Democratic innovations in Central and Eastern Europe: expanding the research agenda

References

• Adler, R. P., & Goggin, J. (2005). What do we mean by ‘civic engagement’? Journal of Transformative Education, 3(3), 236–253. doi: 10.1177/1541344605276792
   Google Scholar
• Altman, D. (2011). Direct democracy worldwide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Amnå, E., & Ekman, J. (2013). Standby citizens: Diverse faces of political passivity. European Political Science Review, 6(2), 261–281. doi: 10.1017/S175577391300009X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett, M., & Zani, B. (Eds.). (2015). Political and civic engagement: Multidisciplinary perspectives. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Berger, B. (2009). Political theory, political science and the end of civic engagement. Perspectives on Politics, 7(2), 335–350. doi: 10.1017/S153759270909080X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernhagen, P., & Marsh, M. (2007). Voting and protesting: Explaining citizen participation in old and new European democracies. Democratization, 14(1), 44–72. doi: 10.1080/13510340601024298
   Google Scholar
• Buss, T. F., Redburn, S., & Guo, K. (Eds.). (2016). Modernizing democracy: Innovations in citizen participation. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, D., & Ranney, A. (Eds.). (1994). Referendums around the world: The growing use of direct democracy. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Dalton, R. J. (2008). Citizen politics. Public opinion and political parties in advanced industrial democracies (5th ed.). Washington, DC: CQ Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ekman, J., & Amnå, E. (2012). Political participation and civic engagement: Towards a new typology? Human Affairs, 22(3), 283–300. doi: 10.2478/s13374-012-0024-1
   Google Scholar
• Ekman, J., Gherghina, S., & Podolian, O. (2016). Challenges and realities of political participation and civic engagement in central and eastern Europe. East European Politics, 32(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/21599165.2016.1141091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elstub, S., & McLaverty, P. (Eds.). (2014). Deliberative democracy. Issues and Cases. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Folscher, A. (2007). Participatory budgeting in Central and Eastern Europe. In A. Shah (Ed.), Participatory budgeting (pp. 127–155). Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Geissel, B., & Gherghina, S. (2016). Constitutional deliberative democracy and democratic innovations. In M. Reuchamps & J. Suiter (Eds.), Constitutional deliberative democracy in Europe (pp. 75–92). Colchester: ECPR Press.
   Google Scholar
• Geissel, B., & Hess, P. (2017). Explaining political efficacy in deliberative procedures: A novel methodological approach. Journal of Public Deliberation, 13(2), 1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Geissel, B., & Joas, M. (Eds.). (2013). Participatory democratic innovations in Europe. Improving the quality of democracy? Opladen: Barbara Budrich.
   Google Scholar
• Geissel, B., & Newton, K. (Eds.). (2012). Evaluating democratic innovations: Curing the democratic malaise? London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gherghina, S. (2017a). Direct democracy and subjective regime legitimacy in Europe. Democratization, 24(4), 613–631. doi: 10.1080/13510347.2016.1196355
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gherghina, S. (2017b). The use of referendum in Central and Eastern Europe after EU accession. In T. Hashimoto & M. Rhimes (Eds.), Reviewing European Union accession. Unexpected results, spillover effects, and externalities (pp. 41–56). Leiden: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Gherghina, S., & Groh, A. (2016). A poor sales pitch? The European citizens’ initiative and attitudes toward the EU in Germany and the UK. European Politics and Society, 17(3), 373–387. doi: 10.1080/23745118.2016.1166875
   Google Scholar
• Gherghina, S., & Miscoiu, S. (2013). The failure of cohabitation: Explaining the 2007 and 2012 institutional crises in Romania. East European Politics & Societies, 27(4), 668–684. doi: 10.1177/0888325413485621
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gherghina, S., & Miscoiu, S. (2016). Crowd-sourced legislation and politics: The legitimacy of constitutional deliberation in Romania. Problems of Post-Communism, 63(1), 27–36. doi: 10.1080/10758216.2015.1057092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gronlund, K., Bachtiger, A., & Setala, M. (2014). Deliberative mini-publics. Involving citizens in the democratic process. Colchester: ECPR Press.
   Google Scholar
• Herman, L. E. (2006). Re-evaluating the post-communist success story: Party elite loyalty, citizen mobilization and the erosion of Hungarian democracy. European Political Science Review, 8(2), 251–284. doi: 10.1017/S1755773914000472
   Google Scholar
• Hooghe, M., & Quintelier, E. (2013). Political participation in European countries: The effect of authoritarian rule, corruption, lack of good governance and economic downturn. Comparative European Politics, 12(2), 209–232. doi: 10.1057/cep.2013.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, M. M. (2003). The weakness of civil society in post-communist Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobsson, K. (Ed.). (2015). Urban grassroots movements in Central and Eastern Europe. Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Jonsson, M. E. (2015). Democratic innovations in deliberative systems – the case of the Estonian citizens’ assembly process. Journal of Public Deliberation, 11(1), 1–29.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufmann, B., & Waters, D. (Eds.). (2004). Direct democracy in Europe: A comprehensive reference guide to the initiative and referendum process in Europe. Durham: Carolina Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Knobloch, K. R., & Gastil, J. (2014). Civic (re)socialisation: The educative effects of deliberative participation. Politics, 35(2), 183–200. doi: 10.1111/1467-9256.12069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kostelka, F. (2014). The state of political participation in post-communist democracies: Low but surprisingly little biased citizen engagement. Europe-Asia Studies, 66(6), 945–968. doi: 10.1080/09668136.2014.905386
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kriesi, H. (2005). Direct democratic choice. The Swiss experience. Plymouth: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• LeDuc, L. (2003). The politics of direct democracy: Referendums in global perspective. Toronto: Broadview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marchenko, A. (2016). Civic activities in Eastern Europe: Links with democratic political culture. East European Politics, 32(1), 12–25. doi: 10.1080/21599165.2015.1130698
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris, P. (Ed.). (1999). Critical citizens: Global support for democratic government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, P. (2011). Democratic deficit: Critical citizens revisited. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Qvortrup, M. (2014). Referendums around the world. The continued growth of direct democracy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Ruth, S. P., Welp, Y., & Whitehead, L. (Eds.). (2016). Let the people rule? Direct democracy in the twenty-first century. Colchester: ECPR Press.
   Google Scholar
• Setala, M., & Schiller, T. (Eds.). (2009). Referendums and representative democracy. Responsiveness, accountability and deliberation. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Silagadze, N., & Gherghina, S. (2018). When who and how matter: explaining the success of referendums in Europe. Comparative European Politics, 16(5), 905–922.
   Google Scholar
• Sintomer, Y., Traub-Merz, R., & Zhang, J. (Eds.). (2012). Participatory budgeting in Asia and Europe. Key challenges of participation. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Skocpol, T., & Fiorina, M. P. (Eds.). (1999). Civic engagement in American democracy. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smilov, D. (2017). Democratic innovation and the politics of fear: 25 lessons from Eastern Europe. In Governance Report 2017 (Hertie Sch, pp. 25–42). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, G. (2009). Democratic innovations. Designing institutions for citizen participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tomšič, M., & Kleindienst, P. (2017). E-participation, e-democracy and political engagement of the citizenry in Central and Eastern Europe. In B. Rončević & M. Tomšič (Eds.), Information society and its manifestations: Economy, politics, culture (pp. 117–134). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• van Deth, J. W., Montero, J. R., & Westholm, A. (Eds.). (2007). Citizenship and involvement in European democracies: A comparative analysis. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Vrablikova, K. (2013). How context matters? Mobilization, political opportunity structures, and nonelectoral political participation in old and new democracies. Comparative Political Studies, 47(2), 203–229. doi: 10.1177/0010414013488538
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walter-Rogg, M. (2008). Direkte demokratie. In O. W. Gabriel (Ed.), Die EU-Staaten im Vergleich. Strukturen, Prozesse, Politikinhalte (pp. 236–267). Wiesbaden: VS, Verl. für Sozialwissenschaft.
   Google Scholar
• Wennerhag, M., Fröhlich, C., & Piotrowski, G. (Eds.). (2018). Radical left movements in Europe. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar