Women's Substantive Representation: Defending Feminist Interests or Women's Electoral Preferences?

References

• Ballmer-Cao, T.-H. (2005). Switzerland. In M. Tremblay & Y. Galligan (Eds.), Sharing power. Women, parliament, democracy (pp. 159–170). Burlington: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Ballmer-Cao, T.-H., & Schulz, P. (1991). L'égalité des sexes et le parlement fédéral. In Conseil des Etats (Ed.), Le parlement – Autorité suprême de la confédération? (pp. 73–88). Bern: Haupt.
   Google Scholar
• Bowden, P., & Mummery, J. (2009). Understanding feminism. Stocksfield: Acumen.
   Google Scholar
• Bratton, K. A. (2005). Critical mass theory revisited: The behavior and success of token women in state legislatures. Gender and Politics, 1(1), 97–125. doi: 10.1017/S1743923X0505004X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bühler, E. (2001). Frauen und Gleichstellungsatlas Schweiz. Zürich: Seismo.
   Google Scholar
• Bütikofer, S., & Engeli, I. (2010). The transformation of the ideological gender gap in Switzerland. In S. Hug & H. Kriesi (Eds.), Value change in Switzerland (pp. 45–61). Plymouth: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, R. (2004). Gender, ideology and issue preference: Is there such a thing as a political women's interest in Britain? British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 6, 20–44. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-856X.2004.00125.x
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, S. J. (2001). Representing women: Women state legislators as agents of policy-related change. In S. J. Carroll (Ed.), The impact of women in public office (pp. 3–21). Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, S. J. (2006). Are women legislators accountable to women? The complementary roles of feminist identity and women's organizations. In B. O'Neill & E. Gidengil (Eds.), Gender and social capital (pp. 357–378). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Chattopadhyay, R., & Duflo, E. (2004). Women as policy makers: Evidence from a randomized policy experiment in India. Econometrica, 72(5), 1409–1443. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0262.2004.00539.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Childs, S. (2004). New Labour’s women MPs. Women representing women. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Childs, S., & Webb, P. (2011). Sex, gender and the Conservative Party: From Iron Lady to kitten heels. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Childs, S., & Withey, J. (2006). The substantive representation of women: The case of the reduction of VAT on sanitary products. Parliamentary Affairs, 59, 10–23. doi: 10.1093/pa/gsj003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowley, P., & Stuart, M. (1997). Sodomy, slaughter, Sunday shopping and seatbelts: Free votes in the House of Commons, 1979 to 1996. Party Politics, 3(1), 119–130. doi: 10.1177/1354068897003001006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlerup, D. (1988). From a small to a large minority: Women in Scandinavian politics. Scandinavian Political Studies, 11(4), 275–298. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9477.1988.tb00372.x
   Google Scholar
• Dahlerup, D. (2006). The story of the theory of critical mass. Politics & Gender, 2(4), 511–522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodson, D. L. (2001). Acting for women. Is what legislators say, what they do? In S. J. Carroll (Ed.), The impact of woman in public office (pp. 225–242). Indiana: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Funk, P., & Gathmann, C. (2010). Gender gaps in policy making: Evidence from direct democracy in Switzerland. Social Science Research Network. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.02
   Google Scholar
• Giger, N. (2009). Towards a modern gender gap in Europe? A comparative analysis of voting behavior in 12 countries. The Social Science Journal, 46, 474–492. doi: 10.1016/j.soscij.2009.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grey, S. (2006). Numbers and beyond: The relevance of critical mass in gender research. Politics & Gender, 2, 492–502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffin, J. D., Newman, B., & Wolbrecht, C. (2012). A gender gap in policy representation in the U.S. Congress? Legislative Studies Quarterly, 37(1), 35–66. doi: 10.1111/j.1939-9162.2011.00034.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hug, S. (2010). Selection effects in roll call votes. British Journal of Political Science, 40(1), 225–235. doi: 10.1017/S0007123409990160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inglehart, R., & Norris, P. (2003). Rising tide: Gender equality & cultural change around the world. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Inter-parliamentary Union. (2012). Women in national parliaments. Retrieved from http://www.ipu.org/wmne/world.htm
   Google Scholar
• Kohler, U., & Kreuter, F. (2009). Data analysis using Stata. College Station, TX: Stata Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kriesi, H., & Trechsel, A. (2008). The politics of Switzerland. Continuity and change in a consensus democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, D. S., Moretti, E., & Butler, M. J. (2004). Do voters affect or elect policies? Evidence from the U.S. House. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119(3), 807–859. doi: 10.1162/0033553041502153
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lefkofridi, Z., Giger, N., & Kissau, K. (2012). Inequality and representation in Europe. Representation, 48(1), 1–11. doi: 10.1080/00344893.2012.653227
   Google Scholar
• Legewie, J. (2012). Die Schätzung von Kausalen Effekten: Überlegungen Zu Methoden der Kausalanalyse Anhand von Kontexteffekten in der Schule. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 64(1), 123–153. doi: 10.1007/s11577-012-0158-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindgren, K.-O., Inkinen, M., & Widmalm, S. (2009).Who knows best what the people want: Women or men? A Study of political representation in India. Comparative Political Studies, 42(3), 31–55.
   Google Scholar
• Lloren, A. (2014). Pour qui luttent les femmes. De la représentation des intérêts des femmes au Parlement Suisse. Zürich: Seismo, Coll. Questions de Genre.
   Google Scholar
• Mansbridge, J. (1999). Should blacks represent blacks and women represent women? A contingent ‘yes’. Journal of Politics, 61(3), 628–657. doi: 10.2307/2647821
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nai, A., & Lloren, A. (2009). Intérêts spécifiques et formation de l'opinion politique des Suissesses (1999–2005). Swiss Political Science Review, 15(1), 99–132. doi: 10.1002/j.1662-6370.2009.tb00124.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, A. (1995). The politics of presence. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sciarini, P. (2007). The decision-making process. In P. Knoepfel, U. Klöti, H. Kriesi, W. Linder, Y. Papadopulos, & P. Sciarini (Eds.), Handbook of Swiss politics (pp. 491–525). Zürich: NZZ Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Senti, M. (1999). Parlamentariennen zwischen Fraktionsdiziplin und Frauensolidarität: Eine Analyse der Abstimmungsverhalten im schweizerischen Nationalrat. Swiss Political Science Review, 5(1), 57–79. doi: 10.1002/j.1662-6370.1999.tb00262.x
   Google Scholar
• Simon, D. M., & Palmer, B. (2010). The roll call behavior of men and women in the U.S. House of Representatives. Politics & Gender, 6, 225–246. doi: 10.1017/S1743923X1000005X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skjeie, H. (1991). The rhetoric of difference: On women's inclusion into political elites. Politics and Society, 19(2), 233–263. doi: 10.1177/003232929101900205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snyder, Jr., J. M., & Groseclose, T. (2000). Estimating party influence in Congressional roll-call voting. American Journal of Political Science, 44(2), 187–205. doi: 10.2307/2669305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soroka, S. N., & Wlezien C. (2010). Degrees of democracy: Politics, public opinion and policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Studlar, D. T., & McAllister, I. (2002). Does a critical mass exist? A comparative analysis of women's legislative representation since 1950. European Journal of Political Research, 41, 233–253. doi: 10.1111/1475-6765.00011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swers, M. L. (2002). The difference women make. The policy impact of women in Congress. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tremblay, M., & Pelletier, R. (2000). More feminists or more women? Descriptive and substantive representations of women in the 1997 Canadian federal election. International Political Science Review, 21, 381–406. doi: 10.1177/0192512100214004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verba, S. (1995). The citizen as respondent: Sample surveys and American democracy. American Political Science Review, 90(1), 1–7. doi: 10.2307/2082793
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Washington, E. L. (2008). Female socialization: How daughters affect their legislator fathers’ voting on women's issues. American Economic Review, 98(1), 311–332. doi: 10.1257/aer.98.1.311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weldon, L. S. (2002). Beyond bodies: Institutional sources of representation for women in democratic policymaking. Journal of Politics, 64(4), 1153–1174. doi: 10.1111/1468-2508.00167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiliarty, S. E. (2010). The CDU and the politics of gender in Germany: Bringing women to the party. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wlezien, C., & Soroka, S. (2009). The relationship between public opinion and policy. In R. J. Dalton & H.-D. Klingemann (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political behaviour (pp. 799–817). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar