Semantic similarities between personality, identity, character, and singularity within the context of the city or urban, neighbourhood, and place in urban planning and design

References

• Abusaada, Hisham, and Abeer Elshater. 2022a. “Examining Similarity Indicators in Six Planned Capital Cities from Africa and Asia: A Qualitative Research Technique.” City, Territory and Architecture 9 (1). doi:10.1186/s40410-022-00181-2.
   Google Scholar
• Abusaada, Hisham, and Abeer Elshater. 2022b. “Notes on Developing Research Review in Urban Planning and Urban Design Based on PRISMA Statement.” Social Sciences 11 (9): 391. doi:10.3390/socsci11090391.
   Google Scholar
• Abusaada, Hisham, Abeer Elshater, and Rowaida Rashed. 2023. “Exploring the Singularity of Smart Cities in the New Administrative Capital City, Egypt.” Ain Shams Engineering Journal 10: 102087. doi:10.1016/j.asej.2022.102087.
   Google Scholar
• Alawadi, K. 2017. “Rethinking Dubai’s Urbanism: Generating Sustainable Form-Based Urban Design Strategies for an Integrated Neighborhood.” Cities 60: 353–366. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2016.10.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amirbagheri, K., A. Núñez-Carballosa, L. Guitart-Tarrés, and J. M. Merigó. 2019. “Research on Green Supply Chain: A Bibliometric Analysis.” Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy 21: 3–22. doi:10.1007/s10098-018-1624-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anthopoulos, L., ed. 2019. Smart City Emergence: Cases from Around the World. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Araabi, H. F., and A. McDonald. 2019. “Towards a Deleuzoguattarian Methodology for Urban Design.” Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability 12 (2): 172–187. doi:10.1080/17549175.2018.1552883.
   Google Scholar
• Arksey, H., and L. O’Malley. 2005. “Scoping Studies: Towards a Methodological Framework.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 8 (1): 19–32. doi:10.1080/1364557032000119616.
   Google Scholar
• Arnheim, R. 1954. Art and Visual Perception: A Psychology of the Creative Eye. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bauman, Z. 1996. “From Pilgrim to Tourist – or a Short History of Identity.” In Questions of Cultural Identity, edited by S. Hall, and P. D. Gay, 18–36. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Bay, Joo Hwa P., and Steffen Lehman. 2017. Growing Compact: Urban Form, Density and Sustainability. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bernardo, F., and J.-M. Palma-Oliveirac. 2016. “Urban Neighbourhoods and Intergroup Relations: The Importance of Place Identity.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 45: 239–251. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.01.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloom, W. 1990. Personal Identity, National Identity, and International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Butina-Watson, G., and I. Bentley. 2007. Identity by Design. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Casakin, H., B. Hernández, and C. Ruiz. 2015. “Place Attachment and Place Identity in Israeli Cities: The Influence of City Size.” Cities 42: 224–230. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2014.07.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dandekar, H. C. 2005. “Qualitative Methods in Planning Research and Practice.” Journal of Architectural and Planning Research 22 (2): 129–137. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43030731.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G. 1968. Difference and Repetition. Translated by P. Patton. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dovey, K. 2009. Becoming Places: Urbanism/Architecture/Identity/Power. London: Kim Dovey. doi:10.4324/9780203875001.
   Google Scholar
• Dovey, K., I. Woodcock, and S. Wood. 2009a. “A Test of Character: Regulating Place-Identity in Inner-City Melbourne.” Urban Studies 46 (12): 2595–2615. doi:10.1177/0042098009344229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dovey, K., I. Woodcock, and S. Wood. 2009b. “Understanding Neighbourhood Character: The Case of Camberwell.” Australian Planner 46 (3): 32–39. doi:10.1080/07293682.2009.10753406.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenman, P. 1982. “Editor’s Introduction by Peter Eisenman.” In The Architecture of the City, edited by A. Rossi. Translated by D. Ghirardo, & J. Ockman. 3–11. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elshater, Abeer, and Hisham Abusaada. 2022. “From Uniqueness to Singularity through City Prestige.” Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Urban Design and Planning 175 (2): 91–97. doi:10.1680/jurdp.21.00046.
   Google Scholar
• Elshater, A., H. Abusaada, and S. Afifi. 2019. “What Makes Livable Cities of Today Aaike? Revisiting the Criterion of Singularity Through two Case Studies.” Cities 92: 273–291. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2019.04.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elshater, Abeer, Hisham Abusaada, and Husam AlWaer. 2022. “Editorial: City Singularity and Paradigms of Urban Forms Pluralist.” Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Urban Design and Planning 175 (2): 51–55. doi:10.1680/jurdp.2022.175.2.51.
   Google Scholar
• Erikson, E. 1959. Identity and the Life Cycle: Selected Papers. New York: International Universities Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ewing, R., and K. Park. 2020. Basic Quantitative Research Methods for Urban Planners. Translated by R. Ewing, & K. Park. New York: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780429325021.
   Google Scholar
• Fainstein, S. S. 2005. “Cities and Diversity: Should we Want It? Can we Plan for it?” Urban Affairs Review 41 (3): 3–19. doi:10.1177/1078087405278968.
   Google Scholar
• Funder, D. 1997. The Personality Puzzle. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Gehlawat, M. 2013. “Space, the Self, and Singularity in Le Corbusier and Christopher Isherwood.” Literary Imagination 15 (3): 349–364. doi:10.1093/litimag/imr140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hague, C., and P. Jenkins, eds. 2005. Place Identity, Participation and Planning. New York: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heidegger, M. 1969. Identity and Differences. Translated by J. Stambaugh. New York: Harper & Row, Publishers, Incorporated.
   Google Scholar
• Huovinena, A., E. Timonen, T. Leinoc, and T. Seppäläc. 2017. “Changing Urban Identities on a Discursive map.” City, Culture and Society 11: 20–28. doi:10.1016/j.ccs.2017.08.002.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, R. 1996. Social Identity. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jivén, G., and P. J. Larkham. 2003. “Sense of Place, Authenticity and Character: A Commentary.” Journal of Urban Design 8 (1): 67–81. doi:10.1080/1357480032000064773.
   Google Scholar
• Kajonius, P., and E. M. Giolla. 2017. “Personality Traits Across Countries: Support for Similarities Rather Than Differences.” PLoS ONE 12 (6): 1–13. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0179646.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lalli, M. 1988. “Urban Identity.” In Environmental Social Psychology, edited by D. V. Canter, J. C. Jesuino, L. Soczka, and G. Stephenson, Translated by H. Dittmar. 303–311. Berlin, Germany: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Larco, N. 2019. “Hybridizing Place: Global and Local Identity in Puerto Madero, Buenos Aires.” International Planning Studies 14 (3): 275–292. doi:10.1080/135634709034506.
   Google Scholar
• Lefebvre, H. 1968. Everyday Life in the Modern World. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Lefebvre, H. 1977. Critique of Everyday Life (Volume I: Introduction). London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Li, Y., D. Rybsk, and J. R. Kropp. 2020. “Singularity Cities.” Urban Analytics and City Science 48 (1): 43–59. doi:10.1177/2399808319843534.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, K. 1961. The Image of the City. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, K. 1981. A Theory of Good City Form (1981). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• McFarlane, C. 2011a. “Assemblage and Critical Urbanism.” City: Analysis of Urban Trends, Culture, Theory, Policy, Action 15 (2): 204–224. doi:10.1080/13604813.2011.568715.
   Google Scholar
• McFarlane, C. 2011b. “The City as Assemblage: Dwelling and Urban Space.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 29: 649–671. doi:10.1068/d4710.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melonia, A., F. Fornara, and G. Carrus. 2019. “Predicting Pro-environmental Behaviours in the Urban Context: The Direct or Moderated Effect of Urban Stress, City Identity, and Worldviews.” Cities 88: 83–90. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2019.01.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muller, B. 2007. “Continuity of Singularities: Urban Architectures, Ecology and the Aesthetics of Restorative Orders.” Environmental Philosophy 4 (1/2): 179–191. doi:10.5840/envirophil200741/213.
   Google Scholar
• Neill, W. 2003. Urban Planning and Cultural Identity. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Neuendorf, K. A. 2016. The Content Analysis Guidebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Noonan, H. W. 1989. Personal Identity. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Norberg-Schulz, C. 1971. Existence, Space and Architecture. London: Studio Vista Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Norberg-Schulz, C. 1979. Genius Loci: Towards a Phenomenology of Architecture. London: Academy Editions.
   Google Scholar
• Ouf, A. M. 2001. “Authenticity and the Sense of Place in Urban Design.” Journal of Urban Design 6 (1): 73–86. doi:10.1080/13574800120032914.
   Google Scholar
• Pamer, V. 2019. “Urban Planning in the Most Liveable City: Vienna.” Urban Research & Practice 12 (3): 285–295. doi:10.1080/17535069.2019.1635728.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Relph, E. 1976. Place and Placelessness. London: Pion.
   Google Scholar
• Rossi, A. 1982. The Architecture of the City. Translated by D. Ghirardo, & J. Ockman. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sennett, R. 1970. The Uses of Disorder: Personal Identity and City Life. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sennett, R. 1992. The Conscience of the Eye: The Design and Social Life of Cities. New York: W. W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Sepe, M., and M. Pitt. 2014. “The Characters of Place in Urban Design.” Urban Design International 19 (3): 215–227. doi:10.1057/udi.2013.32
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smiley, K. T., W. Rushing, and M. Scott. 2016. “Behind a Bicycling Boom: Governance, Cultural Change and Place Character in Memphis, Tennessee.” . Urban Studies 53 (1): 193–209. doi:10.1177/0042098014556590.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, Y., Y. Long, P. Wu, and X. Wang. 2018. “Are All Cities with Similar Urban Form or not? Redefining Cities with Ubiquitous Points of Interest and Evaluating Them with Indicators at City and Block Levels in China.” International Journal of Geographical Information Science 32 (6): 1–30. doi:10.1080/13658816.2018.1511793.
   Google Scholar
• Swyngedouw, E., and E. Swyngedouw. 2009. “The Congolese Diaspora in Brussels and Hybrid Identity Formation: Multi-Scalarity and Diasporic Citizenship.” Urban Research & Practice 2 (1): 68–90. doi:10.1080/17535060902727074.
   Google Scholar
• Tewari, S., and D. Beynon. 2018. “Changing Neighbourhood Character in Melbourne: Point Cook a Case Study.” Journal of Urban Design 23 (3): 456–464. doi:10.1080/13574809.2017.1383152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tölle, A. 2010. “Urban Identity Policies in Berlin: From Critical Reconstruction to Reconstructing the Wall.” Cities 27 (5): 348–357. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2010.04.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tonkiss, F. 2013. Cities by Design: The Social Life of Urban Form. New Jersey, United States: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Wesener, A. 2016. “‘This Place Feels Authentic’: Exploring Experiences of Authenticity of Place in Relation to the Urban Built Environment in the Jewellery Quarter.” Birmingham. Journal of Urban Design 21 (1): 67–83. doi:10.1080/13574809.2015.1106915.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiles, R., G. Crow, and H. Pain. 2011. “Innovation in Qualitative Research Methods: A Narrative Review.” Qualitative Research 11 (5): 587–604. doi:10.1177/1468794111413227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodward, K., ed. 1997. Identity and Difference. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar