Ostracism and the EU’s contradictory approach to sanctions at home and abroad

References

• Abulof, U., & Kornprobst, M. (2017). Introduction: The politics of public justification. Contemporary Politics, 23(1), 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adler-Nissen, R. (2014). Stigma management in international relations: Transgressive identities, norms and order in international society. International Organization, 68(1), 143–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldwin, D. A. (1985). Economic statecraft. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barroso, J. M. (2012, September 12). State of the Union address 2012. SPEECH-12-596.
   Google Scholar
• Barroso, J. M. (2013, September 13). State of the Union address 2013. SPEECH-13-684.
   Google Scholar
• BBC. (2016, December 15). Venezuela Mercosur: Battle of rooms at Latin American summit. Retrieved from bbc.com
   Google Scholar
• Bodalska, B. (2018, March 13). Baltic states against EU sanctions on Poland. Euractiv. Retrieved from https://www.euractiv.com
   Google Scholar
• Boltanski, L., & Thévenot, L. (2000). The reality of moral expectations: A sociology of situated judgement. Philosophical Explorations, 3(3), 208–231.
   Google Scholar
• Boogaerts, A. (2016). Beyond norms: A configurational analysis of the EU’s Arab spring sanctions. Foreign Policy Analysis, 14(3), 408–428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Börzel, T., Hofmann, T., & Panke, D. (2012). Caving in or sitting it out? Longitudinal patterns of non-compliance in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy, 19(4), 454–471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Börzel, T., & van Hüllen, V. (2015). Governance transfer by regional organizations. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Brodie, B. (1959). The anatomy of deterrence. World Politics, 11(2), 173–191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brok, E. (2000, March 15). 50th anniversary of the Geneva Convention – humanitarian law (debate). European Parliament. from Retrieved from http://www.europarl.europa.eu/plenary/en/debates-video.html
   Google Scholar
• Bundesregierung. (2017, July 24). Judicial reform in Poland. Retrieved from https://www.bundeskanzlerin.de/bkin-en/news/a-chance-for-the-rule-of-law-403282
   Google Scholar
• Case, T. I., & Williams, K. D. (2004). Ostracism: A metaphor for death. In J. Greenberg, S. L. Koole, & T. A. Pyszczynski (Eds.), Handbook of experimental existential psychology (pp. 336–351). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Closa, C., & Kochenov, D. (2016). Reinforcing Rule of Law oversight in the European Union. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Council Legal Service. (2014, May 27). Opinion of the legal service […] new EU Framework to strengthen the Rule of Law. 10296/14.
   Google Scholar
• Council of the European Union. (2002, November 12). Belarus – Draft Council conclusions. 14075/02.
   Google Scholar
• Council of the European Union. (2004, November 23). Ivory Coast – Council Conclusions, annex. 15134/04.
   Google Scholar
• Council of the European Union. (2011a, March 21). Council decision 2011/172/CFSP [Egypt].
   Google Scholar
• Council of the European Union. (2011b, April 12). Council decision 2011/235/CFSP [Iran].
   Google Scholar
• Council of the European Union. (2011c, July 6). Main aspects and basis choices of the CFSP 2010. 12562/11.
   Google Scholar
• Council of the European Union. (2011d, December 1). Syria – Council conclusions, annex. 17965/11.
   Google Scholar
• Council of the European Union. (2012a, July 23). Council conclusions on Mali/Sahel, annex. 12808/12.
   Google Scholar
• Council of the European Union. (2012b, October 15). Council decision 2012/642/CFSP [Belarus].
   Google Scholar
• Council of the European Union. (2013, May 29). Council conclusions on fundamental rights and Rule of Law […]. 10168/13.
   Google Scholar
• Council of the European Union. (2014a, February 20). 3300th Council meeting Foreign Affairs. 6767/14 PRESSE 86.
   Google Scholar
• Council of the European Union. (2014b, February 21). Relations with Ukraine - Council conclusions, annex. 6761/14.
   Google Scholar
• Council of the European Union. (2014c, March 5). Council decision 2014/119/CFSP [Ukraine].
   Google Scholar
• Council of the European Union. (2014d, March 17). Council decision 2014/145/CFSP [Ukraine].
   Google Scholar
• Council of the European Union. (2014e, May 12). Council conclusions, relations with Ukraine, annex. 9735/14.
   Google Scholar
• Council of the European Union. (2014f, December 12). ‘Ensuring respect for the Rule of Law’. Presidency. 16862/14.
   Google Scholar
• Council of the European Union. (2015a, July 20). CFSP report ‘Main aspects and basic choices of the CFSP 2014.’ 11083/15.
   Google Scholar
• Council of the European Union. (2015b, October 1). Council decision 2015/1763/CFSP [Burundi].
   Google Scholar
• Council of the European Union. (2015c, November 9). Ensuring the respect for the rule of law - dialogue and exchange of views. 13744/15.
   Google Scholar
• Council of the European Union. (2016a, May 13). Presidency non-paper for the Council (General Affairs) on 24 May 2016 - Rule of Law dialogue. 8774/16.
   Google Scholar
• Council of the European Union. (2016b, May 27). Council decision 2016/849/CFSP [Democratic People's Republic of Korea].
   Google Scholar
• Council of the European Union. (2016c, September 20). Council decision 2016/1693/CFSP [ISIL (Da'esh) and Al-Qaeda].
   Google Scholar
• Council of the European Union. (2017a, October 16). Council decision 2017/1860/CFSP [Democratic People's Republic of Korea].
   Google Scholar
• Council of the European Union. (2017b, October 16). Iran nuclear deal. PRESS RELEASE 590/17.
   Google Scholar
• Council of the European Union. (2017c, October 24). Presidency conclusions after the annual rule of law dialogue on the topic “Media pluralism and the rule of law in the digital age”. 13609/17.
   Google Scholar
• De Goede, M. (2011). Blacklisting and the ban: Contesting targeted sanctions in Europe. Security Dialogue, 42(6), 499–515.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diez, T. (2005). Constructing the self and changing others: Reconsidering 'Normative Power Europe'. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 33(3), 613–636.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doxey, M. P. (1980). Economic sanctions and international enforcement (2nd ed.). London: Macmillan for the Royal inst. of international affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Dreyer, I., Luengo-Cabrera, J., Bazoobandi, S., Biersteker, T., Connolly, R., Giumelli, F., … van Bergeijk, P. A. (2015). On target? EU sanctions as security policy tools. Paris: European Union Institute for Security Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Eriksson, M. (2011). Targeting peace: Understanding UN and EU targeted sanctions. Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Eriksson, M. (2018). Sanctions and the security policy environment from a European perspective. In A. Bakardjieva Engelbrekt, A. Michalski, N. Nilsson, & L. Oxelheim (Eds.), The European Union: Facing the challenge of multiple security threats (pp. 64–87). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2003, October 15). Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament on Article 7 of the Treaty on European Union […] COM(2003) 606 final.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2011, December 12). Human rights and democracy at the heart of EU external action […] COM(2011) 886 final.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2013, March 17). ‘EU Justice Scoreboard’. IP/13/285.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2014a, March 11). A new EU Framework to strengthen the Rule of Law. Annex 2. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/transparency/regdoc/rep/1/2014/EN/1-2014-158-EN-F1-1-ANNEX-1.Pdf
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2014b, March 19). A new EU framework to strengthen the Rule of Law. COM(2014)158/F2.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2016a, January 13). Rule of Law in Poland: Commission starts dialogue. WM/16/2030.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2016b, January 13). [R]ecent developments in Poland and the Rule of Law Framework: Questions & Answers. MEMO/16/62.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2016c, July 27). Commission recommendation of 27.7.2016 regarding the Rule of Law in Poland. C(2016) 5703 final.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2016d). Accession criteria. Last updated: 6/12/2016. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/neighbourhood-enlargement/policy/glossary/terms/accession-criteria_en
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2017a). European Union restrictive measures (sanctions) in force (updated 17.1.2017). Retrieved from https://eeas.europa.eu/sites/eeas/files/restrictive_measures-2017-01-17-clean.pdf
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2017b, January 17). Follow up to the European Parliament resolution […] EU mechanism on democracy, the rule of law and fundamental rights. SP(2017)16.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2017c). European Union restrictive measures (sanctions) in force (updated 4.8.2017). Retrieved from https://eeas.europa.eu/sites/eeas/files/restrictive_measures-2017-08-04.pdf
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2017d, December 20). Rule of Law: European Commission acts to defend judicial independence in Poland. IP/17/5367.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2018, May 2). Proposal for a regulation […] the protection of the Union's budget in case of generalised deficiencies as regards the rule of law in the Member States. COM(2018) 324 final.
   Google Scholar
• European Council. (1989, June 26–27). Presidency conclusions of the Madrid European Council: Declaration on China. Annex 2. SN 254/2/89.
   Google Scholar
• European Council. (2000, March 23–24). Presidency conclusions of the Lisbon European Council. Retrieved from http://www.europarl.europa.eu/summits/lis1_en.htm
   Google Scholar
• European Council. (2004, November 4–5). Presidency conclusions of the Brussels European Council. 14292/1/04 REV 1.
   Google Scholar
• European Council. (2010, June 17). European council conclusions, ‘Declaration on Iran’, EUCO 13/1/10 REV 1, Annex 2.
   Google Scholar
• European Council. (2014, June 26–27). European Council conclusions. EUCO 79/14.
   Google Scholar
• European Council. (2015, March 19–20). European Council meeting – conclusions. EUCO 11/15.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament. (2008). REPORT on the evaluation of EU sanctions as part of the EU’s actions and policies in the area of human rights. A6-0309/2008.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament. (2012). European Parliament resolution of 13 December 2012 on the review of the EU’s Human Rights Strategy. 2012/2062(INI).
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament. (2013). Working document on the midterm review of the Stockholm Programme. Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs. DT\935978EN.doc.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament. (2016). REPORT with recommendations to the Commission on the establishment of an EU mechanism on democracy, the rule of law and fundamental rights. A8-0283/2016.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament. (2018). European Parliament resolution on the need to establish a European Values Instrument […] (2018/2619(RSP)).
   Google Scholar
• European Union. (1997/1999). Treaty of Amsterdam amending the Treaty on European Union, the Treaties establishing the European Communities and certain related acts.
   Google Scholar
• European Union. (2001/2003). Treaty of Nice amending the Treaty on European Union, the Treaties establishing the European Communities and certain related acts.
   Google Scholar
• European Union. (2007/2009a). Consolidated version of the treaty on European Union.
   Google Scholar
• European Union. (2007/2009b). Consolidated version of the treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Garssen, B. (2001). Argument schemes. In F. van Eemeren (Ed.), Crucial concepts in argumentation theory (pp. 81–100). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giumelli, F. (2011). Coercing, constraining and signalling: Explaining and understanding UN and EU sanctions after the Cold War. Colchester: ECPR press.
   Google Scholar
• Giumelli, F., & Ivan, P. (2013). The effectiveness of EU sanctions: An analysis of Iran, Belarus, Syria and Myanmar (Burma). EPC Issue Paper N 76. Brussels: European Policy Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Grabbe, H. (2014). Six lessons of enlargement ten years on: The EU's transformative power in retrospect and prospect. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 52(1), 40–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (1996). Between facts and norms: Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hazelzet, H. (2001). Carrots or sticks? EU and US reactions to human rights violations (1989-2000) (doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://cadmus.eui.eu
   Google Scholar
• Hellquist, E. (2014). Regional organizations and sanctions against members. KFG Working Paper No 59. Freie Universität Berlin. Retrieved from http://userpage.fu-berlin.de/kfgeu/kfgwp/wpseries/WorkingPaperKFG_59.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hellquist, E. (2015). Interpreting sanctions in Africa and Southeast Asia. International Relations, 29(3), 319–333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellquist, E. (2016). Either with us or against us? Third-country alignment with EU sanctions against Russia/Ukraine. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 29(3), 997–1021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heupel, M., & Zürn, M. (2017). Protecting the individual from international authority: Human rights in international organizations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffmann, F. (1967). The functions of economic sanctions: A comparative analysis. Journal of Peace Research, 4(2), 140–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hufbauer, G. C., Schott, J. J., & Elliott, K. A. (1990). Economic sanctions reconsidered: History and current policy. Washington, DC: Peterson Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Hurd, I. (1999). Legitimacy and authority in international politics. International Organization, 53(2), 379–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, S. G. (2007). The rise of European security cooperation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Juncker, J.-C. (2014, July 15). A new start for Europe: Opening statement in the European Parliament plenary session. Speech/14/567.
   Google Scholar
• Juncker, J.-C. (2015, October 8). Menschen in Europa: Euro, Russia, Refugees – which perspective for the European Union? Speech/15-5824.
   Google Scholar
• Juncker, J.-C. (2016, July 19). Remarks by Jean-Claude Juncker. Speech/16/2589.
   Google Scholar
• Juncker, J.-C. (2017, May 11). Discours du Président Juncker au Sénat et au Parlement roumain réunis en Congrès. Speech/17-1274.
   Google Scholar
• Kamiński, M. T. (2006, October 26). Uzbekistan (debate). European Parliament. Retrieved from http://www.europarl.europa.eu/plenary/en/debates-video.html
   Google Scholar
• Karnitschnig M. (2017, May 29). Poland has a problem — with Frans Timmermans Politico. Retrieved from www.politico.eu
   Google Scholar
• Kelam, T. (2011, May 11). Written statements (Rule 149). European Parliament. Retrieved from http://www.europarl.europa.eu/plenary/en/debates-video.html
   Google Scholar
• Kelemen, D. R. (2017). Europe’s other democratic Deficit: National authoritarianism in Europe’s democratic Union. Government and Opposition, 52(2)), 211–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelemen, D. R., & Blauberger, M. (2017). Introducing the debate: European Union safeguards against member states’ democratic backsliding. Journal of European Public Policy, 24(3), 317–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kochenov, D. (2008). EU enlargement and the failure of conditionality. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International.
   Google Scholar
• Kochenov, D., Magen, A., & Pech, L. (2016). Introduction: The great Rule of Law debate in the EU. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 54(5), 1045–1049.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kochenov, D., & Pech, L. (2016). Better late than never? On the European Commission’s rule of Law framework and its first activation. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 54(5), 1062–1074.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korhola, E.-R. (2008, September 3). Evaluation of EU Sanctions […] (debate). European Parliament. Retrieved from http://www.europarl.europa.eu/plenary/en/debates-video.html
   Google Scholar
• Kornprobst, M. (2014). From political judgements to public justifications (and Vice Versa): How communities generate reasons upon which to act. European Journal of International Relations, 20(1), 192–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kovàcs, L. (2006, March 23). Belarus – the political situation after the elections (debate). European Parliament. Retrieved from http://www.europarl.europa.eu/plenary/en/debates-video.html
   Google Scholar
• Kratochwil, F. (1989). Norms, rules and decisions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Macdonald, A. (2016, January 7). EU's Juncker says sanctions on Poland over disputed laws unlikely. Reuters. Retrieved from www.reuters.com
   Google Scholar
• Manners, I. (2002). Normative power Europe: A contradiction in terms? JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 40(2), 235–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merkel, A. (2014a, March 13). Policy statement by Federal Chancellor Angela Merkel on the situation in Ukraine. German Bundestag. Berlin: Federal Government. Retrieved from https://www.bundesregierung.de/breg-en/chancellor/policy-statement-by-federal-chancellor-angela-merkel-on-the-situation-in-ukraine-443796
   Google Scholar
• Merkel, A. (2014b, 29 July). Kein Selbstzweck, Sondern Unvermeidbar. Berlin: Die Bundesregierung [Federal Government]. Retrieved from https://www.bundesregierung.de/Content/DE/Artikel/2014/07/2014-07-29-eu-sanktionen.html
   Google Scholar
• Merlingen, M., Mudde, C., & Sedelmeier, U. (2001). The right and the righteous? European norms, domestic politics and the sanctions against Austria. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 39(1), 59–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mogherini, F. (2015a, January 14). Situation in Ukraine (debate). European Parliament. Retrieved from http://www.europarl.europa.eu/plenary/en/debates-video.html
   Google Scholar
• Mogherini, F. (2015b, January 19). Issues Paper on relations with Russia. Foreign Affairs Council. Retrieved from the Financial Times https://blogs.ft.com/brusselsblog/files/2015/01/Russia.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Mogherini, F. (2015c, 22 January). Interview with CNN's Christiane Amanpour. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/commission/commissioners/2014-2019/mogherini/blog/rebutting-controversy-eu-foreign-policy-chief-says-europe-united-russia_en
   Google Scholar
• Mogherini, F. (2015d, September 9). Situation in Belarus (debate). European Parliament.
   Google Scholar
• Mogherini, F. (2015e, November 4). Speech by HR/VP Federica Mogherini at ASEF Young Leaders Summit. 151104_04.
   Google Scholar
• Mogherini, F. (2015f, December 8). Keynote speech on the EU Global Strategy at the The Hague Institute for Global Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Mogherini, F. (2016a, April 9). Speech by the High Representative/Vice-President Federica Mogherini at the National Defence University of Indonesia.160409_02.
   Google Scholar
• Mogherini, F. (2016b, May 14). HRVP's address at Regional Security Summit 2016. 160514_03.
   Google Scholar
• Mogherini, F. (2016c, October 10). Speech by Federica Mogherini at the public seminar “EU as a Global Actor”. 161010_11.
   Google Scholar
• Mogherini, F. (2016d, November 22). Implementation of the Common Security and Defence Policy (debate) European Parliament.
   Google Scholar
• Mogherini, F. (2016e, December 13). Implementation of the Common Foreign and Security Policy (Article 36 TEU) (debate) European Parliament.
   Google Scholar
• Mogherini, F. (2017a, April 14). Remarks by HR/VP Mogherini at the joint press conference with Foreign Minister of the Russian Federation Sergey Lavrov. 170424_9.
   Google Scholar
• Mogherini, F. (2017b, September 12). Speech by Federica Mogherini at the European Parliament plenary session on the situation in the Democratic People's Republic of Korea. 170912_14.
   Google Scholar
• Mogherini, F. (2018, March 13) Speech by High Representative/Vice-President Federica Mogherini at the European Parliament […] peace prospects for the Korean Peninsula. 180313_17.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, G. (2007). European political integration and the need for justification. Constellations (oxford, England), 14(3), 332–346.
   Google Scholar
• Müller, J.-W. (2013). Safeguarding democracy inside the EU: Brussels and the future of liberal order. Transatlantic Academy 2012–2013, Paper Series No. 3.
   Google Scholar
• Müller, J.-W. (2016). Protecting the rule of Law (and Democracy!) in the EU. In C. Closa & D. Kochenov (Eds.), Reinforcing Rule of Law oversight in the European Union (pp. 206–224). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• OHCHR. (2017). Special Rapporteur on the negative impact of the unilateral coercive measures on the enjoyment of human rights. Retrieved from http://www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/UCM/Pages/SRCoerciveMeasures.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Ouest France. (2017, April 27). Emmanuel Macron demande des sanctions contre la Pologne. Retrieved from https://www.ouest-france.fr
   Google Scholar
• Ouwerkerk, J. W., Kerr, N. L., Gallucci, M. & Van Lange, P. A.M. (2005). Avoiding the social death penalty: Ostracism and cooperation in social dilemmas. In K. D. Williams, J. P. Forgas, and W. von Hippel (Eds.), The social outcast: Ostracism, social exclusion, rejection, and bullying (pp. 321–322). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pech, L. (2016, 31 October). Systemic threat to the Rule of Law in Poland: What should the Commission do next? Verfassungsblog: on matters constitutional. Retrieved from http://verfassungsblog.de
   Google Scholar
• Portela, C. (2010). European Union sanctions and foreign policy: When and why do they work? London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Portela, C. (2016). Are European Union sanctions “targeted”?. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 29(3), 912-929.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rawls, J. (1993). The Law of Peoples. Critical Inquiry, 20(1), 36–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reding, V. (2013a, April 22). Safeguarding the Rule of Law and solving the ‘Copenhagen Dilemma’. SPEECH/13/348.
   Google Scholar
• Reding, V. (2013b, September 4). The EU and the Rule of Law – What next? SPEECH/13/677.
   Google Scholar
• Reding, V. (2014a, March 11). A new Rule of Law initiative. European Parliament. SPEECH/14/202.
   Google Scholar
• Reding, V. (2014b, March 18). A new EU framework to safeguard the rule of law in the European Union. SPEECH/14/228
   Google Scholar
• Rettman, A. (2017, December 20). Poland becomes first in EU history to face sanctions. EU Observer. Retrieved from https://euobserver.com
   Google Scholar
• Sadurski, W. (2009). Adding bite to a bark: The story of Article 7. E.U. Enlargement, and Jorg Haider. Columbia Journal of European Law, 16(3), 385–426.
   Google Scholar
• Scheppele, K. L. (2016a). Enforcing the basic principles of EU Law through systemic infringement actions. In C. Closa & D. Kochenov (Eds.), Reinforcing rule of law oversight in the European Union (pp. 105–132). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scheppele, K. L. (2016b, October 24). Can Poland be Sanctioned by the EU? Not Unless Hungary is Sanctioned Too. Verfassungsblog: on matters constitutional. Retrieved from http://verfassungsblog.de
   Google Scholar
• Schulz, W. F. (2015). Caught at the Keyhole: The power and limits of Shame. In H. R. Friman (Ed.), The politics of leverage in international relations: Name, shame and sanction (pp. 33–42). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Sedelmeier, U. (2014). Anchoring democracy from above? The European Union and democratic backsliding in Hungary and Romania after accession. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 52(1), 105–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sedelmeier, U. (2017). Political safeguards against democratic backsliding in the EU: The limits of material sanctions and the scope of social pressure. Journal of European Public Policy, 24(3), 337–351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sjursen, H., & Rosén, G. (2017). Arguing sanctions: On the EU’s response to the crisis in Ukraine. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 55(1), 20–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tallberg, J. (2002). Paths to compliance: Enforcement, management, and the European Union. International Organization, 56(3), 609–643.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timmermans, F. (2015a, February 12). Commission Statement: EU framework for democracy, rule of law and fundamental rights. SPEECH/15/4402.
   Google Scholar
• Timmermans, F. (2015b, May 19). Commission statement on the situation in Hungary. SPEECH/15/5010.
   Google Scholar
• Timmermans, F. (2015c, June 24). Intervention du Premier Vice-Président Timmermans, au nom de Jean-Claude Juncker, Président de la Commission européenne. SPEECH/15/5261.
   Google Scholar
• Timmermans, F. (2015d, November 13). Speech of First Vice-President Frans Timmermans at ‘Prague European Summit’ Conference. SPEECH/15/6079.
   Google Scholar
• Timmermans, F. (2016a, January 13). Readout by First Vice-President Timmermans. SPEECH/16/71.
   Google Scholar
• Timmermans, F. (2016b, January 19). Situation in Poland. SPEECH/16/114.
   Google Scholar
• Timmermans, F. (2016c, June 1). Opening Remarks – Press Conference on Rule of Law in Poland. SPEECH/16/2023.
   Google Scholar
• Timmermans, F. (2017a, March 22). EP Committee on civil liberties and rule of law in Poland: exchange of views. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/avservices/video/player.cfm?sitelang=EN&ref=I135762
   Google Scholar
• Timmermans, F. (2017b, August 31). Opening and closing remarks of First Vice-President Frans Timmermans on the Rule of Law in Poland. SPEECH-17-3042.
   Google Scholar
• Timmermans, F. (2017c, December 20). Opening remarks of First Vice-President Frans Timmermans, Rule of Law in Poland. SPEECH/17/5387.
   Google Scholar
• Timmermans, F. (2017d, December 20). Q/A Read-out of the weekly meeting of the Juncker Commission by Frans Timmermans, First Vice-President of the EC. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/avservices/video/player.cfm?ref=I148588
   Google Scholar
• Tsolova T. & Sobczak, P. (2017, August 25). ‘In stinging attack, France's Macron says Poland isolating itself in Europe’ Reuters. Retrieved from www.reuters.com
   Google Scholar
• Tusk, D. (2015, January 13). Speech to the European Parliament, EUCO 5/15 PRESSE 5.
   Google Scholar
• Tusk, D. (2016, January 18) Joint Press Conference President Tusk & President of Poland - Part 3 Q&A. [Official video recording no longer available at http://ec.europa.eu/avservices/]
   Google Scholar
• Van den Bos, B. (2002, April 24). ‘Human Rights’. European Parliament debate. Retrieved from http://www.europarl.europa.eu/plenary/en/debates-video.html
   Google Scholar
• Van Rompuy, H. (2014). [F]irst session of the European Council 20 March 2014 EUCO 67/14 PRESSE 175.
   Google Scholar
• Von Borzyskowski, I. & Portela, C. (2016). Piling on: The Rise of Sanctions Cooperation between Regional Organizations, the United States, and the EU. KFG Working Paper Series 70. Freie Universität Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M & González Pons, E. (2017). Poland: PiS government has crossed the red line of the rule of law. Retrieved from http://www.eppgroup.eu/press-release/PiS-government-has-crossed-the-red-line-of-the-rule-of-law
   Google Scholar
• Westerwelle, G., Timmermanns, F., Sövndal, V. & Tuomioja, E. (2013, March 6). Open letter to José Manuel Barroso.
   Google Scholar
• White, N., & Abass, A. (2010). Countermeasures and sanctions. In M. D. Evans (Ed.), International law (3rd ed) (pp. 531–558). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, B. A. O. (2005). In the beginning was the deed: Realism and moralism in political argument. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wodak, R., & Pelinka, A. (2002). The Haider phenomenon in Austria. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
   Google Scholar