Paving the way for farm animal welfare in international relations: an EU–Brazil case study

References

• Abbott, K., & Snidal, D. (2009). The governance triangle: Regulatory standards institutions and the shadow of the state. In W. Mattli & N. Woods (Eds.), The politics of global regulation (pp. 44–88). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Amos, N., & Sullivan, R. (2012). Press release on the First Benchmark of Global Food Companies’ Approach to Farm Animal Welfare (BBFAW report). Retrieved March 23, 2013, from http://www.bbfaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/BBFAW_Press_Release_FINAL.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Amos, N., & Sullivan, R. (2013). The Business Benchmark on Farm Animal Welfare: 2012 Report. Retrieved December 20, 2013, from http://www.bbfaw.com/index.php/info/.
   Google Scholar
• Bayvel, D., & Cross, N. (2010). Animal welfare: A complex domestic and international public-policy issue: Who are the key players? Journal of Veterinary Medical Education, 37(1), 3–12. doi: 10.3138/jvme.37.1.3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, C. J. (1991). What is policy convergence and what causes it? British Journal of Political Science, 21, 215–233. doi: 10.1017/S0007123400006116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein, S., & Cashore, B. (2012). Complex global governance and domestic policies: Four pathways of influence. International Affairs, 88(3), 585–604. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2346.2012.01090.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blandford, D., Bureau, J. C., Fulponi, L., & Henson, S. (2002). Potential implications of animal welfare concerns and public policies in industrialized countries for international trade. In B. Krissoff, M. Bohman, & J. A. Caswell (Eds.), Global food trade and consumer demand for quality (pp. 77–100). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Börzel, T. A., & Risse, T. (2012). From Europeanisation to diffusion: Introduction. West European Politics, 35(1), 1–19. doi: 10.1080/01402382.2012.631310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busch, L., & Bain, C. (2004). New! Improved? The transformation of the global agrifood system. Rural sociology, 69(3), 321–346. doi: 10.1526/0036011041730527
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busch, P. O., & Jörgens, H. (2005). The international sources of policy convergence: Explaining the spread of environmental policy innovations. Journal of European Public Policy, 12(5), 860–884. doi: 10.1080/13501760500161514
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busch, P. O., & Jorgens, H. (2012). Governance by diffusion: Exploring a new mechanism of international policy coordination. In J. Meadowcroft, O. Langhelle, & A. Ruud (Eds.), Governance, democracy and sustainable development: Moving beyond the impasse (pp. 221–228). Cheltenham-Northampton: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, K., & Bowles, D. (2010). Growing pains: The developing relationship of animal welfare standards and the world trade rules. Review of European Community & International Environmental Law, 19(2), 227–238. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9388.2010.00679.x
   Google Scholar
• Copa-Cogeca. (2012). The reaction of European farmers and European agri-cooperatives to the EU strategy for the protection and welfare of animals. Retrieved from December 12, 2012, from http://www.copa-cogeca.be/Main.aspx?page=Papers&lang=en&id=361614
   Google Scholar
• Dunoff, J. L. (1998). The misguided debate over NGO participation at the WTO. Journal of International Economic Law, 1(3), 433–456. doi: 10.1093/jiel/1.3.433
   Google Scholar
• Esty, D. C. (1998). Non-governmental organizations at the World Trade Organization: Cooperation, competition, or exclusion. Journal of International Economic Law, 1(1), 123–148. doi: 10.1093/jiel/1.1.123
   Google Scholar
• Eurogroup. (2000). Farm Animal Welfare and the WTO (Discussion Paper presented by Eurogroup for Animal Welfare to a EC Consultation Meeting on Agriculture). (Prepared by: Chris Fisher) Retrieved from Fevereiro 11, 2008, from http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2005/april/tradoc_122238.pdf
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2007). Brazil: Country strategy paper 2007–2013. Retrieved August 14, 2012, from http://eeas.europa.eu/brazil/csp/07_13_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2013). DGTrade – Countries and regions: Brazil. Retrieved August 14, 2012, from http://ec.europa.eu/trade/policy/countries-and-regions/countries/brazil/
   Google Scholar
• Evans, P. (1996). Introduction: Development strategies across the public-private divide. World Development, 24(6), 1033–1037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falkner, R. (2003). Private environmental governance and international relations: Exploring the links. Global Environmental Politics, 3(2), 72–87. doi: 10.1162/152638003322068227
   Google Scholar
• Footer, M. (2008). The Role of ‘Soft’ Law Norms in Reconciling the Antinomies of WTO Law. Paper read at Society of International Economic Law (SIEL) Inaugural Conference (14 July 2008). Retrieved August 22, 2013, from SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1159929
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, D., & Kalfagianni, A. (2010). The causes and consequences of private food governance. Business and Politics, 12(3), 1–36. doi: 10.2202/1469-3569.1319
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, D., Kalfagianni, A., & Arentsen, M. (2009). Retail power, private standards, and sustainability in the global food system. In J. A. Clapp & D. Fuchs (Eds.), Corporate power in global agrifood governance (pp. 29–60). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fulponi, L. (2006). Private voluntary standards in the food system: The perspective of major food retailers in OECD countries. Food Policy, 31(1), 1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2005.06.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grethe, H. (2007). High animal welfare standards in the EU and international trade: How to prevent potential ‘low animal welfare havens’? Food Policy, 32(3), 315–333. doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2006.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatanaka, M., Bain, C., & Busch, L. (2005). Third-party certification in the global agrifood system. Food Policy, 30(3), 354–369. doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2005.05.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heine, J. (2006). On the manner of practising the new diplomacy. Centre for International Governance Innovation (CIGI) (Working Paper n. 11). Retrieved September 12, 2012, from http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/10195
   Google Scholar
• Henson, S. (2008). The role of public and private standards in regulating international food markets. Journal of International Agricultural Trade and Development, 4(1), 63–81.
   Google Scholar
• Henson, S., & Jaffee, S. (2008). Understanding developing country strategic responses to the enhancement of food safety standards. The World Economy, 31(4), 548–568. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9701.2007.01034.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernandez-Lopez, E. A. (2001). Recent trends and perspectives for non-state actor participation in World Trade Organization disputes. Journal of World Trade, 35(3), 469–498. doi: 10.1023/A:1016639332537
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobbs, A. L., Hobbs, J. E., Isaac, G. E., & Kerr, W. A. (2002). Ethics, domestic food policy and trade law: Assessing the EU animal welfare proposal to the WTO. Food Policy, 27(5), 437–454. doi: 10.1016/S0306-9192(02)00048-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hocking, B. (2004). Privatizing diplomacy? International Studies Perspectives , 5(2), 147–152. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-3577.2004.00164.x
   Google Scholar
• Hocking, B. (2006). Multi-stakeholder diplomacy: Forms, functions and frustrations. In J. Kurbalija & V. Katrandjiev (Eds.), Multistakeholder diplomac: Challenges and opportunities (pp. 13–32). Msida, Malta: DiploFoundation.
   Google Scholar
• Holzinger, K., & Knill, C. (2005). Causes and conditions of cross-national policy convergence. Journal of European Public Policy, 12(5), 775–796. doi: 10.1080/13501760500161357
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huige, M. (2011). 6. Private retail standards and the law of the World Trade Organisation. In B. Van der Meulen (Ed.), Private food law (pp. 175–185). Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Kelley, J. R. (2010). The new diplomacy: Evolution of a revolution. Diplomacy & Statecraft, 21(2), 286–305. doi: 10.1080/09592296.2010.482474
   Google Scholar
• Kirton, J. J., & Trebilcock, M. J. (2004). Hard choices, soft law: Voluntary standards in global trade, environmental and social governance. Cornwall: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Knill, C. (2005). Introduction: Cross-national policy convergence: Concepts, approaches and explanatory factors. Journal of European Public Policy, 12(5), 764–774. doi: 10.1080/13501760500161332
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knill, C., & Tosun, J. (2009). Hierarchy, networks, or markets: How does the EU shape environmental policy adoptions within and beyond its borders? Journal of European Public Policy, 16(6), 873–894. doi: 10.1080/13501760903088090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konefal, J., Mascarenhas, M., & Hatanaka, M. (2005). Governance in the global agro-food system: Backlighting the role of transnational supermarket chains. Agriculture and Human Values, 22(3), 291–302. doi: 10.1007/s10460-005-6046-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang, T., & Heasman, M. A. (2004). Food wars: The global battle for mouths, minds and markets. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Langhorne, R. (2005). The diplomacy of non-state actors. Diplomacy & Statecraft, 16(2), 331–339. doi: 10.1080/09592290590948388
   Google Scholar
• Lavenex, S., & Schimmelfennig, F. (2009). EU rules beyond EU borders: Theorizing external governance in European politics. Journal of European Public Policy, 16(6), 791–812. doi: 10.1080/13501760903087696
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindgreen, A., & Hingley, M. (2003). The impact of food safety and animal welfare policies on supply chain management: The case of the Tesco meat supply chain. British Food Journal, 105(6), 328–349. doi: 10.1108/00070700310481702
   Google Scholar
• Maciel, C., & Bock, B. (2013). Modern politics in animal welfare: The changing character of governance of animal welfare and the role of private standards. International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food (Special Volume Private Agri-Food Standards - Part II), 20(2), 219–235.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, S., Sharp, P., Wiseman, G., Criekemans, D., & Melissen, J. (2011). The present and future of diplomacy and diplomatic studies. International Studies Review, 13(4), 709–728. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2486.2011.01079.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pigman, G. A. (2005). Making room at the negotiating table: The growth of diplomacy between nation-state governments and non-state economic entities. Diplomacy & Statecraft, 16(2), 385–401. doi: 10.1080/09592290590948414
   Google Scholar
• Pigman, G. A., & Vickers, B. (2012). Old habits die hard? Diplomacy at the World Trade Organisation and the ‘new diplomatic studies paradigm’. International Journal of Diplomacy and Economy, 1(1), 19–41. doi: 10.1504/IJDIPE.2012.049941
   Google Scholar
• Prevost, D. (2008). Private sector food-safety standards and the sps agreement: Challenges and possibilities. South African Yearbook of International Law, 33, 1–37.
   Google Scholar
• Rahman, N., & Amin, J. (1999). Role of soft law in international law making process. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 48(4), 901–913.
   Google Scholar
• Ramlogan, R. (2001). The environmental and international law: Rethinking the traditional approach. Vermont Journal of Environmental Law, 3(1), 1–40.
   Google Scholar
• Sansolini, A. (2008). Animal welfare and trade. Private Standards. Retrieved August 13, 2012, from http://animalwelfareandtrade.com/animal-welfare-and-trade/private-standards
   Google Scholar
• Sapra, S. (2009). WTO system of trade governance: The stale NGO debate and the appropriate role for non-state actors. Oregon Review of International Law, 11, 71–107.
   Google Scholar
• Schimmelfennig, F. (2007). Europeanization beyond Europe. Living reviews in European Governance. 1: 1. Retrieved April 26, 2012, from http://europeangovernance.livingreviews.org/Articles/lreg-2007-1/
   Google Scholar
• Shelton, D. (2003). Commitment and compliance: The role of non-binding norms in the international legal system. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sherman, R., & Eliasson, J. (2006). Trade disputes and non-state actors: New institutional arrangements and the privatisation of commercial diplomacy. The World Economy, 29(4), 473–489. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9701.2006.00795.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skjærseth, J. B., Stokke, O. S., & Wettestad, J. (2006). Soft law, hard law, and effective implementation of international environmental norms. Global Environmental Politics, 6(3), 104–120. doi: 10.1162/glep.2006.6.3.104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanton, G. (2012). Food safety-related private standards: The WTO perspective (Chapter 09). In A. Marx, M. Maertens, J. Swinnen & J. Wouters (Eds.), Private standards and global governance: Legal and economic perspectives (pp. 235–254). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Stevenson, P. (2009). European and international legislation: A way forward for the protection of farm animals? In P. J. Sankoff & S. W. White (Eds.), Animal law in Australasia: A new dialogue (pp. 307–332). Leichhardt: The Federation Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stoker, G. (1998). Governance as theory: Five propositions. International Social Science Journal, 50(155), 17–28. doi: 10.1111/1468-2451.00106
   Google Scholar
• Stone, D. (2004). Transfer agents and global networks in the ‘transnationalization'of policy. Journal of European Public Policy, 11(3), 545–566. doi: 10.1080/13501760410001694291
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan, R., Amos, N., & Ngo, M. L. (2012). Animal welfare: How investors can engage on the farm. Retrieved February 11, 2013, from http://www.ethicalcorp.com/governance-regulation/animal-welfare-how-investors-can-engage-farm
   Google Scholar
• Thiermann, A., & Babcock, S. (2005). Animal welfare and international trade. Revue scientifique et technique International Office of Epizootics, 24(2), 747–755.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Der Meulen, B. (2011). Private food law: Governing food chains through contract law, self-regulation, private standards, audits and certification. Schemes: Wageningen Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Van Horne, P. L. M., & Achterbosch, T. J. (2008). Animal welfare in poultry production systems: Impact of EU standards on world trade. World's Poultry Science Journal, 64(1), 40–52. doi: 10.1017/S0043933907001705
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogel, D. (2006). The private regulation of global corporate conduct. Paper prepared for presentation at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association. Retrieved July 22, 2012, from http://escholarship.org/uc/item/8g66g3hf
   Google Scholar
• Vogel, D. (2008). Private global business regulation. Annual Review of Political Science, 11(1), 261–282. doi: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.053106.141706
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagemans, A. J., van Koppen, C. S. A., & Mol, A. P. J. (2014). The effectiveness of socially responsible investment: A review. Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences, 10(3/4), 235–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolff, C., & Scannell, M. (2008). Implication of private standards in international trade of animals and animal products. (Report for the 76th General Session of the World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE) Paris, 25–30 May 2008). Retrieved from January 26, 2010, from http://www.oie.int/fileadmin/Home/eng/Internationa_Standard_Setting/docs/pdf/A_private_20standards.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wouters, J., & Geraets, D. (2012). Private food standards and the World Trade Organization: Some legal considerations. World Trade Review, 11, 479–489. doi: 10.1017/S1474745612000237
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar