Minimal democratic audit of Islamic and other identitarian regimes

References

• Abdullah, N. (2007). Legislating faith in Malaysia. Singapore Journal of Legal Studies, [2007], 264–289.
   Google Scholar
• Akbaba, Y., & Fox, J. (2011). The Religion and State-Minorities [RASM] dataset. Journal of Peace Research, 48(6), 807–816. doi: 10.1177/0022343311418997
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ang, S., Lee, M. C., & Lim, S. F. (Eds.). (2008). Religious liberty after 50 years of independence. Petaling Jaya: NECF Malaysia Research Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Aziz, K. K. (1993). The murder of history: A critique of history textbooks used in Pakistan. Lahore: Vanguard Books.
   Google Scholar
• Beetham, D. (1994). Key principles and indices for a democratic audit. In D. Beetham (Ed.), Defining and measuring democracy (pp. 25–43). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Berger, P. L. (Ed.). (1999). The desecularization of the world: Resurgent religion and world politics. Grand Rapids, MI: Ethics and Public Policy Center and William B. Eerdmans.
   Google Scholar
• Berlin, I. (1958). Two concepts of liberty. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bernama. (2014, May 8). More Chinese youth apply to become police constables. Bernama: Official Portal of National News Agency of Malaysia. Retrieved May 9, 2014, from http://www.bernama.com.my/bernama/v7/ge/newsgeneral.php?id=1036901
   Google Scholar
• Brown, S. (2014, June 24). Malaysian court to Christians: You can't say ‘Allah’. CNN News. Retrieved July 1, 2014, from http://edition.cnn.com/2014/06/24/world/asia/Malaysia-allah-ban/
   Google Scholar
• Casanova, J. (1994). Public religions in the modern world. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Casanova, J. (2008). Public religions revisited. In H. de Vries (Ed.), Religion: Beyond a concept (pp. 101–119). New York, NY: Fordham University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Case, W. (2001). Malaysia's resilient pseudodemocracy. Journal of Democracy, 12(1), 43–57. doi: 10.1353/jod.2001.0004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collier, D., & Levitsky, S. (1997). Democracy with adjectives: Conceptual innovation in comparative research. World Politics, 49(3), 430–451. doi: 10.1353/wp.1997.0009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crouch, H. (1996). Malaysia: Do elections make a difference? In R. H. Taylor (Ed.), The politics of elections in Southeast Asia (pp. 114–135). Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, R. A. (1971). Polyarchy: Participation and opposition. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, R. A. (1988). On democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Denk, T., & Anckar, C. (2014). Length of independence and democratic failure. Comparative Politics, 20(4), 385–401.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Statistics, Malaysia. (2011). Population distribution and basic demographic characteristics: 2010. Kuala Lumpur: Government of Malaysia. Retrieved September 20, 2014, from http://www.statistics.gov.my/portal/download_Population/files/census2010/Taburan_Penduduk_dan_Ciri-ciri_Asas_Demografi.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dworkin, R. (1977). Taking rights seriously. London: Duckworth.
   Google Scholar
• Eckstein, H. (1979). Support for regimes: Theories and tests. Princeton, NJ: Center for International Studies.
   Google Scholar
• el-Gaili, A. T. (2004). Federalism and the tyranny of religious majorities: Challenges to Islamic federalism in Sudan. Harvard International Law Journal, 45(2), 503–545.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esposito, J. L. (1992). The Islamic threat: Myth or reality. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Esposito, J. L. (2011). The future of Islam and U.S.-Muslim relations. Political Science Quarterly, 126(3), 365–401. doi: 10.1002/j.1538-165X.2011.tb00705.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esposito, J. L., & Voll, J. O. (1996). Islam and democracy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Esposito, J. L., & Voll, J. O. (2001). Islam and democracy. Humanities, 22(6), 22–26.
   Google Scholar
• Furnivall, J. S. (1939). Netherlands India: A study of plural economy. London: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gabriel, T. (2007). Christian citizens in an Islamic state: The Pakistan experience. Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Government of Malaysia. (2010). Federal constitution. Kuala Lumpur: The Commissioner of Law Revision, Malaysia.
   Google Scholar
• Guinier, L. (1994). The tyranny of the majority: Fundamental fairness in representative democracy. New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gurr, Ted Robert. (2000). Peoples versus states: Minorities at risk in the new century. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (2011). “The political”: The rational meaning of a questionable inheritance of political theology. In E. Mendieta & J. VanAntwerpen (Eds.), The power of religion in the public sphere (pp. 15–33). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hamzah, S. (1966). Contemporary urbanization in Malaysia. Asian Survey, 6(9), 484–491. doi: 10.2307/2642349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harding, A. (2012). The constitution of Malaysia: A contextual analysis. Oxford: Hart.
   Google Scholar
• Horowitz, D. L. (1994). The Qur'an and the common law: Islamic law reform and the theory of legal change [Part-II]. The American Journal of Comparative Law, 42(3), 543–580. doi: 10.2307/840701
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huntington, S. P. (1997). The clash of civilizations and the remaking of world order. London: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Inglehart, R., & Welzel, C. (2010). Changing mass priorities: The link between modernization and democracy. Perspectives on Politics, 8(2), 551–567. doi: 10.1017/S1537592710001258
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juris, P. (2012). Democratic Islamization in Pakistan and Turkey: Lessons for the post-Arab Spring Muslim world. The Middle East Journal, 66(2), 273–289. doi: 10.3751/66.2.14
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karatnycky, A. (2002). Muslim countries and the democracy gap. Journal of Democracy, 13(1), 99–112. doi: 10.1353/jod.2002.0009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakoff, S. (2004). The reality of Muslim exceptionalism. Journal of Democracy, 15(4), 133–139. doi: 10.1353/jod.2004.0065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J. (2010). Islamization and activism in Malaysia. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, B. (2002). What went wrong?: The clash between Islam and modernity in the Middle East. London: Weidenfeld & Nicholson.
   Google Scholar
• Madison, J. (1788/2001). Federalist No. 47: The particular structure of the new government and the distribution of power among its different parts. In J. Manis (Ed.), The federalist papers (pp. 215–220). Hazelton: Penn State Electronic Classics Series Publication.
   Google Scholar
• Mahmood, S. M. (2004). The constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan. Islamabad: National Assembly of Pakistan.
   Google Scholar
• Mahmud, T. (1995). Freedom of religion and religious minorities in Pakistan: A study of judicial practice. Fordham International Law Journal, 19(1), 39–100.
   Google Scholar
• Means, G. P. (1996). Soft authoritarianism in Malaysia and Singapore. Journal of Democracy, 7(4), 103–117. doi: 10.1353/jod.1996.0065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Means, G. P. (2009). Political Islam in Southeast Asia. Petaling Jaya: Strategic Information and Research Development Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Melson, R., & Wolpe, H. (1970). Modernization and the politics of communalism: A theoretical perspective. The American Political Science Review, 64(4), 1112–1130. doi: 10.2307/1958361
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendieta, E., & VanAntwerpen, J. (Eds.). (2011). The power of religion in the public sphere. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mill, J. S. (1859/2001). On liberty. Kitchener, ON, Canada: Batoche Books.
   Google Scholar
• Mill, J. S. (1861/2004). Considerations on representative government. Hazelton: Penn State Electronic Classics Series Publication.
   Google Scholar
• Minorities at Risk Project. (2009). Minorities at risk dataset. College Park, MD: Center for International Development and Conflict Management. Retrieved from http://www.cidcm.umd.edu/mar/
   Google Scholar
• Mohamad, M. (2010). Making majority, undoing family: Law, religion and the Islamization of the state in Malaysia. Economy and Society, 39(3), 360–384. doi: 10.1080/03085147.2010.486218
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgenbesser, L. (2014). Elections in hybrid regimes: Conceptual stretching revived. Political Studies, 62(1), 21–36. doi: 10.1111/1467-9248.12020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nasr, S. V. R. (1995). Democracy and Islamic revivalism. Political Science Quarterly, 110(2), 261–285. doi: 10.2307/2152362
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nasr, V. (2005). The rise of “Muslim democracy”. Journal of Democracy, 16(2), 13–27. doi: 10.1353/jod.2005.0032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nayyar, A. H., & Salim, A. (2003). The state of curricula and textbooks in Pakistan. Islamabad: Sustainable Development Policy Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, J. M. (2011). In the shadow of Shari'ah: Islam, Islamic law, and democracy in Pakistan. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• North, D. C., Wallis, J. J., & Weingast, B. R. (2009). Violence and social orders: A conceptual framework for interpreting recorded human history. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Othman, N., Puthucheary, M., & Kessler, C. (Eds.). (2008). Sharing the nation: Faith, difference, power and the state 50 years after Merdeka. Petaling Jaya: Strategic Information and Research Development Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Pepinsky, T. (2007). Malaysia: Turnover without change. Journal of Democracy, 18(1), 113–117. doi: 10.1353/jod.2007.0013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pepinsky, T. (2009). The 2008 Malaysian elections: An end to ethnic politics? Journal of East Asian Studies, 9(1), 87–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Przeworski, A., Alvarez, M. E., Cheibub, J. A., & Limongi, F. (2000). Democracy and development: Political institutions and well-being in the world, 1950-1990. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pye, L. (1958). The non-Western political process. The Journal of Politics, 20(3), 468–486. doi: 10.2307/2127224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabushka, A., & Shepsle, K. (1972). Politics in plural societies: A theory of democratic instability. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.
   Google Scholar
• Raina, A. K. (2014a). Democrats and minority marginalization: The case of Pakistan. Asian Journal of Political Science, 22(2), 206–226. doi: 10.1080/02185377.2013.879069
   Google Scholar
• Raina, A. K. (2014b). Minorities and representation in a plural society: The case of the Christians of Pakistan. South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies, XXXVII(4), 684–699. doi: 10.1080/00856401.2014.966945
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Said, E. (1978). Orientalism. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Saigol, R. (2010). Strangers in the house: Minorities in Pakistani textbooks. In R. Manchanda (Ed.), States in conflict with their minorities: Challenges to minority rights in South Asia (pp. 204–223). New Delhi: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Schumpeter, J. A. (1943/1994). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A. (1999). Democracy as a universal value. Journal of Democracy, 10(3), 3–17. doi: 10.1353/jod.1999.0055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shklar, J. N. (1984). Ordinary vices. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shome, A. (2002). Malay political leadership. London: RoutledgeCurzon.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M. G. (1969). Institutional and political conditions of pluralism. In L. Kuper & M. G. Smith (Eds.), Pluralism in Africa (pp. 27–65). Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stepan, A. (2000). Religion, democracy, and the “twin tolerations”. Journal of Democracy, 11(4), 37–57. doi: 10.1353/jod.2000.0088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stepan, A., & Robertson, G. B. (2003). An ‘Arab’ more than ‘Muslim’ electoral gap. Journal of Democracy, 14(3), 30–59. doi: 10.1353/jod.2003.0064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations. (1948, December 10). Universal Declaration of Human Rights. UNGA Resolution 217 (III). Retrieved May 1, 2013, from http://www.ohchr.org/EN/UDHR/Pages/Introduction.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Volpi, F. (2004). Pseudo-democracy in the Muslim world. Third World Quarterly, 25(6), 1061–1078. doi: 10.1080/0143659042000256896
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volpi, F. (2009). Political Islam in the Mediterranean: The view from democratization studies. Democratization, 16(1), 20–38. doi: 10.1080/13510340802575791
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vries, H. (Ed.). (2008). Religion: Beyond a concept. New York, NY: Fordham University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Welzel, C., & Inglehart, R. (2008). Political culture, mass beliefs, and value change. Retrieved from http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/wvs/articles/folder_published/publication_580
   Google Scholar
• Weng, N. K. (2004). Doing the right thing: A practical guide on legal matters for churches in Malaysia. Petaling Jaya: Kairos Research Centre Sdn Bhd.
   Google Scholar
• Zakaria, F. (2004). Islam, democracy, and constitutional liberalism. Political Science Quarterly, 119(1), 1–20. doi: 10.2307/20202302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaman, M. Q. (2011). Pakistan: Shar'ia and the state. In R. G. Hefner (Ed.), Shar'ia politics: Islamic law and society in the modern world (pp. 207–243). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar