Authority in rebel groups: identity, recognition and the struggle over legitimacy

References

• 41 Karen Civil Society Organisations. (2015, October 4). Open Letter: Karen civil society has lost trust in the Nationwide ceasefire agreement (NCA) Negotiations as a gateway to political dialogue. Burma Partnership. Retrieved January 12, 2017, from http://www.burmapartnership.org/2015/10/karen-civil-society-has-lost-trust-in-the-nationwide-ceasefire-agreement-nca-negotiations-as-a-gateway-to-political-dialogue/
   Google Scholar
• Allina-Pisano, J. (2009). How to tell an axe murderer: An essay on ethnography, truth, and lies. In E. Schatz (Ed.), Political ethnography: What immersion contributes to the study of power (pp. 53–75). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Asad, T. (1972). Market model, class structure and consent: A reconsideration of Swat political organisation. Man, 7(1), 74–94. doi: 10.2307/2799857
   Google Scholar
• Azar, E. (1986). Protracted international conflicts: Ten propositions. In E. Azar, & J. Burton (Eds.), International conflict resolution: Theory and practice (pp. 28–39). Brighton: Wheatsheaf.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, M., & Finnemore, M. (1999). The politics, power, and pathologies of international organizations. International Organization, 53(4), 699–732. doi: 10.1162/002081899551048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barth, F. (1959). Political leadership among Swat Pathans. London: Athlone Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bertil, L. (2016, January 11). New approach needed for genuine peace process. The Irrawaddy. Retrieved January 12, 2017, from http://www.irrawaddy.com/commentary/new-approach-needed-for-genuine-peace-in-burma.html
   Google Scholar
• Brenner, D. (2015). Ashes of co-optation: From armed group fragmentation to the rebuilding of popular insurgency in Myanmar. Conflict, Security & Development, 15(4), 337–58. doi: 10.1080/14678802.2015.1071974
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brenner, D. (2016). Insurgency as a social process: Authority and armed groups in Myanmar’s changing borderlands ( PhD thesis). The London School of Economics and Political Science.
   Google Scholar
• Brenner, D. (2017). Inside the Karen insurgency: Explaining conflict and conciliation in Myanmar’s changing borderlands. Asian Security. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/14799855.2017.1293657
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, J., Kramer, T., & Woods, K. (2013). Developing disparity: Regional investment in Burma's borderlands. Amsterdam: Transnational Institute. Retrieved January 12, 2017, from http://www.tni.org/sites/www.tni.org/files/download/tni-2013-burmasborderlands-def-klein-def.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Clark, I. (2005). Legitimacy in international society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cunningham, K., Bakke, K., & Seymour, L. (2012). Shirts today, skins tomorrow: Dual contests and the effects of fragmentation in self-determination disputes. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 56(1), 67–93. doi: 10.1177/0022002711429697
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrelly, N. (2012). Ceasing Ceasefire? Kachin Politics beyond the Stalemate. In N. Cheesman, M. Skidmore, & T. Wilson (Eds.), Myanmar’s transition: Openings, obstacles and opportunities (pp. 52–71). Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Fink, C. (2008). Militarization in Burma’s ethnic states: Causes and consequences. Contemporary Politics, 14(4), 447–462. doi: 10.1080/13569770802519367
   Google Scholar
• Global Witness. (2009). A disharmonious trade: China and the continued destruction of Burma's northern frontier forests. London: Global Witness. Retrieved January 12, 2017, from: http://www.globalwitness.org/library/disharmonious-trade-china-and-continued-destruction-burmas-northern-frontier-forests
   Google Scholar
• Haacke, J. (2005). The Frankfurt school and international relations: On the centrality of recognition. Review of International Studies, 31(1), 181–194. doi: 10.1017/S0260210505006376
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holliday, I. (2012). Burma Redux: Global justice and the quest for political reform in Myanmar. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Honneth, A. (1996). The struggle for recognition: The moral grammar of social conflicts. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hurd, I. (2008). After anarchy: Legitimacy and power in the United Nations Security Council. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• International Crisis Group. (2003). Myanmar backgrounder: Ethnic minority politics. Retrieved January 12, 2017, from http://www.crisisgroup.org/~/media/Files/asia/south-east-asia/burma-yanmar/052%20Myanmar%20Backgrounder%20Ethnic%20Minority%20Politics.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jost, J., & Major, B. (2001). Emerging perspectives on the psychology of legitimacy. In J. Jost, & B. Major (Eds.), The psychology of legitimacy: Emerging perspectives on ideology, justice, and intergroup relations (pp. 3–32). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kachin Development Networking Group. (2007). Valley of darkness: Gold mining and militarization in Burma's Hugawng Valley. Retrieved January 12, 2017, from http://www.burmacampaign.org.uk/reports/ValleyofDarkness.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kalyvas, S. (2006). The logic of violence in civil war. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Karen Human Rights Group. (2015). With only our voices, what can we do?’ Land confiscation and local response in southeast Myanmar. Retrieved January 12, 2017 from http://www.khrg.org/2015/06/with-only-our-voices-what-can-we-do-land-confiscation-and-local-response.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Mampilly, Z. (2011). Rebel Rulers: Insurgent governance and civilian life during war. New York: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McConnachie, K. (2014). Governing refugees: Justice, order and legal pluralism. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, B. (1978). Injustice: The social bases of obedience and revolt. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Myanmar Peace Monitor. (2016). Armed Ethnic Groups. Chiang Mai: Burma News International. Retrieved April 20, 2017, from http://www.mmpeacemonitor.org/stakeholders/armed-ethnic-groups
   Google Scholar
• Neumann, C., & Neumann, I. (2015). Uses of the self: Two ways of thinking about scholarly situatedness and method. Millennium, 43(3), 798–819. doi: 10.1177/0305829815576818
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearlman, W. (2009). Spoiling inside and out: Internal political contestation and the Middle East peace process. International Security, 33(3), 79–109. doi: 10.1162/isec.2009.33.3.79
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearlman, W. (2010). A composite-actor approach to conflict behavior. In E. Chenoweth, & A. Lawrence (Eds.), Rethinking violence: States and non-state actors in conflict (pp. 212–235). Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Phan, Z. (2013, December 10). Listen to us: Stop ignoring our concerns. Karen News. Retrieved on January 12, 2013, from http://karennews.org/2013/10/listen-to-us-stop-ignoring-our-concerns.html/
   Google Scholar
• Reno, W. (2009). Explaining patterns of violence in collapsed states. Contemporary Security Policy, 30(2), 356–374. doi: 10.1080/13523260903060250
   Google Scholar
• Ruzza, S. (2015). There are two sides to every COIN: Of economic and military means in Myanmar's comprehensive approach to illiberal peacebuilding. European Journal of East Asian Studies, 14(1), 76–97. doi: 10.1163/15700615-01401008
   Google Scholar
• Sadan, M. (2013). Being & becoming Kachin: Histories beyond the state in the borderworlds of Burma. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schlichte, K. (2012). The limits of armed contestation: Power and domination in armed groups. Geoforum, 43(4), 716–724. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2012.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, J. (1979). Revolution in the revolution: Peasants and commissars. Theory and Society, 7(1-2), 97–134. doi: 10.1007/BF00158679
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, J. (1985). Weapons of the weak: Everyday forms of peasant resistance. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shah, A. (2013). The Intimacy of insurgency: Beyond coercion, greed or grievance in Maoist India. Economy and Society, 42(3), 480–506. doi: 10.1080/03085147.2013.783662
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherman, J. (2003). Burma: Lessons from the Ceasefires. In K. Ballentine, & J. Sherman (Eds.), The political economy of armed conflict: Beyond greed and grievance (pp. 225–255). Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M. (1999). Burma: Insurgency and the politics of ethnicity (2nd ed.). Dhaka: University Press Dhaka.
   Google Scholar
• South, A. (2008). Ethnic politics in Burma: States of conflict. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Staniland, P. (2014). Networks of rebellion: Explaining insurgent cohesion and collapse. New York: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H. (1978). Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. London: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thawnghmung, A. (2012). The” other” Karen in Myanmar: Ethnic minorities and the struggle without arms. Plymouth: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Transnational Institute. (2013). The Kachin crisis: peace must prevail. Amsterdam: Author. Retrieved January 12, 2017, from https://www.tni.org/en/publication/the-kachin-crisis-peace-must-prevail
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, T. (2001). A psychological perspective on the legitimacy of institutions and authorities. In J. Jost, & Major B. (Eds.), The psychology of legitimacy: Emerging perspectives on ideology, justice, and intergroup relations (pp. 412–436). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Uphoff, N. (1989). Distinguishing power, authority & legitimacy: Taking Max Weber at his word by using resources-exchange analysis. Polity, 22(2), 295–322. doi: 10.2307/3234836
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Maanen, J. (1991). Playing back the tape: Early days in the field. In W. Shaffir, & R. Stebbins (Eds.), Experiencing fieldwork: An inside view of qualitative research (pp. 31–42). London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Walton, M. (2013). The “Wages of Burman-ness:” Ethnicity and Burman privilege in contemporary Myanmar. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 43(1), 1–27. doi: 10.1080/00472336.2012.730892
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, M. (1947). The theory of economic and social organization. Part I of Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, (Henderson AR and Parsons, Translated from German by). London: TW Hodge.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M. (1980). Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft: Grundriss der verstehenden Soziologie. Tübingen: Mohr.
   Google Scholar
• Wickham-Crowley, T. (1987). The rise (and sometimes fall) of guerrilla governments in Latin America’. Sociological Forum, 2(3), 473–99. doi: 10.1007/BF01106622
   Google Scholar
• Wood, E. (2003). Insurgent collective action and civil war in El Salvador. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Woods, K. (2011). Ceasefire capitalism: Military–private partnerships, resource concessions and military–state building in the Burma–China borderlands. Journal of Peasant Studies, 38(4), 747–770. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2011.607699
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan Naing. (2013, October 18). Who’s behind the bombings in Burma?. The Irrawaddy. Retrieved January 12, 2017, from http://www.irrawaddy.org/news-analysis/whos-behind-bombings-burma.html
   Google Scholar
• Yan Naing. (2014, June 6). The growing friendship between Naypyidaw and the KNU, The Irrawaddy. Retrieved January 12, 2017, from http://www.irrawaddy.org/multimedia-burma/growing-friendship-naypyidaw-knu.html
   Google Scholar
• Zelditch, M. (2001). Theories of legitimacy. In J. Jost, & B. Major (Eds.), The psychology of legitimacy: Emerging perspectives on ideology, justice, and intergroup relations (pp. 33–53). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar