The vulnerability of securitisation: the missing link of critical security studies

References

• Abrams, D., & Hogg, M. A.1990). Social identity theory: Constructive and critical advances. Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Arian, A. (2021). The ‘war on terror’ and the disciplining of American Muslims’, Al Jazeera.
   Google Scholar
• Alkopher, T. D., & Blanc, E. (2017). Schengen area shaken. Journal of International Relations and Development, 20(3), 511–542. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41268-016-0005-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amnesty International. (2017). Dangerously disproportionate.
   Google Scholar
• Aradau, C. (2004). Security and the democratic scene: Desecuritization and emancipation. Journal of International Relations and Development, 7(4), 388–413. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jird.1800030
   Google Scholar
• Baele, S. J., & Jalea, D. (2022). Twenty-five years of securitization theory: A corpus-based review. Political Studies Review, 21(2), 376–389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baele, S. J., & Thomson, C. P. (2017). An experimental agenda for securitization theory. International Studies Review, 19(4), 646–666. https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/vix014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balzacq, T. (2005). The three faces of securitization: Political agency, audience and context. European Journal of International Relations, 11(2), 171–201. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066105052960
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balzacq, T. (2010). Constructivism and securitization studies. In V. Mauer, & M. Dunn Cavelty (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of security studies (pp. 56–72). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Balzacq, T. (2011). A theory of securitization: Origins, core assumptions and variants. In T. Balzacq (Ed.), Securitization theory: How security problems emerge and dissolve (pp. 1–30). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Balzacq, T. (2015). The ‘essence’ of securitization: Theory, ideal type, and a sociological science of security. International Relations, 29(1), 103–113. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117814526606b
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balzacq, T., Léonard, S., & Ruzicka, J. (2016). Securitization’ revisited: Theory and cases. International Relations, 30(4), 494–531. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117815596590
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BBC. (2015, September 21). Hungary PM orban: Europe borders threatened by migrants.
   Google Scholar
• BBC. (2017. March 29). Build that wall’ says border resident.
   Google Scholar
• Beattie, A., & Schick, K. (2013). Introduction. In A. Beattie, & K. Schick (Eds.), The vulnerable subject (pp. 1–24). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Beattie, A. R. (2016). Between safety and vulnerability: the exiled other of international relations. Citizenship Studies, 20(2), 228–242. http://doi.org/10.1080/13621025.2015.1132565
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bigo, D. (2002). Security and immigration: Toward a critique of the governmentality of unease. Alternatives, 27(1), 63–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/03043754020270S105
   Google Scholar
• Bissonnette, A., & Vallet, É. (Eds.). (2020). Borders and border walls: In-security, symbolism, vulnerabilities. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Böller, F., & Herr, L. D. (2020). From Washington without love: congressional foreign policy making and US-Russian relations under president Trump. Contemporary Politics, 26(1), 17–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569775.2019.1617655
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, W. (2010). Walled states, waning sovereignty. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Browning, C. S. (2018). Brexit, existential anxiety and ontological (in)security. European Security, 27(3), 336–355. https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2018.1497982
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bush, G. (2003). President Bush addresses United Nations General Assembly. The White House.
   Google Scholar
• Buzan, B. (1991). People, states, and fear (2nd ed). Harvester Wheatsheaf.
   Google Scholar
• Buzan, B., Wæver, O., & De Wilde, J. (1998). Security: A new framework for analysis. Lynne Rienner Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, B., & Manning, J. (2018). The rise of victimhood culture. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Chicago Council Surveys. (2022). Democrats and republicans split over immigration levels.
   Google Scholar
• Combes, M. d. (2017). Encountering the stranger: Ontological security and the Boston Marathon bombing. Cooperation and Conflict, 52(1), 126–143. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010836716653160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eidelson, R. J., & Eidelson, J. I. (2003). Dangerous ideas: Five beliefs that propel groups toward conflict. American Psychologist, 58(3), 182–192. http://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.58.3.182
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elbe, S. (2006). Should HIV/AIDS be securitized? The ethical dilemmas of linking HIV/AIDS and security. International Studies Quarterly, 50(1), 119–144. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2478.2006.00395.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enns, D. (2012). The violence of victimhood. Penn State Press.
   Google Scholar
• Floyd, R. (2007). Towards a consequentialist evaluation of security: Bringing together the Copenhagen and the Welsh Schools of security studies. Review of International Studies, 33(2), 327–350. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026021050700753X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Floyd, R. (2010). Security and the environment: Securitisation theory and US environmental security policy. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Floyd, R. (2016). The promise of theories of just securitization. In J. Nyman, & A. Burke (Eds.). In ethical security studies (pp. 75–88). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Floyd, R. (2018). Parallels with the hate speech debate: The pros and cons of criminalising harmful securitising requests. Review of International Studies, 44(1), 43–63. http://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210517000328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Floyd, R. (2019). The morality of security: A theory of just securitization. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Füredi, F. (2007). Invitation to terror: The expanding empire of the unknown. Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Gaddis, J. L. (2004). Surprise security, and the American experience. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gallup. (2002). Top ten findings about public opinion and Iraq.
   Google Scholar
• Gallup. (2023a). Immigration. https://news.gallup.com/poll/1660/Immigration.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Gallup. (2023b). Plurality in U.S. says southern border situation is ‘Crisis’. https://news.gallup.com/poll/508565/plurality-say-southern-border-situation-crisis.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to-face interaction. Pantheon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Goodin, R. E., & Tilly, C. (Eds.) (2006). The Oxford handbook of contextual political analysis. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guardian, T. (2002). George Bush's Speech on Iraq.
   Google Scholar
• Hellberg, U. (2011). Securitization as a modern strategy of constructing identity: ‘Negative proof identity in the European Union. Department of Global Political Studies at Malmö University.
   Google Scholar
• Howell, A., & Richter-Montpetit, M. (2020). Is securitization theory racist? Civilizationism, methodological whiteness, and antiblack thought in the Copenhagen School. Security Dialogue, 51(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010619862921
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howell, J. (2014). The securitisation of NGOs post-9/11. Conflict, Security & Development, 14(2), 151–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/14678802.2014.903692
   Google Scholar
• Hudson, N. F. (2009). Securitizing women’s rights and gender equality. Journal of Human Rights, 8(1), 53–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/14754830802686526
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, B. (2007). Securitizing Iraq: The bush administration’s social construction of security. Global Change, Peace & Security, 19(2), 83–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/14781150701358946
   Google Scholar
• Hutchings, K. (2013). A place of greater safety? Securing judgement in international ethics. In A. Beattie, & K. Schick (Eds.), In The vulnerable subject (pp. 25–42). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Huysmans, J. (1998). Security! What do you mean? From concept to thick signifier. European Journal of International Relations, 4(2), 539–561. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066198004002004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huysmans, J. (2006). The politics of insecurity. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Huysmans, J. (2011). What’s in an act? On security speech acts and little security nothings. Security Dialogue, 42(4-5), 371–383. https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010611418713
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huysmans, J. (2014). Security unbound: Enacting democratic limits. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jutila, M. (2015). Securitization, history, and identity. Nationalities Papers, 43(6), 927–943. https://doi.org/10.1080/00905992.2015.1065402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinnvall, C., & Nesbitt-Larking, P. (2013). Securitising citizenship: (B)ordering practices and strategies of resistance. Global Society, 27(3), 337–359. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600826.2013.790786
   Google Scholar
• Kirk, J. (2020). From threat to risk? Exceptionalism and logics of health security. International Studies Quarterly, 64(2), 266–276. http://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqaa021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirk, J. (2022). ‘The cure cannot be worse than the problem’: Securitising the securitisation of COVID-19 in the USA. Contemporary Politics, 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lebow, R. N. (2016). National identities and international relations. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lustick, I. S. (2006). Trapped in the war on terror. University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mabee, B. (2007). Re-imagining the borders of US security after 9/11: Securitisation, risk, and the creation of the department of homeland security. Globalizations, 4(3), 385–397. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747730701532567
   Google Scholar
• Mackenzie, C. (2020). Vulnerability, insecurity and the pathologies of trust and distrust. International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 28(5), 624–643. http://doi.org/10.1080/09672559.2020.1846985
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markiewicz, T. (2023). Talking to the state: Interviewing the elites about what’s Not to Be said. International Studies Perspectives, ekad013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markiewicz, T., & Sharvit, K. (2021). When victimhood goes to War? Israel and victim claims. Political Psychology, 42(1), 111–126. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12690
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, M. (2008). Securitization and the construction of security. European Journal of International Relations, 14(4), 563–587. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066108097553
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, M. (2011). Deliberation and resecuritization: Australia, asylum-seekers and the normative limits of the Copenhagen school. Australian Journal of Political Science, 46(2), 281–295. https://doi.org/10.1080/10361146.2011.568471
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McSweeney, B. (1996). Identity and security: Buzan and the Copenhagen school. Review of International Studies, 22(1), 81–93. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210500118467
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mencken, H. L. (2009). In defense of women. Cosimo.
   Google Scholar
• Mirow, W. (2016). Strategic culture, securitisation, and the use of force. Post-9/11 security practices of liberal democracies. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Morgenthau, H. J. (1962). Politics in the twentieth century. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, M. C. (2001). The fragility of goodness: Luck and ethics in Greek tragedy and philosophy. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. (2002). Public more internationalist than in 1990s.
   Google Scholar
• Politico. (2016). We’re the only plane in the sky.
   Google Scholar
• Politifact. ( n.d.). Donald Trump’s file.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, C. (2004). A strategy of partnerships. Foreign Affairs, 83(1), 22–34. https://doi.org/10.2307/20033826
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roe, P. (2012). Is securitization a ‘negative’ concept? Revisiting the normative debate over normal versus extraordinary politics. Security Dialogue, 43(3), 249–266. https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010612443723
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sagir, M., & Mockabee, S. T. (2023). Public attitudes toward immigration: Was there a Trump effect? American Politics Research, 51(3), 381–396. http://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X221139762
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salter, M. B. (2011). When securitization fails: The hard case of counter-terrorism programs. In T. Balzacq (Ed.), Securitization theory: How security problems emerge and dissolve (pp. 116–132). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz-Shea, P., & Yanow, D. (2013). Interpretive research design: Concepts and processes. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Shenhav, S. (2015). Analyzing social narratives. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Shildrick, M. (2000). Becoming vulnerable: Contagious encounters and the ethics of risk. Journal of Medical Humanities, 21(4), 215–227. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009025125203
   Google Scholar
• Shipoli, E. A. (2018). Islam, securitization, and US foreign policy. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Silver, R., Cohen, E., Holman, A., McIntosh, D. N., Poulin, M., & Gil-Rivas, V. (2002). Nationwide longitudinal study of psychological responses to September 11. Jama, 288(10), 1235–1244. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.288.10.1235
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spivak, G. C. (1990). The post-modern condition: The end of politics? In G. C. Spivak, & S. Harasym (Eds.), The postcolonial critic: Interviews, strategies, dialogues (pp. 17–34). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stritzel, H. (2007). Towards a theory of securitization: Copenhagen and beyond. European Journal of International Relations, 13(3), 357–383. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066107080128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stritzel, H. (2012). Securitization, power, intertextuality: Discourse theory and the translations of organized crime. Security Dialogue, 43(6), 549–567. https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010612463953
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stritzel, H. (2014). Security in translation: Securitization theory and the localization of threat. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• ‘t Hart, P. (2014). Contextual analysis. In: ‘t Hart, P., and Rhodes, R. A. W. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political leadership (pp. 210 –224). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• The American Presidency Project. (2002). Commencement address at the United States military academy in west point.
   Google Scholar
• The Telegraph. (2001). Revealed: what really went on during Bush's ‘missing hours’.
   Google Scholar
• Trump, D. (2017, January 20). Inaugural address. Miller Center.
   Google Scholar
• Trump, D. (2018a, January 26). Address at the world economic forum. Miller Center.
   Google Scholar
• Trump, D. (2018b, September 25). Address at the 73rd session of the United Nations General Assembly. Miller Center.
   Google Scholar
• Trump, D. (2019, February 5). State of the union address. Miller Center.
   Google Scholar
• Trump, D. (2020, February 4). State of the union address.
   Google Scholar
• Van Rythoven, E. (2015). Learning to feel, learning to fear? Emotions, imaginaries, and limits in the politics of securitization. Security Dialogue, 46(5), 458–475. https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010615574766
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, R. E., & Seegers, A. (2012). Securitisation: The case of post-9/11 United States Africa policy. Scientia Militaria: South African Journal of Military Studies, 40(2), 22–45. https://doi.org/10.5787/40-2-995
   Google Scholar
• Waltz, K. N. (1988). The origins of war in neorealist theory. The Journal of Interdisciplinary History, 18(4), 615–628. https://doi.org/10.2307/204817
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, S. D. (2012). ‘Framing’ the Copenhagen school: Integrating the literature on threat construction. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 40(2), 279–301. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829811425889
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, M. C. (2003). Words, images, enemies: Securitization and international politics. International Studies Quarterly, 47(4), 511–531. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0020-8833.2003.00277.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, M. C. (2011). The continuing evolution of securitization theory. In T. Balzacq (Ed.), Securitization theory: How security problems emerge and dissolve (pp. 212–222). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, M. C. (2015). Securitization as political theory: The politics of the extraordinary. International Relations, 29(1), 114–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117814526606c
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright Miles, C. (1959). The sociological imagination. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wæver, O. (1995). Securitization and desecurization. In R. D. Lipschutz (Ed.), On security (pp. 46–86). Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar