Reuniting strategy and diplomacy for 21^st century statecraft

References

• Abbott, K. W., Genschel, P., Snidal, D., & Zangl, B. (Eds.). (2015). International organizations as orchestrators. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Acharya, A. (2016). Regionalism beyond EU-centrism. In T. A. Börzel & T. Risse (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of comparative regionalism (pp. 109–130). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Aggarwal, V. K. (1998). Reconciling multiple institutions: Bargaining, linkages and nesting. In V. K. Aggarwal (Ed.), Institutional designs for a complex world. Bargaining, linkages, and nesting (pp. 1–31). Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Alter, K. J., & Meunier, S. (2009). The politics of international regime complexity. Perspectives on Politics, 7(1), 13–24. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592709090033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alter, K. J., & Raustiala, K. (2018). The rise of international regime complexity. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 14(1), 329–349. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-101317-030830
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldwin, D. A. (1985). Economic statecraft. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barros-Platiau, A. F., & Gomes do Cravo Barros, J. (2021). Brazil’s strategic diplomacy for maritime security and safety. Contemporary Politics, 27.
   Google Scholar
• Bennis, W., & Nanus, B. (1985). Leaders: The strategies for taking charge. Harper and Row.
   Google Scholar
• Bhabha, H. K. (1994). The location of culture. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bianculli, A. (2016). Latin America. In T. A. Börzel & T. Risse (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of comparative regionalism (pp. 154–177). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Börzel, T. A., & Risse, T. (2016). Three cheers for comparative regionalism. In T. A. Börzel, & T. Risse (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of comparative regionalism (pp. 621–648). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bresser-Pereira, L. C. (2009). From Old to New Developmentalism in Latin America, Texto para Discussão 193. Escola de Economia de São Paulo da Fundação Getulio Vargas.
   Google Scholar
• Brodie, B. (1973). War and politics. Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, R. (2017). How Everything became war and the military became everything: Tales from the Pentagon. Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Buell, R. L. (1925). International relations. Henry Holt.
   Google Scholar
• Burges, S. W. (2009). Brazilian foreign policy after the Cold War. University Press of Florida.
   Google Scholar
• Burges, S. W. (2017). Brazil in the world: The international relations of a South American giant. Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, R. N. (1968). The economics of interdependence: Economic policy in the Atlantic community. Council on Foreign Relations.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, R. (1957). The concept of power. Behavorial Science, 2(3), 201–215. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/bs.3830020303
   Google Scholar
• Doctor, M. (2021). Development banks as instruments of Brazilian strategic diplomacy. Contemporary Politics. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13569775.2021.1961395
   Google Scholar
• Drezner, D. W., Farrell, H., & Newman, A. L. (Eds.). (2021). The uses and abuses of weaponized interdependence. Brookings Institutions Press.
   Google Scholar
• ECLAC. (2019). Social panorama of Latin America. United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• Farrell, H., & Newman, A. L. (2019). Weaponized interdependence: How global economic networks shape state coercion. International Security, 44(1), 42–79. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1162/isec_a_00351
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fawcett, L. (2005). The origins and development of regional ideas in the Americas. In L. Fawcett, & M. Serrano (Eds.), Regionalism and governance in the americas: Continental drift (pp. 25–51). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, T. L. (2005). The world is flat: A brief history of the twenty-first century. Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.
   Google Scholar
• Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• George, A. L. (1993). Bridging the Gap: Theory and practice in foreign policy. United States Institute of Peace Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goddard, S. E., MacDonald, P. K., & Nexon, D. H. (2019). Repertoires of statecraft: Instruments and logics of power politics. International Relations, 33(2), 304–321. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117819834625
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goh, E. (2020). The Asia-Pacific’s ‘Age of Uncertainty’: Great Power Competition, Globalisation, and the Economic-Security Nexus, RSIS Working Papers No 330, Singapore: S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Goh, E., & Prantl, J. (2017). Why strategic diplomacy matters for Southeast Asia. East Asia Forum Quarterly, 9(2), 36–39.
   Google Scholar
• Goh, E., & Prantl, J. (2020). COVID-19 is exposing the complexity of connectivity. East Asia Forum, 8 April, www.eastasiaforum.org/2020/04/08/covid-19-is-exposing-the-complexity-of-connectivity/
   Google Scholar
• Goldin, I., & Mariathasan, M. (2014). The butterfly defect: How globalization creates systemic risks, and what to do about it. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grieco, J. M. (2018). The schools of thought problem in international relations. International Studies Review, 21(3), 424–446. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/viy005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haas, E. B. (1975). Is there a hole in the whole? Knowledge, technology, interdependence, and the construction of international regimes. International Organization, 29(3), 827–876. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300031787
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162(3859), 1243–1248. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1126/science.162.3859.1243
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, K., & Li, M. (2020). Understanding the dynamics of the Indo-Pacific: US-China strategic competition, regional actors, and beyond. International Affairs, 96(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiz242
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holsti, K. J. (1978). A new international politics? Diplomacy in complex interdependence. International Organization, 32(2), 513–530. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S002081830002662X
   Google Scholar
• Hudson, V. M. (2005). Foreign policy analysis: Actor-Specific theory and the ground of international relations. Foreign Policy Analysis, 1(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-8594.2005.00001.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudson, V. M., & Day, B. S. (2020). Foreign policy analysis: classic and contemporary theory (3rd ed). Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• The International Institute of Strategic Studies. (2017). Strategic survey 2017: The annual assessment of geopolitics. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jervis, R. (1997). System effects: Complexity in political and social life. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jung, C. G. (1978). Man and his symbols. Picador.
   Google Scholar
• Keohane, R. O., & Nye, J. S. (1977). Power and interdependence: world politics in transition. Little, Brown and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Keohane, R. O., & Nye, J. S. (2012). Power and interdependence (4th ed). Langham.
   Google Scholar
• Keohane, R. O., & Victor, D. G. (2011). The regime complex for climate change. Perspectives on Politics, 9(1), 7–23. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592710004068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khong, Y. F. (2014). Foreign policy analysis and the international relations of Asia. In S. Pekkanen, J. Ravenhill, & R. Foot (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of the international relations of Asia (pp. 81–99). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lauren, P. G., Craig, G. A., & George, A. L. (2020). Force and statecraft: Diplomatic challenges of our time (6th ed). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meadows, D. (2008). Thinking in systems: A primer. Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Micklethwait, J., & Wooldridge, A. (2014). The fourth revolution: The global race to reinvent the state. Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, J. H. (2015). A crude look at the whole: The science of complex systems in business, life, and society. Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Naím, M. (2013). The end of power: From boardrooms to battlefields and churches to states, why being in charge isn't what it used to Be. Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Orsini, A., Le Prestre, P., Haas, P. M., Brosig, M., Pattberg, P., Wideberg, O., Morin, J.-F., Gomez-Mera, L., Harrison, N. E., Geyer, R., & Chandler, D. (2020). Forum: Complex systems and international governance. International Studies Review, 22(4), 1008–1038. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/viz005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orsini, A., Morin, F., & Young, O. (2013). Regime complexes: A buzz, a boom, or a boost for global governance. Global Governance, 19(1), 27–39. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1163/19426720-01901003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pereira, J. C., & Viola, E. (2021). Brazilian climate policy (1992–2020): An exercise in strategic diplomatic failure. Contemporary Politics. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13569775.2021.1961394
   Google Scholar
• Prantl, J. (2011). Cooperating in the Energy Security Regime Complex, Asia Security Initiative Policy Series, Working Paper No 18, Singapore: S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Prantl, J. (Ed.). (2013). Effective multilateralism: Through the looking glass of East Asia. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Prantl, J., & Goh, E. (2016). Strategic diplomacy in Northeast Asia. Global Asia, 11(4), 8–13.
   Google Scholar
• Raustiala, K., & Victor, D. G. (2004). The regime complex for plant genetic resources. International Organization, 58(2), 277–309. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818304582036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosecrance, R., Alexandroff, A., Koehler, W., Kroll, J., Laqueur, S., & Stocker, J. (1977). Whither interdependence? International Organization, 31(3), 425–471. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S002081830002645X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheffer, M. (2009). Critical transitions in nature and society. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schwab, K. (2016). Shaping the future of the fourth industrial revolution: A guide to building a better world. Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, A. M. (1977). The logic of international interaction. International Studies Quarterly, 21(3), 429–460. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/2600233
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slaughter, A.-M. (2004). A new world order. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Slaughter, A.-M. (2017). The chessboard and the web: Strategies of connection in a networked world. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spektor, M. (2021). Strategies of rising Brazil: Postmortem review, looking forward. Contemporary Politics. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13569775.2021.1961452
   Google Scholar
• Strange, S. (1996). The retreat of the state: The diffusion of power in the world economy. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tickner, A. B. (2008). Latin American IR and the primacy of Lo práctico. International Studies Review, 10(4), 735–748. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2486.2008.00829.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toye, J., & Toye, R. (2003). The origins and interpretation of the Prebisch-Singer thesis. History of Political Economy, 35(3), 437–467. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1215/00182702-35-3-437
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. (2020). World social report 2020: Inequality in a rapidly Changing world. United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• Vigevani, T., & Cepaluni, G. (2009). Brazilian foreign policy in changing times: The quest for autonomy from Sarney to Lula. Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Waltz, K. N. (1970). The myth of national interdependence. In C. P. Kindelberger (Ed.), The International corporation: A symposium (pp. 205–226). MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Waltz, K. N. (1979). Theory of international politics. Addison Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Waltz, K. N. (2000). Structural realism after the Cold War. International Security, 25(1), 5–41. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1162/016228800560372
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, A. (1992). The evolution of international society: A comparative historical analysis. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, T. J. (2017). All measures short of war: The contest for the twenty-first century and the future of American power. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Young, O. (2017). Governing complex systems: Social capital for the anthropocene. MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Young, O. (2019). The governance of international spaces and earth systems: Solving collective action problems in the absence of public Authority. In E. Brousseau, J.-M. Glachant, & J. Sgard (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of institutions of international economic governance and market regulations. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190900571.013.40
   Google Scholar
• Zarakol, A. (2016). Creating a community of area studies in a changing world. In E. Clowles & S. J. Bromberg (Eds.), Area studies in the global age: Community, place, identity (pp. 268–276). Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar