Applied Economic-ipea. Retrieved 29 August 2019 from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/6f49/f79f363016b0c8c21316f6a64480fc7be3c1.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Holvad, T. 2011. “Metro Systems in Europe: A Comparison of the Copenhagen and Bucharest Metros.” In Urban Transport XVII: Urban Transport and the Environment in the 21st Century. Transactions on the Built Environment Series, no. 116, edited by A. Pratelli, and C. A. Brebbia, 97–108. Valencia, Spain: WIT. Retrieved 12 April 2019 from http://worldcat.org/isbn/9781845645205. https://catalog.loc.gov/vwebv/search?searchCode=LCCN&searchArg=2007633780&searchType=1&permalink=y https://github.com/sk1me/poland-gis-datasets.
   Google Scholar
• Hurley, A. 1997. “Fiasco at Wagner Electric: Environmental Justice and Urban Geography in St. Louis.” Environmental History 2: 460–481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, K. 1985. Crabgrass Frontier: The Suburbanization of the United States. Oxford: University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Janssen, L. L., and F. J. Vanderwel. 1994. “Accuracy Assessment of Satellite Derived Land-Cover Data: A Review.” Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing (United States) 60 (4): 419–426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joens, P. M. 1979. New approaches to understanding travel behavior: The human activity approach In: Hensher.
   Google Scholar
• Khajeh Borj Sefidi, A., and M. Ghalehnoee. 2016. “Analysis of Urban Growth Pattern Using Logistic Regression Modeling, Spatial Autocorrelation and Fractal Analysis, Case Study: Ahvaz City.” International Journal of Architectural Engineering & Urban Planning 26 (2): 183–194. December 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Kheyroddin, R., and M. Naderi. 2015. “Success and Failure in Metropolitan Region Organization (Comparative Comparison of East Pivot of Metropolis Tehran and East Pivot of Metropolis Paris).” Journal of Bagh-e Nazar 37 (12): 22–34.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, B. 2006. Urban Spatial Structure, Commuting, and Growth in US Metropolitan Areas, Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School University of Southern California in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy (Planning).
   Google Scholar
• Lu, Y., and J. Tong. 2004. “Fractal Dimension of a Transportation Network and its Relationship with Urban Growth: A Study of the Dallas-Fort Worth Area.” Environment and Planning B 31 (6): 895–911.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandelbrot, B. 1983. The Fractal Geometry of Nature. Macmillan: W. H. Freeman and Co.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, M. D., and E. J. Miller. 2001. Urban Transportation Planning: 2nd Ed. New York: McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Moghadam, S. H., and M. Halbich. 2013. “Spatiotemporal Urbanization Processes in the Megacity of Mumbai, India: A Markov Chains-Cellular Automata Urban Growth Model.” Applied Geography 40: 140–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mumford, L. 1961. “The City in History: Its Origins, its Transformations, and its Prospects.” In The History of the City, edited by L. Benevolo, 66–68. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.
   Google Scholar
• Myint-U, T., and L. Debnath. 2006. Linear Partial Differential Equations for Scientists and Engineers. Berlin: Birkhauser.
   Google Scholar
• O’Sullivan, D., and P. M. Torres. 2000. “Cellular Model of Urban Systems. Centre for Advanced Spatial Analysis University College London,” Working paper series of 22. London. Online at: http://www.casa.ucl.ac.uk/cellularmodels.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Pels, E., and P. Rietveld. 2007. “Railway Station and Urban Dynamics.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 39: 2043–2047. doi:10.1068/a4093.
   Google Scholar
• Pourpeikari-Heris, M. 2017. “Evaluating Metropolitan Spatial Development: A Method for Identifying Settlement Types and Depicting Growth Patterns.” Journal of Regional Studies, Regional Science 4 (1): 7–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pruess, S. A. 1995. “Some Remarks on the Numerical Estimation of Fractal Dimension.” In Fractals in the Earth Sciences., edited by C. C. Barton, and P. R. La Pointe. Boston, MA: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-1397-5_3.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenfield, G. H., and K. Fitzpatrick-Lins. 1986. “A Coefficient of Agreement as a Measure of Thematic Classification Accuracy.” Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 52 (2): 223–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salem, M., A. Bose, B. Bashir, D. Basak, S. Roy, I. R. Chowdhury, A. Alsalman, and N. Tsurusaki. 2021. “Urban Expansion Simulation Based on Various Driving Factors Using a Logistic Regression Model: Delhi as a Case Study.” Sustainability 13 (13): 10805. doi:10.3390/su131910805.
   Google Scholar
• Scholl, B. 2008. Spatial Planning and Development in Switzerland: Observations and Suggestions form the International Group of Experts, ETH Zurich. (Report No. 978-3-9523440-1-9) Retrieved from Institute for Spatial and Landscape Development (IRL) Alleviation website: https://www.ethz.ch/content/dam/ethz/special-interest/baug/irl/chair-of-spatial-development-dam/documents/projekte/diverses/ch-eva-en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Scholl, B. 2016. CODE PATRAS, Rail&City: A Test Planning Process for Patras. Exhibition and Workshop with the Citizens of Patras, ETH Zurich. (Report No. 2/13/2016) Institute for Spatial and Landscape Development (IRL) Alleviation website: http://www.codepatras.ethz.ch/workshop_2016.php.
   Google Scholar
• Shen, J., Y. Zhang, C. Ling, W. Liu, and X. Zhang. 2019. “Comparative Study on the Fractal Dimensions of Soil Particle Size.” IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 267: 022039. doi:10.1088/1755-1315/267/2/022039.
   Google Scholar
• Shin, H. B. 2017. “Geography: Rethinking the ‘Urban’ and Urbanization.” In Defining the Urban: Interdisciplinary and Professional Perspectives, edited by D. Iossifova, C. Doll, and A. Gasparatos, 27–39. London, UK: Routledge. Retrieved 9 May 2019 from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/312016490_Geography_rethinking_the_'urban'_and_urbanization.
   Google Scholar
• Statistical Office in Warsaw (SOW). 2019. Regional Statistics. Retrieved 6 May 2019 from https://warszawa.stat.gov.pl/en/, November 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Terzi, F., and H. S. Kaya. 2011. “Dynamic Spatial Analysis of Urban Sprawl Through Fractal Geometry: The Case of Istanbul.” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 38 (1): 175–190. doi:10.1068/b35096.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UIC. 2011. Synopsis 2011. Available from the international union of railways website (www.uic.org).
   Google Scholar
• Wegener, M., and M. Clés. 1993. Transport and Spatial Organisation of Cities: Synthesis of Theories and MO Dels. Alleviation website: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/TRANSPORT-AND-SPATIAL-ORGANISATION-OF-CITIES%3A-OF-MO-Wegener-Cl%C3%A9s/a9855f3b3ad84806db194652b948271e219f7ac4#citing-papers.
   Google Scholar
• White, R., and G. Engelen. 1993. “Cellular Dynamics and GIS: Modelling Spatial Complexity.” Geographical Systems 23 (4): 1237–1253.
   Google Scholar
• White, R., and G. Engelen. 1997. “Cellular Automata as the Basis of Integrated Dynamic Regional Modelling.” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 24 (2): 235–246.
   Google Scholar
• Willigers, J., H. Floor, and B. van Wee. 2007. “Accessibility Indicators for Location Choices of Offices: An Application to the Intraregional Distributive Effects of High-Speed Rail in the Netherlands.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 39: 2086–2898.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfram, S. 1984. “Cellular Automata as Models of Complexity.” Nature 311 (5985): 419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woraratpanya, K., D. Kakanopas, and R. Varakulsiripunth. 2012. “Triangle-Box Counting Method for Fractal Dimension Estimation.” ASEAN Engineering Journal Part D 1 (1): 5–16.
   Google Scholar