Polarization and the political agenda: income inequalities in political parties’ manifestos in Poland

References

• Aronoff, M. J., & Kubik, J. (2013). Anthropology and political science. Convergent approach. New York, NY: Berghan Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bochel, H., & Defty, A. (2007a). MPs’ attitudes to welfare: A new consensus? Journal of Social Policy, 36(1), 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Bochel, H., & Defty, A. (2007b). Welfare policy under new labor: Views from inside westminster. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brady, D., & Leicht, K. T. (2008). Party to inequality: Right party power and income inequality in affluent Western democracies. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 26, 77–106.
   Google Scholar
• Buchowski, M. (2006). The specter of orientalism in Europe: From exotic other to stigmatized brother. Anthropological Quarterly, 79(79), 463–482.
   Google Scholar
• Budge, I. (1994). A new spatial theory of party competition: Uncertainty, ideology and policy equilibria viewed comparatively and temporally. British Journal of Political Science, 24(4), 443–467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budge, I., Klingemann, H.-D., Volkens, A., Bara, J., & McDonald, M. (2006). Mapping policy preferences: Estimates for parties, Electors, and governments in Eastern Europe, European Union and OECD 1990-2003. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bukowski, P., & Novokmet, F. (2017). Top incomes during wars, communism and capitalism: Poland 1892-2015. Working paper 17. London: the London School of Economics.
   Google Scholar
• Cześnik, M. (2011). Zawartość programów wyborczych polskich partii politycznych – zastosowanie metody MRG do ilościowej analizy treści. [Contents of manifestos of Polish political parties – MRG method as used for quantitative content analysis.]. In I. Słodkowska, & M. Dołbakowska (Eds.), Wybory 2007. Partie i ich programy (pp. 9–25). Warszawa: ISP PAN.
   Google Scholar
• Domański, H. (2007). Struktura społeczna [social structure]. Warszawa: Scholar.
   Google Scholar
• Dorling, D. (2010). Injustice: Why social inequality persists. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gella, A. (1989). Development of class structure in Eastern Europe. Albany, NY: New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grabowska, M. (2004). Podział postkomunistyczny. Społeczne podstawy polityki w Polsce po 1989 roku [Postcommunist divide. Social bases of politics in Poland after 1989]. Warszawa: Scholar.
   Google Scholar
• Grabowska, M., & Szawiel, T. (2001). Budowanie demokracji [building democracy]. Warszawa: PWN.
   Google Scholar
• Hardy, J. (2009). Poland’s new capitalism. London: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jasiewicz, K. (2008). The new populism in Poland: The usual suspects? Problems of Post-Communism, 55(3), 7–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasiewicz, K. (2009). The party is never dead: Identity, class and voting behavior in contemporary Poland. East European Politics and Societies, 23(4), 491–508.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelley, J., & Zagórski, K. (2004). Economic change and the legitimation of inequality: The transition from socialism to the free market in central and east Europe. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 22, 319–364.
   Google Scholar
• Kołodko, G. (2000). From shock to therapy. The political economy of postocialist transformation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kowalik, T. (2012). From solidarity to sellout. The restoration of capitalism in Poland. New York, NY: Monthly Review Press.
   Google Scholar
• Letki, N., Brzeziński, M., & Jancewicz, B. (2014). The rise of inequalities in Poland and their impacts: When politicians don’t care but citizens do. In B. Nolan, W. Salverda, & D. Checchi (Eds.), Changing inequalities and societal impacts in rich countries: Thirty countries’ experiences (pp. 488–513). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Markowski, R. (2002a). Dynamika współzawodnictwa w polskim systemie partyjnym 1997-2001 [dynamics of competition in Polish party system 1997-2001]. In R. Markowski (Ed.), System partyjny i zachowania wyborcze. Dekada polskich doświadczeń [party system and voting behaviour. Decade of Polish experiences] (pp. 145–175). Warszawa: ISP PAN.
   Google Scholar
• Markowski, R. (2002b). Propozycja <manifesto research group>: metoda, wyniki, problem – komentarz [proposal of manifesto research Gropu: Methods, results, problems – Commentary]. In R. Markowski (Ed.), System partyjny i zachowania wyborcze. Dekada polskich doświadczeń [party system and voting behaviour. Decade of Polish experiences] (pp. 267–287). Warszawa: ISP PAN.
   Google Scholar
• Markowski, R. (2006). Wybory 2005 – chaos, czy rekonstrukcja systemu partyjnego? [Elections 2005 – chaos or reconstruction of the party system]. In I. Słodkowska & M. Dołbakowska (Eds.), Wybory 2005. Partie i ich programy [Elections 2005. Parties and their manifestos (pp. 15–23). Warszawa: ISP PAN.
   Google Scholar
• Markowski, R., & Cześnik, M. (2002). ‘Polski system partyjny: dekada zmian instytucjonalnych i ich konsekwencje’ [Polish party system: Decade of institutional changes and their consequences]. In R. Markowski (Ed.), System partyjny i zachowania wyborcze. Dekada polskich doświadczeń [party system and voting behaviour. Decade of Polish experiences] (pp. 27–48). Warszawa: ISP PAN.
   Google Scholar
• Matthes, C.-Y. (2016). The state of democracy in Poland after 2007. Problems of Post-Communism, 63(5-6), 288–299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. (2011). Divided we stand: Why inequality keeps rising. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Orenstein, M. A. (2013). Reassessing the neo-liberal development model in Central and Eastern Europe. In V. A. Schmidt, & M. Thatcher (Eds.), Resilient liberalism in Europe’s political economy (pp. 374–400). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ost, D. (2005). Defeat of solidarity. Anger and politics in postcommunist Europe. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pfau-Effinger, B. (2005). Culture and welfare state policies: Reflections on a complex interrelation. Journal of Social Policy, 34(1), 3–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the twenty-first century. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
   Google Scholar
• Prawo i Sprawiedliwość. (2011). Nowoczesna, solidarna, bezpieczna Polska. Program Prawa i Sprawiedliwości [Modern, Solidary, Safe Poland Manifesto of Law and Justice]. Warszawa.
   Google Scholar
• Rapley, T. (2007). Doing conversation, discourse and document analysis. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Rek-Woźniak, M., & Woźniak, W. (2017). From the cradle of ‘solidarity’ to the land of cheap labour and the home of precarious. Strategic discourse on labour arrangements in post-socialist Poland. Social Policy and Administration, 51(2), 348–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohrschneider, R., & Whitefield, S. (2006). Political parties, public opinion and European integration in post-communist countries: The state of the art, the state of the art. European Union Politics, 7(1), 141–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohrschneider, R., & Whitefield, S. (2009). Understanding cleavages in party systems: Issue position and issue salience in 13 post-communist. Comparative Political Studies, 42(2), 280–313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rokita, J., & Kawalec, S. (Eds.). (2005). Państwo dla obywateli. Plan rządzenia 2005-2009 [State for the citizens. Governance plan 2005-2009]. Warszawa: Instytut Państwa i Administracji.
   Google Scholar
• Ruch Palikota. (2012). Nowe Porozumienie Społeczne [New social agreement]. Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Indygo Zahir Media.
   Google Scholar
• Ruedin, D., & Morales, L. (2017). Estimating party positions on immigration. Party Politics, 25(3), 303–314.
   Google Scholar
• Słodkowska, I. (Ed.). (2002). Wybory 2001. Partie i ich programy [Elections 2001. Parties and their manifestos]. Warszawa: ISP PAN.
   Google Scholar
• Słodkowska, I., & Dołbakowska, M. (Eds.). (2006). Wybory 2005. Partie i ich programy [Elections 2005. Parties and their manifestos]. Warszawa: ISP PAN.
   Google Scholar
• Słodkowska, I., & Dołbakowska, M. (Eds.). (2007). Wybory prezydenckie 2005. Programy kandydatów [Presidential elections 2005. Manifestos of the candidates]. Warszawa: ISP PAN.
   Google Scholar
• Słodkowska, I., & Dołbakowska, M. (Eds.). (2011). Wybory 2007. Partie i ich programy [Elections 2007. Parties and their manifestos]. Warszawa: ISP PAN.
   Google Scholar
• Słodkowska, I., & Dołbakowska, M. (Eds.). (2012). Wybory prezydenckie 2010. Programy kandydatów [Presidential elections 2010. Manifestos of the candidates]. Warszawa: ISP PAN.
   Google Scholar
• Słodkowska, I., & Dołbakowska, M. (Eds.). (2013). Wybory 2011. Partie i ich programy [Elections 2011. Parties and their manifestos]. Warszawa: ISP PAN.
   Google Scholar
• de Swaan, A., Manor, J., Oyen, E., & Reis, E. P. (2000). Elite perceptions of the poor: Reflections for a comparative research project. Current Sociology, 48(1), 43–54.
   Google Scholar
• Szczerbiak, A. (2013). Poland (mainly) chooses stability and continuity: The October 2011 Polish parliamentary election. Perspectives on European Politics and Society, 14(4), 480–504.
   Google Scholar
• Sztompka, P. (2000). Civilisational competence: A prerequisite for post-communist transition. Centre for European Studies. Jagiellonian University in Cracow. Retrieved from http://www.ces.uj.edu.pl/sztompka/competence.htm
   Google Scholar
• Sztompka, P. (2001). The Ambivalence of Social Change: Triumph or Trauma? Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung GmbH. Retrieved from http://bibliothek.wzb.eu/pdf/2000/p00-001.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sztompka, P. (2008). The ambivalence of social change in post-communist societies. In A. Śliż & M. S. Szczepański (Eds.), Czy koniec socjalizmu? Polska transformacja w teoriach socjologicznych [Whither the end of socialism? Polish transformation in sociological theories] (pp. 36–57). Warszawa: Scholar.
   Google Scholar
• Tavits, M. (2008). Policy positions, issue importance, and party competition in new democracies. Comparative Political Studies, 41(1), 48–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Therborn, G. (2013). The killing fields of inequality. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• van Oorschot, W., Pfau-Effinger, B., & Opielka, J. (2008). The culture of the welfare state: Historical and theoretical arguments. In W. van Oorschot, M. Opielka, & B. Pfau-Effinger (Eds.), Culture and welfare state. Values and social policy in comparative perspective (pp. 1–26). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Volkens, A. (2007). Strengths and weaknesses of approaches to measuring policy positions of parties. Electoral Studies, 26(1), 108–200. doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2006.04.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitefield, S. (2002). Political cleavages and post-communist politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 5, 181–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitefield, S., Vachudova, M. A., Steenbergen, M. R., Rohrschneider, R., Marks, G., Loveless, M. P., & Hooghe, L. (2007). Do expert surveys produce consistent estimates of party stances on European integration? Comparing expert surveys in the difficult case of Central and Eastern Europe. Electoral Studies, 26(1), 50–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, R., & Pickett, K. (2009). The spirit level: Why more equal societies almost always do better. London: Allen Lane.
   Google Scholar
• Woźniak, W. (2009) Kultura a polityka społeczna. O skomplikowanych współzależnościach i potrzebie ich badania [culture and social policy. On complicated interrelationships and the need to study them]. Problemy Polityki Społecznej [Problems of Social Policy], 12, 57–74.
   Google Scholar
• Woźniak, W. (2012a). Nierówności społeczne w polskim dyskursie politycznym [Social inequalities in Polish political discourse]. Warszawa: Scholar Scientific Press.
   Google Scholar
• Woźniak, W. (2012b). Użycie i nadużycie nauk społecznych. Przypadek merytokracji [Use and misuse of social sciences. The case of meritocracy]. In P. Żuk (Ed.), Wiedza, władza, ideologia. O społecznej funkcji uniwersytetu w społeczeństwie rynkowym [Knowledge, power, ideology. University in market society] (pp. 97–120). Warszawa: Scholar Scientific Press.
   Google Scholar
• Woźniak, W. (2014a). Nierówności społeczne i ich dziedziczenie jako problem strukturalny i polityczny [Social inequality and its reproduction as a structural and political problem]. In B. Kłos & J. Szymańczak (Eds.), Nierówności społeczne w Polsce [Social inequality in Poland] (pp. 73–94). Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Sejmowe.
   Google Scholar
• Woźniak, W. (2014b). From underclass to Homo sovieticus: Human constraints towards modernization. Praktyka Teoretyczna [Theoretical Practice], 13(3), 171–199.
   Google Scholar
• Woźniak, W. (2014c). Perception of inequality by the general public and political elites. In D. Eissel, J. Leaman & E. Rokicka (Eds.), Welfare state et risk. Rising inequality in Europe (pp. 217–231). Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Woźniak, W. (2017). Programy polskich partii politycznych jako materiał empiryczny w badaniach dyskursu politycznego [Manifestos of Polish political parties as an empirical source in a research on political discourse]. Środkowoeuropejskie Studia Polityczne [Central European Political Studies], 2, 41–58.
   Google Scholar
• Zarycki, T. (2003). Cultural capital and the political role of the intelligentsia in Poland. Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics, 19(4), 91–108.
   Google Scholar
• Zarycki, T. (2014). Social dialogue under the supremacy of the intelligentsia. Warsaw Forum of Economic Sociology, 5(2), 69–79.
   Google Scholar
• Zarycki, T. (2015). Class analysis in conditions of a dual-stratification order. East European Politics and Societies: And Cultures, 29(3), 711–718.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zarycki, T., Smoczyński, R., & Warczok, T. (2017). The roots of Polish culture-centered politics: Toward a non–purely cultural model of cultural domination in Central and Eastern Europe. East European Politics and Societies: and Cultures, 31(2), 360–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar