Identity, procedures and performance: how authoritarian regimes legitimize their rule

References

• Alagappa, M. (1995). Political legitimacy in Southeast Asia: The quest for moral authority. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Albrecht, H., & Schlumberger, O. (2004). “Waiting for godot”: Regime change without democratization in the middle east. International Political Science Review, 25(4), 371–392. doi: 10.1177/0192512104045085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almond, G. A., & Verba, S. (1989). The civic culture: Political attitudes and democracy in five nations. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Art, D. (2012). What do we know about authoritarianism after ten years? Comparative Politics, 44(3), 351–373. doi: 10.5129/001041512800078977
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker, R. (2001). Legitimating identities: The self-presentations of rulers and subjects. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beetham, D. (1991). The legitimation of power. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bogaards, M. (2009). How to classify hybrid regimes? Defective democracy and electoral authoritarianism. Democratization, 16(2), 399–423. doi: 10.1080/13510340902777800
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bollen, K. A., & Paxton, P. (2000). Subjective measures of liberal democracy. Comparative Political Studies, 33(1), 58–86. doi: 10.1177/0010414000033001003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Booth, J. A., & Seligson, M. A. (2009). The legitimacy puzzle in Latin America: Political support and democracy in eight nations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brady, A.-M. (2009). Mass persuasion as a means of legitimation and China’s popular authoritarianism. American Behavioral Scientist, 53(3), 434–457. doi: 10.1177/0002764209338802
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brownlee, J. (2007). Hereditary succession in modern autocracies. World Politics, 59(5), 595–628. doi: 10.1353/wp.2008.0002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brusis, M. (2015). Introduction. In J. Ahrens, M. Brusis, & M. Schulze Wessel (Eds.), The politics of legitimation in Post-Soviet Eurasia (pp. 1–17). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bueno de Mesquita, B., Smith, A., Siverson, R. M., & Morrow, J. D. (2003). The logic of political survival. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bunce, V. J., & Wolchik, S. L. (2010). Defeating dictators: Electoral change and stability in competitive authoritarian regimes. World Politics, 62(1), 43–86. doi: 10.1017/S0043887109990207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burnell, P. (2006). Autocratic opening to democracy: Why legitimacy matters. Third World Quarterly, 27(4), 545–562. doi: 10.1080/01436590600720710
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Case, W. (1995). Malaysia: Aspects and audiences of legitimacy. In M. Alagappa (Ed.), Political legitimacy in Southeast Asia: The quest for moral authority (pp. 69–107). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clapham, C. (2012). From liberation movement to government: Past legacies and the challenge of transition in Africa ( No. 8/2012). Johannesburg: Brenthurst Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Coppedge, M., Gerring, J., & Lindberg, S. I. (2012). V-Dem – Codebook. Version 19 October 2012. Gothenburg: Varieties of Democracy Project (V-Dem).
   Google Scholar
• Croissant, A., & Wurster, S. (2013). Performance and persistence of autocracies in comparison: Introducing issues and perspectives. Contemporary Politics, 19(1), 1–18. doi: 10.1080/13569775.2013.773199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cummings, S. N. (2006). Legitimation and identification in Kazakhstan. Nationalism and Ethnic Politics, 12(2), 177–204. doi: 10.1080/13537110600734547
   Google Scholar
• DeNardo, J. (1985). Power in numbers: The political strategy of protest and rebellion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Diamond, L. (2002). Thinking about hybrid regimes. Journal of Democracy, 13(2), 21–35. doi: 10.1353/jod.2002.0025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimitrov, M. K. (2009). Popular autocrats. Journal of Democracy, 20(1), 78–81. doi: 10.1353/jod.0.0057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimitrov, M. K. (Ed.). (2013). Why communism did not collapse: Understanding authoritarian regime resilience in Asia and Europe. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dukalskis, A. (2017). The authoritarian public sphere: Legitimation and autocratic power in North Korea, Burma, and China. London & New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dzhuraev, S. (2012). Governance challenges in Post-Soviet Kyrgyzstan: The externalization and parochialization of political legitimacy ( Working Paper). Oslo: Norwegian Institute of International Affairs (NUPI).
   Google Scholar
• Easton, D. (1965). A systems analysis of political life. New York: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Easton, D. (1975). A re-assessment of the concept of political support. British Journal of Political Science, 5(4), 435–457. doi: 10.1017/S0007123400008309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fagen, R. R. (1965). Charismatic authority and the leadership of Fidel Castro. The Western Political Quarterly, 18(2), 275–284. doi: 10.2307/444996
   Google Scholar
• Gandhi, J., & Przeworski, A. (2006). Cooperation, cooptation, and rebellion under dictatorships. Economics and Politics, 18(1), 1–26. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0343.2006.00160.x
   Google Scholar
• Geddes, B. (1999a). Authoritarian breakdown: Empirical test of a game theoretic argument. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Atlanta, September 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Geddes, B. (1999b). What do we know about democratization after twenty years? Annual Review of Political Science, 2, 115–144. doi: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.2.1.115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geddes, B., Wright, J., & Frantz, E. (2014). Autocratic breakdown and regime transitions: A new data set. Perspectives on Politics, 12(2), 313–331. doi: 10.1017/S1537592714000851
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerschewski, J. (2013). The three pillars of stability: Legitimation, repression, and co-optation in autocratic regimes. Democratization, 20(1), 13–38. doi: 10.1080/13510347.2013.738860
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gervasoni, C. (2010). Measuring variance in subnational regimes: Results from an expert-based operationalization of democracy in the argentine provinces. Journal of Politics in Latin America, 2(2), 13–52.
   Google Scholar
• Gilley, B. (2009). The right to rule: How states win and lose legitimacy. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein, K. (2002). Getting in the door: Sampling and completing elite interviews. Political Science & Politics, 35(4), 669–672. doi: 10.1017/S1049096502001130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadenius, A., & Teorell, J. (2005). Assessing alternative indices of democracy. Lund: Department of Political Science. Retrieved from http://www.concepts-methods.org
   Google Scholar
• Hadenius, A., & Teorell, J. (2007). Pathways from authoritarianism. Journal of Democracy, 18(1), 143–157. doi: 10.1353/jod.2007.0009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herb, M. (1999). All in the family: Absolutism, revolution, and democracy in the Middle Eastern Monarchies. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holbig, H. (2013). Ideology after the end of ideology. China and the quest for autocratic legitimation. Democratization, 20(1), 61–81. doi: 10.1080/13510347.2013.738862
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L., Bakker, R., Brigevich, A., de Vries, C., Edwards, E., Marks, G., … Vachudova, M. (2010). Reliability and validity of the 2002 and 2006 Chapel Hill expert surveys on party positioning. European Journal of Political Research, 49(5), 687–703. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2009.01912.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, M. M., & Roessler, P. G. (2006). Liberalizing electoral outcomes in competitive authoritarian regimes. American Journal of Political Science, 50(2), 365–381. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00189.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber, J., & Inglehart, R. (1995). Expert interpretations of party space and party locations in 42 societies. Party Politics, 1(1), 73–111. doi: 10.1177/1354068895001001004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huntington, S. P. (1968). Political order in changing societies. New Haven, NJ: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hyde, S. D., & Marinov, N. (2012). Which elections can be lost? Political Analysis, 20(2), 191–210. doi: 10.1093/pan/mpr040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inglehart, R., & Welzel, C. (2005). Modernization, cultural change, and democracy: The human development sequence. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Isaacs, R. (2010). ‘Papa’ – Nursultan Nazarbayev and the discourse of charismatic leadership and nation-building in Post-Soviet Kazakhstan. Studies in Ethnicity and Nationalism, 10(3), 435–452. doi: 10.1111/j.1754-9469.2011.01089.x
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, R. H., & Rosberg, C. G. (1982). Why Africa’s weak states persist: The empirical and the juridical in statehood. World Politics, 35(1), 1–24. doi: 10.2307/2010277
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaase, M., & Newton, K. (1998). Beliefs in government (Vol. 5). New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kailitz, S. (2013). Classifying political regimes revisited: Legitimation and durability. Democratization, 20(1), 39–60. doi: 10.1080/13510347.2013.738861
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, G., Keohane, R. O., & Verba, S. (1994). Designing social inquiry: Scientific inference in qualitative research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kneuer, M. (2013). Die Suche nach Legitimität. Außenpolitik als Legitimationsstrategie autokratischer Regime. Politische Vierteljahresschrift, special edition 47, 205–236.
   Google Scholar
• Koesel, K. J., & Bunce, V. J. (2013). Diffusion-proofing: Russian and Chinese responses to waves of popular mobilizations against authoritarian rulers. Perspectives on Politics, 11(3), 753–768. doi: 10.1017/S1537592713002107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Köllner, P., & Kailitz, S. (2013). Comparing autocracies: Theoretical issues and empirical analyses. Democratization, 20(1), 1–12. doi: 10.1080/13510347.2013.738859
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koopmans, R. (1997). Dynamics of repression and mobilization: The German extreme right in the 1990s. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 2(2), 149–164.
   Google Scholar
• Krastev, I. (2011). The paradoxes of new authoritarianism. Journal of Democracy, 22(2), 5–16. doi: 10.1353/jod.2011.0027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeBas, A. (2011). From protest to parties: Party-building and democratization in Africa. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levitsky, S., & Way, L. (2010). Competitive authoritarianism: Hybrid regimes after the cold war. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levitsky, S., & Way, L. (2013). The durability of revolutionary regimes. Journal of Democracy, 24(3), 5–17. doi: 10.1353/jod.2013.0043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levitsky, S., & Way, L. A. (2002). The rise of competitive authoritarianism. Journal of Democracy, 13(2), 51–65. doi: 10.1353/jod.2002.0026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linz, J. J. (2000). Totalitarian and authoritarian regimes. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Lipset, S. M. (1959). Some social requisites of democracy: Economic development and political legitimacy. American Political Science Review, 53(1), 69–105. doi: 10.2307/1951731
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magaloni, B. (2008). Voting for autocracy: Hegemonic party survival and its demise in Mexico. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mansfield, E. D., & Snyder, J. (1995). Democratization and the danger of war. International Security, 20(1), 5–38. doi: 10.2307/2539213
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marks, G., Hooghe, L., Steenbergen, M. R., & Bakker, R. (2007). Crossvalidating data on party positioning on european integration. Electoral Studies, 26(1), 23–38. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2006.03.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. (2001). Strategies of justification in authoritarian ideology. Journal of Political Ideologies, 6(2), 147–168. doi: 10.1080/13569310120053830
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, M. D., Mendes, S. M., & Kim, M. (2007). Cross-temporal and cross-national comparisons of party left-right positions. Electoral Studies, 26(1), 62–75. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2006.04.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, M. K. (2015). Electoral authoritarianism and human development. Comparative Political Studies, 48(12), 1526–1562. doi: 10.1177/0010414015582051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morse, Y. L. (2011). Review article: The era of electoral authoritarianism. World Politics, 64(1), 161–198. doi: 10.1017/S0043887111000281
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munck, G. L. (2006). Drawing boundaries: How to craft intermediate regime categories. In A. Schedler (Ed.), Electoral authoritarianism: The dynamics of unfree competition (pp. 27–40). Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, D. N. (1984). Charisma, control, and coercion: The dilemma of communist leadership. Comparative Politics, 17(1), 1–15. doi: 10.2307/421734
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pepinsky, T. (2014). The institutional turn in comparative authoritarianism. British Journal of Political Science, 44(3), 631–653. doi: 10.1017/S0007123413000021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Przeworski, A., & Limongi, F. (1993). Political regimes and economic growth. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 7(3), 51–69. doi: 10.1257/jep.7.3.51
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radnitz, S. (2012). Oil in the family: Managing presidential succession in Azerbaijan. Democratization, 19(1), 60–77. doi: 10.1080/13510347.2012.641300
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Razi, G. H. (1990). Legitimacy, religion, and nationalism in the middle east. The American Political Science Review, 84(1), 69–91. doi: 10.2307/1963630
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reyntjens, F. (2004). Rwanda, ten years on: From genocide to dictatorship. African Affairs, 103(411), 177–210. doi: 10.1093/afraf/adh045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roessler, P. G., & Howard, P. N. (2009). Post-cold war political regimes: When do elections matter? In S. I. Lindberg (Ed.), Democratization by elections: A new mode of transition (pp. 101–127). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roller, M. B. (2001). Constructing autocracy: Aristocrats and emperors in Julio-Claudian Rome. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rothstein, B. (2009). Creating political legitimacy: Electoral democracy versus quality of government. American Behavioral Scientist, 53(3), 311–330. doi: 10.1177/0002764209338795
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saiegh, S. M. (2009). Recovering a basic space from elite surveys: Evidence from Latin America. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 34(1), 117–145. doi: 10.3162/036298009787500349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scharpf, F. W. (1997). Games real actors play: Actor-centered institutionalism in policy research. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scharpf, F. W. (1999). Governing in Europe: Effective & democratic? Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schatz, E. (2006). Access by accident: Legitimacy claims and democracy promotion in authoritarian Central Asia. International Political Science Review, 27(3), 263–284. doi: 10.1177/0192512106064463
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schatzberg, M. G. (2001). Political legitimacy in middle Africa. Father, family, food. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schedler, A. (2002). The menu of manipulation. Journal of Democracy, 13(2), 36–50. doi: 10.1353/jod.2002.0031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schedler, A. (Ed.). (2006). Electoral authoritarianism: The dynamics of unfree competition. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Schedler, A. (2012). Judgment and measurement in political science. Perspectives on Politics, 10(1), 21–36. doi: 10.1017/S1537592711004889
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schedler, A. (2013). The politics of uncertainty: Sustaining and subverting electoral authoritarianism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V. A. (2013). Democracy and legitimacy in the European union revisited: Input, output and “throughput”. Political Studies, 61(1), 2–22. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2012.00962.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitz, A. (2004). Turkmenistan: Der privatisierte Staat. In U. Schneckener (Ed.), States at risk: Fragile Saaten als Sicherheits-und Entwicklungsproblem (pp. 67–83). Berlin: SWP Studie.
   Google Scholar
• Simpser, A. (2013). Why governments and parties manipulate elections: Theory, practice, and implications. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Snyder, R. (2006). Beyond electoral authoritarianism: The spectrum of nondemocratic regimes. In Electoral authoritarianism. The dynamics of unfree competition (pp. 219–231). Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• von Soest, C. (2015). Democracy prevention: The international collaboration of authoritarian regimes. European Journal of Political Research, 54(4), 623–638. doi: 10.1111/1475-6765.12100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Soest, C., & Grauvogel, J. (2015). Comparing legitimation strategies in Post-Soviet countries. In J. Ahrens, M. Brusis, & M. Schulze Wessel (Eds.), The politics of legitimation in Post-Soviet Eurasia (pp. 18–46). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Solinger, D. J. (2001). Ending one-party dominance: Korea, Taiwan, Mexico. Journal of Democracy, 12(1), 30–42. doi: 10.1353/jod.2001.0017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staats, J. L., Bowler, S., & Hiskey, J. T. (2008). Measuring judicial performance in Latin America. Latin American Politics and Society, 47(4), 77–106. doi: 10.1111/j.1548-2456.2005.tb00329.x
   Google Scholar
• Tansey, O. (2007). Process tracing and elite interviewing: A case for non-probability sampling. PS: Political Science & Politics, 40(4), 765–772.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, M. R. (2001). Whatever happened to “asian values”? Journal of Democracy, 12(4), 154–165. doi: 10.1353/jod.2001.0083
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wahman, M., Teorell, J., & Hadenius, A. (2013). Authoritarian regime types revisited: Updated data in a comparative perspective. Contemporary Politics, 19(1), 19–34. doi: 10.1080/13569775.2013.773200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, M. (1980). Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Grundriß der verstehenden Soziologie. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M. (2004). The vocation lectures. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.
   Google Scholar
• Wedeen, L. (1999). Ambiguities of domination: Politics, rhetoric, and symbols in contemporary Syria. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Whitehead, L. (2015). International democracy promotion as a political ideology: Upsurge and retreat. Journal of Political Ideologies, 20(1), 10–26. doi: 10.1080/13569317.2015.991510
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wintrobe, R. (1998). The political economy of dictatorship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wintrobe, R., & Ferrero, M. (Eds.). (2009). Political economy of theocracy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. (2012). Database of political institutions (DPI). Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Yom, S. L., & Gause, F. G. III. (2012). Resilient royals: How Arab monarchies hang on. Journal of Democracy, 23(4), 74–88. doi: 10.1353/jod.2012.0062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar