Does party identification still matter for political efficacy? A cross-national assessment, 1996–2016

References

• Abramson, P. R., & Aldrich, J. H. (1982). The decline of electoral participation in America. American Political Science Review, 76(3), 502–521. https://doi.org/10.2307/1963728
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almond, G. A., & Verba, S. (1963). The civic culture. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Banducci, S. A., & Karp, J. A. (2009). Electoral systems, efficacy, and voter turnout. In H.-D. Klingemann (Ed.), The comparative study of electoral systems (pp. 109–134). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bartels, L. M. (2002). Beyond the running tally: Partisan bias in political perceptions. Political Behavior, 24(2), 117–150. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021226224601
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentancur, V. P., Rodriֳguez, R. P., & Rosenblatt, F. (2019). Efficacy and the reproduction of political activism: Evidence from the broad front in Uruguay. Comparative Political Studies, 52(6), 838–867. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414018806528
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blais, A., Guntermann, E., Arel-Bundock, V., Dassonneville, R., Laslier, J.-F., & Péloquin-Skulski, G. (2022). Party preference representation. Party Politics, 28(1), 48–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068820954631
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, A., Gurin, G., & Miller, W. (1954). The voter decides. Row & Peterson.
   Google Scholar
• Chamberlain, A. (2012). A time-series analysis of external efficacy. Public Opinion Quarterly, 76(1), 117–130. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfr064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig, S. C., Niemi, R. G., & Silver, G. E. (1990). Political efficacy and trust: A report on the NES pilot study items. Political Behavior, 12(3), 289–314. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992337
   Google Scholar
• Dalton, R. J. (2002). The decline of party identifications. In R. J. Dalton & M. P. Wattenberg (Eds.), Parties without partisans: Political change in advanced industrial democracies (pp. 19–36). USA: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dalton, R. J. (2016). Party identification and its implications. In Oxford research encyclopedia of politics. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.72
   Google Scholar
• Dalton, R. J., Farrell, D. M., & McAllister, I. (2011). Political parties and democratic linkage: How parties organize democracy. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dassonneville, R., Feitosa, F., Hooghe, M., & Oser, J. (2021). Policy responsiveness to all citizens or only to voters? A longitudinal analysis of policy responsiveness in OECD countries. European Journal of Political Research, 60(3), 583–602. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12417
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Easton, D. (1965). A framework for political analysis. Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Easton, D., & Dennis, J. (1967). The child's acquisition of regime norms: Political efficacy. American Political Science Review, 61(1), 25–38. https://doi.org/10.2307/1953873
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esaiasson, P., Kölln, A.-K., & Turper, S. (2015). External efficacy and perceived responsiveness: Similar but distinct concepts. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 27(3), 432–445. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edv003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finifter, A. W. (1970). Dimensions of political alienation. American Political Science Review, 64(2), 389–410. https://doi.org/10.2307/1953840
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finkel, S. E. (1985). Reciprocal effects of participation and political efficacy: A panel analysis. American Journal of Political Science, 29(4), 891–913. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiorina, M. (1981). Retrospective voting in American national elections. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gauja, A. (2015). The construction of party membership. European Journal of Political Research, 54(2), 232–248. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelman, A., & Hill, J. (2006). Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, B. C., & Bean, C. S. (1993). Political efficacy: A comparative study of the United States, West Germany, Great Britain and Australia. European Journal of Political Research, 23(3), 261–280. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.1993.tb00359.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, G., & Han, H. (2021). Linking members to leaders: How civic associations can strengthen members’ external political efficacy. American Politics Research, 49(3), 293–303. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X20972101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooghe, M., & Oser, J. (2017). Partisan strength, political trust and generalized trust in the United States: An analysis of the general social survey, 1972–2014. Social Science Research, 68, 132–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2017.08.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huddy, L., Mason, L., & Aarøe, L. (2015). Expressive partisanship: Campaign involvement, political emotion, and partisan identity. American Political Science Review, 109(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055414000604
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyengar, S. (1980). Subjective political efficacy as a measure of diffuse support. Public Opinion Quarterly, 44(2), 249–256. https://doi.org/10.1086/268589
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, L. R., Mettler, S., & Zhu, L. (2022). The pathways of policy feedback: How health reform influences political efficacy and participation. Policy Studies Journal, 50(3), 483–506. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karp, J., & Banducci, S. (2008). Political efficacy and participation in twenty-seven democracies: How electoral systems shape political behaviour. British Journal of Political Science, 38(2), 311–334. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123408000161
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, R. S., Mair, P., Bardi, L., Bille, L., Deschouwer, K., Farrell, D., Koole, R., Morlino, L., Müller, W., Pierre, J., Poguntke, T., Sundberg, J., Svasand, L., van de Velde, H., Webb, P., & Widfeldt, A. (1992). The membership of political parties in European democracies, 1960–1990. European Journal of Political Research, 22(3), 329–345. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.1992.tb00316.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane, R. E. (1959). Political life: Why people get involved in politics. The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis-Beck, M. S., Nadeau, R., & Elias, A. (2008). Economics, party, and the vote: Causality issues and panel data. American Journal of Political Science, 52(1), 84–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00300.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lupu, N. (2015). Partisanship in Latin America. In R. Carlin, M. Singer, & E. Zechmeister (Eds.), The Latin American voter: Pursuing representation and accountability in challenging contexts (pp. 226–245). University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mair, P. (2014). On parties, party systems and democracy. ECPR Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mair, P., & van Biezen, I. (2001). Party membership in twenty European democracies 1980–2000. Party Politics, 7(1), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068801007001001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, W. E., Pierce, R., Thomassen, J., Herrera, R., Esaisson, P., Holmberg, S., & Webels, B. (1999). Policy representation in western democracies. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Muirhead, R. (2006). A defense of party spirit. Perspectives on Politics, 4(4), 713–727. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592706060452
   Google Scholar
• Muirhead, R. (2014). The promise of party in a polarized age. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Muirhead, R., & Rosenblum, N. L. (2020). The political theory of parties and partisanship: Catching up. Annual Review of Political Science, 23(1), 95–110. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-041916-020727
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niemi, R. G., Craig, S. C., & Mattei, F. (1991). Measuring internal political efficacy in the 1988 national election study. American Political Science Review, 85(4), 1407–1413. https://doi.org/10.2307/1963953
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okolikj, M. (2023). Economic voting. In M. Giugni & M. Grasso (Eds.), The encyclopedia of political sociology, (pp. 138–141). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781803921235.00041
   Google Scholar
• Okolikj, M., & Hooghe, M. (2022). Is there a partisan bias in the perception of the state of the economy? A comparative investigation of European countries, 2002–2016. International Political Science Review, 43(2), 240–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512120915907
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oser, J. (2023). Political efficacy. In M. Giugni & M. Grasso (Eds.), The encyclopedia of political sociology (pp. 388–390). Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Oser, J., Feitosa, F., & Dassonneville, R. (2023). Who feels they can understand and have an impact on political processes? Socio-demographic correlates of political efficacy in 46 countries, 1996–2016. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 35(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edad013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oser, J., Grinson, A., Boulianne, S., & Halperin, E. (2022). How political efficacy relates to online and offline political participation: A multilevel meta-analysis. Political Communication, 39(5), 607–633. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2022.2086329
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pateman, C. (1970). Participation and democratic theory. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pollock, P. H. (1983). The participatory consequences of internal and external political efficacy: A research note. Western Political Quarterly, 36(3), 400–409. https://doi.org/10.1177/106591298303600306
   Google Scholar
• Powell, G. B. (2004). The chain of responsiveness. Journal of Democracy, 15(4), 91–105. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2004.0070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, G. B. (2014). Conclusion: Why elections matter. In L. LeDuc, R. G. Niemi, & P. Norris (Eds.), Comparing democracies: Elections and voting in a changing world (4th ed.), (pp. 187–204). Sage publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Quintelier, E., & van Deth, J. W. (2014). Supporting democracy: Political participation and political attitudes. Exploring causality using panel data. Political Studies, 62(S1), 153–171. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12097
   Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, A., & Reher, S. (2019). Civil society engagement and policy representation in Europe. Comparative Political Studies, 52(11), 1648–1676. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414019830724
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scarrow, S. (2000). Parties without members? In R. J. Dalton & M. P. Wattenberg (Eds.), Parties without partisans: Political change in advanced industrial democracies (pp. 79–101). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scarrow, S. (2015). Beyond party members: Changing approaches to partisan mobilization. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scarrow, S. (2019). Multi-speed parties and representation. The evolution of party affiliation in Germany. German Politics, 28(2), 162–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644008.2018.1496239
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scarrow, S. E., & Gezgor, B. (2010). Declining memberships, changing members? European political party members in a new era. Party Politics, 16(6), 823–843. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068809346078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scarrow, S. E., Webb, P. D., & Poguntke, T. (2017). Organizing political parties: Representation, participation, and power. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shaffer, S. D. (1981). A multivariate explanation of decreasing turnout in presidential elections, 1960–1976. American Journal of Political Science, 25(1), 68–95. https://doi.org/10.2307/2110913
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, D. M. (1970). The democratic citizen: Social science and democratic theory in the twentieth century. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• van Biezen, I., Mair, P., & Poguntke, T. (2012). Going, going, … gone? The decline of party membership in contemporary Europe. European Journal of Political Research, 51(1), 24–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2011.01995.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Biezen, I., & Poguntke, T. (2014). The decline of membership-based politics. Party Politics, 20(2), 205–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068813519969
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Haute, E., & Gauja, A. (2015). Party members and activists. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L., & Brady, H. E. (1995). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Webb, P., Farrell, D., & Holliday, I. (2002). Political parties in advanced industrial democracies. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Whiteley, P. (2011). Is the party over? The decline of party activism and membership across the democratic world. Party Politics, 17(1), 21–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068810365505
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whiteley, P., & Kölln, A.-K. (2019). How do different sources of partisanship influence government accountability in Europe? International Political Science Review, 40(4), 502–517. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512118780445
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolak, J. (2018). Feelings of political efficacy in the fifty states. Political Behavior, 40(3), 763–784. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-017-9421-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar