Facilitating transfers: regulatory governance frameworks as ‘rites of passage’

References

• Adler-Nissen, R. (2015). Towards a practice turn in EU studies: The everyday of European integration. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 54(1), 87–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amstutz, M. (2005). In-between worlds: Marleasing and the emergence of interlegality in legal reasoning. European Law Journal, 11(6), 766–784. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0386.2005.00286.x
   Google Scholar
• Amstutz, M. (2009). Métissage. Zur Rechtsform in der Weltgesellschaft. In A. Fischer-Lescano, F. Rödl, & C. U. Schmid (Eds.), Europäische Gesellschaftsverfassung. Zur Konstitutionalisierung sozialer Demokratie in Europa (pp. 333–351). Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Amstutz, M., & Karavas, V. (2009). Weltrecht: Ein Derridasches Monster. In G.-P. Calliess, A. Fischer-Lescano, D. Wielsch, & P. Zumbansen (Eds.), Soziologische Jurisprudenz. Festschrift für Gunther Teubner zum 65. Geburtstag (pp. 645–672). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Baars, G. (2016). The role of Law in global value chains: A research manifesto. London Review of International Law, 4(1), 127–163. doi: 10.1093/lril/lrw008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Backer, L. C. (2007). Economic globalization and the rise of efficient systems of global private lawmaking: Wal-mart as global legislator. University of Connecticut Law Review, 39(4), 1739–1784.
   Google Scholar
• Beckert, S. (2014). Empire of cotton: A global history. New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf.
   Google Scholar
• Brunkhorst, H. (2010). Constitutionalism and democracy in the world society. In P. Dobner, & M. Loughlin (Eds.), The twilight of constitutionalism? (pp. 179–198). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brunkhorst, H. (2014). Critical theory of legal revolutions: Evolutionary perspectives. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Calliess, G.-P., & Zumbansen, P. (2010). Rough consensus and running code: A theory of transnational private Law. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Durkheim, É. ([1893] 2011). De la Division du Travail Social étude su Ĺorganisation des Sociétés supérieures. Charleston, SC: Bibliolife.
   Google Scholar
• Easton, D. (1965). A systems analysis of political life. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer-Lescano, A., & Teubner, G. (2004). Regime-collisions: ‘The vain search for legal unity in the fragmentation of global law’. Michigan Journal of International Law, 25(4), 999–1046.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (1987). Geschichtsbewußtsein und posttraditionale Identität. Die Westorientierung der Bundesrepublik. In J. Habermas, Eine Art Schadensabwicklung. Kleine politische Schriften IV (pp. 159–179). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (1992). Faktizität und Geltung. Beiträge zur Diskurstheorie des Rechts und des demokratischen Rechtsstaats. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Haliday, T., & Shaffer, G. (Ed.). (2015). Transnational legal orders. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harlow, C. (2006). Global administrative law: The quest for principles and values. European Journal of International Law, 17(1), 187–214. doi: 10.1093/ejil/chi158
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herborth, B., & Kessler, O. (2016). Society. In F. Berenskoetter (Ed.), Concepts in world politics (pp. 142–156). London: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Joerges, C., & Neyer, J. (1997). From intergovernmental bargaining to deliberative political processes: The constitutionalisation of comitology. European Law Journal, 3(3), 273–299. doi: 10.1111/1468-0386.00031
   Google Scholar
• Kjaer, P. F. (2006, September). Systems in Context: On the Outcome of the Habermas/Luhmann-debate. Ancilla Iuris, pp. 66–77.
   Google Scholar
• Kjaer, P. F. (2009). Post-Hegelian networks: Comments on the chapter by Simon Deakin. In M. Amstutz, & G. Teunber (Eds.), Networks: Legal issues of multilateral cooperation (pp. 75–85). Oxford: Hart Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Kjaer, P. F. (2010). Between governing and governance: On the emergence, function and form of Europe’s post-national constellation. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Kjaer, P. F. (2014). Constitutionalism in the global realm – A sociological approach. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kjaer, P. F. (2015a). Context construction through competition: The prerogative of public power, intermediary institutions and the expansion of statehood through competition. Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory, 16(2), 146–166. doi: 10.1080/1600910X.2015.1066692
   Google Scholar
• Kjaer, P. F. (2015b). The function of justification in transnational governance. WZB Berlin Social Science Center Discussion Papers, SP IV 2015-808.
   Google Scholar
• Koskenniemi, M. (2009). Legal fragmentation(s) – An essay on fluidity and form. In G.-P. Calliess, A. Fischer-Lescano, D. Wielsch, & P. Zumbansen (Eds.), Soziologische Jurisrudenz. Festschrift für Gunther Teubner zum 65. Geburtstag (pp. 795–810). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. (1971). Sinn als Grundbegriff der Soziologie. In J. Habermas, & N. Luhmann (Eds.), Theorie der Gesellschaft oder Sozialtechnologie. Was leistet die Systemforschung? (pp. 25–100). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. (1996). Quod Omnes Tangit: Remarks on Jürgen Habermas’ legal theory. Cardozo Law Review, 17(5), 883–899.
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. (1997). Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. ([1975] 2009). Die Weltgesellschaft. In N. Luhmann (Ed.), Soziologische Aufklärung 2. Aufsätze zur Theorie der Gesellschaft (pp. 51–71). Opladen: Westdeutsche Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. W., Boli, J., Thomas, G. M., & Ramirez, F. O. (1997). World society and the nation-state. American Journal of Sociology, 103(1), 144–181. doi: 10.1086/231174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neumann, F. L. ([1933] 1996). The decay of German democracy. In W. Scheuerman (Ed.), The rule of law under siege. Selected essays of Franz L. Neumann and Otto Kirchheimer (pp. 29–43). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Osterhammel, J. (2014). The transformation of the world: A global history of the nineteenth century. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, T. (1971). The system of modern societies. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Ponte, S., & Sturgeon, T. (2014). Explaining governance in global value chains: A modular theory-building effort. Review of International Political Economy, 21(1), 195–223. doi: 10.1080/09692290.2013.809596
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt, C. (1950). Der Nomos der Erde. Im Völkerrecht des Jus Publicum Europaeum. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.
   Google Scholar
• SewellJr.W. (2005). Social theory and social transformation. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Slaughter, A.-M. (2004). A new world order. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stichweh, R. (1998). Globalisierung der Wissenschaft und die Rolle der Universität. In P. Rusterholz, & A. Liechti (Eds.), Universität am Scheideweg. Herausforderungen - Probleme – Strategien, (pp. 63–74). Zürich: VDF.
   Google Scholar
• Stichweh, R. (2000). Die Weltgesellschaft: Soziologische Analysen. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Stichweh, R. (2005). Transfer in Sozialsystemen: Theoretische Überlegungen. Paper 12. Retrieved from http://www.unilu.ch/deu/prof._dr._rudolf_stichwehpublikationen_38043.html.
   Google Scholar
• Stichweh, R. (2008). Das Konzept der Weltgesellschaft: Genese und Strukturbildung eines globalen Gesellschaftssystems. Rechtstheorie, 39(2-3), 329–55. doi: 10.3790/rth.39.2-3.329
   Google Scholar
• Supiot, A. (2009). The territorial inscription of laws. In G.-P. Calliess, A. Fischer-Lescano, D. Wielsch, & P. Zumbansen (Eds.), Soziologische Jurisrudenz. Festschrift für Gunther Teubner zum 65. Geburtstag (pp. 375–93). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Teubner, G. (1997). Global Bukowina. Legal pluralism in the world society. In G. Teubner (Ed.), Global Law without a State (pp. 3–28). Aldershot-Dartmouth: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Teubner, G. (2012). Constitutional fragments. Societal constitutionalism and globalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thornhill, C. (2015). The crisis of corporatism and the rise of international law. In E. Hartmann, & P. F. Kjaer (Eds.), The evolution of intermediary institutions in Europe: From corporatism to governance (pp. 217–239). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Thornhill, C. (2016a). A sociology of transnational constitutions: The social foundations of the post-national legal structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thornhill, C. (2016b). The constititutionalization of labour law and the crisis of national democracy. In P. K. Kjaer, & N. Olsen (Eds.), Critical theories of crises in Europe: From Weimar to the Euro (pp. 89–105). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Tönnies, F. ([1887] 2005). Gemeinschaft und Gesellschaft. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
   Google Scholar
• van Gennep, A. ([1909] 1960). The rites of passage. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Viola, L. A. (2013). Stratificatory differentiation as a constitutive principle of the international system. In M. Albert, B. Buzan, & M. Zürn (Eds.), Bringing sociology to international relations. World politics as differentiation theory (pp. 112–131). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, N. (2008). Beyond boundary disputes and basic grids: Mapping the global disorder of normative orders. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 6(3-4), 373–396. doi: 10.1093/icon/mon016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, E. (1976). Peasants into Frenchmen: The modernization of rural France, 1870–1914. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weiler, J. H. H. (1999). Epilogue: ‘comitology’ as revolution – infranationalism, constitutionalism and democracy. In C. Joerges, & E. Vos (Eds.), EU committees: Social regulation, law and politics (pp. 337–350). Oxford: Hart Publishing.
   Google Scholar