609
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

A Facebook post is born: exploring the process of generating MPs’ social media presence

, &

References

  • Andersen, K. N., & Medaglia, R. (2009). The use of Facebook in national election campaigns: Politics as usual?Paper presented at the first annual conference on electronic participation, September 1-3, Germany, University of Heidelberg.
  • Askim, J., & Hanssen, G. S. (2008). Councilors’ receipt and use of citizen input: Experience from Norwegian local government. Public Administration, 86(2), 387–409. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2008.00722.x
  • Avery, E. J., & Graham, M. W. (2013). Political public relations and the promotion of participatory, transparent government through social media. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 7(4), 274–291. doi: 10.1080/1553118X.2013.824885
  • Belkacem, K., & Busby, A. (2013). Coping with the information overload: An exploration of assistants’ backstage role in the everyday practice of European Parliament politics. European Integration Online Papers Special Issue, 1(17), 1–28.
  • Bernhard, U., & Dohle, M. (2015). Local politics online: The influence of presumed influence on local politicians’ online communication activities in Germany. Local Government Studies (ahead of print).
  • Bilbao-Osorio, B., Dutta, S., & X Lanvin, B. (2013). The Global Information Technology Report 2013: Growth and jobs in a hyperconnected world. Retrieved from http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GITR_Report_2013.pdf
  • Blumler, J. G., & Coleman, S. (2009). The internet and democratic citizenship. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Bouchard, N. (2016). The dark side of public participation: Participative processes that legitimize elected officials’ values. Canadian Public Administration, 59(4), 516–537. doi: 10.1111/capa.12199
  • Bürger, T., & Ross, K. (2014). Face to face(book) social media, political campaigning and the unbearable lightness of being there. Political Science, 66(1), 46–62. doi: 10.1177/0032318714534106
  • Coleman, S., & Gøtze, J. (2001). Bowling together: Online public engagement in policy deliberation. London: Hansard Society.
  • ComScore. (2011). It’s a social world: Top 10 need-to-knows about social networking and where it’s headed. www.comscore.com/it_is_a_social_world
  • Congressional Management Foundation. (2011). Perceptions and use of social media on Capitol Hill. Washington, DC.
  • Enli, G. S., & Skogerbø, E. (2013). Personalized campaigns in party-centered politics: Twitter and Facebook as arenas for political communication. Information, Communication & Society, 16(5), 757–774. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2013.782330
  • Fisher, E. (2012). How less alienation creates more exploitation? Audience labour on social network sites. tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique. Open Access Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society, 10(2), 171–183.
  • Gibson, R., & Ward, S. (2009). Parties in the digital age: A review article. Representation, 45(1), 87–100. doi: 10.1080/00344890802710888
  • Grossman, L. K. (1995). The electronic republic: Reshaping democracy in the information age. New York, NY: Viking Penguin.
  • Haleva-Amir, S. (2010). This site’s aim is to maintain a useful, stable, ongoing connection with the public: On the gap between texts and applications in Knesset Members’ personal websites. Paper presented at the conference IPP10: Internet, politics, policySeptember. Oxford University.
  • Haleva-Amir, S. (2011). Online Israeli politics: The current state of the art. Israel Affairs, 17(3), 467–485. doi: 10.1080/13537121.2011.584678
  • Hermans, L., & Vergeer, M. (2013). Personalization in e-campaigning: A cross-national comparison of personalization strategies used on candidate websites of 17 countries in EP elections 2009. New Media & Society, 15(1), 72–92. doi: 10.1177/1461444812457333
  • Hoff, J. (2004). The democratic potentials of information technology: Attitudes of European MPs towards new technology. Information Polity, 9, 55–66.
  • Howard, P. N. (2006). New media campaigns and the managed citizen. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Jackson, N. (2003). MPs and web technologies: An untapped opportunity?. Journal of Public Affairs, 3(2), 124–137. doi: 10.1002/pa.141
  • Jackson, N. (2011). Perception or reality: How MPs believe the internet helps them win votes. Journal of Political Marketing, 10(3), 230–250. doi: 10.1080/15377857.2011.588099
  • Jackson, N., & Lilleker, D. (2011). Microblogging, constituency service and impression management: UK MPs and the Use of twitter. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 17(1), 86–105. doi: 10.1080/13572334.2011.545181
  • Jonsson, A. M., & Ornebring, H. (2011). User-generated content and the news. Journalism Practice, 5(2), 127–144. doi: 10.1080/17512786.2010.501155
  • Joshi, S., Thamm, M., & Wandhoefer, T. (2011). Politician 2.0: Information behavior and dissemination on social networking sites: Gaps and best practices. eJournal of EDemocracy and Open Government, 3(2), 207–214.
  • Kruikemeier, S., van Noort, G., Vliegenthart, R., & de Vreese, C. H. (2013). Getting closer: The effects of personalized and interactive online political communication. European Journal of Communication, 28(1), 53–66. doi: 10.1177/0267323112464837
  • Langer, A. I. (2010). The politicization of private persona: Exceptional leaders or the new rule? The case of the United Kingdom and the blair effect. Political Science, 15(1), 60–76.
  • Larsson, A. O. (2014). Online, all the time? A quantitative assessment of the permanent campaign on facebook. New Media & Society (ahead of print).
  • Lee, E. J., & Shin, S. Y. (2012a). Are they talking to me? Cognitive and affective effects of interactivity in politicians’ Twitter communication. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15(10), 515–520. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2012.0228
  • Lee, E. J., & Shin, S. Y. (2012b). When the medium is the message: How transportability moderates the effects of politicians’ Twitter communication. Communication Research, 20(10), 1–23.
  • Lev-On, A. (2011). Campaigning online: Use of the internet by parties, candidates and voters in national and local elections in Israel. Policy and Internet, 3(1), 1–28. doi: 10.2202/1944-2866.1045
  • Lev-On, A. (under review). Online campaigning moves to Facebook: Contenders’ perspectives.
  • Liel, D. (2015). The committee approved: Another parliamentary assistant for each MP. Mako, Retrieved from http://www.mako.co.il/news-military/politics-q4_2015/Article-18f544fc2b8a051004.htm [Hebrew]
  • Lilleker, D. G., & Koc-Michalska, K. (2011). MEPs online: Understanding communication strategies for remote representatives. Paper presented at the European consortium of political researchers conference, September, Reykjavik, Iceland.
  • Macintosh, A., & Whyte, A. (2008). Towards an evaluation framework for eParticipation. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 2(1), 16–30. doi: 10.1108/17506160810862928
  • Mako. (2010). Coming soon: A Facebook page for all MKs. Retrieved from http://www.mako.co.il/news-money/tech/Article-f89c1d2216b4721004.htm. [Hebrew]
  • Mann, R. (2015). The transmigration of media personalities and celebrities to politics: The case of Yair Lapid. Israel Affairs, 21(2), 262–276. doi: 10.1080/13537121.2015.1008239
  • Metag, J., & Marcinkowski, F. (2012). Strategic, structural, and individual determinants of online campaigning in German elections. Policy & Internet, 4(3-4), 136–158. doi: 10.1002/poi3.14
  • Mitchell, A., Kiley, J., Gottfried, J., & Guskin, E. (2013, October 24). The role of news on Facebook. Pew Research Journalism Project. Retrieved from http://www.journalism.org/2013/10/24/the-role-of-news-on-facebook/
  • Orkibi, E. (2015). New politics, new media—new political language? A rhetorical perspective on candidates’ self-presentation in electronic campaigns in the 2013 Israeli elections. Israel Affairs, 21(2), 277–292. doi: 10.1080/13537121.2015.1008242
  • Petersen, S. M. (2008). Loser generated content: From participation to exploitation. First Monday, 13(3). Retrieved from http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2141/1948–by doi: 10.5210/fm.v13i3.2141
  • Sabag-Ben Porat, C., Lev-On, A., & Lehman-Wilzig, S. (under review). Whose post is it anyway? Social network site usage patterns of parliamentary assistants and MPs.
  • Saranga, I. (2001). The modern communicative triangle: The relations between ministers, communication advisors and spokespersons (MA Thesis). Bar-Ilan University, Israel.
  • Serazio, M. (2015). Managing the digital news cyclone: Power, participation, and political production strategies. International Journal of Communication, 9, 1907–1925.
  • Steinfeld, N., & Lev-On, A. (under review). MPs on Facebook: An analysis of politicians’ Facebook pages.
  • Stromer-Galley, J. (2000). Online interaction and why candidates avoid it. Journal of Communication, 50, 111–132. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2000.tb02865.x
  • Tenscher, J. (2014). MPs and the internet: An empirically-based typology. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 20(3), 305–320. doi: 10.1080/13572334.2014.895125
  • Williams, C. B., & Gulati, G. J. (2013). Social networks in political campaigns: Facebook and the congressional elections of 2006 and 2008. New Media & Society, 15(1), 52–71. doi: 10.1177/1461444812457332
  • Williamson, A. (2009). MPs online: Connecting with constituents. London: Hansard Society.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.