The duality of shared responsibility

References

• Abbott, K. W. (2014). Orchestration: Global governance through intermediaries. In K. W. Abbott (Ed.), International organizations as orchestrators (pp. 3–36). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Agreement for the Implementation of the Provisions of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea of 10 December 1982 Relating to the Conservation and Management of Straddling Fish Stocks and Highly Migratory Fish Stocks. (1995, September). UN conference on straddling fish stocks and highly migratory fish stocks (UN Headquarters, New York, 24 July–4 August 1995) (UN Doc A/CONF. 164/37). Retrieved from http://www.un.org/depts/los/convention_agreements/convention_20years/1995FishStockAgreement_ATahindro.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Alford, R. P. (2011). Apportioning responsibility among joint tortfeasors for international law violations. Pepperdine Law Review, 38, 233. Retrieved from http://opiniojuris.org/2010/09/01/apportioning-responsibility-among-joint-tortfeasors-for-international-law-violations/
   Google Scholar
• Allum, F., & Gilmour, S. (2012). Introduction. In F. Allum & S. Gilmour (Eds.), Routledge handbook of transnational organized crime (pp. 1–15). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Amnéus, D. (2008). Responsibility to protect by military means—emerging norms on humanitarian intervention? (Doctoral dissertation). Stockholm University.
   Google Scholar
• Application of the convention on prevention and punishment of crime of genocide (Bosnia and Herzegovina v Serbia & Montenegro) (Judgment), ICJ Rep. 43. (ICJ, 2007).
   Google Scholar
• Arrow, K. J. (1994). Methodological individualism and social knowledge. The American Economic Review, 84(2), 1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnett, M., & Duvall, R. (2005). Power in global governance. In M. Barnett & R. Duvall (Eds.), Power in global governance (pp. 1–32). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Behrami v. France (Admissibility decision), App. Nos. 71412/01 & 78166/01 (ECtHR, 2007).
   Google Scholar
• Boisson de Chazournes, L. (2013). United in joy and sorrow: Some considerations on responsibility issues under partnerships among international financial institutions. In M. Ragazzi (Ed.), Responsibility of international organization: Essays in memory of Sir Ian Brownlie (pp. 211–224). Leiden: Brill | Martinus Nijhoff.
   Google Scholar
• Bovens, M. (1998). The quest for responsibility: Accountability and citizenship in complex organizations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bovens, M. (2007). Analysing and assessing accountability: A conceptual framework. European Law Journal, 13(4), 447–468. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00378.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brownlie, I. (1998). The rule of law in international affairs. Leiden: Brill | Martinus Nijhoff.
   Google Scholar
• Brunnée, J. (2005). International legal accountability through the lens of the law of state responsibility. Netherlands Yearbook of International Law, 36(1), 21–56. doi: 10.1017/S0167676805000218
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, A., & Keohane, R. O. (2009). The legitimacy of global governance institutions. Ethics and International Affairs: A Reader, 20(4), 155–183.
   Google Scholar
• Cane, P. (2001). Responsibility and fault: A relational and functional approach to responsibility. In P. Cane & J. Gardner (Eds.), Relating to responsibility (pp. 81–110). Oxford: Hart.
   Google Scholar
• Certain phosphate lands in Nauru (Nauru v. Australia) (Preliminary objections, judgment) ICJ Rep. 240. (ICJ, 1992).
   Google Scholar
• Chesterman, S., & Fisher, A. (2009). Private security, public order: The outsourcing of public services and its limits. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, L. C. (2011). Responsibility of international organizations under international law for the acts of global health public-private partnerships. Chicago Journal of International Law, 12(1), 55–84.
   Google Scholar
• Commentary to the articles on the responsibility of states for internationally wrongful Acts (2001). ILC Yearbook II(2) (ARSIWA Commentary).
   Google Scholar
• Condorelli, L. (1995). Le statut des forces de l’ONU et le droit international humanitaire. Rivista di diritto internazionale, 78(4), 881–906.
   Google Scholar
• Condorelli, L. (1997). Le statut des forces des Nations Unies et le droit international humanitaire. In C. Emmanuelli (Ed.), Les casques bleus: policiers ou combatants? (pp. 87–113). Montréal: Wilson & Lafleur Itéé.
   Google Scholar
• Corfu channel case (United Kingdom v. Albania) (Judgment) ICJ Rep. 244. (ICJ, 1949).
   Google Scholar
• Council of Europe. (2007). Secret detentions and illegal transfers of detainees involving council of Europe member states: Second report. Explanatory memorandum, by Mr. Dick Marty (Doc. 11302 rev., AS/Jur (2007) 36). Retrieved from http://assembly.coe.int/CommitteeDocs/2007/EMarty_20070608_NoEmbargo.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, J. (2000). Third report on state responsibility, ILC Yearbook II(1), 19.
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, J. (2002). The international law commission’s articles on state responsibility, introduction, text and commentaries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, J., & Watkins, J. (2010). International responsibility. In S. Besson & J. Tasioulas (Eds.), The philosophy of international law (pp. 283–298). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Curtin, D., & Nollkaemper, A. (2005). Conceptualizing accountability in international and European law. Netherlands Yearbook of International Law, 36(1), 3–20. doi: 10.1017/S0167676805000036
   Google Scholar
• Dannenbaum, T. (2010). Translating the standard of effective control into a system of effective accountability: How liability should be apportioned for violations of human rights by member state troop contingents serving as United Nations peacekeepers. Harvard International Law Journal, 51(1), 113–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Argent, P. (2014). Reparation, cessation, assurances and guarantees of non-repetition. In P. A. Nollkaemper & I. Plakokefalos (Eds.), Principles of shared responsibility in international law: An appraisal of the state of the art (pp. 208–250). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dupuy, P. M. (1999). Reviewing the difficulties of codification: On ago’s classification of obligations of means and obligations of result in relation to state responsibility. European Journal of International Law, 10(2), 371–385. doi: 10.1093/ejil/10.2.371
   Google Scholar
• East Timor (Portugal v. Australia) (Judgment) (dissenting opinion of Judge Weeramantry), ICJ Rep. 90. (ICJ, 1995).
   Google Scholar
• Economides, C. (2010). Content of the obligation: Obligations of means and obligations of result. In J. Crawford, A. Pellet, & S. Olleson (Eds.), The law of international responsibility (pp. 371–382). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• El-Masri v. the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (Judgment), App. No 39630/09, (ECtHR, 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Erskine, T. T. (2008). Locating responsibility: The problem of moral agency in international relations. In C. Reus-Smit & D. Snidal (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of international relations (pp. 699–707). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Erskine, T. T. (2015). “Coalitions of the willing” and the shared responsibility to protect. In A. Nollkaemper & D. Jacobs (Eds.), Distribution of responsibilities in international law (pp. 277–264). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eurotunnel Arbitration (The Channel Tunnel Group Ltd & France-Manche S.A. v. United Kingdom & France) (Partial Award), (Permanent Court of Arbitration, 2007).
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, W. (1969). General course in public international law. Recueil des Cours de l’Académie de Droit International, 47, 38–246.
   Google Scholar
• Fry, J. (2014). Attribution of responsibility. In P. A. Nollkaemper & I. Plakokefalos (Eds.), Principles of shared responsibility in international law: An appraisal of the state of the art (pp. 98–133). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, J. (2003). The mark of responsibility. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 23(2), 157–171. doi: 10.1093/ojls/23.2.157
   Google Scholar
• Guzman, A. T. (2006). Reputation and international law. Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law, 34(2), 379–392.
   Google Scholar
• Hakimi, M. (2010). State bystander responsibility. European Journal of International Law, 21(2), 341–385. doi: 10.1093/ejil/chq037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammarberg, T. (2011, September 1). Statement in rights chief: Europe “complicit” in U.S. torture. CBS News. Retrieved from http://www.cbsnews.com/news/rights-chief-europe-complicit-in-us-torture/
   Google Scholar
• Hardin, R. (1971). Collective action as an agreeable “n” – prisoners’ dilemma. Behavioural Science: Journal of the Society for General Systems Research, 16(5), 472–481. doi: 10.1002/bs.3830160507
   Google Scholar
• Harlow, C. (2011). Accountability as a value in global governance and for global administrative law. In G. Anthony (Ed.), Values in global administrative law (pp. 167–185). Oxford: Hart.
   Google Scholar
• HN v. Netherlands (Ministry of Defence and Ministry of Foreign Affairs) (Judgment in First instance), ILDC 1092 (NL 2008) (District Court of The Hague, 2008).
   Google Scholar
• Honoré, T. (1999). Responsibility and fault. Oxford: Hart.
   Google Scholar
• Hood, C. (2002). The risk game and the blame game. Government and Opposition, 37(1), 15–37. doi: 10.1111/1477-7053.00085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood, C. (2011). The blame game: Spin, bureaucracy and self-preservation in government. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hufnagel, S. (2013). Policing cooperation qcross borders: Comparative perspectives on law enforcement within the EU and Australia. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hussein v. Albania (Judgment), App. No 23276/04 (ECtHR, 2006).
   Google Scholar
• International Law Commission. (1978). ILC Yearbook II(2).
   Google Scholar
• International Law Commission. (2001). Draft articles on responsibility of states for internationally wrongful acts, with commentaries (ILC Yearbook, II(2)).
   Google Scholar
• International Law Commission. (2011). Draft articles on the responsibility of international organizations, with commentaries (ILC Yearbook, II(2)).
   Google Scholar
• Jinks, D. (2004). How to influence states: Socialization and international human rights law. Duke Law Journal, 54(3), 621–703.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legality of the Use of Force (Serbia and Montenegro v. Belgium) (Judgment), ICJ Rep. 279. (ICJ, 2004).
   Google Scholar
• Legality of the Use of Force (Serbia and Montenegro v. United Kingdom) (Provisional Measures), ICJ Rep. 826. (ICJ, 1999).
   Google Scholar
• Linklater, A. (2011). The problem of harm in world politics: Theoretical investigations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lucas, J. R. (1995). Responsibility. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lukes, S. (1968). Methodological individualism reconsidered. The British Journal of Sociology, 19(2), 119–129. doi: 10.2307/588689
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, M. (2008). The governance of transnational environmental harm: Addressing new modes of accountability/responsibility. Global Environmental Politics, 8(3), 8–24. doi: 10.1162/glep.2008.8.3.8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May, L. (1987). The morality of groups. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
   Google Scholar
• May, L. (1996). Sharing responsibility. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Military and paramilitary activities in and against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v. United States) (Judgment), ICJ Rep. 14. (ICJ 1986).
   Google Scholar
• Miller, D. (2007). National responsibility and global justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, S. (2015). The global financial crisis and collective moral responsibility. In A. Nollkaemper & D. Jacobs (Eds.), Distribution of responsibilities in international law (pp. 404–433). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mishkin, F. S. (2011). Over the cliff: From the subprime to the global financial crisis. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 25(1), 49–70. doi: 10.1257/jep.25.1.49
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.S.S. v. Belgium and Greece (Judgment), App. No. 30696/09 (ECtHR, 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Naftali, O. B. (2009). The obligation to prevent and to punish genocide. In P. Gaeta (Ed.), The genocide convention: A commentary (pp. 27–57). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nissenbaum, H. (1996). Accountability in a computerized society. Science and Engineering Ethics, 2, 25–42. doi: 10.1007/BF02639315
   Google Scholar
• Nollkaemper, A. (2008). Multilevel accountability in international law: A case study of the aftermath of Srebrenica. In T. Broude & Y. Shany (Eds.), The shifting allocation of authority in international law: Considering sovereignty, supremacy and subsidiarity (pp. 345–368). Oxford: Hart.
   Google Scholar
• Nollkaemper, A. (2011). Dual attribution: Liability of the Netherlands for conduct of Dutchbat in Srebrenica. Journal of International Criminal Justice, 9(5), 1143–1157. doi: 10.1093/jicj/mqr048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nollkaemper, A., & Jacobs, D. (2013). Shared responsibility in international law: A conceptual framework. Michigan Journal of International Law, 34(2), 359–438.
   Google Scholar
• Nollkaemper, A., & Plakokefalos, I. (Eds.). (2016). The practice of shared responsibility in international law: An appraisal of the state of the art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Noyes, J. E., & Smith, B. D. (1988). State responsibility and the principle of joint and several liability. Yale Journal of International Law, 13, 225. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/yjil/vol13/iss2/2/
   Google Scholar
• Nuhanović v. Netherlands (Appeals Judgment), LJN BR 0133 (The Hague Court of Appeal, 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Olson, M. (1968). The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Open Society Justice Initiative. (2013). Globalizing torture: CIA secret detention and extraordinary rendition. Retrieved from http://www.opensocietyfoundations.org/sites/default/files/globalizing-torture-20120205.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Petersmann, E. U. (2011). International economic law, ‘public reason’, and multilevel governance of interdependent public goods. Journal of International Economic Law, 14(1), 23–76. doi: 10.1093/jiel/jgr005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Posner, E. A., & Sykes, A. O. (2013). The economic foundations of international law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Principles of European Tort Law. Retrieved from http://www.egtl.org
   Google Scholar
• Request for an advisory opinion submitted by the sub-regional fisheries commission (SRFC) Case No. 21 (Request to render an advisory opinion), ITLOS Rep. 2013, 2. (International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (ITLOS), 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Responsibilities and obligations of states sponsoring persons and entities with respect to activities in the area, Case No. 17, Advisory opinion of February 1, 2011, 11 ITLOS Rep. 10. Retrieved from http://www.itlos.org/fileadmin/itlos/documents/cases/case_no_17/adv_op_010211.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sari, A. (2008). Jurisdiction and international responsibility in peace support operations: The Behrami and Saramati cases. Human Rights Law Review, 8(1), 151–170. doi: 10.1093/hrlr/ngm046
   Google Scholar
• Sarooshi, D. (2004). Conferrals by states of powers on international organizations: The case of agency. The British Year Book of International Law, 74, 291–332. doi: 10.1093/bybil/74.1.291
   Google Scholar
• Seiberth, C. (2013). Private military and security companies in international law. Mortsel: Intersentia.
   Google Scholar
• Shue, H. (1988). Mediating duties. Ethics, 98, 687–704. doi: 10.1086/292999
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern, B. (2005). A plea for “reconstruction” of international responsibility based on the notion of legal injury. In M. Ragazzi (Ed.), International responsibility today: Essays in memory of Oscar Schachter (pp. 93–107). Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff.
   Google Scholar
• Stöckle, P. (2013). Victims caught between a rock and a hard place: Individual compensation claims against troop-contributing states. Journal of International Peace and Organization, 88(3–4), 119–141.
   Google Scholar
• Talmon, S. (2008). A plurality of responsible actors: International responsibility for acts of the coalition provisional authority in Iraq. In P. Shiner & A. Williams (Eds.), The Iraq war and international law the Iraq war and international law (pp. 185–230). Oxford: Hart.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, D. F. (1980). The moral responsibility of public officials: The problem of many hands. American Political Science Review, 74(4), 905–916. doi: 10.2307/1954312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, D. F. (2014). Responsibility for failures of government: The problem of many hands. The American Review of Public Administration, 44(3), 259–273. doi: 10.1177/0275074014524013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tondini, M. (2010). The “Italian job”: How to make international organizations compliant with human rights and accountable for their violation by targeting member states. In J. Wouters, E. Brems, S. Smis, & S. Schmitt (Eds.), Accountability for human rights violations of international organizations (pp. 169–212). Antwerp: Intersentia.
   Google Scholar
• Tsagourias, N. (2011). The responsibility of international organisations for military missions. In M. Odello & R. Piotrowisz (Eds.), International military missions and international law (pp. 245–265). Leiden: Brill | Martinus Nijhoff.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (signed 10 December 1982, entered into force 16 November 1994) 1833 U.N.T.S. 397.
   Google Scholar
• Van de Poel, I., Fahlquist, J. N., Doorn, N., Zwart, S., & Royakkers, L. (2012). The problem of many hands: Climate change as an example. Science and Engineering Ethics, 18(1), 49–67. doi: 10.1007/s11948-011-9276-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Wilt, H. (2005). Joint criminal enterprise: Possibilities and limitations. Journal of International Criminal Justice, 5, 91–108. doi: 10.1093/jicj/mql043
   Google Scholar
• Vetlesen, A. J. (2000). Genocide: A case for the responsibility of the bystander. Journal of Peace Research, 37(4), 519–532. doi: 10.1177/0022343300037004007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallach, M. A., Kogan, N., & Bem, D. J. (1964). Diffusion of responsibility and level of risk taking in groups. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 68(3), 263–274. doi: 10.1037/h0042190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watkins, J. W. N. (1952). The principle of methodological individualism. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, III(10), 186–189. doi: 10.1093/bjps/III.10.186
   Google Scholar
• Wittich, S. (2009). Joint tortfeasors in investment law. In C. Binder, U. Kriebaum, A. Reinisch, & S. Wittich (Eds.), International investment law for the 21st century. Essays in honour of Christoph Schreuer (pp. 708–723). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zaring, D. (2004). Informal procedure, hard and soft, in international administration. Chicago Journal of International Law, 5, 547–603.
   Google Scholar
• Zwanenburg, M. C. (2005). Accountability of peace support operations. Leiden: Brill | Martinus Nijhoff.
   Google Scholar