References
- Bonikowski, B. (2016). Nationalism in settled times. Annual Review of Sociology, 42(1), 427–449. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-081715-074412
- Brubaker, R. (1996). Nationalism reframed: Nationhood and the national question in the New Europe. Cambridge Univ. Press.
- Brubaker, R. (2004). In the name of the nation: Reflections on nationalism and patriotism. Citizensh. Stud, 8, 115–127.
- Brubaker, R. (2020). Populism and nationalism. Nations and Nationalism, 26(1), 44–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/nana.12522
- Bui, H. T. (2015). Civil society and governance in Vietnam’s one-party system [PhD thesis]. School of Political Science and International Studies, The University of Queensland. https://doi.org/10.14264/uql.2015.646
- Chandhoke, N. (2007). Civil society. Development in Practice, 17(4-5), 607–614. https://doi.org/10.1080/09614520701469658
- Charney, E. (1998). Political liberalism, deliberative democracy, and the public sphere. American Political Science Review, 92(1), 97–110. https://doi.org/10.2307/2585931
- Cờ Đỏ Tp, Hồ Chí Minh. (2020). Cảnh giác với chiêu trò cổ vũ cho sự ra đời, hoạt động của tổ chức xã hội dân sự độc lập. Available at: https://www.facebook.com/page/226547977820783/search/?q=c%C3%A1ch%20m%E1%BA%A1ng%20%C4%91%C3%A3%20l%E1%BA%ADp%20t%E1%BB%95%20ch%E1%BB%A9c%20XHDS%20%C4%91%E1%BB%99c%20l%E1%BA%ADp (Accessed 9 September 2020).
- Công an nhân dân Online. (2020). Chống diễn biến hòa bình. Cảnh giác thủ đoạn lợi dụng ‘xã hội dân sự’ để chống phá chế độ. http://cand.com.vn/Chong-dien-bien-hoa-binh/Canh-giac-thu-doan-loi-dung-xa-hoi-dan-su-de-chong-pha-che-do-581991/
- Cooley, A. (2015). Authoritarianism goes global: Countering democratic norms. Journal of Democracy, 26(3), 49–63. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2015.0049
- Coombes, T. (2020). Instead of shrinking space, let’s talk about humanity’s shared future. OpenGlobalRights. Retrieved January 10, 2020, from https://www.openglobalrights.org/instead-of-shrinking-space-lets-talk-about-humanitys-shared-future/
- Crabtree-Condor, I. (2020). Narrative power and collective action: Conversations with people working to change narratives for social good-Part 1. Oxfam Policy & Practice. Available at: https://policy-practice.oxfam.org/resources/narrative-power-and-collective-action-conversations-with-people-working-to-chan-621020/ (Accessed 8 July 2020)
- Diamond, L. J. (1994). Toward democratic consolidation. Journal of Democracy, 5(3), 4–17. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.1994.0041
- Edwards, M. (2013). Civil society. Polity Press.
- Farrington, J., & Lewis, D. J. (2014). Non-governmental organizations and the state in Asia rethinking roles in sustainable agricultural development. Routledge.
- Gainsborough, M. (2002). Political change in Vietnam: In search of the middle-class challenge to the state. Asian Survey, 42(5), 694–707. https://doi.org/10.1525/as.2002.42.5.694
- Gellner, E. (1983). Nations and nationalism. Cornell Press, 8. 15O.
- Goldberg, J. (2018). Suicide of the west: How the rebirth of tribalism, populism, nationalism, and identity politics is destroying American democracy. Crown Forum.
- Gray, M. L. (1999). Creating civil society? The emergence of NGOs in Vietnam. Development and Change, 30(4), 693–713. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7660.00134
- Habets, I. (2015). Liberal democracy: The threat of counter-narratives. European View, 14(2), 145–154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12290-015-0369-z
- Han, Lua. (2020). Cảnh giác thủ đoạn lợi dụng “xã hội dân sự” để chống phá chế độ. Available at: https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=645995702982087&id=313457446235916 (Accessed 27 August 2020)
- Hannah, J. (2007). Local non-government organisations in Vietnam: Development, civil society, and state-society relations. University of Washington.
- Harari, Y. N. (2018). The bright side of nationalism. Public lecture by Yuval Noah Harari. https://www.ceu.edu/article/2019-05-17/yuval-noah-harari-discusses-bright-side-nationalism
- Harvey, D. (2006). Neo-liberalism as creative destruction. Geografiska Annaler: Series B. Human Geography, 88(2), 145–158. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0435-3684.2006.00211.x.
- Hewson, C., Yule, P., Laurent, D., & Vogel, C. (2003). Internet research methods (New technologies for social research. SAGE.
- Kekes, J. (1997). What is conservatism? Philosophy, 72(281), 351–374. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031819100057053.
- Kekes, J. (1998). A case for conservatism. Cornell University Press.
- Kerkvliet, B. J. T. (2010). Workers’ protests in contemporary Vietnam (with some comparisons to those in the pre-1975 south). Journal of Vietnamese Studies, 5(1), 162–204. https://doi.org/10.1525/vs.2010.5.1.162
- Kerkvliet, B. J. T. (2014). Government repression and toleration of dissidents in contemporary Vietnam. Politics in contemporary Vietnam (pp. 100–134). Springer.
- Kerkvliet, B. J. T. (2019). Speaking Out in Vietnam. Cornell University Press.
- Kosterman, R., & Feshbach, S. (1989). Toward a measure of patriotic and nationalistic attitudes. Political Psychology, 10, 257–274. https://doi.org/10.2307/3791647
- Kuhn, O. E. (2018). Liberal universalism in crisis: The nationalist populist challenge of transnational political standards. Transnational Social Review, 8(3), 317–330. https://doi.org/10.1080/21931674.2018.1505590
- Lawrence, P. (2016). Nationalism: History and theory. Routledge.
- Lawrence, P., & Lawrence, P. J. N. (2005). Nationalism: History and theory. Pearson Education.
- Lux, S. J., & Straussman, J. D. (2004). Searching for balance: Vietnamese NGOs operating in a state-led civil society. Public Administration and Development: The International Journal of Management Research and Practice, 24(2), 173–181. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.283
- Madge, C. (2007). Developing a geographers’ agenda for online research ethics. Progress in Human Geography, 31(5), 654–674. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132507081496
- Morris-Jung, J. (2015). Vietnam’s online petition movement. Southeast Asian Affairs, SEAA15(1), 402–413. https://doi.org/10.1355/aa15-1w
- Pham, Q. P., Le, Q. B., & Nguyen, M. H. (2021). Gender norms and employment. A study on the contemporary Vietnamese youths through social debates on the social media. Unpublished report.
- Phan Xuân Sơn (Nghĩa Nhân phỏng vấn). (2006). “Xã hội dân sự yếu thì nhà nước yếu”, Pháp luật TPHCM, 21-6-2006, tr. 3.
- Quân Đội Nhân Dân Online. (2018)., Cảnh giác với chiêu trò cổ vũ cho sự ra đời, hoạt động của tổ chức xã hội dân sự độc lập. Available at: https://www.qdnd.vn/phong-chong-dien-bien-hoa-binh/canh-giac-voi-chieu-tro-co-vu-cho-su-ra-doi-hoat-dong-cua-to-chuc-xa-hoi-dan-su-doc-lap-535194 (Accessed 01 April 2018)
- Salemink, O. (2006). Translating, interpreting and practicing civil society in Vietnam: A tale of calculated misunderstandings. In D. Lewis & D. Mosse (Eds.), Development brokers and translators: The ethnography of aid and agencies (pp. 101–126). Kumarian press.
- Scruton, R. (1980). The meaning of conservatism. Middlesex: Penguin.
- Scruton, R. (2014). How to be a conservative. A&C Black.
- Sinh, B. T. (2003). Civil society and NGOs in Vietnam: Some initial thoughts on developments and obstacles. Paper presented at the meeting with the delegation of the Swedish Parliamentary Commission on Swedish Policy for global Development to Vietnam, February 26–March 3, 2002.
- Sinh, B. T. (2011). Civil society in Vietnam. In T. Chong, & S. Elies (Eds.), An ASEAN community for all: Exploring the scope for civil society engagement (pp. 138–147). ISEAS and NIAS Press.
- Skorupski, J. M. (2015). The conservative critique of liberalism. In S. Wall (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to liberalism (pp. 401–422). Cambridge companions to philosophy, Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139942478.022
- Smith, C. (2003). Moral, believing animals: Human personhood and culture. Oxford University Press.
- Sombatpoonsiri, J. (2018). Conservative civil society in Thailand. In R. Youngs, G. Fowler, A. Larok, P. Marczewski, V. MJ, G. Nodia, N. Shapovalova, J. Sombatpoonsiri, M. Von Bulow, and O. Zihnioglu (Eds.), The mobilization of conservative civil society (pp. 27–32). Carnegie Europe. https://carnegieeurope.eu/2018/10/04/mobilization-of-conservative-civil-society-pub-77366
- Szabó, J. (2020). First as tragedy, then as farce: A comparative study of right-wing populism in Hungary and Poland. Journal of Comparative Politics, 13(2), 24–42. https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/first-as-tragedy-then-farce-comparative-study/docview/2416506379/se-2
- Thayer, C. A. (2009). Political legitimacy of Vietnam's one party state: Challenges and responses. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 28(4), 47–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/186810340902800403
- Theo Đảng, V. T. (2020). Tên phản động Nguyễn Anh Tuấn đã bị sa lưới pháp luật. https://www.facebook.com/Chinhluan47/posts/2942802669146116
- Thi, A. S. P. (2021). Activism in Vietnam: political practice and cognitive resistance [PhD Thesis]. The University of Manchester.
- Townsend, L., & Wallace, C. (2016). Social media research: A guide to ethics. University of Aberdeen.
- Tran, H. Q. (2010). Hướng đến một khái niệm khoa học về xã hội dân sự. Tạp chí Khoa học xã hội, số, 4(140), 10–23.
- Tran, M. (2020). Nhận diện những phương thức, thủ đoạn, biểu hiện chống phá mới của các thế lực thù địch trong lĩnh vực tư tưởng, lý luận hiện nay. http://tapchimattran.vn/thuc-tien/nhan-dien-nhung-phuong-thuc-thu-doan-bieu-hien-chong-pha-moi-cua-cac-the-luc-thu-dich-tren-linh-vuc-tu-tuong-ly-luan-hien-nay-35733.html
- Tran-Thanh, K. (2003). Needle in a haystack: Searching for civil society in the socialist republic of Vietnam. Development planning unit. University College London.
- Turley, W. S. (1993). Introduction. In W. S. Turley, & M. Selden (Eds.), Reinventing Vietnamese socialism: Doi Moi in comparative perspective (pp. 1–15). Westview Press Inc.
- Tuyen Giao (2020). Từ “xã hội dân sự” thúc đẩy đa nguyên, đa Đảng – Âm mưu thâm độc của các thế lực thù địch. Available at: http://tuyengiao.vn/bao-ve-nen-tang-tu-tuong-cua-dang/tu-xa-hoi-dan-su-thuc-day-da-nguyen-da-dang-am-muu-tham-doc-cua-cac-the-luc-thu-dich-112999
- United Nations Development Programme. (1999). Chapter 10: Cross-cutting lessons. A Study on Aid to the Environment Sector in Vietnam, Hanoi, November 1999.
- Vijayana, M. J. (2018). The ascent of conservative civil society in India. https://carnegieeurope.eu/2018/10/04/ascent-of-conservative-civil-society-in-india-pub-77372
- Vu, A. N. (2019). NGO-led activism under authoritarian rule of Vietnam: Between cooperation and contestation. Community Development, 50(4), 422–439. https://doi.org/10.1080/15575330.2019.1642925
- Vu, N. A. (2017a). Civil society activism in authoritarian contexts: (Re) structuring state-society relations in Vietnam [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Bath.
- Vu, N. A. (2017b). Grassroots environmental activism in an authoritarian context: The trees movement in Vietnam. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 28(3), 1180–1208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-017-9829-1
- Wells-Dang, A. (2010). Political space in Vietnam: A view from the ‘rice-roots’. The Pacific Review, 23(1), 93–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512740903398355
- Wells-Dang, A. (2011). Informal pathbreakers: Civil society networks in China and Vietnam [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Birmingham.
- Wischermann, J. (2003). Vietnam in the era of doi moi: Issue-oriented organizations and their relationship to the Government. Asian Survey, 43(6), 867–889.
- Wischermann, J. (2013). Civic organizations in Vietnam's one-party state: Supporters of authoritarian rule? (No. 228). GIGA Working Papers.
- World Bank. (2001, December 7–8). Putting parternships to work, Joint report of the Government of Vietnam–Donor–NGO Poverty Working Group, Consultative Group Meeting for Vietnam, Hanoi.
- World Bank. (2021). Vietnam at a glance. https://www.worldbank.org/en/country/vietnam/overview#1
- Yêu Nước Thời Kỳ 4.0. (2019). Nhận diện những âm mưu lợi dụng “xã hội dân chủ” để chống phá Việt Nam. https://www.facebook.com/YeuNuocThoiKy4.0/photos/nh%E1%BA%ADn-di%E1%BB%87n-nh%E1%BB%AFng-%C3%A2m-m%C6%B0u-l%E1%BB%A3i-d%E1%BB%A5ng-x%C3%A3-h%E1%BB%99i-d%C3%A2n-s%E1%BB%B1-%C4%91%E1%BB%83-ch%E1%BB%91ng-ph%C3%A1-vi%E1%BB%87t-nam-t%E1%BB%B1-di%E1%BB%85n-bi%E1%BA%BFn/159799202076286/
- Youngs, R. (2018). The mobilization of conservative civil society. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.