The emergence of regulatory regionalism: transnational networks and the diffusion of regulatory agencies within regions

References

• Avant, D. D., Finnemore, M., & Sell, S. K. (2010). Who governs the globe? Cambridge Studies in International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, M. N., & Finnemore, M. (1999). The politics, power and pathologies of international organizations. International Organization, 53(4), 699–732. doi: 10.1162/002081899551048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bearce, D. H., & Bondanella, S. (2007). Intergovernmental organizations, socialization and member-state interest convergence. International Organization, 61(4), 703–733. doi: 10.1017/S0020818307070245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, N. (1989). Estimating dynamic models using Kalman filtering. Political Analysis, 1(1), 121–156. doi: 10.1093/pan/1.1.121
   Google Scholar
• Berg, V. S., & Horrall, J. (2008). Networks of regulatory agencies as regional public goods. Review of International Organizations, 3(2), 179–200. doi: 10.1007/s11558-007-9028-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Börzel, T., Goltermann, L., Lahoaus, M., & Striebinger, K. (Eds.). (2012). Roads to regionalism. Genesis, design and effects of regional organizations. Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Braithwaite, J. (2008). Regulatory capitalism, how it works, ideas for making it work better. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Buckley, J. (2003). Estimation of models with beta-distributed dependent variables: A replication and extension of Paolino's study. Political Analysis, 11(2), 204–205. doi: 10.1093/pan/mpg010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao, X. (2009). Networks of intergovernmental organizations and convergence in domestic economic policies. International Studies Quarterly, 53(4), 1095–1130. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2478.2009.00570.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao, X. (2012). Global networks and domestic policy convergence: A network explanation of policy changes. World Politics, 64(3), 374–425. doi: 10.1017/S0043887112000081
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, T., & Laegreid, P. (2006). Autonomy and regulation. Coping with agencies in the modern state. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. doi: 10.2307/2095101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobbin, F., Simmons, B., & Garrett, G. (2007). The global diffusion of public policies: Social construction, coercion, competition, or learning? Annual Review of Sociology, 33, 449–472. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.33.090106.142507
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández-i-Marín, X. (2013). ggmcmc: Graphical tools for analyzing Markov Chain Monte Carlo simulations from Bayesian inference. Retrieved from http://xavier-fim.net/packages/ggmcmc
   Google Scholar
• Fink, S. (2013). ‘When I find myself in times of trouble … ’: The conditional effect of international organizations on policy convergence. European Journal of Political Research, 52(5), 630–659. doi: 10.1111/1475-6765.12006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franzese, R. J., & Hays, J. C. (2007). Spatial econometric models of cross-sectional interdependence in political science panel and time-series-cross-section data. Political Analysis, 15, 140–164. doi: 10.1093/pan/mpm005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franzese, R. J., & Hays, J. C. (2008). Contagion, common exposure and selection: Empirical modelling of theories and substance of interdependence in political science. Concepts & Methods, 4(2), 3–9.
   Google Scholar
• Garrett, G. (2000). The causes of globalization. Comparative Political Studies, 33(6–7), 941–991. doi: 10.1177/001041400003300610
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelman, A., Carlin, J. B., Stern, H. S., & Rubin, D. B. (2003). Bayesian data analysis (2nd ed.). Boca Raton, FL: Chapman Hall/CRC.
   Google Scholar
• Gelman, A., Pasarica, C., & Dodhia, R. (2002). Let's practice what we preach: Turning tables into graphs. The American Statistician, 56(2), 121–130. doi: 10.1198/000313002317572790
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelman, A., & Stern, H. (2006). The difference between “significant” and “not significant” is not itself statistically significant. The American Statistician, 60(4), 328–331. doi: 10.1198/000313006X152649
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geweke, J. F. (1992). Evaluating the accuracy of sampling-based approaches to the calculation of posterior moments. In J. Berger, J. Bernardo, A. Dawid, & A. Smith (Eds.), Bayesian statistics (Vol. 4, pp. 169–174). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1990). The consequences of modernity. Raymond Fred West memorial lectures at Stanford University. Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gilardi, F. (2008). Delegation in the regulatory state. Independent regulatory agencies in Western Europe. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Gilardi, F., Jordana, J., & Levi-Faur, D. (2007). Regulation in the age of globalization: The diffusion of regulatory agencies across Europe and Latin America. In G. Hodge (Ed.), Privatization and market development (pp. 127–147). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Gill, J. (2002). Bayesian methods: A social and behavioral sciences approach. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, E., Shipan, Ch., & Volden, C. (2013). The diffusion of policy diffusion research in political science. British Journal of Political Science, 43, 673–701. doi: 10.1017/S0007123412000415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haas, P. M. (1992). Introduction: Epistemic communities and international policy coordination. International Organization, 46(1), 1–35. doi: 10.1017/S0020818300001442
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinze, T. (2011). Mechanism-based thinking on policy diffusion. A review of current approaches in political science (Working Paper KFG, The Transformative Power of Europe, No. 34).
   Google Scholar
• Held, D., & McGrew, A. G. (2007). Globalization/anti-globalization: Beyond the great divide. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Henisz, W. J., Zelner, B. A., & Guillén, M. F. (2005). The worldwide diffusion of market-oriented infrastructure reform, 1977–1999. American Sociological Review, 70(6), 871–897. doi: 10.1177/000312240507000601
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heston, A., Summers, R., & Aten, B. (2009). Penn World Table (Version 6.3). Retrieved from http://pwt.econ.upenn.edu/php_site/pwt_index.php
   Google Scholar
• Holzinger, K., Knill, C., & Sommerer, T. (2008). Environmental policy convergence: The impact of international harmonization, transnational communication and regulatory competition. International Organization, 62(3), 553–587. doi: 10.1017/S002081830808020X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingram, P., Robinson, J., & Busch, M. L. (2005). The intergovernmental network of world trade: IGO connectedness, governance, and embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 111(3), 824–858. doi: 10.1086/497350
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jayasuriya, K. (2008). Regionalising the state: Political topography of regulatory regionalism. Contemporary Politics, 14(1), 21–35. doi: 10.1080/13569770801933270
   Google Scholar
• Jayasuriya, K. (2009). Regulatory regionalism in the Asia-Pacific: Drivers, instruments and actors. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 63(3), 335–347. doi: 10.1080/10357710903104810
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordana, J., & Levi-Faur, D. (2010). Exploring trends and variations in agency scope. Competition and Regulation in Network Industries, 11(4), 342–360.
   Google Scholar
• Jordana, J., & Levi-Faur, D. (2014). Regional integration and transnational regulatory regimes: The polycentric architecture of governance in Latin American telecommunications. In L. Bruszt & G. A. McDermott (Eds.), Leveling the playing field. Transnational regulatory integration and development (Chap. 11, pp. 271–293). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jordana, J., Levi-Faur, D., & Fernández-i-Marín, X. (2011). The global diffusion of regulatory agencies: Channels of transfer and stages of diffusion. Comparative Political Studies, 44(10), 1343–1369. doi: 10.1177/0010414011407466
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahler, M. (2009). Networked politics: Agency, power, and governance, Cornell studies in political economy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Koremenos, B., Lipson, C., & Snidal, D. (2001). The rational design of international institutions. International Organization, 55(4), 761–799. doi: 10.1162/002081801317193592
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leichter, H. M. (1983). The patterns and origins of policy diffusion. The case of Commonwealth. Comparative Politics, 15(2), 223–233. doi: 10.2307/421677
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levi-Faur, D. (2005). The global diffusion of regulatory capitalism. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 598, 12–32. doi: 10.1177/0002716204272371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levi-Faur, D., & Jordana, J. (2005). The rise of regulatory capitalism. The global diffusion of a new order. Annals of the American Academy for Political and Social Sciences, 598, 200–217. doi: 10.1177/0002716204273623
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansfield, E., & Milner, H. (1999). The new wave of regionalism. International Organization, 53, 589–627. doi: 10.1162/002081899551002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meseguer, C. (2010). Learning, policy making, and market reforms. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meseguer, C., & Escribà-Folch, A. (2011). Learning, political regimes and the liberalisation of trade. European Journal of Political Research, 50(6), 775–810. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2010.01982.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meseguer, C., & Gilardi, F. (2009). What is new in the study of policy diffusion? Review of International Political Economy, 16(3), 527–543. doi: 10.1080/09692290802409236
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milner, H. V., & Mukherjee, B. (2009). Democratization and economic globalization. Annual Review of Political Science, 12, 163–181. doi: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.12.110507.114722
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paolino, P. (2001). Maximum likelihood estimation of models with beta-distributed dependent variables. Political Analysis, 9(4), 325–346. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pan.a004873
   Google Scholar
• Pevehouse, J. C. (2002). Democracy from the outside-in? International organizations and democratization. International Organization, 56, 515–549. doi: 10.1162/002081802760199872
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pevehouse, J. C., Nordstrom, T., & Warnke, K. (2004). The cow-2 international organizations dataset version 2.0. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 21(2), 101–119. doi: 10.1080/07388940490463933
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plummer, M. (2010). JAGS: Just another Gibbs sampler (Version 2.1.0). Retrieved from http://www-fis.iarc.fr/~martyn/software/jags/
   Google Scholar
• Plummer, M., Best, N., Cowles, K., & Vines, K. (2009). coda: Output analysis and diagnostics for MCMC. R package version 0.13-4.
   Google Scholar
• R Development Core Team. (2013). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org
   Google Scholar
• Scholte, J. (2000). Globalization: A critical introduction. New York, NY: St. Martin's Press.
   Google Scholar
• Slaughter, A.-M. (2005). A new world order. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, B. J. (2007). Boa: An r package for mcmc output convergence assessment and posterior inference. Journal of Statistical Software, 21(11), 1–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smithson, M., & Verkuilen, J. (2006). A better lemon squeezer? Maximum-likelihood regression with beta-distributed dependent variables. Psychological Methods, 11(1), 54–71. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.11.1.54
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solingen, E. (2012). Of dominoes and firewalls: The domestic, regional, and global politics of international diffusion. International Studies Quarterly, 56, 631–644. doi: 10.1111/isqu.12034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Western, B. (1998). Causal heterogeneity in comparative research: A Bayesian hierarchical modelling approach. American Journal of Political Science, 42(4), 1233–1259. doi: 10.2307/2991856
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Western, B., & Jackman, S. (1994). Bayesian inference for comparative research. The American Political Science Review, 88(2), 412–423. doi: 10.2307/2944713
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar