Public-private coordination in large emerging economies: the case of Brazil, India and China

References

• Abu-el-Haj, J. (2007). From interdependence to neo-mercantilism: Brazilian capitalism in the age of globalization. Latin American Perspectives, 34(5), 92–114. doi: 10.1177/0094582X07306244
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, F., Chakrabarti, R., De, S., Qian, J., & Qian, M. (2012). Financing firms in India. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 21, 409–445. doi: 10.1016/j.jfi.2012.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amsden, A. H. (1989). Asia’s next giant: South Korea and late industrialization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, P. (2016). Crisis in Brazil. London Review of Books, 38(8), 15–22.
   Google Scholar
• Bai, C. (2015, October 6). The systemic foundation of China’s economic development [zhongguo jingji fazhan de zhidu jichu]. China Economics Education Net. Retrieved from http://chuansong.me/n/1759175
   Google Scholar
• Bazuchi, K. R. V., da Silva Zacharias, S. A., Broering, L. W., Fernanda Arreola, M., & Bandeira-de Mello, R. (2013). The role of home country political resources for Brazilian multinational companies. BAR - Brazilian Administration Review, 10(4), 415–438. doi: 10.1590/S1807-76922013000400004
   Google Scholar
• Becker, U. (2007). Open systemness, contested reference frames and change. A reformulation of the varieties of capitalism theory. Socio-Economic Review, 5(2), 261–286. doi: 10.1093/ser/mwl025
   Google Scholar
• Becker, U. (2009). Open varieties of capitalism: Continuity, change and performances. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, U. (2013). Institutional change in the BRICs, Eastern Europe, South Africa and Turkey, 1998–2008. In U. Becker (Ed.), The BRICs and emerging economies in comparative perspective: Political economy, liberalisation and institutional change (pp. 27–52). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Blattman, C. (2012). Corruption and development: Not what you think? Retrieved from https://chrisblattman.com/2012/11/05/corruption-and-development-not-what-you-think/
   Google Scholar
• Boeckh, A. (2003). Der gefesselte Gigant: Politik und Reform(un-)fähigkeit in Brasilien. In G. Kohlhepp (Ed.), Brasilien: Entwicklungsland oder tropische Grossmacht des 21. Jahrhunderts? (pp. 57–80). Tübingen: Attempo.
   Google Scholar
• Boschi, R. (2012). Brazil and the emerging actors in a comparative perspective: State capacity and the political-institutional dimension (unpublished manuscript).
   Google Scholar
• Boschi, R. (2013). Politics and trajectory in Brazilian capitalist development. In U. Becker (Ed.), The BRICs and emerging economies in comparative perspective: Political economy, liberalisation and institutional change (pp. 123–143). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boyer, R. (2005). How and why capitalisms differ ( MPIfG Discussion Paper 05 and 4). Cologne: Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
   Google Scholar
• Bremmer, I. (2010). The end of the free market: Who wins the war between states and corporations? New York: Portfolio.
   Google Scholar
• Campos, N. F., & Dimova, R. (2010). Corruption does sand the wheels of growth. Voxeu. Retrieved from http://www.voxeu.org/article/does-corruption-sand-or-grease-wheels-economic-growth?quicktabs_tabbed_recent_articles_block=0
   Google Scholar
• Chaisty, P., Cheeseman, N., & Power, T. J. (2015). The prospects for president rousseff’s coalition government in Brazil. Policy Brief, Department of Politics and International Relations. Oxford: University of Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Chibber, V. (2003). Locked in place: State-building and late industrialization in India. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Corbridge, S. (2013). Corruption in India. In A. Kohli & P. Singh (Eds.), Routledge handbook of Indian politics (pp. 220–229). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dickson, B. J. (2007). Integrating wealth and power in China: The communist party’s embrace of the private sector. The China Quarterly, 192, 827–854. doi: 10.1017/S0305741007002056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickson, B. J. (2016). The dictator’s dilemma: The Chinese communist party’s strategy for survival. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Diniz, E., & Bresser-Pereira, L. C. (2012). Industrieunternehmertum, Demokratie und politische Macht. In D. de la Fontaine & T. Stehnken (Eds.), Das politische system Brasiliens (pp. 193–208). Wiesbaden: VS.
   Google Scholar
• Drahokoupil, J., & Myant, M. (2015). Putting comparative capitalisms research in its place: Varieties of capitalism in transition economies. In M. Ebenau, I. Bruff, & C. May (Eds.), New directions in comparative capitalisms research: Critical and global perspectives (pp. 155–171). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Duckett, J. (2001). Bureaucrats in business, Chinese-style: The lessons of market reform and state entrepreneurialism in the People’s Republic of China. World Development, 29(1), 23–37. doi: 10.1016/S0305-750X(00)00083-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Economist. (2014, March 15th). Planet plutocrat. The Economist, pp. 53–54.
   Google Scholar
• The Economist. (2018, July 27th). Has BRICS lived up to expectations? The Economist. Retrieved from https://www.economist.com/free-exchange/2018/07/27/has-brics-lived-up-to-expectations
   Google Scholar
• Evans, P. (1979). Dependent development. The alliance of multinational, state, and local capital in Brazil. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, P. (1995). Embedded autonomy. States and industrial transformation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Faccio, M. (2006). Politically connected firms. American Economic Review, 96(1), 369–386. doi: 10.1257/000282806776157704
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frankel, F. (2005). India’s political economy, 1947–2004. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gaitán, F., & Boschi, R. (2015). State-business-labor relations and patterns of development in Latin America. In M. Ebenau, I. Bruff, & C. May (Eds.), New directions in comparative capitalisms research: Critical and global perspectives (pp. 172–188). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Gouldner, A. W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25(2), 161–178. doi: 10.2307/2092623
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, P., & Soskice, D. (2001). An introduction to varieties of capitalism. In P. Hall & D. Soskice (Eds.), Varieties of capitalism: The institutional foundations of comparative advantage (pp. 1–68). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heilmann, S. (2008). Policy experimentation in China’s economic rise. Studies in Comparative International Development, 43(1), 1–26. doi: 10.1007/s12116-007-9014-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Höpner, M. (2005). What connects industrial relations and corporate governance? Explaining institutional complementarity. Socio-Economic Review, 3(2), 331–358. doi: 10.1093/SER/mwi014
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, R. (2000). Democratic politics and economic reform in India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, S. (2011). Fragmented influence: Business lobbying in China in comparative perspective. In S. Kennedy (Ed.), Beyond the middle kingdom (pp. 113–135). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kochanek, S. A. (1974). Business and politics in India. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kochanek, S. A. (1987). Briefcase politics in India: The congress party and the business elite. Asian Survey, 27(12), 1278–1301. doi: 10.2307/2644635
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kochanek, S. A. (2007). Liberalization and business lobbying in India. In R. Mulherji (Ed.), India’s economic transition: The politics of reforms (pp. 412–431). New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kohli, A. (2004). State-directed development: Political power and industrialization in the global periphery. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kurlantzick, J. (2016). State capitalism: How the return of statism is transforming the world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ledeneva, A. (2008). Blat and Guanxi: Informal practices in Russia and China. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 50(1), 118–144. doi: 10.1017/S0010417508000078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, C. (2010). China’s communist party-state: The structure and dynamics of power. In W. A. Joseph (Ed.), Politics in China: An introduction (pp. 165–191). New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Matthews, C. (2014). When corruption is good for the economy. Retrieved from http://fortune.com/2014/08/07/corruption-economic-benefits/
   Google Scholar
• Mauss, M. (1966). The gift. Form and functions of exchange in archaic societies. London: Cohen & West.
   Google Scholar
• Maxfield, S., & Schneider, B. R. (Eds.). (1997). Business and the state in developing countries. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mazumdar, S. (2008a). Crony capitalism: Caricature or category? ( ISID Working Paper 2008/2). Delhi: Institute for Studies in Industrial Development.
   Google Scholar
• Mazumdar, S. (2008b). Crony capitalism and India: Before and after liberalization ( ISID Working Paper 2008/4). Delhi: Institute for Studies in Industrial Development.
   Google Scholar
• Mazumdar, S. (2013). Continuity and change in Indian capitalism. In U. Becker (Ed.), The BRICs and emerging economies in comparative perspective. Political economy, liberalisation and institutional change (pp. 79–99). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McNally, C. A., & Wright, T. (2010). Sources of social support for China’s current political order: The “thick embeddedness” of private capital holders. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 43, 189–198. doi: 10.1016/j.postcomstud.2010.03.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michailova, S., & Worm, V. (2003). Personal networking in Russia and China: Blat and Guanxi. European Management Journal, 21(4), 509–519. doi: 10.1016/S0263-2373(03)00077-X
   Google Scholar
• Naughton, B. (2007). The Chinese economy: Transitions and growth. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Naughton, B. (2015). Local debt restructuring: A case of ongoing authoritarian reform. China Leadership Monitor, 47. Retrieved from https://www.hoover.org/research/local-debt-restructuring-case-ongoing-authoritarian-reform
   Google Scholar
• Nee, V., & Su, S. (1996). Institutions, social ties, and commitment in China’s corporatist transformation. In J. McMillan & B. Naughton (Eds.), Reforming Asian socialism: The growth of market institutions (pp. 111–134). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nölke, A., ten Brink, T., May, C., & Claar, S. (2015). Domestic structures, foreign economic policies and global economic order: Implications from the rise of large emerging economies. European Journal of International Relations, 21(3), 538–567. doi: 10.1177/1354066114553682
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nölke, A., ten Brink, T., May, C., & Claar, S. (2019). State capitalism in large emerging economies. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nölke, A., & Vliegenthart, A. (2009). Enlarging the varieties of capitalism: The emergence of dependent market economies in East Central Europe. World Politics, 61(4), 670–702. doi: 10.1017/S0043887109990098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oi, J. C. (1995). The role of the local state in China’s transitional economy. The China Quarterly, 144, 1132–1149. doi: 10.1017/S0305741000004768
   Google Scholar
• Pei, M. (2016). China’s crony capitalism. The dynamics of regime decay. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, N. (2004). The southern cone model: The political economy of regional capitalist development in Latin America. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Polanyi, K. (1977). The livelihood of man. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Polanyi, K. (2001). The great transformation. The political and economic origins of our time. Boston: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rudolph, L. I., & Rudolph, S. (1987). In pursuit of Lakshmi: The political economy of the Indian state. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rudolph, L. I., & Rudolph, S. (2007). Iconization of Chandrababu: Sharing sovereignty in India’s federal market economy. In R. Mulherji (Ed.), India’s economic transition: The politics of reforms (pp. 231–264). New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schmalz, S. (2012). Die brasilianische Wirtschaftspolitik seit dem Ende der Militärdiktatur: Von der Krise der Importsubstitution zum Programa de Aceleração do Crescimento. In D. de la Fontaine & T. Stehnken (Eds.), Das politische System Brasiliens (pp. 265–280). Wiesbaden: VS.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V. (2009). Putting the political back into political economy by bringing the state back in yet again. World Politics, 61(3), 516–546. doi: 10.1017/S0043887109000173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, B. R. (2013). Hierarchical capitalism: Business, labour, and the challenge of equitable development in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1998). The grabbing hand: Government pathologies and their cures. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sinha, A. (2004). The changing political economy of federalism in India: A historical institutionalist approach. India Review, 3(1), 25–63. doi: 10.1080/14736480490443085
   Google Scholar
• Sinha, A. (2011). Business and politics. In N. G. Jayal & P. B. Mehta (Eds.), The Oxford companion to politics in India (pp. 459–476). New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Svensson, J. (2005). Eight questions about corruption. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(3), 19–42. doi: 10.1257/089533005774357860
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ten Brink, T. (2013). Paradoxes of prosperity in China’s new capitalism. Journal of Current Chinese Affairs, 42(4), 17–44. doi: 10.1177/186810261304200402
   Google Scholar
• ten Brink, T. (2019). China’s capitalism. A paradoxical route to economic prosperity. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thurbon, E. (2016). Developmental mindset: Revival of financial activism in South Korea. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wade, R. H. (1990). Governing the market: Economic theory and the role of government in East Asian industrialization. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walder, A. G. (1995). Local governments as industrial firms: An organizational analysis of China’s transitional economy. American Journal of Sociology, 101(2), 263–301. doi: 10.1086/230725
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wedeman, A. (2004). The intensification of corruption in China. The China Quarterly, 180, 895–921. doi: 10.1017/S0305741004000670
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witt, M. A., & Redding, G. (2013). Asian business systems: Institutional comparison, clusters and implications for varieties of capitalism and business systems theory. Socio-Economic Review, 11(2), 265–300. doi: 10.1093/ser/mwt002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Bank. (2018). World development indicators. Retrieved from data.worldbank.org
   Google Scholar
• Zheng, Y. (2007). De facto federalism in China: Reforms and dynamics of central-local relations. Singapore: World Scientific.
   Google Scholar
• Zheng, Y. (2010). The Chinese communist party as organizational emperor: Culture, reproduction, and transformation. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu, J. (2018). Corruption in reform China: A multidisciplinary review. In W. Wu & M. F. Frazier (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of contemporary China (pp. 302–322). London: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu, J., & Zhang, D. (2017). Does corruption hinder private businesses? Leadership stability and predictable corruption in China. Governance, 30(3), 343–363. doi: 10.1111/gove.12220
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar