‘Exclusionary welfarism’: a new programmatic agenda for populist right-wing parties?

References

• Abts, K., Dalle Mulle, E., van Kessel, S., & Michel, E. (2021). The welfare agenda of the populist radical right in Western Europe: Combining welfare chauvinism, producerism and populism*. Swiss Political Science Review, 27, 21–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Afonso, A., & Rennwald, L. (2018). The changing welfare state agenda of radical right parties in Europe. In P. Manow, B. Palier, & H. Schwander (Eds.), Welfare democracies and party politics (pp. 171–196). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Banting, K. (1995). The welfare state as Statescraft: Territorial politics and Canadian social policy. In S. Liebfried & P. Pierson (Eds.), European social policy: Between fragmentation and integration (pp. 269–300). Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Barry, N. (1997). Conservative thought and the welfare state. Political Studies, 45(2), 331–345. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.00085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caiani, M., & Graziano, P. (2019). Understanding varieties of populism in times of crises. West European Politics, 42(6), 1141–1158. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2019.1598062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, P. (1999). The national front in France: Ideology, discourse and power. Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Winter, L. (1998). A comparative analysis of electoral, office and policy success of ethnoregionalist parties. In L. De Winter & H. Türsan (Eds.), Regionalist parties in Western Europe (pp. 204–247). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Diamanti, I. (2003). Bianco, rosso, verde … e azzurro. Mappe e colori dell'Italia politica. il Mulino.
   Google Scholar
• Ennser-Jedenastik, L. (2016). A welfare state for whom? A group-based account of the Austrian freedom party’s social policy profile. Swiss Political Science Review, 22(3), 409–427. https://doi.org/10.1111/spsr.12218
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enggist, M., & Pinggera, M. (2022). Radical right parties and their welfare state stances – not so blurry after all? West European Politics, 45(1), 102--128. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2021.1902115
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ennser-Jedenastik, L. (2022). The impact of radical right parties on family benefits. West European Politics, 45(1), 154–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2021.1936944
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three words of welfare capitalism. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fenger, M. (2018). The social policy agendas of populist radical right parties in comparative perspective. Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy, 34(3), 188–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/21699763.2018.1483255
   Google Scholar
• Ferrera, M. (2012). Welfare-state transformations: From neo-liberalism to liberal neo-welfarism? In V. A. Schmidt & M. Thatcher (Eds.), Resilient liberalism in Europe’s political economy (pp. 77–111). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, A. M. (2020). The dark sides of social policy: From neoliberalism to resurgent right-wing populism. Development and Change, 51(2), 371–397. https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12577
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, M. (1962). Capitalism and freedom. Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• George, V., & Wilding, P. (1994). Welfare and ideology. Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Golder, M. (2016). Far right parties in Europe. Annual Review of Political Science, 19(1), 477–497. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-042814-012441
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, C. (2014). The right and the welfare state. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kitschelt, H., & McGann, A. (1995). The radical right in Western Europe: A comparative analysis. University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Korpi, W. (1983). The democratic class struggle. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Michel, E. (2019). The strategic adaptation of the populist radical right in Western Europe: shifting the party message. In E. Suhay, B. Grofman, & A. Trechsel (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of electoral persuasion. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190860806.013.56
   Google Scholar
• Lefkofridi, Z., & Michel, E. (2016). The electoral politics of solidarity: The welfare agendas of radical right. In K. Banting & W. Kimlycka (Eds.), The strains of commitment: The political Sources of solidarity in diverse societies (pp. 233–267). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Massetti, E., & Schakel, A. H. (2015). From class to region: How regionalist parties link (and subsume) left-right into centre-periphery politics. Party Politics, 21(6), 866–886. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068815597577
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mudde, C. (2007). Populist radical right parties in Europe. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mudde, C., & Kaltwasser, C. R. (2018). Studying populism in comparative perspective: Reflections on the contemporary and future research agenda. Comparative Political Studies, 51(13), 1667–1693. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414018789490
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Natili, M., Jessoula, M., Madama, I., & Matsaganis, M. (2018). The right(s) and minimum income in hard times: Southern and Eastern Europe compared. European Societies, 21(1), 33–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616696.2018.1494300
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otjes, S., Ivaldi, G., Jupskås, A. R., & Mazzoleni, O. (2018). It’s not economic interventionism, stupid! Reassessing the political economy of radical right-wing populist parties. Swiss Political Science Review, 24(3), 270–290. https://doi.org/10.1111/spsr.12302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özdemir, Y. (2020). AKP’s neoliberal populism and contradictions of new social policies in Turkey. Contemporary Politics, 26(3), 245–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569775.2020.1720891
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierson, P. (1994). Dismantling the welfare state? Reagan, Tatcher, and the politics of retrenchment. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rathgeb, P. (2020). Makers against takers: The socio-economic ideology and policy of the Austrian Freedom Party. West European Politics.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rathgeb, P., & Busemeyer, M. (2022). How to study the populist radical right and the welfare state? West European Politics, 45(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2021.1925421
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rémond, R. (1982). Les Droites en France. bier-Montaigne.
   Google Scholar
• Rovny, J. (2013). Where do radical right parties stand? Position blurring in multidimensional competition European Political Science Review, 5(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773911000282
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rovny, J., & Polk, J. (2020). Still blurry? Economic salience, position and voting for radical right parties in Western Europe. European Journal of Political Research, 59(2), 248–268. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12356
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Röth, L., Afonso, A., & Spies, D. (2018). The impact of populist radical right parties on socio-economic policies. European Political Science Review, 10(3), 325–350. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773917000133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urwin Derek W., 1983, ‘Herbinger, Fossil or Fleabite? ‘Regionalism’ and the West European Party Mosaic’. In H. Daalder, & P. Maier (Eds.), Western European party systems. Continuity and change (pp. 221–256). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Van Kersbergen, K. (1995). Social capitalism: A study of Christian Democracy and the Welfare State. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Vlandas, T., & Halikiopoulou, D. (2018). Does unemployment matter? Economic insecurity, labour market policies and the far right vote in Europe. European Political Science, 18(3), 421–438. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41304-018-0161-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zulianello, M. (2020). Varieties of populist parties and party systems in Europe: From state-of-the-art to the application of a novel classification scheme to 66 parties in 33 countries. Government and Opposition, 55(2), 327–347. https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2019.21
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar